I can read and reply to messages written here in both English and French.

Je peux lire et répondre aux messages écrits en français et en anglais.

Welcome!

Hello, Falconus, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  gidonb 15:58, 14 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the link from that page because I felt that after reviewing the wiki that it was very biased. That's my view anyway.

Be Bold and put the link back in, if others remove it then you should go to the discussion page and give reasons to add it to the article. I won't remove it again.

Just take care to not edit war. This is very very important.

And, welcome to Wikipeida :) Regards, —-- That Guy, From That Show! ^(esperanza) 2006-05-15 02:56

See Wikipedia:Citing sources/example style for a few examples. On that page we are so far basically just inserting: <ref>{{cite web| url=http://urlofwebsite.com| title=Title of website| accessed=October 9, 2006}}</ref> after the information to be cited (that is, in-line with the text). If you do that it will automatically show up at the end and with a numbered footnote. So if I were citing CNN.com for some fact, here, I would do the following.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://cnn.com/article/etc|title=Title of that CNN article|accessed=October 9, 2006}}</ref> That should show up as a little footnote number here, and if you had a <references/> tag somewhere on the page you would see the actual citation. --Fastfission 21:18, 9 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The page on The Ancient Apostolic Communion is under my userpage because the original article was deleted for being non-notable. So in an effort to keep the article alive I moved it to my userpage where we are allowed to have such articles without fear of them being deleted. --Kf4bdy ^{talk contribs} 20:23, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I see. Its a shame, as it is an interesting article. Falconus|Talk 22:27, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

How are you?

I am proposing that the following article: Release Lillywhite Recordings Campaign be deleted. There is no proof that this campaign led to the recording of Busted Stuff, or was acknowledged by the DMB or RCA people. While the campaign was mentioned in Rolling Stone and Entertainment Weekly, I don't think that is grounds enough to have a separate article. Please comment on the [[Talk:Release Lillywhite Recordings Campaign|Talk page]]. Thanks. Milchama 17:39, 18 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I know nothing of this Lillywhite stuff, and therefore do not want to become involved in this kind of thing. Sorry, Falconus|Talk 18:18, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've merged the three tags - {{launching}}, {{launching24}}, and {{launchingX}} into one template at Template:Launching (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs). The time can be changed using the variable "|time = X" where X is the period of time, with units. --GW_Simulations_{User Page | Talk} 00:01, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

OK, thank you. --Falconus|Talk 00:09, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The tag is currently in use on Space Shuttle, Space Shuttle program, STS-116 and Space Shuttle Discovery. It is also present on Minotaur rocket and I am about to add it to Ariane 5.

When it goes, just add {{current spaceflight}} to the four pages (if I don't beat you to it), and add {{in space}} to the crew pages. Thanks, --GW_Simulations_{User Page | Talk} 00:30, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'll check when I get back, but I am going to try to see the space shuttle in flight, and I have homework to finish. If you (or someone else) hasn't done it by the time I get around to it, I'll put the tags in. Thanks, Falconus|Talk 00:35, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Also, do you mind if I change the "in" to "within" in that template?--Falconus|Talk 01:07, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Done. --GW_Simulations_{User Page | Talk} 01:22, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Cool. Thanks.Falconus|Talk 01:23, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Falconus. Over at WikiProject Harry Potter we're trying to compile a list of active participants. Your name, along with all other project participants, has been placed on the inactive list. If you'd like to get involved again, please place your name back on the active list, and take a look at the project talk page for the latest happenings.

