User talk:West Virginian

This is West Virginian's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34

Hi West Virginian,

I am Petros Apostolopoulos, a Ph.D. candidate in Public History at North Carolina State University. My Ph.D. project examines how historical knowledge is produced on Wikipedia. If you are interested in participating in my research study by offering your own experience of writing about history on Wikipedia, you can click on this link https://ncsu.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_9z4wmR1cIp0qBH8. There are minimal risks involved in this research.

If you have any questions, please let me know. Petros Apostolopoulos, [email protected] Apolo1991 (talk) 15:38, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Burials at Lee Chapel indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Qwerfjkltalk 20:10, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Nick-D on the Franklin–Nashville campaign Review essay: Military History Wikiproject Coordinators' reading list

Category:People associated with The Greenbrier has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. _wjemather^{please leave a message...} 18:38, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Good article nominations | January 2022 Backlog Drive
January 2022 Backlog Drive: On New Year's Day, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number and age of articles reviewed. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here.
Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talkpage.
You're receiving this message because you have conducted 10+ good article reviews or participated in the March backlog drive. Click here and remove your username from the mailing list to opt out of any future messages. --Usernameunique

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles at 21:18, 31 December 2021 (UTC).[reply]

Lennart97 (talk) 19:28, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply] — Maile (talk) 00:03, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year and Happy New WikiCup! The 2022 competition has just begun and all article creators, expanders, improvers and reviewers are welcome to take part. Even if you are a novice editor you should be able to advance to at least the second round, improving your editing skills as you go. If you have already signed up, your submissions page can be found here. If you have not yet signed up, you can add your name here and the judges will set up your submissions page. Any questions on the rules or on anything else should be directed to one of the judges, or posted to the WikiCup talk page. Signups will close at the end of January, and the first round will end on 26 February; the 64 highest scorers at that time will move on to round 2. The judges for the WikiCup this year are: Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs · email) and Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs · email). Good luck! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:37, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year and Happy New WikiCup! The 2022 competition has just begun and all article creators, expanders, improvers and reviewers are welcome to take part. Even if you are a novice editor you should be able to advance to at least the second round, improving your editing skills as you go. If you have already signed up, your submissions page can be found here. If you have not yet signed up, you can add your name here and the judges will set up your submissions page. Any questions on the rules or on anything else should be directed to one of the judges, or posted to the WikiCup talk page. Signups will close at the end of January, and the first round will end on 26 February; the 64 highest scorers at that time will move on to round 2. The judges for the WikiCup this year are: Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs · email) and Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs · email). Good luck! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:02, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:02, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, West Virginian. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Arthur G. Froe at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Cheers, Baffle☿gab 05:03, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Baffle gab1978, thank you, as always, for the comprehensive and thorough review and copyedit! -- West Virginian (talk) 14:05, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No problem; good luck with your planned GA nomination. :) Cheers, Baffle☿gab 17:59, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Baffle gab1978, thank you! The GA nomination and listing occurred shortly after my GOCE nomination, but now the article is of even higher quality thanks to you! -- West Virginian (talk) 18:41, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Edgar P. Rucker you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kavyansh.Singh -- Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 19:21, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Edgar P. Rucker you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Edgar P. Rucker for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kavyansh.Singh -- Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 19:41, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Edgar P. Rucker you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Edgar P. Rucker for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kavyansh.Singh -- Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 11:41, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Armistead Abraham Lilly, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Highland, New York. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Edgar P. Rucker at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Bruxton (talk) 18:29, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• 3,114 views for DYK. Bruxton (talk) 15:38, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Bruxton, thank you so much for letting me know, and for reviewing and improving this hook! -- West Virginian (talk) 15:45, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Nick-D on the Australian Army in Somalia Review essay: Hog Farm on American Civil War sites in the South and Midwest

