User talk:Briantist

see also User talk:Briantist/archive6 User talk:Briantist/archive5 User talk:Briantist/archive4 User talk:Briantist/archive3 User talk:Briantist/Archive2 User talk:Briantist/archive1

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:The Time of Angels illustrative image.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. ╟─TreasuryTag►sheriff─╢ 08:16, 13 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue removing Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did with File:The Time of Angels illustrative image.jpg, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. ╟─TreasuryTag►without portfolio─╢ 09:00, 13 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You had already been denied the deletion once, perhaps it is YOU who should play by the rules?  BRIANTIST  (talk) 09:15, 13 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The rule is that you are not allowed to remove {{ifd}} tags or other deletion notices – that is not complicated, and if you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. ╟─TreasuryTag►cabinet─╢ 09:18, 13 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, but you seem to apply rules only to others. Can you point me to where I can report you? Thanks  BRIANTIST  (talk) 09:20, 13 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Certainly. You may report me at the administrators' noticeboard, though I suggest you don't, because in this case, you are in the wrong. ╟─TreasuryTag►constablewick─╢ 09:21, 13 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I have made it known.  BRIANTIST  (talk) 09:31, 13 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

╟─TreasuryTag►presiding officer─╢ 09:41, 13 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:H2G2 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 14:59, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It is obviously up to you if you respond and how, but you might want to describe the state the articles were in before the template was used. HairyWombat (talk) 17:59, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Just wanted to say thanks for your work on the script.  BRIANTIST  (talk) 17:22, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Ali Boulala logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:33, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Skylogo96.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:52, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please if you have time and you know anything to it (I have seen that you have made edits in the article area which owns relations on it) , please look on the article Audio theatre, somebody placed a erase discussion on it. after we have had a merge discussion. It would be interesting what you would say to the merge and the delete discussion. And possibly it could help to contact other people that they should help also. )-: Merry Xmas --Soenke Rahn (talk) 16:35, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Two Tribes Hibakusha.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 03:29, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Two Tribes Carnage.ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 03:29, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Two Tribes Annihilation.ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 03:29, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Two Tribes (Hibakusha).ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 03:29, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Shades of paranomia.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 04:27, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Art of Noise Peter Gunn.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 04:41, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Moments in Love Picture Disk.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 04:49, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:HH caveman.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Peripitus (Talk) 14:09, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Skylogo97.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:55, 18 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your "London Overground As A Circle" map is featured on the Altantic Cities blog. D-Notice (talk) 13:00, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

And I was at a loose end earlier, so I re-imagined your map slightly, adding the occasionally used line from Camden Road to South Hampstead and a reopened Primrose Hill. JonLaneLondon (talk) 04:30, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I put an update request on the image as the Overground has recently expanded. Could you add the new lines? Would be nice to bring it up to date - it is a great concept. Thanks. Cnbrb (talk) 23:09, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of massacres in Great Britain and Northern Ireland, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Preston (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:43, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Brighton city transport website layout.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:52, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Former tram shelter lewes road brighton.jpg, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Sohambanerjee1998 07:57, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Tottenham Hale Station redevelopment poster.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to [email protected], stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [email protected].

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:22, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:London Underground and Overground map for 2015- (north east section).svg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 23:05, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:London Underground and Overground map for 2015- (north east section).svg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you.  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 22:03, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Greenford to West Ealing London Overground lIne.svg, which you've attributed to London Underground. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to [email protected], stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [email protected].

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 20:59, 3 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Hitch Hikers Theme Original Records Version.ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:23, 18 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Bbc logo before 1970.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:05, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, can you update File:London Overground as a circle.svg please as the Overground has recently expanded with new lines out of Liverpool Street. Here's another diagram to help you. Thanks, Cnbrb (talk) 20:26, 17 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the East Village, London page, your edit caused an unnamed parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:22, 22 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:41, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Two Tribes (We Dont Want To Die).ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:59, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Relax (16 Minute Sex Mix) - 12ZTAS1.ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:13, 6 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Relax New York Mix.ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:19, 6 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:The Long Dark Tea-Time of the Soul (radio serial).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:17, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:The Long Dark Tea-Time of the Soul (radio serial) iPlayer.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:18, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:KYTV Sports.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:58, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, in this edit you claim "Revert edits by blocked user Whlstation" - but you went back much further than that, since edits by Nordic Nightfury (talk · contribs), Wham2001 (talk · contribs) and myself were undone too. In fact, Nordic Nightfury had already undone Whlstation's edits in this edit. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 14:57, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This line is still under construction. Unless you have a source that the two stations on the new line are open despite the line being closed, or that the Watford Metropolitan station has been closed and the line turned into a reversing siding, please leave this diagram alone. Britmax (talk) 18:06, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This diagram is about the planned link, so the finalised state is correct.  BRIANTIST  (talk) 09:06, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The diagram illustrates the current state of the project. Although I now partly understand your changes I don't feel that leaving the two planned stations "open" and prematurely "closing" Watford Met is a solution. In my opinion the diagram is better as it is until the line opens and Watford Met closes. Britmax (talk) 09:13, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Arriva Rail London logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you.   JaJaWa |hello  23:18, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Marvin Single Cover emu.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 21:09, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Marvin the double B side.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:09, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:06, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I understand the intention and appreciate the effort you have put into coding the {{TfLstyle}} template, but the one-size fits all statements that this uses for station descriptions is not helpful as they are not always reflective of the actual stations. I have deleted a number of the entries you have added to stations for the following reasons:

