User talk:Clarence Oveur

Click here to leave me a new message

Swcrowe, I appreciate your efforts to build out the West Virginia Mountaineers football article. Please, take a moment to review Wikipedia:HEADING regarding the proper capitalization of section headings. I also encourage you to check out Wikipedia:WikiProject College football. There are a lot of resources there for editors working on college football topics and it's a good place to bring up problems and pose questions for discussion. Let me know if I can be of any help. Thanks. Jweiss11 (talk) 07:00, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sure thing, glad to help. I'm gonna go check out Pitt's page and see if they've admitted that ASU is a step up from Pitt in the college football world. Hahah let's go Mountaineers!(Shredder2012 (talk) 00:20, 15 December 2011 (UTC))[reply]

The January 2012 issue of the WikiProject United States newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

 
--Kumi-Taskbot (talk) 19:47, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, the 1989 Gator Bowl (December) article never existed. 1989 Gator Bowl exists, but only because there were two games that calendar year. One in January, at the end of the 1988 season, and one in December, at the end of the 1989 season. Feel free to create that article if you'd like. There are many other examples of bowl game articles you could use to get started. Happy editing! DeFaultRyan 15:46, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Art Lewis WVU.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 06:13, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

West Virginia is officially a member of the Big East right now and will not become a member of the Big 12 until July. Leave as Big east until then.--Rockchalk717 (talk) 21:07, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm keeping it as Big 12. The schedule is out and they won't play another down of football in the Big East conference. Not to mention, ESPN's Big 12 football blog now covers WVU. There's no reason to leave it as Big East. The argument that "it's not official until July 1" does nothing more than split hairs. Swcrowe^msg 19:53, 12 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I started a discussion at the talkpage. If no other users put in opinions I will move it to the project page. Leave it alone for now since Big East is what is accurate at the present moment. Also I strongly suggest you read WP:OWN because several of your statements about the situation appear to violate it.-Rockchalk717 (talk) 02:54, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

And your statements strongly suggest the same, such as "leave as Big East until then" and "leave it alone". We can play this game all day...Swcrowe^msg 03:06, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

In response to my talkpage, me too. In response to your trash talk, we shall see December 1st. Welcome to the Big 12, not sure if you guys are ready for Big 12 football. Ha ha! Lol.--Rockchalk717 04:36, 14 April 2012 (UTC)

Looking forward to it! I still don't understand why your Jayhawks fired Mangino, thought that was a huge mistake. In any event, I (along with the majority of WVU fans) are looking forward to the Big 12. It's going to be a real challenge for the Mountaineers to continue the kind of success they enjoyed in the Big East. I am anxious to see how my Alma Mater stacks up against much stiffer competition. Best of luck to KU as well (except on December 1! lol). Keep in touch... Swcrowe^message 06:24, 14 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Mangino resigned, Gill they fired. I am excited for new conference opponents, really looking forward to the basketball games.--Rockchalk717 21:04, 14 April 2012 (UTC)

In my opinion, Mangino's resignation was as a forced resignation if there ever was one.Swcrowe^message 21:51, 14 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Initial GA remarks to be posted within 24 hours. I'm a bit awestruck that your nomination lay dormant for well over three months, especially when other articles have their reviews initiated within days or even just hours. There's nothing that necessarily says you absolutely have to take one from the top of the list when reviewing, but damned if that doesn't seem contrary to how the thing is supposed to work. Well, your wait is (nearly) over. Green-eyed girl (Talk · Contribs) 01:27, 22 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Haha, no worries! Never in a rush. Thanks for contacting me. Swcrowe^message 07:45, 22 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It's gonna take me a couple more days to get all the way through it. I hope you don't take the breadth and length of my review as any sort of indictment against the quality of the article, this is simply how I work. Green-eyed girl (Talk · Contribs) 07:04, 24 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Not a problem at all, and that thought never once crossed my mind. I've been editing the article accordingly, following the guidelines of your review (and admonishing myself for the simple grammatical mistakes in the process!).Swcrowe^message 07:33, 24 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Good :) Just making sure. Green-eyed girl (Talk · Contribs) 07:57, 24 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Are you going to return the comments that are waiting for you at the above FLC or would you prefer to archive the nomination? Thanks. The Rambling Man (talk) 11:46, 14 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Might as well go ahead and archive it. Thanks! Swcrowe^message 06:44, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of West Virginia Mountaineers significant football games is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of West Virginia Mountaineers significant football games until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Jweiss11 (talk) 04:55, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Anthony Becht WVU.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 13:17, 16 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your kindness and recognition to my work. I really appreciate it so I have not so much experience rendering american football uniforms, but I always enjoy a lot designing them. I'll make the changes to the helmets to upload the new version of the file a.s.a.p. My great goal would be to add all the missing NCAA uniforms but I know that I'll take some time.

On My user page at Commons you can take a look to some of my other contributions to sports uniforms (and other vector files) if you wish. Thank you again for the support ! - Fma12 (talk) 20:29, 21 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks again for your feedback. To be sincere, I left the socks white because I had not found any reference to know what color they should be. Of course you can edit the picture to modify the socks colors. I would feel really honoured if you'll use one of my images as guidance to colorize the WV socks. So go ahead and good luck !

Don't hesitate to contact me if you need some assistance. Thank you again! Best, - Fma12 (talk) 04:39, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi pal: I haven't seen other photos than the one you showed me and the promotional material displayed at NikeInc website. The pics displayed there suggest that the protective masks are dark blue and white respectively, although I'm not completely sure to affirm that with a 100% accuracy.

About the socks, if I didn't understand wrong, all of them should be completely white, right?. If so, could you please confirm this ? Once I have all the information checked, I'll work on the file to have it uploaded immediately.

Thanks again for your support ! - Fma12 (talk) 19:40, 24 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Some of your images may be unfree. See Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2013 November 15#OTRS pending since August. --Stefan2 (talk) 23:53, 15 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Stefan2, thank you for your message. I have contacted the copyright holders of the images in question and await their response. Swcrowe^message 23:39, 17 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:WVU Football Uniforms 2013.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:02, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the West Virginia Mountaineers football page, your edit caused a URL error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:19, 14 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Corkythehornetfan. I noticed that you recently removed some content from West Virginia Mountaineers football without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I have restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Corkythehornetfan 00:27, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:51, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Swcrowe. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Swcrowe. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2018 West Virginia Mountaineers football team, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gus Johnson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Swcrowe. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:WVUhelmet.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:11, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:42, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

West Virginia Mountaineers football, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for a community good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Hog Farm _Talk 06:38, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Art Lewis WVU.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 10:27, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]