User talk:Codharris

A tag has been placed on Pet Education and Therapy, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Corvus cornix 22:40, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have replied to you on the article's Talk page. Corvus cornix 23:23, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there -

I've reviewed the userfied page that you've worked on and it's clear that you've put some really good energy into it. Since I'm not particularly familiar with the history of Civil Air Patrol articles on Wikipedia, I'm not sure that I'm the best one to affirm that it would "definitely" make it in the encyclopedia. I am happy, though, to say that I believe it meets my standards and stands a pretty good chance in the encyclopedia. If you'd like, I'll be happy to move it out myself. - Philippe | Talk 06:23, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Philippe- that would be great. I'm quite sure the data is accurate, but wanted a second opinion on its completion level before migrating it. If you could publish it as an article, that would be greatly appriciated! Codharris (talk) 18:47, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done.  :-) It's at Connecticut Wing Civil Air Patrol. I'm not sure that's the right title, but someone will move it for us if not, I'm sure. - Philippe | Talk 21:21, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding Connecticut Wing Civil Air Patrol: I have placed the article on hold an put suggestions for improvement on the talk page.--The Dominator (talk) 21:55, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Rather than waiting for the LoCE (which we can still use but I need to review the article as soon as possible) I personally asked a very good copyeditor that has helped me out in the past, the user has some questions about the article that I'm not capable of answering, so standby and once Milkbreath is done with the CE I can review (and hopefully pass) the article.--The Dominator (talk) 04:44, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

		The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
		I award you this barnstar for working miracles with Connecticut Wing Civil Air Patrol ultimately leading to its successful GA review and so you have something to put on that bare userpage =) The Dominator (talk) 01:22, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, and that blue userpage link looks much better in a signature!--The Dominator (talk) 01:40, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the good reviews a few weeks ago. When you get the chance can you come look over the article and add the fact tags?

Please use Category:Wikipedia requested photographs in Hartford County, Connecticut for Rocky Hill, Connecticut articles. Thanks. GregManninLB (talk) 21:35, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have access to any of the L-Tronics Little L-Per equipment? —  scetoaux (T|C) 22:36, 9 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I figured you did. If you could get high quality pictures of both the old and new L-Pers (and of course be willing to release them under GFDL) that would be extremely helpful. —  scetoaux (T|C) 02:44, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm writing here to let you know that I've recently begun a discussion to review the deleted and redirected Category:Gay Wikipedians (which now points to Category:LGBT Wikipedians. instead of being it's own category) If you have the time, please add your thoughts on the deletion review to the current Discussion. Thanks! Ncboy2010 (talk) 12:56, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:39, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox Civil Air Patrol Wing has been nominated for merging with Template:Infobox military unit. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. PPEMES (talk) 13:00, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]