• Baker Street tube station - Nothing of Leslie Green's Bakerloo line station building remains or his tiling design at platform levels.
• Marylebone station - Green's station was demolished in the 1930s and a new access created through the mainline station. His tiling has been replaced with a similar scheme.
• Clapham North tube station - This was not a Morden extension station, it opened a quarter of a century earlier. Holden remodelled the original building for the extension to add escalators and added the 1920s tiling to the platform walls, but the station building was never the same as the extension ones and Holden's changes have been obliterated anyway.
• Clapham Common tube station - As for Clapham North.
• Moor Park tube station - the link to Holden is very minor as he hadn't done any work for the tube since the late 1940s and he died in 1960.
• Kensal Green station - the description was relevant to the original station building, though that wasn't opened in 1902, and it was demolished in 1980 and rebuilt.
• Morden tube station - there is already a detailed description of the station's architecture.
• Warwick Avenue tube station - there are no oxblood tiled facades as there are no above ground structures.
• Regents Park tube station - by Leslie Green - but not a typical one as it is another one that has no surface buildings.

I don't think it is going to be possible to make a set of options that give sufficient detail to the information to cover the whole system and some of the statements in the design idiom booklet are so general as to be useless. Much of the colour scheme information relates to platform signage rather than to the buildings. --DavidCane (talk) 00:39, 20 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Makes sense, I was hoping to code in the station types from the list of 20 architechutal types and hoped that others might refine the work. I was taking the TfL document as a good reference for these.  BRIANTIST  (talk) 05:04, 20 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Given what I wrote above, which you seemed to accept. Why have you added the template to a load more articles today. As before, the first few of these are too generic to be useful or are just wrong. Please stop making this generic additions:

• Highgate tube station - save for one original station buildings which is a private residence, the original station was completely rebuilt in the 1930s for the Northern Heights extension. The original station is gone and the replacement above ground platforms have been disused since the 1950s. The station that people use today is below ground and has minimal above ground buildings, nothing like what was described in the template. You have just restored the incorrect information again - why?
• Arsenal tube station - Leslie Green's above ground building was rebuilt in the 1930s and the oxblood facade does not exist.
• East Finchley tube station - the templated text implied that the station was designed by others in Charles Holden's style. It was actually designed by him.

--DavidCane (talk) 13:02, 20 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I'm just making sure that the vast majority of tube stations have the relevant information that is supplied in the TfL-funded TfL-published document I'm linking to. I agree that there are disagreements as you pointed out, but my source is a good one, but clearly not without some level of missing information. I'm keen for these to be pointed out as there are several planning applications in/near tube stations which take "Design Idiom" as the gospel truth. I'm just going to assume here that you've got references that show your assertions about East Finchley, and so forth.  BRIANTIST  (talk) 13:27, 20 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

In addition to issues with the templated information not being correct for particular pages, this appears to be an inappropriate use of templates. It says explicitly on the guidelines page (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Template_namespace#Guidelines): "Templates should not normally be used to store article text, as this makes it more difficult to edit the content." Dubmill (talk) 13:34, 20 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

