User talk:Demhem

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary, as you forgot on your recent edit to Grand Valley State University. Thank you. While looking at GVSU's article history, I noticed that you aren't using the Edit Summary box. This was confirmed after looking at your User Contributions. I highly suggest using it so other editors know what you did in your edit. Also, please try to combine your edits instead of having one edit per section in the article. It makes the history of the article very long and other edits have to go through your edit to see what you changed. Suttna08 (talk) 00:07, 26 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Demhem (talk) 18:39, 26 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You are welcome, good sir. Suttna08 (talk) 07:06, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

When you add a list of names to articles, like you did to Grand Valley State University, please provide reference to prove that these people actually attended the university. Who then was a gentleman? (talk) 04:15, 6 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I just wanted to say thanks for your contributions to the Grand Valley State University and Grand Valley State Lakers articles. I'm hoping to continue improving the articles and getting the GVSU article to A-class someday. Regards, PDCook (talk) 23:29, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings. I changed the color of the Template:Grand Valley State University to match the Grand Valley color (the blue that's in the official logo). I thought the black on primary blue was a little hard to read. If you don't like the change, we can change it back or discuss it. Thanks for making the template in the first place! PDCook (talk) 03:09, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again and thanks for your continued contribution to GVSU-related articles. I noticed you put the GVSU template on the Grand Rapids, Michigan article. Generally university templates are placed on articles that are a part of the university (such as the Lanthorn, presidents of the university, etc), not the city in which the university resides. For example, neither Ann Arbor, Madison, Boulder, or any other major college towns (that I can think of) have such a template on their articles. I went ahead and removed the GVSU template from the Grand Rapids article. If you have any questions or comments, (or if you think I am wrong here!) please send me a message. Happy editing! PDCook (talk) 04:36, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for clearing up the issue with the rankings. I was looking for the exact US News and World Report article that mentioned that GVSU is the number one up and coming masters college in the midwest, but couldn't find it. The GVSU source will suffice, but of course an independent source is always better. Thanks, PDCook (talk) 13:27, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

		The Original Barnstar
		For your many contributions to Grand Valley State University and related articles! P. D. Cook Talk to me! 16:51, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This article needs some independent sources. I think some folks might question its notabiliy if only the GVSU website is used as a reference. Regards, P. D. Cook ^{Talk to me!} 14:42, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You are correct I know, I'm going to add an independent one as soon as I can.Demhem (talk) 16:28, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings. I nominated the GVSU article for GA review, and Racepacket review it here. If you have time, it would be helpful if you could address a few of the issues mentioned there. If you fix them, please make a note of at on the review page. Regards, P. D. Cook ^{Talk to me!} 16:20, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Demhem: If you get to the point where you feel that you have addressed the concerns outlined in the GA review, please renominate the article and drop a note on my talk page. I will be happy to see that it gets a prompt review. Thanks, Racepacket (talk) 16:18, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article WCKS (college radio) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WCKS (college radio) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Edison (talk) 19:11, 2 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have replied to your post on the "WCKS" AfD. - Neutralhomer • Talk • 06:18, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

So sup now? emmy (talk) 15:27, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Demhem,

Back in December, you got either an AfD or PROD notification, which was part of the template testing project's experiments. If you could go here and leave us some feedback about what you think about the new versions of the templates we tested (there are links to the templates), that would be very useful. (You can also email me at mpinchukwikimedia.org if you want.) Thanks! Maryana (WMF) (talk) 18:48, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Grand Valley State Athletics Logo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:13, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your upload of File:Connection Commons.JPG or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 15:07, 22 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello someone here Nice to here. emmy (talk) 15:25, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:34, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Demhem. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Demhem. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Demhem. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Demhem. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Louie the Laker, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Louie the Laker until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]