User talk:Azukimonaka

Welcome to the Wikipedia! Your English is much better than my Japanese, I would be happy to help! Chris 18:01, 31 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I can write only short English. Please forgive my wrong grammar. --Azukimonaka 19:52, 31 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much for your improvements on these articles! This was my late Wife's family. Chris 06:40, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not introduce any form of vandalism to the userpages of other users, as you did to User:DDRG. Thank you. -- Mackan 20:03, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This user is Inconclusive[1]　I do not support the personal attack.　--Azukimonaka 20:10, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Even so, do NOT throw around accusations of personal attacks lightly. It's uncivil and can constitute a personal attack of it's own. Mackan 20:13, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It is a personal attack that you rewrite the top page of the hated user. Please contact the administrator if there is a problem in my behavior. I explain your behavior. --Azukimonaka 20:17, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please familiarize yourself with Wikipedia policies. Guidelines for dealing with suspected sockpuppets/meatpuppets specifically state one SHOULD post exactly what I posted on the suspected puppet's userpage. You are NOT describing my "behaviour", you are mischaracterizing my edits as personal attacks. Please read up on WP:NPA and excercise more caution in the future. Mackan 20:27, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It is your interpretation. I think that I should ask the administrator for mediation. You are blaming each other to him. You are not neutrality. --Azukimonaka 20:28, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No, it's not "my interpretation", it's the official take on it. Mackan 20:31, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You must do the change request of TopPage to the administrator if your interpretation is universal. I know you were blaming each other to him. --Azukimonaka 20:36, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Brother Azuki, it is being taken care of, let Mackan do his job. Use your energies for more pleasant things, this is being fixed. No need to fight a friend. Domo arigato gozaimasu, Chris 23:46, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, my friend :-)--Azukimonaka 08:02, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Do not revert other user's edit without providing an appropriate rationale, as you did at Korean Japanese ([2]). If a template says "a user has expressed concern...", do not remove that template without discussion, unless you are the user which first posted the template. Also, please be careful not to break the 3 revert rule. Mackan 12:57, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Azukimonaka. I'm happy to continue engaging in dialogue with you with regards to this article, so that we can hopefully try to come to a mutual understanding. In case you are too, I left you a question on the talk page, and I'll be glad if you could continue the discussion, rather than engaging in edit warring. Thanks, Phonemonkey 23:55, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion about Joji Obara became very complex. I do not understand the discussion. Therefore, I leave from the article on Joji Obara. Thank you --Azukimonaka 17:14, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. You made the following edit: [3] with the given reason: "Kimuchi is not used for Onigiri". That is not true. One example is the Circle K press release:

「韓国風おにぎり」は、近年、韓国への旅行者のおみやげとして国内でも消費量・人気が高まっている韓国のりを使用したおにぎりです。ゴマ油と塩で独特な味付けをした韓国のりとの相性のよさという視点で新たに開発した「牛タン」(135円)と、これまでにもおにぎりの品揃えの一つとして販売してきた中で販売実績の高かった「ツナキムチ」(125円)の2品を販売いたします。

They have been selling it for several years. I will add it back to the article. Bendono 07:05, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, in the case of kombu and mugicha, these are simply the Japanese names for food items that are also authentically Korean and not clearly of Japanese origin. For takuan/danmuji and nori/gim, these are food items of Japanese origin that are extremely popular and important in Korean cuisine, thus have been accepted by Koreans into their cuisine, and thus are part of Korean cuisine. As such, they merit a "Korean cuisine" category to bring our readers to all the foods that are part of the daily lives of Koreans in their cuisine. This is not about national pride but about accurately documenting which foods are consumed and produced in each nation, and part of that nation's cuisine. Badagnani 19:40, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't agree that kombu/dashima or mugicha/bori cha are "Korean Japanese cuisine" or "Japanese Korean cuisine." They are food items produced and consumed as part of the traditional cuisines of both Japan and Korea. As far as I know, takuan/danmuji is a Japanese-produced product but nori/gim is a Japanese invention that has been absorbed into Korean cuisine and used in several Korean dishes. So each ingredient has a different story.