RHB(AWB) 21:35, 30 December 2006 (UTC), on behalf of WPHarry Potter[reply]

This template you created appears to be orphaned. It says its under construction, but hasn't been edited in 4 months. I'm considering deleting it. Would you object? - Mtmelendez ^{(Talk|UB|Home)} 12:31, 5 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nah don't worry. I just think it should be deleted now as it is, but feel free to create a final version in the future. - Mtmelendez ^{(Talk|UB|Home)} 01:22, 6 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've nominated the template for deletion. Feel free to join the discussion. - Mtmelendez ^{(Talk|UB|Home)} 01:40, 6 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I noticed your involvement on U.S. South-related articles, categories and WikiProjects, and I wanted to let you know about a bid we're formulating to get next year's Wikimania held in Atlanta! If you would like to help, be sure to sign your name to the "In Atlanta" section of the Southeast team portion of the bid if you're in town, or to the "Outside Atlanta" section if you still want to help but don't live in the city or the suburbs. If you would like to contribute more, please write on my talk page, the talk page of the bid, or join us at the #wikimania-atlanta IRC chat on freenode.org. Have a great day!

P.S. While this is a template for maximum efficiency, I would appreciate a note on my talk page so I know you got the message, and what you think. This is time-sensitive, so your urgent cooperation is appreciated. :)Mike H. I did "That's hot" first! 01:07, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the cougar because it was irrelevant to the article. If it was a picture of the school's logo or mascot it would have been fine, but a random picture of a wild cougar has absolutly nothing to do with the school. Hopefully that clears it up, and if not tell me and I'll try to make it have more sense. Thanks --Mr.crabby (Talk) 22:37, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, if you have a digital camera, you can always take pictures of the school and upload it onto Wikipedia. --Mr.crabby (Talk) 22:40, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. With all that being said, the article does look very good. You've done great job with it! --Mr.crabby (Talk) 22:43, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Falconus/Sandboxes/Sandbox, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per speedy deletion criterion G2.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 19:25, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. Did it myself once. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 19:28, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Not really, but I think you have to put the code on a subpage or something. There are plenty of template gurus around here that can help you, though. They had to help me with the Wikipedia Intensive Care Unit templates. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 19:36, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am not a template guru, but I did respond with a suggestion on my talk page. I like to keep all of the comments together if possible. Royalbroil 23:56, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

On Image talk:Tiesto elements of life tour.jpg the only text is "hi. tiesto . i love you. i am from iran," but you said that there was no reason to delete the article. Since this looks like random nonsense to me, I am just curious why? I am not saying that the page shouldn't exist in the future, but for the time being it seems fairly pointless to me. Thanks, Falconus^{p t c} 04:37, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I know, but it is a talk page, not an article, and there really is no criteria that requires this comment to be removed. It is harmless, and useless, both. We make a point to not delete user comments on talk pages unless they cause disruption, violate WP:BLP, or otherwise fit criteria requiring removal. JERRY ^talk _contribs 04:40, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I am the only pcziko on wikipedia and commons. Glad you enjoyed the panoramic of Nuuk. Thanks for nominating it. best, Paul —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pcziko (talk • contribs) 20:04, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Apex High School, an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Apex High School. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Rtphokie (talk) 19:09, 10 October 2008 (UTC) Rtphokie (talk) 19:09, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

