User talk:Chaotic Enby

Chaotic Enby is currently experiencing mental health issues, which may affect their Wikipedia editing in various ways. They may have difficulty with: altered perception when making editorial judgements, determining consensus, or reading Wikipedia discussions addressed to them; reduced availability on Wikipedia during times when they experience issues; limited capacity to respond to other Wikipedians via talk page or email messages in a timely fashion, to participate in conflict resolution, or to complete their usual workload of Wikipedia tasks. Thank you for your understanding.

Thanks so much for reviewing this page. Would you be able to highlight specifically the language feel is promotional, advertorial or otherwise not neutral? This was written very carefully to be in Wikipedia's neutral style. There is no content that cannot be directly traced to one of the many high profile sources that are cited. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Caffrey, Neil (talk • contribs) 17:21, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! The emphasis on numbers of followers, visitors, etc. in the lead, with things like is the largest independent online travel publisher definitely give a promotional aspect. This whole paragraph too:

After bootstrapping the company on $11,000, Borden scaled Matador Network into a seven-figure business and one of the largest travel brands on the web. Matador has thousands of travel writers, adventurers and influencers within its network, and has evolved from a branded content business into a full-fledged production studio making custom content for brands, hooking them up with its influencer network and distributing it to its millions of readers and social media followers.

Also, emphasizing likely non-notable rankings like Fast Company named Matador Network to its 2024 list of Most Innovative Companies, or some corporate keywords like a revamped platform, add to the promotional tone of the article. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 17:49, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I really appreciate this feedback! Updated the draft based on these comments. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Caffrey, Neil (talk • contribs) 21:03, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I've fallen in love with your userpage! I'm nb too, is it alright if I use your user page as a base to work on mine? It'd be for eswiki. No problem if not!! It's very original and I even shared it with some friends haha

Have a good day!! ElleAnónime (talk) 17:30, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@ElleAnónime Of course, it would be absolutely fine with me if you do so! Thanks a lot for the compliment! (also, non-binary solidarity, yay!) Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 17:56, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Chaotic Enby, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the autopatrolled user right to your account. This means that pages you create will automatically be marked as 'reviewed', and no longer appear in the new pages feed. Autopatrolled is assigned to prolific creators of articles, where those articles do not require further review, and may have been requested on your behalf by someone else. It doesn't affect how you edit; it is used only to manage the workload of new page patrollers.

Since the articles you create will no longer be systematically reviewed by other editors, it is important that you maintain the high standard you have achieved so far in all your future creations. Please also try to remember to add relevant WikiProject templates, stub tags, categories, and incoming links to them, if you aren't already in the habit; user scripts such as Rater and StubSorter can help with this. As you have already shown that you have a strong grasp of Wikipedia's core content policies, you might also consider volunteering to become a new page patroller yourself, helping to uphold the project's standards and encourage other good faith article writers.

Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! Elli (talk | contribs) 23:55, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

fwiw I updated your post about this, which has archived. I sort of expected that to unarchived it but apparently Things Do Not Work That Way. Anyway, not sure how much time you have to spend on this but I gotta go.just wanted you to know that your suspicions were further validated. I can't do anything about the coordination, sorry. Maybe SPI? Elinruby (talk) 21:52, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Elinruby Thanks a lot for the reply! I think the post has to be unarchived manually, otherwise I can send it to SPI. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 22:39, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Also, quickly replying here to your ANI comment: several of the sources do in fact mention the subject, but under their birth name of I'Nasah Crockett instead, so that's why searching for the name directly didn't reveal much. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 22:42, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Aha. That name did come up several times in searching Google News I think (through my dyslexia is worse that usual right now. If I am right then something I noticed was an obituary, so that might explain why the article at this particular time.

