User talk:Belsen

Richie Ramone article

Sorry to advise you of this, but I will be reverting your edit. Wikipedia has received complaints that many "facts" in the article were incorrect, and the article is largely unsourced. The few things that are sourced make for an unbalanced article. If you want to rebuild the article, please add reference sources. Thanks. Risker (talk) 14:52, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I would second that request. Please review our Biography of Living Persons policy, and do not wholesale restore the material again. If you have concerns please raise them on the article talk page. Thanks. ++Lar: t/c 14:58, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I started to rewrite the whole article, finding out it was only a stub, after that I found out lots of information has been removed, that seemed to be correct. I put both together and made the new Lemma, and included all the sources I had. I find it rather strange this article is removed for a second time, eventhough it has mostly been rewritten en references were made to all the facts. Belsen (talk) 15:42, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is a touchy situation because of the various allegations that have been made. You did not do anything wrong in trying to create a better article but I would ask you to please work on the talk page to put the article back together. It may be slower but it ensures the article stays balanced and free of WP:BLP concerns. ++Lar: t/c 16:33, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Blur template

There's no need to list every single touring member/producer/collaborator who workedf with Blur on very few occasion. Templates only provide links that are very relevant to the band. Further the personnel section was above the albums (which is much more important) and made the template ungainly. indopug (talk) 14:51, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There's no need to list every member who toured with Blur. Templates are supposed to be a collection of links relevant to the band, which a reader is likely to click to pursue further info. Unless the subject played an important part in the Blur story, there's no need to link to it. indopug (talk) 14:36, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Cynicism

Template:Cynicism has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. — This, that, and the other (talk) 00:40, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:17, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Het Beest has been nominated for Did You Know

Hello, Belsen. Het Beest, an article you either created or to which you significantly contributed,has been nominated to appear on Wikipedia's Main Page as part of Did you know. You can see the hook and the discussion here. You are welcome to participate! Thank you. APersonBot (talk!) 12:00, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Het Beest

On 14 July 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Het Beest, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the 1982 Dutch film Het Beest, featuring Willem Ruis in his first and last cinema role, was a "legendary flop"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Het Beest. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Het Beest), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 00:01, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Belsen. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Belsen. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Belsen. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]