User talk:Christian.Mercat

Thanks for your contribution to Celtic knot.

Hello, Christian.Mercat! Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you find Wikipedia as helpful and enjoyable as I do. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, or type {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, when you edit any page, always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some recommended guidelines to help you get started. There are a lot of links; read what you want now and save the rest for later. Happy Editing!  Sean Lotz  talk  08:10, 23 September 2006 (UTC)[reply] Getting Started Wikipedia Tutorial How to edit a page The five pillars of Wikipedia Manual of Style Be bold in editing How to write a great article WikiProjects Getting your info out there Cite your sources Neutral Point of View Point of View Verifiability Uploading images Image use policy Getting more Wikipedia rules Policy Library Getting Help New contributors' help page Where to ask a question Help Desk Frequently Asked Questions Getting along Wikiquette Civility Sign your posts Wikipedians Conflict resolution Getting technical Cleaning up vandalism Pages needing attention Peer review Utilities Village pump

Thanks for adding some sources; I will try to take some time later to integrate the sources into the text and expand the article.

I lived in Montpellier for a few months in 2007 (before Velomagg was created, I assume) and I found it a bad place for biking...compared to cities in Germany, there weren't many bike lanes or good places for bikes, and I always had to fight with cars. It will be interesting to see if things there improve when there are more bikers! rʨanaɢ ^talk/_contribs 16:22, 25 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi rʨanaɢ, thanks for your help. I lived for 1½ year in Berlin and yes, German cities are way more bicycle friendly than French cities. I would say, in a European context, that further North, people know how to behave while driving and riding, or even just walking :-) But yes, the Vélomagg' project did improve the perception of bicycles by all shareholders. Even if Rome was not built in a day! There are still many more improvements like that to make before you can call Montpellier bicycle friendly.

I created a page on the firm behind Vélomagg'. It happens that my brother is the head of this firm, so I understand there is a high probability of Conflict of Interest. As soon as I created the page, User_talk:Tnxman307 erased it and advised me to first do a sandox version. Which I did: User:Christian.Mercat/Sandbox. Now I am waiting for approval from Tnxman to move it back to the main wiki. Is it the correct way to do?

Another question: Is it possible to create a link Vélomagg to Vélomagg' (mind the '!!)? Christian.Mercat (talk) 17:14, 25 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Very nice work. --C S (talk) 03:55, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you C S. I was once thrown away from Conformal map and had to retreat to Conformal pictures because I was too pictural to be serious :-) And I was half expecting to have a too tutorial stance and not encyclopedic enough; but in that subject of knots and graph, I realize that most mathematicians simply don't grow from understanding the 1:1 correspondence between links and planar graphs, towards actually doing anything about it and being able to draw nice knots, unless you take them by the hand and explain to them like they are 6 years old. It works well with 6 years old by the way ;-) I've put up some tutorial material over the 15 years I'm into knots in order to explain that to any kind of people, that's great fun!

salve, io tradotto l`articolo che tu hai citato in arabo dalla wiki italiana http://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intreccio, l`arte e le tecniche di intreccio arabe, possono essere riassunte sotto il nome di arabesco, che nella wiki inglese e` un articolo abbastanza esteso.

alcune delle tecniche di riprodurre forme arabesche lo ho provati anche io, utilizzando delle tecniche digitali, vedi esempio: http://hasanisawi.altervista.org/arabesco.htm. e questo e` solo grafica.

la parte più interessante del argomento in questione sono le tecniche, per questo bisogna cercare dei testi in lingua originale che descrivono in modo dettagliato tali tecniche

Hi, I translated the article `you have cited in Arabic from the Italian wiki http://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intreccio, art and techniques of Arabic straw , can be summarized under the name of arabesque, which in English wiki is a rather extensive article. some of the techniques to reproduce shapes Arabesque I tried it too, by using digital techniques, see here: http://hasanisawi.altervista.org/arabesco.htm. and this is just graphics. the most interesting part of the argument in question are the real techniques used by Muslims craftsmen , for this we must look in original-language texts that describe in detail such techniques --Hasanisawi (talk) 06:57, 6 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I recently added a note at the talk page for Velivert. You created this article. Could you please add to the discussion at the talk page? Thanks! Saebvn (talk) 15:59, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article Libélo has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable bike sharing scheme, fails WP:ORG

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jezhotwells (talk) 23:54, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion has begun about whether the article Libélo, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Libélo until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Jezhotwells (talk) 20:00, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Christian.Mercat. You have new messages at Talk:Vélivert.
Message added 21:37, 25 September 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hello, Christian.Mercat. You have new messages at Talk:Vélomagg'.
Message added 22:33, 25 September 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hello, Christian.Mercat. You have new messages at Talk:Vélopop'.
Message added 22:37, 25 September 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

The article Inter2Geo has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Project/software with no evidence of notability from WP:RS. Use and endorsement by institutions does not directly convey notability.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kinu ^t/_c 03:38, 2 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion has begun about whether the article Inter2Geo, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Inter2Geo until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Kinu ^t/_c 18:56, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Math-Bridge is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Math-Bridge until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Stuartyeates (talk) 23:03, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of bicycle sharing systems, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page SMTC (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:55, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of things named after Felix Klein, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page IMU (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:18, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and thank you for your recent contribution. I appreciate the effort you made for our project, but unfortunately I had to undo your edit because I believe the article was better before you made that change. Feel free to contact me directly if you have any questions. Thank you! Kagundu^{Wanna Chat?} 13:55, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Christian.Mercat. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Smoove.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:28, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]