User talk:DPdH

Welcome to my talk page. Please adhere to the talk page guidelines and particularly the following: Please post your new topic at the bottom of this page. Please sign and date your entry by inserting "~~~~" at the end. Please specify a descriptive "Subject/headline" for a new topic and separate subtopics by ===heading=== lines, if needed. Please indent your posts with one more ":" than what you are replying to, i.e. begin with ":" if replying to an existing topic and "::" if replying to a reply. I will generally respond here to comments that are posted here, rather than replying via your Talk page (or the article Talk page, if you are writing to me here about an article), so you may want to watch this page until you are responded to, or specifically let me know where you'd prefer the reply. ⇒ Start a new Talk topic.

This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries.

Welcome.

Hello, DPdH, and welcome to Wikipedia. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful in developing your contributions:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian. Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Adrian M. H. 13:50, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Nahuel Tank.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 13:07, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading Image:Image-Nahuel Tank.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 14:06, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for contributing your first article. Please ensure that you expand and wikify the article promptly to avoid the possibility of it being nominated for a deletion review. You will also need to cite all statements. If you need further advice or assistance, please contact either me or a user with specialist knowledge in this subject via our talk pages, or ask at the Help Desk. Regards, Adrian M. H. 13:50, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:IAe30.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 18:09, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading Image:IAeDl22.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:47, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:IAe27-3v.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:29, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Good job! --Jor70 14:12, 24 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:MS-760.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:33, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter Issue XXII (December 2007)
Project news The Intelligence task force has been created. The contest department has completed its ninth month of competition. The top scorer this month is Blnguyen, with 22 points, followed by Dreamafter, with 8 points, and Redmarkviolinist, with 6 points. Blnguyen also remains the overall leader, with 162 points in total. All project members are encouraged to submit the articles they're working on as entries. Help with converting deprecated infoboxes is needed; any assistance is welcome! {{WPMILHIST}} now supports an explicit tag (class=DAB) for marking disambiguation pages.	Articles of note New featured articles: Battle of Albuera Battle of Dyrrhachium (1081) Battle of the Gebora Constantine II of Scotland Francis Harvey Vasa (ship) Wulfhere of Mercia New A-Class articles: 1962 South Vietnamese Presidential Palace bombing Evacuation of East Prussia
Current proposals and discussions A discussion about minimizing terminological ambiguity has begun.
Awards and honors Blnguyen has been awarded the WikiChevrons with Oak Leaves in recognition of his efforts in improving the quality of articles related to Vietnamese military history, including the creation of numerous A-Class articles. Woodym555 has been awarded the WikiChevrons with Oak Leaves in recognition of his outstanding work on topics related to the Victoria Cross, notably including the creation of featured articles, featured lists, and a featured topic. For their outstanding efforts as part of Tag & Assess 2007, Bedford, TomStar81, and Parsival74 have been awarded the gold, silver, and bronze Wikis, respectively.
Tag & Assess 2007 Tag & Assess 2007 is now officially over, with slightly under 68,000 articles processed. The top twenty scores are as follows: 1. Bedford — 7,600 2. TomStar81 — 5,500 3. Parsival74 — 5,200 4. FayssalF — 3,500 5. Roger Davies — 3,000 6. Ouro — 2600 7. Kateshortforbob — 2250 8. Cromdog — 2,200 9. BrokenSphere — 2000 9. Jacksinterweb — 2,000 9. Maralia — 2,000 12. MBK004 — 1,340 13. JKBrooks85 — 1,250 14. Sniperz11 — 1100 15. Burzmali — 1000 15. Cplakidas — 1000 15. Gimme danger — 1000 15. Raoulduke471000 15. TicketMan — 1000 15. Welsh — 1000 15. Blnguyen — 1000 Although the drive is officially closed, existing participants can continue tagging until January 31 if they wish, with the extra tags counting towards their tally for barnstar purposes. We'd like to see what lessons can be learned from this drive, so we've set up a feedback workshop. Comments and feedback from participants and non-participants alike are very welcome and appreciated.
To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here.

