User talk:DocteurCosmos

Welcome!

Hello, DocteurCosmos, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} after the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! STTW (talk) 15:37, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, thanks for the message. I've been editing Wikipedia whenever I see an issue for 3 years or so, why did I get this message just now? Was it automated?

In any case, thank you. With nothing to do at my new job I'll probably be editing a lot more :-) Battamer (talk) 00:38, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well thank you again then. It certainly is encouraging to get a message from a real person. Have a good day :-D.Battamer (talk) 12:49, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Hi "Docteur Cosmos", many thanks for the welcome and some helpful advise, good to know that somebody is out there to help and assist! Merci Beaucoup! Ulan76 (talk) 07:42, 13 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have restored the semi-protection on this page per your request. It appears that the edit protection was accidentally removed when another admin added move protection to the article. Let me know if I can help with anything else. caknuck _° is geared up for football season 03:36, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your welcome. This looks like it might be a lot of fun and a good learning experience. Thanks, too, for your offer of help. There certainly is a lot of information about Wikipedia to digest. --1948vintage (talk) 15:43, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A few ago weeks I got a welcome message from you and I only just figured out how to send people messages. Here's a barnstar.

		The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
		hello-Spongefrog (talk) 22:02, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Certainly. The famous A Thousand Plateaus (1988) discusses Chomsky in a lot of detail; linguistics is very prominent in that text. Grunge6910 (talk) 13:53, 6 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm pretty certain he's never responded. Judging from his very low opinion of French postmodernism, I'd wager that, yes, he thinks it's utter gibberish. I'm inclined to agree; when the postmodernists talk about science it usually has very little bearing on reality. Grunge6910 (talk) 15:39, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

To be an anarchist is also something of a cliché? But I agree that this debate has not much usefulness left. Also people like Paul Goodman or Kenneth Rexroth or Robert Duncan were both anarchists and also establishment. As is the whole of France--Radh (talk) 12:25, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm afraid my english isn't good enough to catch your humor... France isn't anarchist at all. DocteurCosmos (talk) 13:09, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

a shame, we germans always want the French to be born anarchists.--Radh (talk) 13:54, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well, you've got the anarch figure conceived by Jünger. DocteurCosmos (talk) 14:06, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Does that not say it all, even our anarchists are soldiers at heart (my father also was a soldier and very much an anarchist at home). I have an enormous respect for Jünger and his conduct in the Third Reich seems to have been blameless. And it is nearly impossible to today read Jünger as he first published his stuff, he censored/changed his writings massively according to his outlook, so one has to be careful there.--Radh (talk) 14:23, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It is writer's freedom. DocteurCosmos (talk) 15:21, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Greek are often anarchists. Mind if I add a random comment to this discussion?--Spongefrog (talk) 20:06, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I give it, let Chomsky be an anarchist, too.--Radh (talk) 09:50, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, my above comment was based on graffiti I saw somewhere, Lord Spongefrog, (I am the Czar of all Russias!) 20:33, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Me, again. I am at the moment involved in an ugly spat at german Wikipedia concerning "Ernst Jünger and his political guilt". I like to get your opinion on this topic. Are there any good sources, that give Adolf Hitler's (or other leading Nazi's) opinions on Ernst Jünger. Or, but perhaps too extensive, are there any well founded books or articles on Ernst Jünger's influence on the Nazi movement? I have Schüddekopf here, also (some minor stuff only) from Mohler and I have heard of Dupeux (will read him, but have not yet seen anything by him).--Radh (talk) 07:32, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Louis Dupeux is certainly one of the best sources on this topic but there are plenty of books about "Jünger and the nazis" as you guess. As an introduction you can read Jünger's entry in Who's Who in Nazi Germany on Google Books. Something important in this debate : Innere Emigration. Anyway, to speak of "guilt" isn't a good historiographical perspective. Jünger was indeed a right-wing nationalist but were all these political activists Hilter's supports ? Of course not. See Ernst Niekisch for example. Anyhow, Jünger left the political arena around 1933.

I could tell you more about this matter but my english isn't good enough... DocteurCosmos (talk) 08:16, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, It is exactly my opinion that there is a fundamental difference between the Nationalbolschewisten and even Nationalsozialisten like the Strassers and "mainstream" NSDAP. But this is one of the things (other than my big mouth and the brilliant idea to use 88 for provocation!) that got me into this mess at de Wikipedia. I will follow your leads and then simply will have to get the Dupeux. Bis bald.--Radh (talk) 08:35, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

On 7 June 2007 an editor created an article Robert A. Levine but within the article both the names Robert and Peter were used. The next month you moved the article to Peter A. Levine with the comment "moved Robert A. Levine to Peter A. Levine: Real name" and subsequently all instances of Robert were changed to Peter. A related redirect has been nominated over at RfD, and we'd appreciate your input if you recall whether this was a typo (wordo?) or if Robert is a name he is known by. -- ToE^T 01:55, 9 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You seem lonely, so I thought I'd say hi. So here it is: "Hi", Lord Spongefrog, (I am the Czar of all Russias!) 20:32, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It's kind, thanks. DocteurCosmos (talk) 06:41, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated User talk:Spongefrog, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/User talk:Spongefrog. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Lord Spongefrog, (I am the Czar of all Russias!) 20:32, 1 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

What the hell?! Sorry, I didn't mean that, it was a twinkle mistake thing. Sorry, Lord Spongefrog, (I am the Czar of all Russias!) 20:34, 1 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the note. Would you be kind enough to add the reference? Or send me the info and I'll add it. <ref>{{cite book | last = | first = | title = | publisher = | year = | url = }}</ref>''' Thanks! Magnolia677 (talk) 15:18, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:35, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, DocteurCosmos. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, DocteurCosmos. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, DocteurCosmos. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, DocteurCosmos. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Polymer failures has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 05:35, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]