User talk:Cukie Gherkin

{{safesubst:require subst|template=New Page Reviewer granted|1=

Hi Cukie Gherkin. Your account has been added to the "New page reviewers" user group. Please check back at WP:PERM in case your user right is time-limited or probationary. This user group allows you to review new pages through the Curation system and mark them as patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or nominate them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is vital to maintaining the integrity of the encyclopedia. If you have not already done so, you must read the tutorial at New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the deletion policy. If you need any help or want to discuss the process, you are welcome to use the new page reviewer talk page or ask via the NPP Discord. In addition, please remember:

• Be nice to new editors. They are usually not aware that they are doing anything wrong. Do make use of the message feature when tagging pages for maintenance so that they are aware.
• You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted. Please be formal and polite in your approach to them – even if they are not.
• If you are not sure what to do with a page, don't review it – just leave it for another reviewer.
• Accuracy is more important than speed. Take your time to patrol each page. Steps such as checking for copyright violations using Earwig's copyright violation detector, checking for duplicate articles, and evaluating sources (both in the article, and if needed, via a Google search) for compliance with the general notability guideline are mandatory and will take a few minutes per article.
• Please review some of our flowcharts (1, 2) to help ensure you don't forget any required steps.
• Use the message feature to communicate with article creators and offer advice as much as possible.

The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you also may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In cases of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, or long-term inactivity, the right may be withdrawn at administrator discretion. If you can read any languages other than English, please add yourself to the list of new page reviewers with language proficiencies. ~~

The article Puff-puff (onomatopoeia) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Puff-puff (onomatopoeia) for comments about the article, and Talk:Puff-puff (onomatopoeia)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pokelego999 -- Pokelego999 (talk) 03:41, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your upload to Wikipedia:

• File:FoxMcCloud.png

You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete or generic. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact source (such as the web page, or printed document) where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain, search engine, pinboard, aggregator, or the direct/bare URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. If you have any questions please ask them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you. — Ирука¹³ 22:53, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• @Iruka13: This doesn't seem to be the case? The image page does link to an article containing the image. (talk page stalker)--Alexandra^IDV 23:02, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NFCC #4 & 10. — Ирука¹³ 23:06, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Cukie Gherkin!

In Talk:Xenoblade Chronicles, someone brought up the possibility of creating an article on Pyra and Mythra. I previously created an article a couple years ago, but it was merged back into the Xenoblade Chronicles 2 page as it did not have enough notability in relation to the real world. Now I would like to revive the project.

It was brought to my attention by Sergecross73 that you have gathered some sources. Would you be willing to share your findings? --MomoQca (talk) 20:27, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 November 14 § Category:Pokémon species by game on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Web-julio (talk) 19:17, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:45, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Completely understandable. Finishing the source review would be greatly appreciated, if it would be possible at this time. I've been finding myself to be pretty busy lately anyway, so it's probably for the best to wait until after finals for a second try. If you have any suggestions for how to make the article more readable to a general audience, that would also be much appreciated. ★ The Green Star Collector ★ (talk) 00:29, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, I'll do my best to get it up to snuff. - 64.235.79.240 (talk) 00:52, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]