I think that you are wrong of me. Konbu is a tradition dish completed in Japan. And, it was exported to Korea by Japan. And, you should divide Gim from Nori. --Azukimonaka 19:57, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"Japanese Korean cuisine" is a confusing name because it isn't clear whether this is Japanese food in Korea, Korean food in Japan, or food made by Japanese Koreans. Would it be the equivalent of American Chinese cuisine or Korean Chinese cuisine? Badagnani 19:47, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

So you're saying that the Japanese "own" the genus Laminaria? And you believe nori and gim are not the same food? For the first, I don't agree, and for the second you may be correct, as in my experience nori seems smoother and has less holes than Korean-produced gim. Badagnani 20:00, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. Which "This is Korean food" or "This is Japanese Korean cuisine" do you use when you introduce Takuan? I select "Takuan is Japanese cuisine". --Azukimonaka 20:03, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Takuan is a Japanese invention and Japanese-produced product that has been accepted into Korean cuisine as an ingredient in Korean dishes that are not found in Japan. Thus, it merits a category "Korean cuisine" as it's verifiably a very popular and prevalent ingredient in Korean cuisine. As I've explained before. And is explained in the article. Badagnani 20:05, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think that Kimuchi is Korean food though a lot of Japanese consume Kimuchi. (Kimchi is not Japanese food). Am I wrong? --Azukimonaka 20:10, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The question is not whether it's "Korean food" but whether it has become an important part of Japanese cuisine. I don't know enough about how kimchi/kimuchi is used in Japan. Certainly it's used in the Korean cuisine of Japan, but I don't know if Japanese people use kimchi in their own recipes, the way Koreans eat takuan/danmuji in Korean recipes. Badagnani 20:12, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Is the recipe of Takuan of Korea original of Korea?　I am searchable of the document of South Korea and Japan. Please write recipe and the history of Takuan in Korea more in detail. --Azukimonaka 20:18, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I just explained very clearly that takuan/danmuji is Japanese in origin, but adopted as a very popular and prevalent ingredient in Korean dishes. I'm not sure how much more clear I can be about that. Badagnani 21:05, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No, you are not introducing original recipe of South Korea at all. A lot of Japanese food is being imported by South Korea. Therefore, I think that it should thoroughly talk about this problem. I can offer a lot of information. Let's discuss it. To a thorough target. --Azukimonaka 21:16, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you make an article about Japanese cuisine as eaten by Koreans, there should also be one for Korean foods as eaten in Japan (such as kimuchi, bibinba, galubi, etc.). Badagnani 20:04, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OK. I will make Japanese Korean cuisine and Korean Japanese cuisine. --Azukimonaka 20:07, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

We are not speaking of "original recipe of South Korea" but important items used in Korean cuisine, which danmuji clearly is. Badagnani 21:19, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A large amount of oolong tea and Mugicha are consumed in South Korea. Why is only Mugicha a South Korea beverage?　--Azukimonaka 19:29, 6 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

First of all, in Korea this tea is called "bori cha," and is a Korean tea made of roasted unhulled barley that I believe is basically identical to the Japanese mugicha. Secondly, all Koreans I know don't regularly drink or enjoy oolong tea and tell me "it is not Korean." Thus, I believe it to be a food item that is not accepted by Koreans as a major part of their cuisine. If you support adding a "Korean cuisine" category for Oolong tea, we should get more input from other editors knowledgeable in Korean cuisine. Badagnani 19:32, 6 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"Bori-Cha" and "Mugi-Cha" will be able to be divided. "Nori" and "Kim" will be able to be divided. --Azukimonaka 19:38, 6 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest that "roasted barley tea" be the new article name (in English), and that it include both mugicha and boricha as subheadings. For "nori" and "gim" I think two separate articles would work, as the two products aren't made in exactly the same way. Badagnani 22:36, 6 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It is correct to introduce Mugicha and boricha in roasted barley tea. And According to my investigation, Kim is Nori that painted oil. And, it is original of Korea. --Azukimonaka 10:08, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Kaneko Anji, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. --Finngall ^talk 21:41, 6 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I found him with Japanese war crimes. He did not get the edit done at all. Therefore, I edited it. My article is based on Kaneko Anji of a Japanese version. see 金子安次--Azukimonaka 10:04, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not completely understanding what you're saying here, but I'll try to explain myself more fully. I tagged the article for deletion because there were no references cited to support any of the facts about him, and because while he was mentioned as participating in Japanese war crimes, there was nothing to indicate his specific role in these crimes and nothing to indicate why he is particularly notable compared with any other soldier. I hope this helps, and if you have more questions, I will try to answer them as well as I can. Thank you. --Finngall ^talk 23:57, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that White Day is a Japanese holiday. However, South Korea now also celebrates it. Therefore it is now part of South Korean culture. Just because it is part of Japanese culture does not mean it is not part of South Korean culture. The article itself states that South Korea celebrates White Day: "White Day is celebrated in Japan, South Korea[1], Taiwan and some other East Asian countries…". Also, this article talks about White Day celebrations in South Korea. Foobaz·o< 02:20, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