I probably need to re-look at the references then; but based on memory the Crockett name came up quite a bit and they probably are at least a GNG pass. The zero results on anything was one of the reasons I thought I might be missing something like a name variant. I am going to leave it archived myself, but that an issue of my time management more than anything. Feel free to unarchive if that will help with the SPI investigation or whatever. I am no SPI expert either but based on some time spent on topics where socks proliferate, I *think* the weirdnesses you described would probably be considered enough behavioral evidence. I will find some time in the next few days to recheck the references for the other name. Black Twitter itself is definitely notable and probably does have some gaps in our coverage. Two of the sources are blogs though, but the Slate and NPR articles are enough to stave off AfD if the subject is indeed mentioned in them as an example. Thanks for the thanks. Probably the lead needs a note about the names, btw, given the principle of least astonishment, but for all I know there is a standard about this when it is a trans subject. I don't usually edit on that area. Elinruby (talk) 00:24, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

They're still active on Twitter, so the obituary was probably for someone else. For trans subjects, if they were notable under their previous name (which appears to be the case here), it should be mentioned just once in the lead to clarify. I think I already added that to the article. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 00:35, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yer right, it was Shafiqah Hudson [1]. It is entirely possible that you did mention the name variant in the lede and I missed it. This is why I avoiding sharp objects for the next week or two; busy and ADD/dyslexia compound one another. I will still re-review the references though, and possibly even improve them, as that is a small compact task that I can get done between all of the other muchness that is going on over here.

You recently offered a statement in a request for arbitration. The Arbitration Committee has accepted that request for arbitration and an arbitration case has been opened at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Backlash to diversity and inclusion. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Backlash to diversity and inclusion/Evidence. Please add your evidence by October 10, 2024, which is when the evidence phase closes. You can also contribute to the case workshop subpage, Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Backlash to diversity and inclusion/Workshop. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Party Guide/Introduction. For the Arbitration Committee, SilverLocust 💬 12:21, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

In the open Backlash to diversity and inclusion arbitration case (also called Yasuke), the proposed findings and remedies have been posted—though you are not mentioned in any of them. If you wish, you may review this decision and draw the arbitrators' attention to any relevant material or statements. Comments may be brought to the attention of the committee on the proposed decision talk page. For a guide to the proposed decision, see Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Party Guide/Proposed decision. SilverLocust 💬 00:22, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As you can see in the history, there is no point at all in rolling back a troll unless you can block them. Next time you see them, because you will likely see them again somewhere, just report them, so they don't have the satisfaction of putting it in the history a half a dozen times. Thanks. Drmies (talk) 00:53, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Drmies Thanks a lot! I reported both IPs when I saw them, but didn't know I shouldn't have rolled back their edits. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 00:58, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! The trial of the RfA discussion-only period passed at WP:RFA2024 has concluded, and after open discussion, the RfC is now considering whether to retain, modify, or discontinue it. You are invited to participate at Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/2024 review/Phase II/Discussion-only period. Cheers, and happy editing! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:38, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Chaotic Enby. Thanks for your review of the new Operation Identification page. I revised the page attempting to respond to your {primary sources} tag: (1) I added a new secondary source (ref #1); (2) I added existing secondary sources as refs (from the FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin journal) to some statements that were previously just see, e.g.-type citations to primary sources; and (3) I revised some of the article language to more accurately reflect analysis in the secondary source rather than relying solely on a primary source as a see, e.g.-type citation for analysis. I believe the article is now supported by appropriate secondary source citations and I tried to eliminate any analysis based solely on primary sources, but I welcome your additional discussion. If you still have concerns that prevent removing the {primary sources} tag, please help me understand which sections of the article you're concerned about. Thanks! Elindstr (talk) 16:57, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Elindstr Thanks a lot! This is definitely an improvement, although the FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin journal is still not fully independent (being also part of the FBI), and completely independent sources would be ideal. Also, the primary sources (for their respective claims) to the National Neighborhood Watch could be replaced by secondary ones, and it would be great to see if a published study reports the claim currently sourced to a letter by Allend Voss to the Attorney General. Still, it is already much better! Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 22:24, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I exhaustively searched and located secondary sources and I've now taken the article as far as I'm interested. I'd like to remove the flag now and move on. OK with you? Elindstr (talk) 00:59, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Much better already, should be fine! Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 11:00, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Elindstr (talk) 14:31, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

was i banned in the wikimedia discord server? sorry to bother you but i can't rejoin it tynjee 00:09, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I genuinely don't know if you are banned, and can't do anything about this either way, I am not a moderator of the Discord sever. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 12:46, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

		The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
		For your kind comments at User talk:CKirby09. --DB1729talk 00:57, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot! Happy to see Sawyer and PMC also got it, they really did a wonderful job! Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 01:16, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I almost denied it for being a copyright violation but then I noticed it does have a link to the source it uses in the last line where it says "In the spirit of education, National Purebred Dog Day maintains a website and social media presence." the link is in the word website. Shadow311 (talk) 23:03, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Linking the source website does not prevent it from being a copyright violation. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 23:26, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

	The Graphic Designer's Barnstar
	That userpage is really something Dronebogus (talk) 21:08, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!!! Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 21:09, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On 11 October 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Pesto (penguin), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that a baby penguin from Australia is "an absolute unit"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Pesto (penguin). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Pesto (penguin)), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:04, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

		Hook update
		Your hook reached 18,673 views (778.0 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of October 2024 – nice work!