and

As a member of the Aviation WikiProject or one of its subprojects, you may be interested in testing your skills in the Aviation Contest! I created this contest, not to pit editor against editor, but to promote article improvement and project participation and camraderie. Hopefully you will agree with its usefulness. Sign up here, read up on the rules here, and discuss the contest here. The first round of the contest may not start until September 1st-unless a large number of editors signup and are ready to compete immediately! Since this contest is just beginning, please give feedback here, or let me know what you think on my talkpage. - Trevor MacInnis ^contribs 21:34, 28 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The problem you seem to be having seems to come from a plugin using Web of Trust. Remove the plugin and the random strange messages won't be appended to your posts. -- kainaw™ 01:08, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I figured that out, and I disabled the popup option. It seems to have fixed it. Falconus^{p t c} 01:30, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Are you referring to the link I posted? If so, I'll remove it. Or you may do it. And if so, now you've got me concerned, although I do have ZoneAlarm and the latest version of Avast. ←Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots→ 05:07, 9 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I was referring to that link. Web of Trust is what I use for my browser, and it has served me fairly well. I'm going to unbold my comment, as it seems a little distracting now that the link has been removed. Falconus^{p t c} 18:47, 9 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The link that I posted [1] is what Web of Trust has to say about the website, if you are interested. Unfortunately it doesn't specify which malware to check for. Given that you have scanners, I suspect that you are probably alright if you didn't download anything. Falconus^{p t c} 18:54, 9 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't download anything (unless the site did it behind the scenes), all I did was go to that website. Not being content to attach malware to porn sites, the purveyors of this stuff are apparently now doing it on seemingly-innocuous sites. >:( ←Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots→ 20:03, 9 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Evidently so. It's really annoying to me, but I suppose that's how it goes... Falconus^{p t c} 23:15, 9 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I know - I've mentioned it at the reference desk talk page - I'm not an admin so I can't take any action myself.94.72.235.30 (talk) 23:54, 30 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I'm not an admin either... These users can be annoying, but what can we do? As for requesting that he be blocked, you may want to go through Wikipedia:Administrator_intervention_against_vandalism - I don't think the reference desk talk page is the most effective place for it. I was going to drop a couple of warnings on his user page, but recommending him for a block renders that pointless. Falconus^{p t c} 00:01, 31 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Well I think an admin should look at what he's actually doing. But I don't think there's any great rush. Maybe a little time will allow a cool down. There are some admins who read the reference desk talk page so it some action should be taken eventually.94.72.235.30 (talk) 00:07, 31 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that an admin needs to look at it, but you did pretty much imply that you've nominated him to be blocked... I'll leave it up to you, but I recommend that you follow through with your threat. Besides, he was asking for it. Falconus^{p t c} 00:09, 31 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I've left a message on User_talk:Runningonbrains , admins are like watched pots - they take longer to act the more you want them too, and often they don't do what you expect.

Tom12350 hasn't got into a revert war on the refdesk (where I deleted his question), or followed up the swearing thing - so it could have been a one off outburst. I still think he could take the people who answer questions on the reference desk a bit more seriously (ie not ask stupid or flame inciting questions) - but that message can come later.94.72.235.30 (talk) 00:17, 31 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I understand. Let's hope he behaves himself. Falconus^{p t c} 00:19, 31 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I've replied at Talk:EastCare. Thanks, PGPirate 03:03, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Another reply there. Thanks, PGPirate 23:53, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

1. It was
2. very helpful — Preceding unsigned comment added by Willminator (talk • contribs) 00:57, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Falconus my friend. It is I again. Thanks for replying to my talk page. You said to let you know if there was anything else you can do to misdirect help me out. If I may, here is my email, [email redacted]. Send me an email letting me know it's you (Falconus) that way I can personally email you any questions I might have that you can misdirect help me out, and I do have some for you. It seems that it is better to ask a question personally than publicly as I've learned that there are some crazy people out there :). Willminator (talk) 23:40, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I posted a reply to your user page. Falconus^{p t c} 03:56, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the stable version template on Talk:Cogan House Covered Bridge. I have done some clean up work on the article since and then updated the template's stable version. Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 19:53, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Correct me if I'm wrong, Falconus, it looks like you started adding a big "stable version" template to some article talk pages yesterday. We used to identify "stable versions" for WP:1.0, an offline version of WP ... perhaps you're involved with that work, but we typically either didn't mention that information on Wikipedia, or added the version to one of the banners that already existed; your banner is huge, and displaces whatever banner was at the top of the page. The very top of the talk page is important "real estate", generally reflecting whatever Wikipedians consider most important, and any one person's preference for any particular version of the page probably isn't the most important thing we can say about an article. Has there been discussion on this yet? - Dank (push to talk) 20:32, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

