User talk:Dynamax

Hola amigo,

Gracias por todo tu trabajo en los artículos peruanos. Se queda mucho para hacer, no es cierto? Una cosita: yo tengo mis dudas sobre la utilidad de poner en artículos inglés enlaces a sitios en español, pero a veces sí sirve. Pero en este caso hay que añadir (in Spanish), como acabo de hacer in el articulo sobre Alan.

Vienes de Lima o otre parte del Perú? A mi me encanta tu país, mas que todo la sierra.

Suerte, -- Viajero 12:09, 17 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Hello, just wanted to let you know that Peru is not divided into departments anymore. Today, the country is composed of 25 regions, so please update this information if you have used it in any article. Thanks! --Tuomas ^hello 02:28, Feb 18, 2005 (UTC)

Please add more information to the last two articles you created. Articles that have images only are at risk for speedy deletion. Academic Challenger 08:31, 21 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Greetings fellow wikipedian

• I am very glad to attend your question about National University of Saint Mark stadium.
• According to official numbers, the maximun capacity it is 67,469 for the number of seats and people there. Currently it is a project about a further expansion of the universitarian statium, however the rector or authorities were not made an accord on that.
• If the expansion is aproved a total of 104 000 people could be added.
• Due to security reasons usually the stadium operates as 43 000 max. capacity.

Feel free to ask, and my apologice about delay in response due to signing in to next academic year level in my faculty. HappyApple 03:50, 19 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Hola! Quería decirte que me gustan mucho las fotos que has puesto en Inca Empire. Creo que aportan mucho al artículo. Estoy trabajando ese artículo poco a poco cuando tenga tiempo libre porque creo que le falta todavía. Nos vemos acá en Wikipedia. Mona-Lynn 22:31, 20 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Mucho gusto! Qué buena idea, algo sobre las momias. Yo quiero escribir algo un poco mejor sobre religion, que en este momento no dice casi nada, y no estoy segura de que lo que dice sea totalmente correcto. No tiene que ser muy detallado, sino más bien que da una visión más completa de la situación. Una pregunta sobre la última foto: cuando estuve en Arequipa, a mi me dijeron que a las vicuñas nunca las han podido domesticar; o sea, no las llevaban en manada como a las llamas y alpacas. Por eso, hoy día, me dijeron, cuando quieren esquilarlas, las rodean en el alto salvaje en un círculo cada vez más chico hasta poder agarrarlas y esquilarlas, simplemente las cazan. Si eso es cierto, que no se domesticaron, tendríamos que cambiar la descripción de la foto. Qué sabes sobre eso?

Hello! Well, I didn't trawl the Web for info about vicuñas, but when I was in Peru I asked a lot of questions about them. I took a tour out of Arequipa to Colca Canyon and part of the tour included vicuña-spotting. The guide definitely said that this animal was not domesticable and that all attempts to domesticate it had failed. They look for them in the wild, encircle them, and "trap" them in order to shear them. In some cases poachers just go out and kill them, because the very fair hair (it's hair, not wool) is so very valuable. This is why they are endangered - because you can't raise them in a corral like you can alpacas and llamas, so they must live in the wild. My limited knowledge causes me to think they are quite different from alpacas and llamas and my hunch is that they are not a hybrid but rather a separate species. If the Incas succeeded in domesticating them, that's another question, although I'd be surprised if the people had forgotten how to raise them over time. I think the photo caption just needs a tiny change - the Incas exploited them rather than domesticated them, or something like that. Anyway your first site that you gave me clearly says that the vicuña and the guanaco only exist in the wild. Does this help? Mona-Lynn 10:41, 21 Mar 2005 (UTC)

YES, you can write me a message on my talk page in order to coordinate our efforts to expand the peruvian-related topics on Wikipedia. As long as we respect each other and always willing to achieve compromise, It is ok. Happy Editing !! Messhermit 20:45, 25 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Right now, I-m working to preserve the integrity of each Peruvian President, especially the ones that are still controvertial. Adding Pictures and preventing them from being vandalised, is my main objective.

By the way, In any page that you call me, please avoid that User:Viajero is there. Let's say that he has a totaly different vision of Peruvian Politics than me. Anyways, Keep in touch. Messhermit 20:45, 25 Mar 2005 (UTC)

May I ask why you marked Garcí Manuel del Carbajal for Speedy deletion? That looks like a wonderful article that you obviously spent much time on. SWAdair | Talk 11:49, 30 Mar 2005 (UTC)

• Nevermind. After I saw the next one on the list (an alternate spelling), I checked your list of contributions and found Manuel Garcia de Carbajal. Now I understand. SWAdair | Talk 11:54, 30 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Greetings! I've made the other spellings into redirects to the page where the article is now instead of deleting them, since it looks like they've all been merged together. This way if anyone searches on one of those spellings, they will be taken to the article they want. It also lets people look at the page history on the pages they came from. Nice work on the article, by the way! Mindspillage (spill yours?) 22:58, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)