IMHO this is a great use of a template. There are 21 styles of station building. I would have thought that Don't repeat yourself is a more pressing matter here.  BRIANTIST  (talk) 13:38, 20 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It may be your opinion that it's a good use, but what about the fact that the guidelines say it should NOT be used for article text? Dubmill (talk) 13:43, 20 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, my understanding is that the rule means that you don't store the text of just one article in a template, as a way of hiding it from other editors. To use a template that works on several hundred pages, as TfLstyle is perfectly acceptable. There is no worry of a one-to-one relationship here!  BRIANTIST  (talk) 13:49, 20 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I could be wrong but my interpretation is that it's saying don't use it for article text, full stop. As it mentions, if someone wants to edit the text as it appears in the article, they will not be able to do so, because the text is embedded in the template, not the article. Dubmill (talk) 13:58, 20 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It seems we have a difference of interpretation, but I can't see any guidance to your view of a total ban. Let me finish adding in the missing stations from my list and you can follow behind copy-and-pasting the generated text if that would make you happy.  BRIANTIST  (talk) 14:05, 20 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No please stop trying to make all of the stations fit a set of "types". There are far more than "21 styles of station building" and many of the stations have multiple phases of development and redevelopment that means that parts belong to different architectural periods, that a simple template cannot accommodate without going into a massive amount of complexity. Complexity that would make it just easier to add the correct information to the article itself directly. Information about "colours" and design standards belongs in a different article anyway. Most of this is to do with decorative colour schemes not about the physical characteristics of the buildings. The various comments about "future development" is misleading as this gives a sense that something is planned, when in most cases the guide being referenced is to guide future development if it happens.--DavidCane (talk) 14:19, 20 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This isn't MY list of types, it's Transport For London's list of types. I have taken the data verbatim from http://content.tfl.gov.uk/station-design-idiom-2.pdf page 199-219. This document is very clear and very official.  BRIANTIST  (talk) 14:22, 20 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Just because TfL have identified these types, does not mean they are correct. It may seem to be an authoritative source, but clearly the interpretations that you are making for which stations fit which types are wrong - as identified above already. A couple of examples using the template:

1. looking at the map on page 112 or 199 (same map, repeated), St Paul's tube station is listed as a being in the Central London Railway type. It isn't. It was built originally, as Post Office, by the CLR, but the station building was demolished a rebuilt in the 1930s and demolished completely and replaced with subway entrances in the 1970s (I think). There is nothing below ground of the original CLR station design. as the platforms were re-tiled in the 1980s. Your template would describe this as:

This station is one originally designed by architect Harry Bell Measures for the Central London Railway, with plain white tiled platformss, bronze finished brushed aluminium, grey granite concrete flagstone and ceramics in   blue,   biscuit and black.^[1]

 

This generic information does not give anything about the architecture of the station and is pretty irrelevant.

2. the same map gives the type for Hyde Park Corner tube station as Leslie Green. Again it doesn't fit this type very well. The original station building was designed by Green, but, since the station was given escalators in the 1930s, it hasn't been used by the station at all. The subway entrances nearer to the Hyde Park Corner are not by Green, the subway ticket hall below the road and and escalator shafts aren't by Green, only the platform tiling is by Green. Your template would give the detail for this as:

This is one of the trademark styles of stations opened in 1906/07 designed by Leslie Green. They feature oxblood red faience exteriors, ceramic tiled ticket halls and platforms distinguished by colour patterns which are unique to each station. The station colours are black, white and bronze finished brushed stainless steel, with Terrazzo floor tiles, exterior concrete flagstones, painted plaster and timber.^[1]

 

Which gives an incomplete description. Also the colours of Green's tiling are brown, white and cream.

3. the map give Kennington tube station as a Holden (Northern) station. The station building by T. P. Figgis is listed because it is the only example of the City and South London Railway's stations that remains in substantially it's original form. Your template would generate this:

This is one of a foray of Charles Holden (the Underground’s consultant architect) classically designed stations connected with the Morden extension of 1926. They feature Portland stone exteriors of a similar design, with traditional tiled interiors. The colours are black, white,   green,   light grey,   dark grey, bronze-finished brushed stainless-steel and varnished timber. The station has Terrazzo floor tiles, exterior concrete flagstones and enamel white tiles.^[1]

 

Which is just completely wrong about the building.

I just don't think it's worth your effort, or others to rectify it afterwards.--DavidCane (talk) 15:01, 20 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I have loaded the information from the TfL document as best I can. If there are stations that are wrong, fine. I've copied the list of stations into the tempate talk file Template:TfLstyle/doc for ease of my checking them.

Also, please note that there are stations in the source PDF that are coded green which mean "2015 PALETTE" and not "District Victorian" or "Clarke (City)". See the Template:TfLstyle/doc for the list if it's not clear (which, it wasn't when I saw the A0 printed version, either). Thanks for your help, I'm just trying to add something interesting and encyclopaedic.  BRIANTIST  (talk) 15:11, 20 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Briantist, I'm not trying to criticise again or put more pressure on you, but I note that you have uploaded and added File:London Underground Station design eras.png into the usage section of the template with the copyright status given on the file's details page as being released into the public domain. Whilst there is no assertion of copyright for the map or the design guide generally, that does not automatically mean that it is public domain. As the map is a variant of the tube map of which TfL is very protective, this is almost certainly not a free to use public domain image. TfL is not the UK government and the government does not usually release things directly into the public domain. It usually uses the Open Government Licence for freely released information. Previously issued government crown copyright documents become public domain after fifty years. I'm afraid, I'm going to tag this for removal.--DavidCane (talk) 11:51, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop making edits like this, this and this; I did give a reason, it is WP:TG. To expand on that, and as noted above, article content should not be generated from templates. If the template-generated information is wrong (and I see that DavidCane has found a number of errors that I didn't spot), the method of rectification is non-intuitive; and since your id numbers are not unique, altering the template to correct one article may well make several others incorrect where previously they had been correct.

