User talk:CornfieldMannequin

The following conversation takes place between User:Arman88 and me, over the image Scarecrow-tdk.jpg. On December 4th, 2008, I noticed this new addition to the page Scarecrow_(comics), and because I was just starting out, I wanted a picture to identify the Scarecrow with my Username. Judge for yourself.

(CornfieldMannequin:)

I saw the image [1] you contributed to Scarecrow_comics [2]. (Thanks, by the way. Its awesome!) But I noticed that the image, under "source" it just says "Blu-ray format of the film." If you didn't get it off any website, and you put "Blu-ray format" and it worked, then does that mean you filed it as your own work? Because if it is, I would like to turn the thumbnail of that into a userbox. [3] What would I have to do to get that? (Because the "license" says that any other uses of the image may be copyright infringement.) I figured that you would know, since you contributed the image. Please help! --CornfieldMannequin (talk) 23:05, 4 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

(Arman88:)

I don't know. I just hit the print screen while watching the bluray version of the movie. Then I edited some shadows and contrasts with Photoshop.

Hope you can help me with the copyright thing. I don't understand that, I just choosed the "screenshot from film, tv, video game" alternative.

(CornfieldMannequin:)

I did some reading. In the Wikipedia Non-Free use guideline page,[4] it says that Non-Free images can be used again only under certain circumstances. So here's what I think: The guideline allows exceptions. Since you were the one who contributed the image (and it isn't directly from the film, because you had edited it) then you should have the rights to that image. You should therefore be able to use that image whenever you want, so long as you're the one doing it. If you make a userbox out of it, Wikipedia shouldn't delete it. As you can see here [5] each userbox is specified by the user who made it on the left, not by all the other people who have it. See if you can make a good-sized userbox (with a caption about being a fan of the Scarecrow) and log it on the page specified in the link above, with the other Batman ones. I'd really appreciate if you could pull this off.

(By the way, what specifically do you need help with on the copyright thing? I'd be happy to help.) --CornfieldMannequin (talk) 23:04, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

(Arman88:)

You can just go ahead and change it, because you're telling me that Wikipedia won't allow the one I uploaded just now. ;) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Arman88 (talk • contribs) 01:36, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

(CornfieldMannequin:)

Put this in your image file: (Go to Edit mode to select and copy)

Non-free media information and use rationale true for Scarecrow (comics)

Description	Picture of the Scarecrow in The Dark Knight.
Source	Blu-ray format of the film.
Article	Scarecrow (comics)
Portion used	Single frame.
Low resolution?
Purpose of use	To have a version of The Dark Knight, newer to the Batman Begins one.
Replaceable?
Fair useFair use of copyrighted material in the context of Scarecrow (comics)//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:CornfieldMannequintrue

You may want to update a few things, like the resolution and stuff. What happened was you put the blockquote information into your Comment section, instead of where it was supposed to be: in your summary. Now at least that thing's fixed. Tell me if you need anything else.

Oh, and could you still do that userbox thing I told you about earlier? That'd be great.--CornfieldMannequin (talk) 00:42, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

(Cornfield Mannequin, 5 days later:)

Thanks. Thanks a lot.

I wandered onto your talk page for a reason, Arman88; I wanted a Scarecrow userbox. That's all.

Then you piped in with your copyright problems. I was willing to help, but I still made it clear that I wanted the userbox. I go and give you the blockquote information, and I can see that your file now has this implemented. But no userbox. At first I thought that maybe you needed time to find out how to make a userbox, how to duplicate the image, etc. I gave you plenty of time, and nothing happened.

In short, Arman88, I gave you what you wanted, and I never got what I came for.

If you really can't duplicate the image, at least print screen another Scarecrow image with a free-use license.--CornfieldMannequin (talk) 23:07, 12 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

(Arman88:)

Dude, I don't know what you're talking about. All I want to do is contribute by uploading a picture of something I like, why is that so hard to do?

Do whatever you can, I don't know, really. Sorry. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Arman88 (talk • contribs) 23:11, 12 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

In reference to this image contribution [6] (it was a long time ago), the panel is in black-and-white, and you say in the rationale that no better alternative could possibly exist.

But I know of a colored version of this image that you may or may not want to replace it with. Here's the link to it: click here

Was your image intended to be black-and-white to refer to as it appeared in newspapers? Do you want to replace it with a color version? Or do you even care?

Please contact me on my User Talk page. I'll remember the dot. --CornfieldMannequin (talk) 20:02, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for remembering the dot ;-) I actually don't have a strong opinion on whether the black & white or the color version should be used. —Remember the dot ^(talk) 06:43, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The deletion discussion is here. Although we thought it was a good idea at the time it was created, we later realised that the use of various maps was simply a minor aspect of the machinima technique, as opposed to an important aspect of the show itself. As TKD notes in the discussion, there is some use for some of the info, but sourced and not in undue detail, in Red vs. Blue production.--Drat (Talk) 19:11, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. That IP was listed under the administrative intervention page and given its long history of bad edits, I reverted the edit the last user had made and temprarily blocked the account. I had no way whatsoever of knowing the edit was made by a legit user editing from an IP. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 15:34, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Dilbert PHB.JPG. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the GFDL or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to [email protected], stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [email protected].

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

In the Licensing section of the image description page you claim to be the copyright owner, but I find that difficult to believe you are Scott Adams. —teb728 t c 01:30, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I isolated the background of the original image using Photoshop CS3. The original image, as linked, is much larger than the smaller size we use for fair use compliance anyhow, so that helps smooth out any possible jaggies. The rest is just painstakingly zooming in 400-600% and cutting out the background with the lasso tool.

As for page protection, it's all a judgement call as to when to implement it. All admins can do it, but I'm the only admin actively involved in Halo articles to a major degree these days. If you have a page you'd like protected, the proper venue to go to is WP:RPP. I hope that answers your questions, if you have more just ask :) Cheers, Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs^(talk) 01:10, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unless you have a reliable source for that, no, you can't add it. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs^(talk) 21:21, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Not really. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs^(talk) 19:42, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

In regards to your question: Yes, it prolly would be fine according to Microsoft's rules and fair use, but Wikipedia follows WP:NFCC, which is far stricter than fair use (since the idea is to cultivate free alternatives wherever possible.) One of the stipulations is that non-free media (what you are talking about would be a derivative work, so still nonfree) not appear anywhere aside from the Article space (so on Master Chief (Halo), but not its talk page, nor a user talk page, et al.) Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs^(talk) 23:06, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The way wiki-syntax works, you can't just throw in level headers into collapse syntax (which is based on CSS/XML markup languages). If you don't know those, modifying the styles (which is why it's got rounded purple corners and such) is going to be difficult. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs^(talk) 19:06, 21 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:HayabusaInHalo3.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk 04:40, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:HayabusaInHalo3.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:31, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Internal Link btn.JPG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Dilbert Necktie.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Ixfd64 (talk) 20:39, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]