You posted a request for peer review of a couple of your articles based on my previous work on war articles. Could you point me to these? I know nothing about wars nor any articles I worked on... Stellertony the Bookcrosser 05:28, Apr 2, 2005 (UTC)

• Nope - that was my welcome message to him/her. Albrecht's talk page is here: User_talk:Albrecht. Stellertony the Bookcrosser 05:56, Apr 7, 2005 (UTC)

Hello! I saw the recent change you did to Arequipa Cathedral. I was looking around the web and some call it "Cathedral San Francisco de Arequipa." While others simply call it cathedral. Do you think we should change the name in the article? I think it would be tter to call the catedral by its name instead of just "cathedral." Sonesta Posada del Inca, a hotel just next to the Main Square, calls it "Cathedral San Francisco de Arequipa," and I'm assuming that's the correct name, too. What do you think? --Dynamax 19:52, 30 Mar 2005 (UTC)

• I would call it "San Francisco de Arequipa Cathedral", and also use a redirect from Arequipa Cathedral.--AAAAA 15:27, 3 Apr 2005 (UTC)

You seem good at organizing things. Maybe you would you like to get this started: Wikipedia:WikiProject Peru. It could be useful to have a central location to discuss naming issues, list categories, etc. My experience with projects is limited only to this one: Wikipedia:WikiProject Opera, which might give you some idea of what is possible. You might also look at around at some of the other projects for more ideas. Just a suggestion. -- Viajero | Talk 21:30, 25 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry if it was motivation for discussing, but I don't know :en: rules as well as you do because I'm colaborating most frequently in :es:, where i'm administ (bibliotecario), but I've ever note such terrible mistakes as "SUPA inca" instead sapa inka and bealiving that Cápac is the surname of Mank Qhapaq. By the other side, I don't think chosing Encyclopedia.com and Encarta as main references shall be a good idea, because of Peru related articles in both sources are so small and so unclear. Another point: Erlier spaniard romanizations brought several mistakes such as hevaing three or mor spellings for a single man (ie: Topa Ualpa, Tupac Hualpa, Túpac Huallpa for Tupaq Wallpa).

Anyway, when I made those changes I've also written spanish alternative name. --Huhsunqu 05:09, 20 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

re: Inca Empire I believe that one should be careful about using this label in cases that are not clear cut - also, I have a vague recollection of the rolling toy thing (if not true, but sometimes believed, this backs my thesis that the vandalism label is inappropriate). BTW, from Toy: "The Inca had a rolling toy even though their adult culture did not employ the wheel." see[1], [2],[3]m( [4] for some non-inca (meso-american) examples. Best wishes, Leonard G. 02:04, 9 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I understand the preference for Spanish spellings for terms related to the Incas, since they're more common in English; but when it comes to actual sentences from Quechua it doesn't seem right. If we were (say) quoting a line of Spanish poetry about Peru, surely we wouldn't change "Perú" to "Peru" in the Spanish text just because the English word is Peru. For that matter, if the Spanish orthography is used, it should really be ama sua, not ama suwa!

For what it's worth, Google searches on "ama quella" and "ama qella" are about even, with a slight edge to the latter.

Still, even the Spanish spelling is better than what was there before, which was quite incorrect.Zompist 03:40, 20 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Precisely because of the Google search is why I did the change. You have a point in the translation part, and perhaps it should be like your saying so as to make it sound better in English. I'm not oppose to this, as long as it seems right to everyone. Thanks for your kind interest. --Dynamax 04:19, 20 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I've answered you question at Talk:Los Angeles, California. The short version is that it was a copyrighted image.

You may be interested in teh Southern California WikiProject. Take a look at the project's page and see if there is anything that interests you. If you have any comments or questions, please contact me. BlankVerse ∅ 16:45, 8 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Seeing as we are almost done with the Andrés Avelino Cáceres collaboration and March is coming up. I'd thought that I should inform you and the other members of WP:Peru that you can add your thoughts on what you think the next project collaboration should be on at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Peru#Collaboration.--Jersey Devil 21:17, 25 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I just thought that you should know that the July collarboration is up at the Wikipedia:WikiProject Peru. You can vote for which ever Peruvian-related article you think needs to be expanded. Voting ends at the beginning of July though.--Jersey Devil 23:16, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I am but a spotty contributor to Wikipedia and it normally is restricted to simple copyediting and the like. I really only write things of substance when I have insomnia! I saw the link you placed on the Inca Empire page and it's perfect to draw people to the Mummy Juanita page. You are doing a great job with the Andean articles. Thanks for the follow up! Oh - and maybe we need to create a page for Ampato or (probably better) link it to Colca Canyon or Arequipa Region? Mona-Lynn 21:58, 13 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Pizarro_House_Museum_in_Trujillo_Spain.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see User talk:Carnildo/images. 15:50, 15 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I saw your adding the {{disputed}} template to the abovementioned article. Why don't we make an effort to actually improve it? As you can see, it is in urgent need of improvement, and the recent vandal attacks from open proxies do not help it either. Obviously, nobody will really want to work on an article that, no matter what it says, is going to be vandalized and/or is going to have these templates on top of it. I think a good way to start would be to focus on the most obvious: What is disputed, and what can we do to fix it? Regards. Andrés C. 02:38, 23 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the correction. I made the mistake of thinking the picture related to the city mentioned in the article. Regards, E Asterion ^{u talking to me?} 05:14, 3 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please see the "Presidents of Peru" section at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Peru and share your opinion with the project.--Jersey Devil 02:45, 18 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