Note: This newsletter was automatically delivered. Regards from the automated, Anibot (talk) 23:13, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process is starting. We are aiming to elect nine coordinators to serve for the next six months; if you are interested in running, please sign up here by February 14! TomStar81 (Talk) 02:50, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The January 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 23:34, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Just to be sure... you are aware that that section of the talk page has been inactive since July of 2007, and the merge long ago was closed as a no merge, right? If not, please check the timestamps on comments before responding. if a section's been dead for months on end, and the merge tag template is no longer on the article, odds are, it's over. ThuranX (talk) 05:29, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The February 2008 Military history WikiProject coordinator election has begun. We will be selecting nine coordinators to serve for the next six months from a pool of fifteen candidates. Please vote here by February 28! --Eurocopter tigre (talk) 12:18, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Just for your information - You recently changed the aircraft-project to no in Talk:DINFIA IA 35, with the explanation that it was a production aircraft not a project. I have reverted your change as the tag means it is a wikipedia aircraft project nothing to do with the status of the aircraft. MilborneOne (talk) 12:55, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The February 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 04:24, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The March 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 01:03, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The April 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:38, 3 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The May 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:26, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The June 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 18:27, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The July 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 01:02, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey,

I'm currently working on the TAM (tank) article, with the ultimate goal of taking it through featured article candidacy (as I do with all of my tank-related articles), but unfortunately the only really good source I own is Javier de Mazarrasa's La Familia Acorazada TAM, which is from Spain. Although another three books are used as sources where they can be used, the majority of the information provided is from the stated book. I was wondering if you knew of any other book published in Argentina which covered the TAM in detail, and where I can buy it. Although I believe that this article will pass the A-class review, I don't know if it will make it through the FAC with only one major source. I plan to masquerade this by adding a new section when I pick up one of my books from my cousin's car's trunk (de Mazarrasa's book Carro de Combate AMX-30E - also has details on Venezuela's AMX-30s) covering how the TAM compares to other tanks in service on the continent (mainly, Venezuela's AMX-30s, Brazil's Leopard 1A1s (I'm not sure when Brazil is supposed to get the "new" 1A5s) and Chile's recently acquired Leopard 2A4s). That way there will be an entire section with sources other than those already used, and it will look as if the article is far more versatile in regards to references. However, I'd still like to know if there are other good and detailed sourced on the TAM which I could buy. I'm avoiding websites because two of the ones I have visited (globalsecurity and FAS) are not reliable (some of their information is incorrect, at that) and any other websites are really not verifiable or reliable. In the article Nahuel (tank), of which you've written most of what is currently there, I see the book Blindados Argentinos, de Uruguay y Paraguay, Ayer y Hoy - does that contain any information on the TAM? If it does, I'd like to look for it and see if I could buy it on the internet.

In any case, thank you for your time. JonCatalán (talk) 04:51, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your reply! I bought my copy of Mazarrasa's book while I was living in Spain, but you can probably find it on the internet (he is one of the most sold authors on this type of topic from Spain). In regards to how the TAM compares to other tanks, I would agree that when comparing armor and firepower the TAM is not in the same league as the Leopard 2, but I doubt the Leopard 2 would have the degree of mobility that the TAM has in the Pampas, or even in the Amazon jungle (referring more to Brazil - I would bet money that this is one of the reasons why they still hesitate about replacing their Leopard 1s with Leopard 2s). I mean, even Chile's Leopard 2s are deployed along the Peruvian border, as I doubt they would be as effective as the TAM in the mountains. I agree that the TAM could probably be upgraded, but I don't think the lack of money should define its role, which was my main argument - its role in the Argentine Army, in my opinion, remains the same as any other main battle tank. Although, I do consider the TAM a superior tank to the AMX-30 and Leopard 1 (it actually has greater armor protection!). And, I will continue looking for Fogliani's book. Thanks, again! JonCatalán (talk) 05:19, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I left some comments on the TAM page. JonCatalán (talk) 23:45, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, you can purchase de Mazarrasa's book here. Also, here. Do you have the names to those magazines? Perhaps I could find them by emailing the editors? Thanks! JonCatalán (talk) 03:34, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