White Day is one of the Japanese cultures that become popular in South Korea. (As well as countries of Taiwan and Asia) Did White Day do original development in South Korea?　--Azukimonaka 17:26, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No, it didn't. For something to be part of South Korean culture, it does not need to have developed in South Korea. Japan created White Day, but it is now part of the culture in other countries, including South Korea. Foobaz·o< 19:01, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. I corrected the culture of South Korea to the culture of Asia. Please write what is wrong. --Azukimonaka 02:21, 22 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The fact that South Korea celebrates White Day makes it part of South Korean culture. Who created White Day is irrelevant. Foobaz·o< 03:01, 22 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Japanese observes Christmas. Is Christmas a Japanese culture?　--Azukimonaka 07:13, 22 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"Is Christmas a Japanese culture?" is an ambiguos question. Christmas does not originate from Japan (nor does it originate from America or Australia). However Christmas is celebrated in Japan in its own way, so if the question is "is Christmas part of modern Japanese culture?", the answer is yes. Phonemonkey 15:50, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I recalled this article by you. Thank you. --Azukimonaka 17:05, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on KOKIA, by Maralia (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because KOKIA seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting KOKIA, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 20:49, 22 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Azukimonaka. This is in response to your request "Please write the reason to delete a lot of explanations.". If you should kindly take the time to actually look at my edit, you will find that the only information I removed, as far as I can see, are:

• 1) The Chaozhou translation for "carrot". This I removed because the article is not about carrots and therefore needlessly clutters the opening sentence.
• 2) The spanish name for daikon. This I removed because this is not a language dictionary.
• 3) The fact that daikon oroshi is served with Japanese hamburgers. If you feel compelled to reinstate this then feel free.

Does that answer your question? Cheers. Phonemonkey 13:23, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Eugenics is a measure directly related to Shōwa militarism and the Japan Times article perfectly explain the link between the drug funds and Manchukuo financing. Your changes can only be explained in two ways : 1) you can not read and understand english or 2) you wilfuly commit vandalism. I would assume your good faith and urge you to read and try to understand what you read before keeping changing articles and deleting sources. --Flying tiger 20:07, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Although I support your position in the article, I have to notify you have definitively violated WP:3RR in the process. Of course, is User:Flying tiger is found to be stubborn about his position, and no-one supports his position, then... --Samuel di Curtisi di Salvadori 18:05, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please demand to participate in the discussion from Flying tiger. I can point out the mistake of his source. --Azukimonaka 18:08, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss at Talk:Manchukuo. I have invited him, check his talk page. --Samuel di Curtisi di Salvadori 18:12, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OK｡If the discussion is begun, could you remove the postscript of Flying Tiger?Please carry this article after it agrees. This part is not urgent information. --Azukimonaka 18:18, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please read WP:CAT-RD regarding the categorization of redirects. Most of them should not be categorized at all unless it is of importance, see the examples given at the guideline there. I'm cleaning up the redirects you created for the Black Lagoon characters, as well as others. As such, you may create the category Category:Black Lagoon characters and place it for those related articles and redirects since it has been decided at the guideline that this would be the only trivial redirect allowed (we're trying to prevent "category bloating" and it was concluded that these types were the only redirect-related categories allowed). If you have any questions or doubts, do not be afraid to let me know or pop your concern at WT:CAT-R. Thanks for listening and I hope you take this message to heart, Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 04:53, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think I've done more than enough now to prove my point, I'll be most content if you could assist in cleaning up the rest though. Or we could work on it together, just hit me on my talk page for whatever the case. Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 05:08, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Just signed up with Windows Live Messenger and set the same name in my preferences. You could you try e-mailing me now, I suppose? Let's deal with this "Prince Zarbon" sock vandal ASAP, as he's getting on my nerves.Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 16:14, 7 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Did the e-mail thing work? I just signed up like two days ago, also, is Category:Romanians anime and manga characters supposed to be titled Category:Romanian anime and manga characters? Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 05:25, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I deleted Category:Romanians anime and manga characters and created Category:Romanian anime and manga characters.