Also, the lead section is intended as a summary of the main article text (see MOS:LEAD) - what you are adding is often not mentioned in the main text at all. Virtually all of these articles have a section for history, most also have a section for design or description - these are where we describe who designed the station, when and in what style. One thing that we do not do is put little coloured squares into article text, lead section or otherwise. You also meed to consider how important it is to specify the colour scheme, some of this is outright trivia.

You are also asking for references for information that is referenced in the main text, and so does not need a ref in the lead as well - see WP:LEADCITE. Some of these articles (including Arnos Grove) have previously been rated as a good article, and your edits have been compromising that status, so please also read up on good articles.

DavidCane, myself and several others have been working on these articles for many years now, and we do not appreciate you steamrollering some highly unusual methods for which you do not have consensus into well over a hundred articles. If you wish to pursue this line, I suggest that you obtain approval from a WikiProject such as WP:TUBE. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 08:57, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Right, I'm making this formal. Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 09:15, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry. I'm out of here. I don't need this attitude when I'm just trying to help. All I was trying to do was add something useful to Wikipedia. I think I know why I stopped posting before.  BRIANTIST  (talk) 09:20, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I thought I was doing the correct thing. All my edits have been well intention and followed all the rules about providing references and so forth. I don't get that adding information from a properly-referenced free, government source about station architecture is "disruptive". I don't see that your reversions of my work are doing anything other than destroying well-researched information. I thought the idea was that editors co-operated, not just reverted other peoples additions and then call them "disruptive". I feel really hurt by this accusation as I've put many hours of work into this.  BRIANTIST  (talk) 09:25, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You were failing to heed the advice of both DavidCane (talk · contribs) and Dubmill (talk · contribs); moreover, you were reinstating content that three people (those two and myself) had already explained was not desirable. So far, I have not found anybody that agrees with you. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 10:26, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Briantist: - just an observation, and a suggestion: I can see that you have a particular idea for adding encyclopedic content to expand Tube station articles and that you have put some genuinely good faith effort into this idea. It's unfortunate that your edits have come into conflict with other editors' views. Can I suggest that you pause editing for now, take this idea to a suitable talk page — perhaps Wikipedia talk:WikiProject London Transport or Template talk:TfLstyle — and lay out your idea, explaining what you hope to add to articles. Other editors will be able to discuss their reservations, and hopefully you will be able to reach some sort of compromise for adding the information that you want to add. That will be less frustrating for you than having your edits reverted. Thanks. Cnbrb (talk) 12:39, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:London Underground Station design eras.png. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to [email protected], stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [email protected].

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. DavidCane (talk) 12:00, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Portal:The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy (2nd nomination) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Portal:The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. ToThAc (talk) 11:18, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:London Overground as a circle 2007-2010.svg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Pkbwcgs (talk) 17:09, 18 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:06, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

Google Code-In, Google-organized contest in which the Wikimedia Foundation participates, starts in a few weeks. This contest is about taking high school students into the world of opensource. I'm sending you this message because you recently edited a documentation page at the English Wikipedia.

I would like to ask you to take part in Google Code-In as a mentor. That would mean to prepare at least one task (it can be documentation related, or something else - the other categories are Code, Design, Quality Assurance and Outreach) for the participants, and help the student to complete it. Please sign up at the contest page and send us your Google account address to [email protected], so we can invite you in!

From my own experience, Google Code-In can be fun, you can make several new friends, attract new people to your wiki and make them part of your community.

If you have any questions, please let us know at [email protected].

Thank you!

--User:Martin Urbanec (talk) 21:59, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:BrightonGreenway line image.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:22, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:29, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:BSB channel logos.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Relax Cassette version.ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:49, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Ztt zang tumb tuum sampled.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 16:22, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:BBC Coat of Arms.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:21, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:07, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:All Sky viewing figures 1995-2009.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused and no apparent use; also apparently not freely licensed (watermark in upper-right).

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:43, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Frankie Two Tribes 12 inch picture disk.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:12, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article Kaos Theory has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appears to fail WP:NALBUM

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 22:46, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Kaos theory volume 1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:20, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Kaos theory volume 4.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:21, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Prodigy G Force (Energy Flow) from Kaos Theory Volume 1.ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:41, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Monsal trail map.svg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Orphaned and redundant to {{Monsal Trail}}.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. HouseBlaster^talk 00:32, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Parliamentary Train 0759 Woodgrange Park to Willesden Junction.svg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused train route diagram. Should be replaced with BSicons if needed.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 09:12, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Parliamentary train 2309 Battersea Park to Clapham High Street.svg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused train route diagram. Should be replaced with BSicons if needed.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 09:12, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:TfLstyle has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 09:07, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]