We're treating it like vandalism. One of his accounts has been blocked, and once I can get a hold of an admin on IRC I will get his IP blocked, as well. JonCatalán (talk) 21:29, 30 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process is starting. We are aiming to elect nine coordinators to serve for the next six months; if you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 (UTC) on September 14!
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:58, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the message. The external link looks, at least for my ignorant eye on the subject, pretty good. But then again, I don't have a clue on the subject. Good wiking, Mariano(t/c) 07:22, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The August 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:54, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The September 2008 Military history WikiProject coordinator election has begun. We will be selecting nine coordinators to serve for the next six months from a pool of fourteen candidates. Please vote here by September 30!
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:47, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The September 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:22, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, would greatly appreciate if anyone can give me advice on how do I "bookmark" an article that I'd like to read later (as is usually done in "paper" books, including encyclopedias).
I've already placed a question in the Help Desk, maybe it's better to answer there.
Thanks & regards, DPdH (talk) 07:46, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I don't know about "bookmarking", but you may click on the "watch" tab and it will place the article on your watchlist. When you're ready to view the list of articles of your interest, simply click on the "my watchlist" tab, and the articles you "watch" will be sorted by the latest timestamp in which the article was last edited. I hope that answers your question. Have a great day. - Jameson L. Tai ^{talk ♦ guestbook ♦ contribs} 07:48, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the fast response. I ommitted here (but did mention in the Help Desk) to say that I'm already doing so, but there are heaps of articles that I'm not interested in tracking changes; but just mark them for later reference. Have a g'day too! DPdH (talk) 07:53, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

{{helpme}}

Your best bet is to create a subpage (say, User:DPdH/Bookmarks) and just populate it with a list of the articles you want to keep an eye on. Also, for future reference, please place the {{helpme}} tag with your question--makes it a bit easier for us! :) [roux » x] 08:07, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OK, good workaround, thanks. It'd be very nice if bookmark were a functionality already included in "Wikipedia". Maybe for a future release? Regards, DPdH (talk) 08:20, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, in that case, why not bookmark it with your browser instead? Depending on the browser you are using, bookmarking or marking a page in your favorites is relatively easy. - Jameson L. Tai ^{talk ♦ guestbook ♦ contribs} 08:10, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The October 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 23:46, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I just wanted to drop you a note to express my appreciation for your efforts to contributing to improving the Fighter aircraft article and its offshoots. Please see my response to your question there and explained where we are in a long-term attempt to improve this set of articles. If you're interested in the subject, we can certainly use a few more hands! Cheers, Askari Mark (Talk) 03:40, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Right now, the main focus is the Fighter aircraft article, which is considered a “core article” for Wikipedia (one of those that any decent encyclopedia should have). Once we get that fixed up, we can export the improvements to the “1st Gen” and “4th Gen” articles. The main thing we need right now is to add sources for much of the extant text. Since so little has been cited yet and much of the material is pretty basic, there’s a lot of “low-hanging fruit” out there (from both online and print sources). If you haven’t worked that side of Wikipedia, it’ll be a good learning experience – not just about sourcing, but you may also find material worth adding. The article currently reflects the personal historical and technical knowledge of a handful of us that needs to be retroactively sourced; this approach has been driven by the short timeline given to clean up the article for WP 0.7. (I was actually working on overhauling the F-16 Fighting Falcon article, which I am still not finished with.) If we had held to finding sources as we went, there’s no way we could have shaped it up in time. What exists is pretty much a “go” for WP 0.7. Now, it’s more a matter of going back and doing it right with sourcing. That will help advance the article to where it can make GA or even FA class and thus qualify for WP 1.0. Does this sound like something up your alley? Best regards, Askari Mark (Talk) 04:44, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, most of my library is packed up and in storage, too. Something about having a family means having them expand to fill all space available – and only your space is negotiable! ;-) Askari Mark (Talk) 16:03, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The November 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 16:17, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The December 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 02:42, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The January 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 03:38, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to the WikiProject Firearms. I hope you enjoy being a member.--LWF (talk) 03:05, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The February 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:03, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process has started; to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 (UTC) on 13 March!
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 18:39, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have reverted your edit to the disambiguation page James Craig.