Did you confirm your e-mail address? I'm still unable to e-mail you. —David Levy 11:54, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"さて、どうしよう･･･。悪い子じゃないんだろうけど、やりづらいなぁ･･･。" (≡ω≡;)

I'm really confused as to why you've copy/pasted a random discussion from my talk page. What do you mean regarding Category:Anime and manga characters who can move at superhuman speeds? I hope you understood WP:CAT-R; one can categorize articles, just not redirects with that kind of category as such. From what I understood, you think Category:Anime and manga characters who can move at superhuman speeds should be deleted instead? Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 16:55, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it is the street. This category remains though you deleted a lot of information.

I do not want to fight by the topic of Anime. Therefore, your deletion is not denied. And, your deletion is supported.

(Various races appear in animation. I think that it is profitable to classify it in detail. )

"結局、俺が気に入らないモノは削除で、俺が気に入ったものはガンガン書くぜ！ってことだからなぁ･･･。東西問わずNarutoのFanってのはやりづらい..."　(≡ω≡；)

I think I have an idea of what you are saying. I'm just following protocal, well the guideline. "Yes, it is the street"? "This category remains though you deleted a lot of information"? What are you hinting at with these vague responses? I did get your point that various races appear in anime/manga but the guideline is clear on this. If you decide to not help me then I guess that makes one of us. Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 01:45, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OK.　Then, Category:Anime and manga characters who can move at superhuman speeds is deleted according to the guideline. It will be executed in three days.

I thought that it was more convenient to use Redirect than to make a small article. (Redirect is often used. Redirect was often used also for the character of Sakura Wars. )

I think that it is profitable to classify the Anime character according to the nationality. However, I do not want to fight against you.

Therefore, after my work is interrupted, and you leave, I will start restoration and the deletion.

"Anime and manga characters who can move at superhuman speeds...って、スーパーマンの速度の定義はどうなっとるんじゃい...。ツッコミどころ満載のカテゴリだなぁ..."　(≡ω≡；)

I think you may need to calm down a bit.

Nothing in Eugenics in Showa Japan really links the eugenics movement of Imperial Japan to any war crimes, or even that strongly the militaritic nationalism of the time.

It correctly attributes nationalism (and in so, to a degree militarism) as a contributing factor, and the War environment provides context for these laws.

Wikipedia has an extensive article on actual Japanese war crimes. The [[4]] section shows how a lot of tehse concepts tie in with each other. You can't really have a discussion about this part of the nationalistic movement in Showa Japan, without discussion how it relates to other similar (and opposing) movements at the time.

The article is also in the category, Category:Home front during World War II, which is very applicable. This category is for "activities of the civilians during a state of total war." [5]. Which goes to clarify that this overall was not a military movement, but a civilian and political one.--ZayZayEM 07:24, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going to address your most recent edits in detail so you amy understand better the concerns regarding your editing style.

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Eugenics_in_Showa_Japan&diff=165427965&oldid=165371493

You changed

Eugenics in Shōwa Japan refers to politics in the first part of the Showa era which promoted increasing the number of healthy Japanese, while simultaneously decreasing the number of people suffering mental retardation , disability, genetic disease and other conditions that led to them being viewed as "inferior" contributions to the Japanese gene pool.

into

Eugenics in Shōwa Japan refers to politics in the first part of the Showa era. To decrease an increase in the gene disease, and to increase the number of healthy Japanese, Japanese Government introduced arbitrary sterilization.

