User talk:D6194c-1cc

THANK YOU FOR YOUR CYTOKINE INFO! It answered my question Verdana♥Bold 15:39, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have move Human kidney back to Kidney. If you still wish to move it, you must start a discussion on the talk page and get consensus. PRAXIDICAE💕 20:11, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• I've already started discussion. If you reverted the page I would like to see reasons for that actions. --D6194c-1cc (talk) 20:15, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Because teh consensus is currently established for Kidneys since it's the primary topic - it's a long standing article with a long standing title and your WP:BOLD move was undone, the onus is on you to demonstrate why the article should be changed and gain consensus. PRAXIDICAE💕 20:19, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Well yes, it describes the human kidney. Did you ever saw bean-shaped pronephros in primitive fish? The most simple kidney consists of a single paired nephron. This article at the moment is a huge mess that been translated to other languages as article about kidney at all, but it is about human kidney. --D6194c-1cc (talk) 20:26, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Make your case on the talk page and get consensus, if one exists and then request it at WP:RM. PRAXIDICAE💕 20:30, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What should I do if nobody would answer for a long time? Does this mean consensus? Sometimes Wikipedia looks like a desert on the talk page. --D6194c-1cc (talk) 20:35, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There's no time limit on Wikipedia, it's a popular article and will eventually get discussion. You have to wait. PRAXIDICAE💕 20:39, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello D6194c-1cc,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username MPGuy2824, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I have tagged an article that you started, Kidney (vertebrates), for deletion, because there's already a page about that topic at Kidney. Please don't be discouraged; we appreciate your effort in creating new articles. To avoid this in the future, consider using the search function to find pages that already cover what you want to write about.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 05:27, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• MPGuy2824, the Kidney article is about the human kidneys with just a little information about other animals in appropriate section. You made wrong deletion attempt. Animal anatomy must be separated from human. --D6194c-1cc (talk) 16:55, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• This speedy deletion was rightly nixed by an admin, since so much time had passed since the article's creation. Anyway, as you know, i've started a merge discussion about the two articles. Hopefully it leads to a good discussion and a resolution about what to do about these pages, and what names they should finally go under. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 02:54, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

	The Writer's Barnstar
	For your work on Kidney (vertebrates). Great job and really well written! Tom (LT) (talk) 10:54, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Thanks! --D6194c-1cc (talk) 19:15, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:31, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nice work! I'd love to nominate it for DYK. What do you think? BorgQueen (talk) 21:00, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Do you mean Wikipedia:Did you know? Yes, of course, I don't mind. D6194c-1cc (talk) 21:07, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Great! Could you suggest some interesting hook which laypeople can understand? How about... Did you know that only the kidneys of mammals and birds can produce concentrated urine? BorgQueen (talk) 21:18, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Btw I fixed the reference formatting problem, which was the extra comma after Withers, Cooper, Maloney. BorgQueen (talk) 22:30, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You could also mention that this ability developed independently by the course of evolution. D6194c-1cc (talk) 05:12, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That's still too technical. Let me put it this way: It has to be something that can be understood by an audience of ten-year-old children. BorgQueen (talk) 17:52, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Almost all the facts about the mammalian kidney can be understood only by at least 13-14 years old children. Even if my daughter in her 6 years knew that we evolved from monkeys and birds evolved from dinosaurs, she didn't understand what evolution is and how it works. Urine concentration is much more complex mechanism to understand than evolution, as I think. D6194c-1cc (talk) 18:21, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reptiles, mammals and birds develop 3 different kidneys next to each other before birth, just like during their evolution.
D6194c-1cc (talk) 05:34, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CO₂ is not just a waste product and used to regulate acid-base ballance (pH) of the blood in terrestrial vertebrates. D6194c-1cc (talk) 05:39, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Only mammals have bean-shaped kidneys, and even in mammals, their form may differ (one of the kidneys of the horse is heart-shaped). D6194c-1cc (talk) 05:42, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The lungs allowed terrestrial animals to live near water, but kidneys allowed them to live far away from water. D6194c-1cc (talk) 05:50, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

---

Those facts aren't all related to mammalian kidneys, but are interesting, too. D6194c-1cc (talk) 07:39, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

---

Kidneys of mammals will have final number of nephrons to the moment of birth or soon after the birth, and won't generate new nephrons within the whole life. D6194c-1cc (talk) 08:42, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

On 4 April 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Mammalian kidney, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that, amongst the kidneys of the vertebrates, only those of mammals and birds can produce concentrated urine? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Mammalian kidney. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Mammalian kidney), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Aoidh (talk) 00:24, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'd like to nominate it for GA. What do you think? BorgQueen (talk) 13:49, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Recently I found a new (2023) article about mammalian kidney evolution ([1]). So I'll need at least a week or two to explore available literature and write a section about mammalian kidney evolution. D6194c-1cc (talk) 15:49, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, no hurries. BorgQueen (talk) 15:54, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Well, it took a month. There are some unresolved small issues in the article. It misses an illustration of the mammalian nephron. I didn't found suitable illustration under open license, so I'll probably draw it myself someday by a few of good sources that are present in the article. I didn't find information on regenerative possibilities of glomerulus. There is not so much information about diseases of mammalian kidneys in the internet, so the article misses a section about mammalian kidney diseases. Probably, diseases should be described in a separate article about human diseases first to make some kind of plan of what diseases in mammals to search for. But I don't think that those issues are blockers for article nomination. D6194c-1cc (talk) 08:41, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nice work. Now all you need to do is to paste {{subst:GAN|subtopic=Biology and medicine}} to the top of the article talk page. (Do not place it inside another template.) Afterward a bot will list the article to the Good Article nominations page.

I just found it out that I can't nominate it since I'm not a significant contributor. BorgQueen (talk) 20:27, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your guidance! I'll study the instructions and nominate the page. Can you give an example of review of similar article (internal organs or something like this) that was nominated to good? D6194c-1cc (talk) 18:46, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You'll find some listed in the Biology and medicine section. BorgQueen (talk) 19:11, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article Mammalian kidney you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Mammalian kidney and Talk:Mammalian kidney/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Maxim Masiutin -- Maxim Masiutin (talk) 11:24, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, D6194c-1cc! Would you please consider reviewing one or two articles nominated for GA in Biology and medicine by other editors? I submitted several articles for review, and if you help to reduce the backlog of pending nominations, other reviewers will catch my submissions sooner. Thank you in advance! Maxim Masiutin (talk) 16:57, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Mammalian kidney you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Maxim Masiutin -- Maxim Masiutin (talk) 17:21, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article Mammalian kidney you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Mammalian kidney for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Maxim Masiutin -- Maxim Masiutin (talk) 18:21, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:47, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Mammalian kidney you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of BeingObjective -- BeingObjective (talk) 18:01, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article Mammalian kidney you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Mammalian kidney for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of BeingObjective -- BeingObjective (talk) 18:23, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Mammalian kidney you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Ajpolino -- Ajpolino (talk) 13:43, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm glad to see you're back. Let me know if any of the comments are unclear. I'm sorry there's a large number of them, but hopefully each can be resolved quickly. I'm planning to finish a first read through for criterion #1 this morning, then I'll move on to looking at the sources for criterion #2 as soon as I can -- hopefully also today. I hope you're well, and that you feel refreshed from your wikibreak. Best, Ajpolino (talk) 14:22, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your comments! I'll check all the issues you've found and try to resolve them. I'll need some time for that. Although some comments need to be discussed but first things first. D6194c-1cc (talk) 15:25, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Mammalian kidney you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Mammalian kidney for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Ajpolino -- Ajpolino (talk) 04:02, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]