User talk:CyrockingSmiler

Note the following points-

• Be civil.
• I'm at med school at the moment and it's my first year so things are chaotic right now. I'll not be able to respond asap.
• I won't have access to a laptop/ computer/ iPad/ tablet for a whole year as these items are not allowed in the dorm of my college for first year students. I won't be able to prolifically edit pages during this period as it's difficult creating new articles or significantly improving a page using a mobile device, in this case my phone.

Thank you for your hard work on Miley Cyrus videography, it is certainly an important (and now well-developed) piece of content for WikiProject Miley Cyrus! I noticed that you recently nominated the page for GA; filmography pages are generally classified as lists, so I would actually suggest withdrawing the GA nomination and renominating it as an FL. Again, thank you for contributions and good luck with the nomination! WikiRedactor (talk) 18:36, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much! I really appreciate your positive feedback. I'm nominating the videography for FL right now. Again, thank you so much for your help! CyrockingSmiler (talk) 18:51, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It's the same principal for removing non-notable awards. If the charity doesn't have it's own Wikipedia article, then it will be removed. Wikipedia isn't an endless list of all the charities she's helped once. LADY LOTUS • TALK 16:43, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I listened to you immediately and deleted all charities which do not have Wikipedia pages. But I have kept the charities which do not fall under the criteria listed by WP:INDISCRIMINATE and have their own Wikipedia and are thus notable.CyrockingSmiler (talk) 16:48, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Beauty Book for Brain Cancer, SNOG, HEADRUSH, Starkey Hearing Foundation, Foundation’s Listen Carefully, Get Ur Good On, American Giving Awards, The Onyx, Celebrity Fight Night, VH1 Save the Music Foundation, TOMS' One Day Without Shoes Challenge, Ryan Seacrest Foundation and Breezy Foundation all do not have their own articles but you've added them back. Look, I think you have nothing but the best of intention on adding things, and you are good about listening when I revert you but now this is edit warring when you've reverted 3 editors saying to not revert it. LADY LOTUS • TALK 17:06, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

But they are notable because if you Google these charities, there are hundreds of results, so why can't they be included in the article? All of the charities you mentioned have a very significant amount of coverage in the media though they don't have a Wikipedia page yet. Do you want me to take make a separate page for each of them on Wikipedia? Please let them remain in the article because I have worked really hard on that section and they do have significant presence online. CyrockingSmiler (talk) 17:11, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Because if they don't have their own article then they are by Wiki definition not notable. It doesn't matter if you can reference it or not, if it's not notable, it doesn't stay. You've done a good job, not saying you haven't, but not every single charity she has ever participated in needs to be present, just like not every award she has ever been nominated in needs to be present. LADY LOTUS • TALK 17:14, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Can we at least re-consider some of it? I'm adding a new section on the talk page of the Cyrus article, so you all can decide what can be added. CyrockingSmiler (talk) 20:26, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I've seen your great work lately. You are fantastic. Hey! I was wondering if you would help expand Hands in the Air, pls. Thanks in advance..--219.90.98.14 (talk) 12:54, 5 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much! I have a plan to expand every single Miley song in the future. I'll expand Hands in the Air and make a page for the rest of the songs from Bangerz which don't have a page yet as well. :) CyrockingSmiler (talk) 12:57, 5 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, so fucking much...--219.90.98.14 (talk) 13:07, 5 August 2014 (UTC}

@CyrockingSmiler: I think you should go ahead and nominate it for GA.

I have already nominated it for GA. Hoping a reviewer will quickly review it. CyrockingSmiler (talk) 12:55, 10 August 2014 (UTC) Great. I just added credits and personnel.. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 219.90.101.140 (talk) 12:58, 10 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article I Hope You Find It you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Bonnietylersave -- Bonnietylersave (talk) 13:42, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much! CyrockingSmiler (talk) 18:25, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The article I Hope You Find It you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:I Hope You Find It for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Bonnietylersave -- Bonnietylersave (talk) 14:02, 8 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please explain how does the sentence However, The Last Song was commercially successful, grossing more than $88 million at the worldwide box office. belong to the Critical reception field of a Cher version of the song? It isn't about the movie and you clearly edited the full article to make it sound like a competition between Miley and Cher. I mean, how does a poll on a random site (Maximum Pop), which is a total mess by the way, make for a serious critical reception of miley's version?

