User talk:Craw-daddy

This user may have left Wikipedia. Craw-daddy has not edited Wikipedia since 16 June 2021. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

It's mine, all mine...
March 2007 - September 2007 October 2007 - November 2008 December 2008 - February 2009

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Coloretto-blue.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:51, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Coloretto-wild.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:39, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

"WikiProject Report" would like to focus on WikiProject Board and table games for a Signpost article to be published in May. This is an excellent opportunity to draw attention to your efforts and attract new members to the project. Would you be willing to participate in an interview? If so, here are the questions for the interview. Just add your response below each question and feel free to skip any questions that you don't feel comfortable answering. Other editors will also have an opportunity to respond to the interview questions. If you know anyone else who would like to participate in the interview, please share this with them. Have a great day. -Mabeenot (talk) 03:56, 8 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I was browsing RPG articles this evening, realized how good the My Life with Master article is compared to others, and looked at the history to see how it got that way. So thanks, a few years late, for all your work on the article. It's great. Paul Czege (talk) 03:23, 23 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I think, in the ages ago of July 2008, you started an AfD for Tremere. Now, given that a few years have passed it's very possible you interest has waned. If not: I've started a big merge discussion for the 13 clans here, and wondered if you might be interested in taking part.

Either way, take care. – Bellum (talk) 22:57, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, Craw-daddy. I noticed that at one time [1] [2] [3], you had access to the Pyramid archives at Steve Jackson's website. If you still have access, would you like to help out with reviews on D&D articles? I have checked for where the reviews were already cited, and added more where they were needed. The main thing I would need help with would be to add the name of the reviewer in most cases, and that we fix the citation template. Additionally, if you have the time and inclination, you could go through the review and see if there are any additional bits worth mentioning in our article, it would help out a ton if you would do that. Here is a sampling of articles that I would suggest you take a look at for starters:

• Birthright Campaign Setting
• Dragonlance: Fifth Age
• Dungeons & Dragons Adventure Game (2 reviews)
• Player's Handbook (6 separate reviews)
• The Forge of Fury
• The Speaker in Dreams
• Forgotten Realms Campaign Setting
• Oriental Adventures
• Epic Level Handbook (2 reviews)
• Deities & Demigods
• Book of Vile Darkness (2 reviews)
• Draconomicon
• Libris Mortis
• Explorer's Handbook
• Dungeon Tiles (2 reviews)

If those all look good to you already, or if you just want to see what else there is, you can check out my full list of Pyramid's online reviews. Thanks! BOZ (talk) 15:47, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Craw-daddy, if there is anything you can do to help out, please let me know. BOZ (talk) 04:44, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You might be interested in this thread given your past activity in the subject area. BOZ (talk) 05:03, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Irish Switch (card game), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page UNO (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:51, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:07, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Craw-daddy. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The article Vampire (card game) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence this game is notable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 22:04, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Once Upon a Time (game) has been nominated for a community good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. VickKiang (talk) 07:13, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]