Per WP:MOSDAB, disambiguation pages should include only one navigable link per line. When you edit a disambiguation page, this guidance is also prominently displayed in a box at the to of the edit page. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 04:48, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject coordinator election has started. We will be selecting coordinators from a pool of eighteen to serve for the next six months. Please vote here by 23:59 (UTC) on Saturday, 28 March! Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:41, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The March 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 02:24, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The reason I removed the empty sections was because (to me) it looked messy, and I prefer not adding section headings until I have a line or two of content. That said, if you re-added the sections, I would have no objections, -- saberwyn 22:29, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you know of first hand accounts of the reason the ARA Guerrico exposed herself I would be most interested to read them. Contrary to what you may infer from the spats I've had with Jor70 I am interested in telling both sides of the story and I have worked jointly with Darius on a number of Falklands articles that do tell both sides of the story. Regards, Justin talk 10:45, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The April 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:54, 5 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Reply from BillCJ, related to my inquiry about "Users" in aircraft infobox. DPdH (talk) 08:00, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

On May 13, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article ARA Rivadavia, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Orlady (talk) 08:38, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DPdH, I could use some assistance on the Helibras article. (I know Spanish and Portuguese are related, and somewhat mutually intelligiable, so you might do better looking at this than I would, whterh or not you know Portuguese.) The current "products" list in our article makes it appear that Helibras manufactures 19 different types of helicopters, while the company's wabsite lists 11 models. What I'm unclear about is the extent in which Helibras actually contributes to these models in production. I believe Helibras assembles some Eurocopter modesl, and may be a subcontractor on others, but I am unable to distinguish between the two without a greater understanding of the language. Thanks for whatever you can do. - BillCJ (talk) 20:46, 16 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The May 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:36, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The June 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:57, 13 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The July 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 19:22, 9 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

As a member of the Aviation WikiProject or one of its subprojects, you may be interested in testing your skills in the Aviation Contest! I created this contest, not to pit editor against editor, but to promote article improvement and project participation and camraderie. Hopefully you will agree with its usefulness. Sign up here, read up on the rules here, and discuss the contest here. The first round of the contest may not start until September 1st-unless a large number of editors signup and are ready to compete immediately! Since this contest is just beginning, please give feedback here, or let me know what you think on my talkpage. - Trevor MacInnis ^contribs 00:12, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process has started; to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 (UTC) on 12 September!
Many thanks,  Roger Davies ^talk 04:24, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The August 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 19:39, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

[1] there from all time, including 1982s, perhaps we can use some. --Jor70 (talk) 20:05, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Voting in the Military history WikiProject coordinator election has now started. The aim is to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months from a pool of sixteen candidates. Please vote here by 23:59 (UTC) on 26 September!
For the coordinators,  Roger Davies ^talk 22:09, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

I have one question on the dust storm in Australia: How bad have it hit Melbourne?--Gilisa (talk) 20:59, 24 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The September 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 23:40, 2 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The criteria used for topic, class and importance can be found at Wikipedia:WikiProject Argentina/Assessment. Thanks for the offer of help, but if you don't mind I would like to empty Category:Unassessed Argentine articles and Category:Unknown-importance Argentine articles all by myself. I have moved to this project recently and my idea is to fill my watchlist with argentine articles, to be able to track changes and revert vandalism on the periods I'm not editing. I know I can do that more easily by other means, like copying and pasting categories contents in it, but I thought it would be better to add them in a manner that helps along the way with maintenance. MBelgrano (talk) 14:40, 5 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

As a member of the Military history WikiProject or World War I task force, you may be interested in competing in the Henry Allingham International Contest! The contest aims to improve article quality and member participation within the World War I task force. It will also be a step in preparing for Operation Great War Centennial, the project's commemorative effort for the World War I centenary.

If you would like to participate, please sign up by 11 November 2009, 00:00, when the first round is scheduled to begin! You can sign up here, read up on the rules here, and discuss the contest here!
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 18:37, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The October 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 18:37, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The November 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 08:47, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The December 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 03:02, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Que tal che!, feliz año !. FYI I stubbed ELMA article. --Jor70 (talk) 16:34, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Another member and I worked and worked to try and find a suitable photo. Thanks for the help. It makes the article look a lot, lot better.--Jackehammond (talk) 05:34, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The January 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 03:24, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I created the Argentine Naval Aviation article and now I really need your help to fill the List of Argentine Naval Aviation aircraft --Jor70 (talk) 11:33, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]