User talk:Bbb23


I went into full indecision mode lol. Sorry if my AIV report was confusing. I was going for final warning then changed my mind. I couldn't decide what to do, eek. Knitsey (talk) 16:26, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not really confusing, more like you were dithering. :-) --Bbb23 (talk) 16:28, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, I was dithering lol. Full on dither mode. Knitsey (talk) 16:30, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Go get 'em! Dithering is really underrated.--Bbb23 (talk) 17:02, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

About my edit on Someeditor7's talk page

I disagree with your reasoning for the revert. The link as it current appears leads to the Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents page with no indication of what happened with that user. I have no will to stir up drama in any way, I just wanted to make the link actually go to where it's supposed to go. SelfCloak (talk) 18:30, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Inappropriate warning

Hello,

I believe this warning was inappropriate. It's inappropriate to claim contesting a block is vandalism. I am considering taking you to ANI for such tomfoolery. pbp 21:21, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As long as you don't repeat what you did, I don't much care what you do, but taking me to ANI is likely to result in WP:BOOMERANG.--Bbb23 (talk) 22:29, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tejas pratihar sock

Hi, a new user is attempting to attempting to restore sock edits(one of which you blocked today) on Uttarakhand [1][2] Ratnahastin (talk) 11:34, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's not as obvious to me; you'll have to take it to SPI.--Bbb23 (talk) 13:00, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Recent G10

Could you take another look at Gaurav Srivastava scandal? It seems to have reasonable sourcing (though not invariably), including a profile in the WSJ. It might be better trimmed than removed. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 14:51, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

My understanding is that G10 is broader than just a negative unsourced BLP, that it encompasses articles that do nothing but attack even if sources support the negative material. OTOH, that would mean that many articles about criminals would be attack pages. So, now having dithered a bit, if you think the article should be restored, go right ahead. Trimming it sounds like a good idea.--Bbb23 (talk) 15:01, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not sure whether I should or not, pretty much for the same dichotomy you list above. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 19:20, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You might be interested in the related SPI at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Acmeism.Data. Apocheir (talk) 03:34, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, that is absolutely no surprise. Restoring. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 13:27, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Risk Possible Block

Good evening. Please what am I doing wrong? I was asked by the owner to edit his wiki page so please tell me what I am doing wrong Tebek EU (talk) 16:54, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Let's keep this on your Talk page. There is now "owner" of an article. More on this on your talk page. Stop editing the article.--Bbb23 (talk) 16:57, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
My sincere apologies and pardon me for bothering you but I really need your help or please refer me to where newbies can go to as I’m not a technical person . Thank you Tebek EU (talk) 18:22, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – October 2024

News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2024).

Administrator changes

added
removed

CheckUser changes

readded
removed

Guideline and policy news

Arbitration

Miscellaneous


Sock?

Hi, does this look like Infinity Sagax, whom you blocked yesterday? Shall I open an SPI, or just take it to AIV? Thanks. Wikishovel (talk) 17:09, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good enough for me, thanks.--Bbb23 (talk) 18:12, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Robert D. Sack, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Circuit judge. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 19:53, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Didn't realize this. By any chance can you restore it to my userspace here? Would like to start with something if there is anything salvageable. CNMall41 (talk) 21:34, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'd rather restore it to draft space. Will that work?--Bbb23 (talk) 22:42, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Even better. Thank you. --CNMall41 (talk) 18:13, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Draft:Northern California Golf Association.--Bbb23 (talk) 18:45, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Theracerboy

Hi, this one looks like a sock of User:Theracerboy and User:Iammrscott. Thanks. Wikishovel (talk) 19:20, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yup, thanks.--Bbb23 (talk) 00:11, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

New block evasion

Hi

Could you look to Marxsafe? Involved in Bangladesh politics Panam2014 (talk) 10:34, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I need more information. Whose block are they evading?--Bbb23 (talk) 11:03, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lycée Joss

Thanks for your note. I see you have draftified the article which I would have preferred to do myself but it was already outside the 90-day window. As it had been tagged for months with no improvement I asked for speedy deletion and if that was rejected my next step was AfD. Mccapra (talk) 12:21, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

But WP:A7 doesn't apply to schools.--Bbb23 (talk) 12:26, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

help.

I accidentally leaked my IP on Wikidata on the 2015 DM319 page! Can you please hide it? MJGTMKME123 (talk) 12:31, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You'll have to ask an admin or WP:OS at Wikidata.--Bbb23 (talk) 12:34, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
ok MJGTMKME123 (talk) 12:36, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]