User talk:Altenpjaconelli

Please refrain from sending me messages like you were a Wikipedia's moderator. Wikipedia is not a site to promote your website ( see Wikipedia:About ) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fillio.gurgon (talk • contribs) 10:54, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been repeatedly removing sourced content from this article without giving any explanation. If you persist in this you are likely to attract the attention of an administrator, who may block your account. . . Mean as custard (talk) 11:03, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

talk I am not effectively a wikipedia moderator (so sorry if I made few technical errors) but I intervene as Community Manager for ALTEN. My mission consists in verify the content is updated correctly in accordance to Wikipedia policy. I have followed wiki process to alert the contributors who have changed ALTEN page to stop it since Wikipedia is not a tribune to express opinions but give informations not polemical. Consequently, it seems I am in my right to avoid vandalism on a page about company in which I work as community manager. In contrary, I pay attention from administrator about agressivity of intervention also without giving more explanation. Regards. Altenpjaconelli (talk)12/28, 10 January 2013 (UTC)

Altenpjaconelli We are waiting for your explanation about why updating Alten's wikipedia page with real information of the company ( see References ) is 'an attack' You are a 'commmunity manager' and Wikipedia is not a site to promote your website

Fillio.gurgon My mission is not to avoid people to express on internet but I consider Wikipedia is not the place. The references which you evocate are all articles from differents syndicate section blogs, so basicaly not neutral about a subject. Maybe in opposite to you, I am not able to give more informations about trouble in Spain and it is not my function, I only consider Wikipedia (and ALTEN Page) is not the place to promote a political opinion.

Altenpjaconelli The content censored by you shows facts. ( see References ) If you aren't able 'to give more informations about trouble in Spain' but you can erase any information about these facts, your behaviour doesn't seem very consistent. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fillio.gurgon (talk • contribs) 12:18, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Fillio.gurgon I repeat you my guideline is to add only informations and no opinion like yours. You made references from blogs or websites clearly involved in this events. I consider its as better tribune to express opinions instead of Wikipedia page. Before to enter alten wikipedia page, you could start a discussion about this subject. But you have prefered introduce yourself without contacting through wikipedia. I regret it and I prefer erase your modifications instead of giving informations which could seem like promotion until the situation is not clarified. Best regards.

Altenpjaconelli I've just changed references for others belonging to newspaper and internet media, no "blogs or websites clearly involved in this events". What is your problem now ? I repeat to you: the content censored by you shows facts ( see References ) Preceding unsigned comment added by Fillio.gurgon —Preceding undated comment added 14:44, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Altenpjaconelli! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Osarius (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the Teahouse This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:16, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]