GalliumBot (talk • contribs) (he/it) 03:27, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That was a constructive resolution, and I appreciate it! AntiDionysius (talk) 23:02, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome! Happy that I could help! Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 23:10, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have been warned by the admin I am not allowed to Talk About that subject any further But I hope That he will not come after me for saying thank you for taking the time to answer me politely in that thread.

have a god day 109.64.53.152 (talk) 18:06, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome! Just to be clear, the restrictions concern discussing the subject itself, but you are of course allow to ask about their extent or how they exist in practice. There is more information at Wikipedia:Contentious topics and Wikipedia:Contentious topics/Arab–Israeli conflict. And feel free to create an account if you want to! Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 20:06, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hlomla Dandala enquiry pertaining to the editing of the public figure's profile Sy McCarthy (talk) 01:01, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You shouldn't add text with a non-neutral tone like He has been one of the actors that took it upon themselves to advocate for the redressing of the injustices and adversities faced by artists in the entertainment industry. If you wish to add this, you should word it more neutrally, and source it to independent reliable sources making the claim. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 01:04, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.

You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:28, 23 October 2024 (UTC) [reply]

Thanks a lot, just answered it! Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 19:43, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

My AfC needs references users say and it's disappointing because I need references to succeed. But help I don't have reference tool. So can you help? — Preceding unsigned comment added by ZiWinger (talk • contribs) 21:36, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, if you're using Visual Editor, you should have an integrated reference tool. Help:Introduction to referencing with VisualEditor/2 is the place for you! Otherwise, if you're using the source editor, then Wikipedia:RefToolbar should be available, with the "Cite" button being on the right of the toolbar. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 21:50, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please help us understand what makes it not encyclopedic? RasDestaDamtew (talk) 21:17, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, the wording of the article is very much promotional and does not correspond to the neutral, encyclopedic tone expected. Wording like HeDPAC is led by prominent champions is clearly not neutral, and a lot of the article in general has a "corporate speak" tone – you can try to reword it by looking at other articles on similar initiatives!

Also, it would be good to clarify your connection with User:Alnjms, as you both created the same page at a close interval. Do you work together, or for HeDPAC, in any capacity? Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 21:57, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject AI Cleanup § Media Request from Suisse Radio (French-speaking). 3df (talk) 09:21, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

it not a type of pasta. It is the sheet we make types of pasta from. VECCHIASFLOGLINA (talk) 14:28, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want, you can move it to the top category "Pasta" instead. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 14:52, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Grazie! VECCHIASFLOGLINA (talk) 01:15, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

		The Civility Barnstar
		Although we disagree on some matters on this topic, I would like to thank you for remaining civil and keeping a level head / impartial perspective on such a contentious issue and rationally explaining your perspective with clear, well thought out arguments. It is nice to see, thank you. Artem P75 (talk) 06:00, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Chaotic Enby,

I noticed your comment in an ANI discussion about "109 countries" but I couldn't find a reference to that phrase on the article that you linked to. If it is not too offensive, could you tell me what this phrase is referring to? Because I'm clueless. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:56, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Liz: Hi (since they haven't gotten back, I'll just quickly answer). The number 109 is white supremacist numeric shorthand for an antisemitic claim that Jews have been expelled from 109 different countries. (Sources on this are found here, here, here, here, here and here). Basically, it's never a good number when used in a context relating to Judaism. MemeGod _chat 14:27, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I was about to write an answer, but you beat me to it! Thanks for the links and the explanation – to be honest, I'm surprised it wasn't in the article I linked, although given the number of absurd claims I understand they can't all be in there... Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 14:34, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I will say that I had to do some digging too, I'd never heard of it before the whole userbox fiasco. :) MemeGod _chat 14:38, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The 2024 WikiCup has come to an end, with the final round being a very tight race. Our new champion is AirshipJungleman29 (submissions), who scored 2,283 points mainly through 3 high-multiplier FAs and 3 GAs on military history topics. By a 1% margin, Airship beat out last year's champion, BeanieFan11 (submissions), who scored second with 2,264 points, mainly from an impressive 58 GAs about athletes. In third place, Generalissima (submissions) scored 1,528 points, primarily from two FAs on U.S. Librarians of Congress and 20 GAs about various historical topics. Our other finalists are: Sammi Brie (submissions) with 879 points, Hey man im josh (submissions) with 533 points, BennyOnTheLoose (submissions) with 432 points, Arconning (submissions) with 244 points, and AryKun (submissions) with 15 points. Congratulations to our finalists and all who participated!