See my last comment on Gabbec's talk page on a better way to organize the project. I too would have e-mailed you concerning this but your e-mail option is disabled.--Jersey Devil 21:25, 19 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:SantaCatalina aqp.JPG. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Angr 08:21, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:SantaCatalina aqp2.JPG. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Angr 08:21, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:SantaCatalina aqp3.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Angr 08:21, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

An image you uploaded, Image:Arequipa coat of arms.jpg, was tagged with the {{coatofarms}} copyright tag. This tag was deleted because it does not actually specify the copyright status of the image. The image may need a more accurate copyright tag, or it may need to be deleted. If the image portrays a seal or emblem, it should be tagged as {{seal}}. If you have any questions, ask them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. -- 01:22, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:LaLey Uno Album Cover.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:13, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Ramon Castilla 100 Intis.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:42, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Ricardo palma.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:14, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, To assist global anti-counterfeiting efforts you may wish to consider marking images of banknotes you upload as "Specimen" in some way, if those banknotes represent legal tender.ShakespeareFan00 10:25, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, as a fellow member of WikiProject Peru, I thought you might want to check out Wikipedia:WikiProject Peru/Article improvement drive. We're having a new article improvement drive, also, lots of things going on at the WikiProject. Hope to see you around. Greetings, --Victor12 01:19, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Cesar vallejo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 21:41, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from a robot. You have recently uploaded Image:Arequipa coat of arms.jpg. The file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 14:33, 8 September 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. If you believe you received this message in error, please notify the bot's owner. OsamaKBOT 14:33, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I just got back with a 37 day vacation in Peru and I came back with 1,400 high-quality photos. The pictures are mostly of Mancora, Piura, Cuzco, Machu Picchu, and the Sacred Valley (some of Lima). This would be my first time uploading images on Wikipedia but I really want to contribute so if you want to help me out that'd be cool...sincerely, Danny ([email protected]) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Grandmastersmoke (talk • contribs) 23:43, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Belalcázar Sucre Ecuadorean Banknote.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 01:05, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:EnanitosVerdesCover.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

• That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
• That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 15:22, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:LosPrisioneros GrandesExitos.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

• That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
• That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 08:32, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Pedrarias.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 19:11, 11 February 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:11, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Victor Raul Haya de la Torre.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stifle (talk) 11:03, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings! I noticed some discussion over moving Biblioteca Nacional del Perú to National Library of Peru on its talk page, so I went ahead and listed it on Wikipedia:Requested moves. Please free to join the discussion. Thanks. - Ruodyssey (talk) 07:00, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Tupac Amaru 2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. MBelgrano (talk) 03:49, 23 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Bustamantejoseluis.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Hekerui (talk) 20:32, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Caretas cover.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:47, 7 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Estadio del la UNSA. Since you had some involvement with the Estadio del la UNSA redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). MicroX (talk) 00:33, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Nicolas de Pierola.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 20:58, 27 August 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:58, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Amauta.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Kelly ^hi! 06:46, 3 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article Famous Thirteen has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced for 5 years. Also an orphan for 5 years.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. NickGibson3900 - Talk - Sign my Guestbook 11:05, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:58, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Sapa Inca.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Questionable license based on source that cannot be tracked. Is currently orphaned and has been marked as orphaned for many years.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  ★  Bigr Tex 20:35, 11 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:LosPrisioneros GrandesExitos.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:29, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It amazed me seeing a person with such sneaky prejudice trying to force his opinions onto others, I am a fan of Tupac Shakur as well as an admirer of Tupac Amaru II. You make various attempts to discredit Tupac Shakur. I just want to say you sound like a egotistical piece of sh*t and f*ck you for not having a broader perspective. 160.81.25.59 (talk) 04:13, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Garcilaso supp kassel.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused, low quality. Superseded by File:Supuesto retrato de Garcilaso de la Vega (B-N).jpg.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 13:14, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]