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Armistead Abraham Lilly you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of GhostRiver -- GhostRiver (talk) 21:42, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Armistead Abraham Lilly you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Armistead Abraham Lilly for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of GhostRiver -- GhostRiver (talk) 16:21, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I saw in the history of Prince Philip of Yugoslavia's page that it was you who added his ancestry, only someone else excluded it because it is "no source" and "BLP". Could you solve this? adding the font you used or something else? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thiago.moreira.gomes (talk • contribs) 03:44, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:02, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Armistead Abraham Lilly you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Armistead Abraham Lilly for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of GhostRiver -- GhostRiver (talk) 21:41, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You are invited to WP:URFA/2020, a working group reviewing featured articles promoted between 2004 and 2015. An article that you nominated for FA status, Capon Lake Whipple Truss Bridge, has been marked as "Satisfactory" by two editors, meaning that they believe the article meets the featured article criteria. Can you check the article and determine if the article meets the FA criteria? If it does, please mark it as "Satisfactory" on WP:URFA/2020B. If you have concerns about the article, we hope that you will fix it up or post your concerns on the article's talk page. If you have any questions, please go to the URFA/2020 talk page or ping me. Thanks for your help and happy editing! Z1720 (talk) 16:27, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for marking Capon Lake Whipple Truss Bridge as satisfactory; this allowed me to mark the article as "FAR not needed", bringing us one step closer to reviewing every FA promoted before 2016. I noticed that you successfully nominated other articles for FA status before 2016. Can you review these articles to ensure they meet the FA standards? Just like the above, please mark the article as "Satisfactory" at WP:URFA/2020B if it meets the FA criteria, or fix up concerns and post comments on the article's talk page if it does not meet the criteria anymore. Feel free to ask questions on the the URFA/2020 talk page or ping me. Happy editing! Z1720 (talk) 15:34, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Z1720, thank you for undertaking and facilitating this gargantuan effort to ensure that these articles still fulfill their FA status. I reviewed my own articles, and re-reviewed other articles that I am either familiar with, regularly monitor, or have reviewed for GA/FA in the past. I will check back regularly to review others as I have additional time. Thank you for making me aware of and including me in this effort! -- West Virginian (talk) 15:58, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• I really appreciate your work today with this. As you can see, we literally have thousands of articles to review, so every review helps. If you are looking for something more adventurous, I encourage you to review articles you are less familiar with to see if they still meet the standards. I review articles as if they were FACs and either fix up concerns or post them on the article's talk pages, pinging the original nominator. If you are feeling extra-adventurous, there are articles at WP:FARGIVEN where editors expressed concerns that the article doesn't reach the FAR criteria; editors can only nominate an article to FAR once a week, so we need more editors who are willing to nominate articles and give feedback if an editor wants to improve the article. Let me know if you have any questions and thanks again for your help. Z1720 (talk) 16:51, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Z1720, thank you again for sharing these opportunities for me to support. I will let you know if I have any questions in the meantime, and thank you again for everything you do to improve the quality and content of Wikipedia! -- West Virginian (talk) 17:01, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, West Virginian. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for James Rumsey Monument at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Cheers, Baffle☿gab 21:36, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Baffle gab1978, thank you so much as always for taking the time to complete this comprehensive, thorough, and thoughtful copyedit of this article. You've improved the quality and flow of this article tremendously, and I look forward to working with you again soon! -- West Virginian (talk) 00:44, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Leon P. Miller you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kavyansh.Singh -- Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 10:01, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Armistead Abraham Lilly at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Bahnfrend (talk) 11:30, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Leon P. Miller you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Leon P. Miller for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kavyansh.Singh -- Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 16:01, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article James Rumsey Monument you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ganesha811 -- Ganesha811 (talk) 04:21, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Leon P. Miller you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Leon P. Miller for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kavyansh.Singh -- Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 05:21, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, West Virginian. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Edgar P. Rucker at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Cheers, Baffle☿gab 21:47, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Baffle gab1978, thank you for taking the time to complete yet another thorough, comprehensive copyedit. As always, I really appreciate your guidance and expertise, and look forward to working with you again on another article soon. As an aside, I noticed that GOCE copyeditors no longer add an additional template with their username. Is this no longer a standard? I have been adding the copyedit to the article history template, but I always liked seeing the additional template with copyeditor's username, which Corinne introduced me to. Thanks again for your continued improvement of Wikipedia, one article at a time! -- West Virginian (talk) 15:56, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 and Nick-D on World War II in Europe

The article James Rumsey Monument you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:James Rumsey Monument for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ganesha811 -- Ganesha811 (talk) 13:41, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

And so ends the first round of the WikiCup. Last year anyone who scored more than zero points moved on to Round 2, but this was not the case this year, and a score of 13 or more was required to proceed. The top scorers in Round 1 were:

• Epicgenius, a finalist last year, who led the field with 1906 points, gained from 32 GAs and 19 DYKs, all on the topic of New York buildings.
• AryKun, new to the contest, was second with 1588 points, having achieved 2 FAs, 11 GAs and various other submissions, mostly on the subject of birds.
• Bloom6132, a WikiCup veteran, was in third place with 682 points, garnered from 51 In the news items and several DYKs.
• GhostRiver was close behind with 679 points, gained from achieving 12 GAs, mostly on ice hockey players, and 35 GARs.
• Kavyansh.Singh was in fifth place with 551 points, with an FA, a FL, and many reviews.
• SounderBruce was next with 454 points, gained from an FA and various other submissions, mostly on United States highways.
• Ktin, another WikiCup veteran, was in seventh place with 412 points, mostly gained from In the news items.

These contestants, like all the others who qualified for Round 2, now have to start scoring points again from scratch. Between them, contestants completed reviews of a large number of good articles as the contest ran concurrently with a GAN backlog drive. Well done all! To qualify for Round 3, contestants will need to finish Round 2 among the top thirty-two participants.

Remember that any content promoted after the end of Round 1 but before the start of Round 2 can be claimed in Round 2. Anything that should have been claimed for in Round 1 is no longer eligible for points. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed.

Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 (talk) and Cwmhiraeth (talk) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:07, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Precious

Eight years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:10, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Gerda Arendt, thank you sincerely for this lovely anniversary reminder. It's so hard to believe that eight years have passed since I received this prestigious and gracious acknowledgement from you. As always, I appreciate everything you do to keep editors engaged and feeling appreciated, and I thank you for all your continued phenomenal contributions to Wikipedia. Danke sehr, und Ich wünsche dir alles Gute!! – West Virginian (talk) 15:52, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi West Virginian! I hope you're doing well! I was going through some logs, and I saw that your user page has been torn up a number of times by vandals and trolls. I also noticed that it had no protection at all. I went ahead and fixed that for you. ;-) If you don't want this protection applied and would like it removed, let me know and I'll be happy to do that for you. I just figured I'd help you out and let you know about it. ;-) Cheers - ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 08:10, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

—Kusma (talk) 12:02, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article William H. Davis (educator) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of GhostRiver -- GhostRiver (talk) 18:01, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:03, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply] Sea Cow (talk) 15:11, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply] Sea Cow (talk) 15:12, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, West Virginian. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for [[Armistead Abraham Lilly]] at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome!

Sushi725 (talk) 16:42, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply] 

• Sushi725, thank you so much for taking the time to perform this thorough and thoughtful copyedit! I greatly appreciate your continued contributions to Wikipedia! -- West Virginian (talk) 12:25, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• No problem, the article was very well-written so there was very little to do! I will take a look at your other request to the GOCE today. Sushi725 (talk) 15:58, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article William H. Davis (educator) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:William H. Davis (educator) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of GhostRiver -- GhostRiver (talk) 17:21, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Nick-D on Hitler as a military leader

Category:Viceroys of the Kingdom of Lombardy-Venetia has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Dicklyon (talk) 23:55, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply] — Maile (talk) 00:02, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

		Hook update
		Your hook reached 6,740 views (561.7 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of April 2022 – nice work!

theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/they) 02:06, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Theleekycauldron, thank you so much for sharing this wonderful news with me, and for your continued guidance and engagement! — West Virginian (talk) 11:27, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/they) 02:42, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply] Sandstein 08:38, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply] Sandstein 08:49, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 on military logistics and rebuilding Nagasaki

The second round of the 2022 WikiCup has now finished. It was a high-scoring round and contestants needed 115 points to advance to round 3. There were some very impressive efforts in round 2, with the top seven contestants all scoring more than 500 points. A large number of the points came from the 11 featured articles and the 79 good articles achieved in total by contestants.

Our top scorers in round 2 were:

1. Epicgenius, with 1264 points from 2 featured article, 4 good articles and 18 DYKs. Epicgenius was a finalist last year but has now withdrawn from the contest as he pursues a new career path.
2. AryKun, with 1172 points from two featured articles, one good article and a substantial number of featured article and good article reviews.
3. Bloom6132, with 605 points from 44 in the news items and 4 DYKs.
4. Sammi Brie, with 573 points from 8 GAs and 21 DYKs.
5. Ealdgyth, with 567 points from 11 GAs and 34 good and featured article reviews.
6. Panini!, with 549 points from 1 FA, 4 GAs and several other sources.
7. Lee Vilenski, with 545 points from 1 FA, 4 GAs and a number of reviews.

The rules for featured and good article reviews require the review to be of sufficient length; brief quick fails and very short reviews will generally not be awarded points. Remember also that DYKs cannot be claimed until they have appeared on the main page. As we enter the third round, any content promoted after the end of round 2 but before the start of round 3 can be claimed now, and anything you forgot to claim in round 2 cannot! Remember too, that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them. When doing GARs, please make sure that you check that all the GA criteria are fully met.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 (talk) and Cwmhiraeth Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:39, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Good article nominations | June 2022 Backlog Drive

On 1 June, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number and age of articles reviewed. Interested in taking part? Sign up here!

You're receiving this message because you have conducted 5+ good article reviews or participated in previous backlog drives. Click here to opt out of any future messages. (t · c) buidhe 04:27, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 on a World War II summit and the American space program

Category:People from Marmet, West Virginia has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 10:38, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 and Nick-D look at four recent works

The third round of the 2022 WikiCup has now come to an end. Each of the sixteen contestants who made it into the fourth round had at least 180 points, which is a lower figure than last year when 294 points were needed to progress to round 4. Our top scorers in round 3 were:

• BennyOnTheLoose, with 746 points, a tally built both on snooker and other sports topics, and on more general subjects.
• Bloom6132, with 683 points, garnered mostly from "In the news" items and related DYKs.
• Sammi Brie, with 527, from a variety of submissions related to radio and television stations.

Between them contestants achieved 5 featured articles, 4 featured lists, 51 good articles, 149 DYK entries, 68 ITN entries, and 109 good article reviews. As we enter the fourth round, remember that any content promoted after the end of round 3 but before the start of round 4 can be claimed in round 4. Please also remember that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them. When doing GARs, please make sure that you check that all the GA criteria are fully met. Please also remember that all submissions must meet core Wikipedia policies, regardless of the review process.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is a good article nomination, a featured process, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. WikiCup judges: Sturmvogel 66 (talk) and Cwmhiraeth (talk) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:51, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article William H. Davis (educator) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:William H. Davis (educator) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of GhostRiver -- GhostRiver (talk) 04:21, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]