The final round was very productive, and contestants had 7 FAs, 9 FLs, 94 GAs, 73 FAC reviews, and 79 GAN reviews and peer reviews. Altogether, Wikipedia has benefited greatly from the activities of WikiCup competitors all through the contest. Well done everyone!

All those who reached the final will receive awards and the following special awards will be made, based on high performance in particular areas of content creation. So that the finalists do not have an undue advantage, these prizes are awarded to the competitor who scored the highest in any particular field in a single round, or in the event of a tie, to the overall leader in this field.

• Generalissima (submissions) wins the featured article prize for 3 FAs in round 4, and 7 FAs overall.
• Hey man im josh (submissions) wins the featured list prize for 23 FLs overall.
• MaranoFan (submissions) wins the featured topic prize for 9 articles in featured topics in round 1.
• Hey man im josh (submissions) wins the featured content reviewer prize for 110 FA/FL reviews overall.
• BeanieFan11 (submissions) wins the good article prize for 58 GAs in round 5, and 70 GAs overall.
• Fritzmann (submissions) wins the good topic prize for 6 articles in good topics in round 2.
• Sammi Brie (submissions) wins the good article reviewer prize for 45 GA reviews in round 2, and 78 GA reviews overall.
• BeanieFan11 (submissions) wins the DYK prize, for 131 Did you know articles overall.
• Muboshgu (submissions) wins the ITN prize, for 15 In the news articles in round 1, and 36 overall.

Next year's competition will begin on 1 January. You are invited to sign up to participate; the WikiCup is open to all Wikipedians, both novices and experienced editors, and we hope to see you all in the 2025 competition. Until then, it only remains to once again congratulate our worthy winners, and thank all participants for their involvement!

If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs), Epicgenius (talk · contribs), and Frostly (talk · contribs). MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:48, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

So thanks to trying to search for your username in the recall discussion (and due to the way my screen reader and speech synthesiser pronounce it, I now know that your username is "Chaotic Enby", not "Chaotic Envy". Apparently I'm not the first to make this mistake. "Chaotic Envy" would be a cool username as well though. :-) Graham87 (talk) 15:38, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! If I ever need an alternate account for some reason, this definitely goes in my list of name ideas! Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 15:45, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On 5 November 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Methuselah (lungfish), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Methuselah likes belly rubs? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Methuselah (lungfish). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Methuselah (lungfish)), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:17, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

		Hook update
		Your hook reached 20,790 views (873.8 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of November 2024 – nice work!

GalliumBot (talk • contribs) (he/it) 01:28, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What a brilliant hook as well Kowal2701 (talk) 13:54, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

story · music · places

Thank you for an unusual topic! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:32, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Madeleine Riffaud - remember. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:04, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! How can I create a page? --Limelightmedia1991 (talk) 18:42, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Limelightmedia1991 Hello! The best way is to start by making sure the topic is notable. While there are quite a few complicated guidelines at Wikipedia:Notability, a much simpler overview is given at Wikipedia:42. Find a few in-depth references from independent reliable sources (interviews or press releases aren't considered independent for our purposes), so you can write the article from the information they give you.

Then, when you feel like writing, you can start with a draft. For that, you can go to Wikipedia:Articles for creation, and read down to the "Click here to start a new article" button. Then, go through a few clicks to start a new, empty draft. When writing it, you can read Wikipedia:Your first article as a reference point. Once you have posted your edits and feel the article is ready, click "Submit" on the banner on top of it, and a reviewer will check the article for it to be published! Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 19:00, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Wikipedia. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement.

Take the survey here.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 00:41, 13 November 2024 (UTC) [reply]

just came across your page and it is so cool!!!

Clementhyme (talk) 06:14, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Northern green anaconda has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. charlotte ^👸♥ 20:26, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]