User talk:DareshMohan

Archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5

This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present.

This is one of many reasons why I'm starting to hate life. Humans hurting others for fun with nothing to gain, what did IA do to deserve this? I just hope all archives aren't lost forever. Kailash29792 (talk) 09:35, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

sadly, yes couldn't able to access the site yesterday. Srivin (talk) 09:43, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

https://www.theverge.com/2024/10/11/24268040/internet-archive-data-breach-outage-hacked check out this Srivin (talk) 07:53, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Kailash29792: @Srivin: pesama WP:wikibreak edukava? (all my stuff revolves around web archives working). DareshMohan (talk) 01:25, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I was anyway semi active for the past few days. You could help expand Draft:Kokkoroko to prevent deletion. Kailash29792 (talk) 02:51, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ur stuff in web archives still working ? Srivin (talk) 06:45, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

hey bro now web archive is working well. click on the archived link from any page its working. Srivin (talk) 05:21, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Srivin, this one works. Still waiting for the full site to work as this says "(provisional, read-only) service". Kailash29792 (talk) 05:28, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, DareshMohan. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Kokkoroko, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:07, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, DareshMohan. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Antharangam, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:08, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@DareshMohan:, Please watch the Tamil version of David in Netflix and I have found the Hindi version of the film in dailymotion, if you do not have Netflix subscription then please watch the Tamil version of the film in the dailymotion (besides the Hindi version the dailymotion has the Tamil version of the film); after watching you shall be able to understand that the two films have major differences, not only Jiiva replaces Vinay Virmani, some other actors are also different, Vikram's voice and Nassar's voice in the Tamil version is real (definitely real, trust me), in the Hindi version Nassar's voice is not real, his voice was dubbed by other man.

David Tamil version (full) in dailymotion, David Hindi version part 1 in dailymotion, David Hindi version part 2 in dailymotion, David Hindi version part 3 in dailymotion, David Hindi version part 4 (last part) in dailymotion - watch these videos. And I have read the Talk:David (2013 Tamil film) earlier. Hamwal (talk) 02:22, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Hamwal: Dubbing for yourself doesn't mean they reshot. I know that all of Jiiva's segments and other actors that were in his segment were reshot. I just wanted to highlight the fact that they dubbed Vikram's version. Only other difference in cast is Sunder Ramu and a few unknown actors, rest are same. DareshMohan (talk) 05:10, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Hey man im josh was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Does not appear to meet WP:NALBUM at this point in time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Prema Qaidi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hey man im josh (talk) 15:36, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

C. Prem Kumar, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Thilsebatti (talk) 05:40, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Poornachandra Mysore, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 13:51, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Idoghor Melody was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Neenyare and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 07:46, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have moved the article to the mainspace as it meets WP:NFILM with at least two reliable reviews and multiple sourced awards. Because IABot and Internet Archive's archiving service are down, could you please add archives via archive.today and/or ghostarchive? Kailash29792 (talk) 08:51, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi DareshMohan, I've removed your copy-edit requests for Pooja Gandhi and Kannum Kannum Kollaiyadithaal from the GOCE Requests page here (diff). I've done this because we only allow two requests per editor at any one time, and you already have two c/e requests pending (one is currently on hold). Please don't add any more c/e requests until at least one of your existing two has been processed. We enforce this rule so all requests have a fair chance of being copy-edited within a reasonable time. If you'd like any of these two articles to be copy-edited before Yugi Sethu and S. Sathyendra, you can replace these in situ with the new requests. Thanks for your patience and understanding. Cheers, Baffle☿gab 02:54, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

My bad. I already removed the unsourced statements from the short articles Yugi Sethu and S. Sathyendra so they are in better state than the long articles Pooja Gandhi and Kannum Kannum Kolaiyadithaal. So if you dont mind can you replace my 1st 2 requests with my most recent requests. @Baffle gab1978: DareshMohan (talk) 03:19, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks your reply, and for removing the uncited material from those articles. Yes, I'll replace your two earlier requests with these latest two at their current positions, so you won't need to do anything else. Cheers, Baffle☿gab 20:35, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Baffle☿gab 20:44, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have merged both Tamil and Hindi articles back to one form. Hamwal very crudely attempted to separate the two, resulting in the Tamil article resembling an older, half baked version. Let the RM stay, that will be consensus whether the two films should have separate articles or not. If the consensus is to split, let me and you do the bifurcation, not Hamwal. Kailash29792 (talk) 09:43, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by RangersRus was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Murivu and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

RangersRus (talk) 16:51, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry. Please add multiple critical reviews from reliable sources and resubmit and let me know. This will be significant enough to pass notability. RangersRus (talk) 16:55, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm TornadoLGS. I noticed that you recently removed content from Ayesha Khan (Indian actress) without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. TornadoLGS (talk) 18:43, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok sure. There was some "gossip" sources that she appeared in a film although there was no confirmation of ehat her role was. 18:46, 9 November 2024 (UTC)