User talk:BBBAAACCC

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you.--Fareed30 (talk) 15:51, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please consider this a formal warning following up on my comment on User Tal:Fareed30#Zarine Khan. Any further harassing or disparaging remarks will be met with a block. Wikipedia is a collaborative environment; it's impossible to collaborate when people are slinging around claims about other editors' skin color and ethnicity. Qwyrxian (talk) 22:32, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for This comment is unacceptable given Qwyrxian's warning.. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  regentspark (comment) 22:48, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Due to your blatantly and unabashedly using IP addresses to sockpuppet in order to evade your block, the block has been extended for an additional 24 hours. Please note that if further block evasion occurs your block will be extended again for much longer. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 13:58, 5 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• As you have continued to evade your block using IP addresses to make egreriously racist personal attacks, your block has been extended to indefininte. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 11:17, 6 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]