.

Problems:

• "Eugenics in Shōwa Japan refers to politics in the first part of the Showa era" is wrong. This reads to say that all politics in the first part of the Showa Japan were eugenically motivated. We need to specify what politics, or at least disclaim with "some". The original does this by saying politics "which promoted increasing the number of healthy Japanese, while simultaneously decreasing the number of people ... being viewed as "inferior". This sort of change in grammar to the lead which destroys comprehension does not favour other editors to accepting your edits as non-disruptive, especially afterrepetitive warnings.
• "gene disease" is not an English term genetic disease and genetic disorder are used.
• However these terms are rather non-specific. This was in the early 20th century (and even late 19th) when not a lot was known about these things. It was not specifically genetic disorders that were targeted (indeed some non-genetic diseases such as leprosy were also targetted), it was disorders, that were thought to be of a genetic nature, that included retardation, physical disability, combinations (such as Down's Syndrome), as well as psychological issues (criminal behaviour, psychosis - which may or may not have genetic factors). The main combining feature was not that these were genetic disorders, but that they were making inferior contributions to the gene pool from the view of eugenicists.

• a Final point is that article is about "politics", not laws. While the laws may say one thing, the political movement at the time may have extra things (or less things) on their minds. From an article on politics, articles on the actual laws may be added. This is why the point about the eugenicist view on contraceptives I feel is important, while no laws were made, it is a facet of the political movement's idealogy, and indeed illustrates a change in the idealogy motivated by various factors.

You also removed an entire section titled "After the war", this is well referenced an important facet of the issue. It is well known, published and verified, that Japanese politicians were involved in the promotion of using geisha houses and other water-trade facilities to pacify (some might also suggest corrupt) American occupiers.

This is your final warning against your disruptive and tendacious editing. Please consider your actions carefully.--ZayZayEM 00:17, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It is troublesome to explain the mistake one by one. I will explain to you by using Timeline. --Azukimonaka 18:58, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

それから、日本人はアメリカ人・中国人・韓国人に嫌われていることを知っているから、あなたたちの編集に怒っていません。ただし、反論(Rebuttal)はします。でわでわ

Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#User:Azukimonaka__Eugenics_in_Showa_Japan

--ZayZayEM 02:17, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

An article you created, Timeline of Japan-North Korea relations history has been tagged as a candidate for speedy deletion, because it has no context. If you disagree, please consider placing a hangon template on it, or add content. Thank you for your attention.--Alasdair 18:32, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not cut and paste discussions from other talk pages onto my talk page without good reason.

If I am participating in a discussion (especially if I am initiating it) I will most likely be watching it. And will comment when I am ready.--ZayZayEM 22:58, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The problem is slowly examined because it became a protected period.

• Japanese eugenicists were preoccupied with demographics (see Japanese demography before WWII), particularly in reducing the rate of birth defects, as well as the protection of the 'racial purity' of the Japanese in East Asia. There was also focus on removing "inferior" traits from the Japanese gene pool. [6]

Flying-Tyger is an editor who likes to add the war crime of Japan. However, Flying-Tyger gives priority to his feelings more than facts. (The Japanese is cruel. ) Therefore, when the fact that contradicts his opinion is written in the source, he falsifies the source. I explain his falsification act one by one.

1. Headline

Flying-Tyger wrote. [7] <- First Version　
Eugenics in Shōwa Japan were supported by politically motivated movements that sought to increase the number of healthy Japanese, while simultaneously decreasing the number of people suffering mental retardation , disability, genetic disease and other conditions that led to them being viewed as "inferior" contributions to the Japanese gene pool.^[1][2].

The source#1 is being written like this.
"The purposes of this law are to prevent the birth of inferior descendants from the eugenic point of view, and to protect the life and health of the mother as well."

He concealed "and to protect the life and health of the mother as well". and emphasized inferior.