Anyway, you must be 12 and I have no intention to go back and forth with making changes you will only revert, so at least you could re-edit some of the content and make the article a bit less obsessive and child-like? thank you. Uncleangelo (talk) 00:35, 08 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Uncleangelo:Now that you mention it, it does sound like this sentence should be moved to a different section of the article. I edited the whole article to make sure it was expanded enough to qualify for GA status. (Which it did, in case you haven't noticed) If the poll you mentioned was on a random site, the GA reviewer would have pointed it out and it would have to be removed. But it wasn't, so it is notable enough. Personally attacking me will not change the established facts. If you present your argument to me in such a petulant manner, you are the one who seems "child-like" and "obsessive". The article passed GA review (in its very first nomination, not to mention). Had it been childish, it would have been failed. I'm going to re-edit the article, however, because if you think it is biased; it must be evaluated again. Thank you for sharing your opinion with me in such a logical, mature and conducive way. Sincerely, CyrockingSmiler (talk) 11:00, 9 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

There you go, I deleted the offending sentence altogether, and provided more reviews in Cher's section. I am such an immature, childish and obsessive twelve-year old. *Sigh* CyrockingSmiler (talk) 11:28, 9 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I will help you to correct some of the mistakes I spotted in the article, but I will not take it for review for the second time as I don't know if that is allowed. However, I will help you with everything the reviewer asks from you. I Am... ***D.D. 14:11, 10 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, thank you for your help! CyrockingSmiler (talk) 14:13, 10 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Just a comment: if a reviewer fails a GAN, he or she most definitely is allowed to review the next GAN after it has been renominated unless that reviewer made lots of significant edits after failing. Snuggums (talk / edits) 10:55, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, I have to work on "Haunted" (an article in my sandbox) and I don't have much free time, so I think that you should just wait a bit until someone else takes the review. If no one takes it until next week, I will review it. I Am... ***D.D. 18:57, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

In the GA review, I actually did state that there were prose concerns and malformatted references which needed addressing. Since you haven't addressed any issues I pointed out, I suggest you withdraw the nomination for now and work on the points I brought up before renominating. Snuggums (talk / edits) 10:52, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@SNUGGUMS:I can't find your review on the talk page of the article. So where is it? CyrockingSmiler (talk) 10:59, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

CyrockingSmiler, here is the review. Talk:FU (song)/GA1. —Indian:BIO · ^{[ ChitChat ]} 11:09, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding this edit, it doesn't belong because it is not about the song itself. I understand your rationale, but frankly it doesn't belong in ANY of the song articles for Bangerz, GA or not. The album article itself, maybe, but definitely not any of the songs. Just thought I should explain. I've seen many instances where songs contain info that only pertains to their albums, and it doesn't help articles to be unnecessarily bloated. Snuggums (talk / edits) 19:07, 18 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I think you should go ahead and put it up for GA. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 219.90.107.198 (talk) 12:48, 13 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

When the tour finishes, the article will be expanded, nominated for GA, then nominated for FA. CyrockingSmiler (talk) 08:50, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I adressed all of the issues on the GA page. I Am... ***D.D. 21:22, 17 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Heading over to the article right now. CyrockingSmiler (talk) 09:57, 18 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of I Hope You Find It at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Hawkeye7 (talk) 23:51, 30 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:OnMyOwnSampleMiley.ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:48, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Hands in the Air you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of SNUGGUMS -- SNUGGUMS (talk) 00:02, 7 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The article Hands in the Air you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Hands in the Air for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of SNUGGUMS -- SNUGGUMS (talk) 00:22, 7 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:HandsInTheAirSampleMiley.ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 13:37, 20 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:LMPMileySample.ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 13:50, 20 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I Hope You Find It, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for an individual good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. BlueMoonset (talk) 23:51, 20 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:DoMyThangSampleMiley.ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 19:28, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Why'd You Only Call Me When You're High? you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Zanimum -- Zanimum (talk) 23:02, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The review is ready! -- Zanimum (talk) 22:46, 29 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The article Why'd You Only Call Me When You're High? you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Why'd You Only Call Me When You're High? for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Zanimum -- Zanimum (talk) 23:01, 29 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:IHopeYouFindItSampleMiley.ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 18:00, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:RFMBSampleMiley.ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 18:48, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The article Why'd You Only Call Me When You're High? you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Why'd You Only Call Me When You're High? for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Zanimum -- Zanimum (talk) 22:23, 6 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article FU (song) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Esprit15d -- Esprit15d (talk) 16:42, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The article FU (song) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:FU (song) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Esprit15d -- Esprit15d (talk) 14:02, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The article FU (song) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:FU (song) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Esprit15d -- Esprit15d (talk) 16:22, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:MYRSampleMiley.ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 00:04, 2 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Sample of "Drive" by Miley Cyrus.ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:41, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:05, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, CyrockingSmiler. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:HighAMSample.ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:18, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]