"while simultaneously decreasing the number of people suffering mental retardation , disability, genetic disease and other conditions..." is also wrong. 　
Source #1 is written, Only "hereditary disorder (遺伝性疾患)".
Source #2 is written, "or hereditary malformation, or the spouse suffers from mental disease or mental disability". However, this is an explanation of The Eugenic Protection Law approved in 1948.　
　

There is still his malignant falsification. (It explains it at the end of October. ) --Azukimonaka 10:16, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• (Rejected) Some thinkers, including Sadao Araki, took interest in and promoted various eugenic measures to preserve the "superior qualities" of the Japanese race.
• Militarism-Socialism in Showa Japan [8]
• One of the last eugenic measure of the Showa regime was taken by the Higashikuni government. On 19 August 1945, the Home Ministry ordered local government offices to establish a prostitution service for allied soldiers to preserve the "purity" of the "japanese race". The official declaration stated that : «Trough the sacrifice of thousands of "Okichis" of the Showa era, we shall construct a dike to hold back the mad frenzy of the occupation troops and cultivate and preserve the purity of our race long into the future...» [9]
• Such clubs were soon established by cabinet councillor Yoshio Kodama and Ryoichi Sasagawa [10]
• Japanese war crimes　[11]
• Japanese fascism　[12]
• Japanese nationalism　[13]

Hi Azukimonaka.

I would really encourage you to be involved in the discussion at Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Eugenics in Showa Japan. I think it will be the most productive way for us to progress here.

I do not believe you are deliberately sabotaging these pages, but editing has become far to heated and communication does not seem to be working.

User:Flying Tiger will be under scrutiny in this discussion too. As will I.

In the meantime please refrain from any further edit-warring at Eugenics in Showa Japan and other pages.

Yoroshiku Onegaishimasu. --ZayZayEM 01:39, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Kochira Koso --Azukimonaka 01:46, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

-- --Flying tiger 18:52, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A Request for Mediation to which you were are a party has been accepted. You can find more information on the case subpage, Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Eugenics in Showa Japan. For the Mediation Committee, Daniel 04:16, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not summarise other people's positions or points. Please allow them to do so for themselves.

You may summarise what you think they are saying in discussion, but please refrain from creating authorative sections displaying others opposing views as you did so here[14].

It is considered misleading and fallacious. See Straw man. --ZayZayEM 03:50, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Swiss anime and manga characters requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. - Jameson L. Tai ^{talk ♦ contribs} 09:32, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add content without citing reliable sources, as you did to Tite Kubo. Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources please take this opportunity to add your original reference to the article. Contact me if you need assistance adding references. Thank you. Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 19:08, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

-- ------ Flying tiger (talk) 22:41, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm your mediator for the above page and I noticed you reverted the archiving of the pre mediation discussion. I was just wondering if there was a particular reason for this? Mediation hasn't even begun yet so we need to start it with a fresh page. Ryan Postlethwaite 12:20, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please add an introductory statement by yourself under the header ===Opening Statement by Azukimonaka=== In it, you should generally not respond to the statements by others, but simply state your concerns about the article (such as the exclusion of "and to protect the life and health of the mother as well" from the description of Eugenics). Avoid attacking editors (even if they attacked you), and try to be succinct and clear with your English. Thank you. Please contact Ryan if you have questions about the mediation process.--ZayZayEM (talk) 05:46, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Azuki. Did you know this request[15]? You are doubted as sockpuppet by someone with poor evidences.--W/mint^-Talk- 04:24, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Kakou Senda, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Unreferenced BLP, which I cannot verify. I think this may be unverifiable and lack notability.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Scott Mac (Doc) 17:35, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Azukimonaka! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 3 of the articles that you created are Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to these articles, it would greatly help us with the current 315 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

1. Akizuki Risu - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
2. Yōsuke Takahashi - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
3. Kakou Senda - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 19:54, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Timeline of Japan–North Korea relations is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Timeline of Japan–North Korea relations until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

ときさき くるみ ^{not because they are easy, but because they are hard} 00:58, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Timeline of Japan–South Korea relations is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Timeline of Japan–South Korea relations until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

ときさき くるみ ^{not because they are easy, but because they are hard} 00:59, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]