As left on Dank's talk page: There has been a small discussion at the Village Pump, and we decided to let it "grow organically". I figure that the best way to do that is put it in enough places that people see it - as it would be doomed to failure if nobody knows about it. I apologize if it's getting in your way; is there another place on the talk page which you would prefer? On the template documentation, as well as the Village Pump discussion, the reasons for the template are discussed - essentially it is to combat what has been identified as a problem with article rot, without being so intrusive as to lock pages, etc. Falconus^{p t c} 20:48, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I did notice with Cogan House Covered Bridge that the "stable version" originally linked to had two dead links (which I repaired). So it might help to ask on the article's talk page first... Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 21:49, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I left a note on all the talk pages that I have tagged - they can decide in each case if they feel that it was an inappropriate addition. I also will probably wait a few days before tagging any more, partly because I think that I need to see what the general reaction will be. Falconus^{p t c} 23:03, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Any reactions so far? If you're comfortable with your banner going underneath the FA or GA banner and underneath any wikiproject banners, then I don't have an opinion one way or the other. Generally, the review processes pick up a number of problems in any article ... unclear or incomprehensible language, not-great sources, language that follows the sources too closely or not closely enough, too much attention to trivial things or not enough attention to important things, etc. ... so for most article reviewers, "stable" doesn't mean a lot (other than maybe "not recently vandalized"), but YMMV. If you'd rather add your information to the FA or GA banner under "article milestones", I don't know the proper format for that, and we'd want to ask first at WT:GAN and WT:FAC whether people mind altering those banners. - Dank (push to talk) 16:15, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, thanks; I will take care to put it under the FA banner for the time being. No negative reactions, one person thought I was canvassing, and a couple of positive reactions. Nothing major; mostly nobody seems to care to comment one way or the other, if they've noticed. There have been a couple of people that have used it, and notably nobody who has removed it. It's not my banner; I was just trying to promote it. Rich Farmbrough is the one that deserves the credit in this. Adding the information to an existing banner is something I had not already thought about, but I'm content for the moment with just seeing what happens at this point. Falconus^{p t c} 17:34, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I'm fine with not using "article milestones". It's possible that others will object to it as a separate template at some point, at which point you might want to suggest the "article milestones" route, but per WP:BEANS, I won't bring that up at Template talk:Stable version. I'll talk about the other point over at the template talk page. - Dank (push to talk) 17:50, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Alitalia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Copa (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:40, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Falconus^{p t c} 11:30, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

That was my mistake, just read Wikipedia:Reference desk/Guidelines/Medical advice carefully. --SupernovaExplosion (talk) 17:49, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, no worries. Are you asking me to read the medical advice section, or saying that you read it? Cheers, Falconus^{p t c} 18:48, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hoops! Sorry again for the confusing language, it was me who read it. :D --SupernovaExplosion (talk) 02:51, 5 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I figured as much, I just thought I should make sure :-). I see that you opened your account quite recently - if you have any questions feel free to ask me. Falconus^{p t c} 11:48, 5 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Remember that stable version tag? Well, there has been some recent deterioration unfortunately. I may need some help there. MegaHasher (talk) 05:02, 5 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

In what way(s) do you think it has deteriorated, and how would you like me to help? Falconus^{p t c} 09:22, 5 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I left a message for you at the reference desk/Hum... À la prochaine fois! Miss Bono ^[zootalk]☆ 14:36, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour. I took a look at your pages on the French WP. May I point out some small errors? In French message is masculine. On your talk page: Vous pouvez me laisser un message ici, mais vous êtes libre aussi de le laisser sur... On your user page: ...j'en suis désolé par avance. Si j'écris quelque chose qui n'est pas clair, laissez-moi un message s'il vous plaît,... Shorter: Si quelque chose n'est pas clair,.... The word chose is feminine, but quelque chose is masculine. Therefore, no "e" at the end of clair. Amicalement, AldoSyrt (talk) 13:03, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your suggestions! I have made the corrections. I really appreciate it! Happy New Year's! Falconus^{p t c} 06:51, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

My pleasure. I wish you all the best for 2014! — AldoSyrt (talk) 18:51, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! You too :-)! Falconus^{p t c} 23:06, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:45, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You asked for some help translating the page into Français, but it seems you have a good command if things already. Here's a Google translation:

  ---- quick Google translation --- deleted to save space --Falconus ------ / end Google translation ------ 

Don't know if this helps you. Sctechlaw (talk) 02:11, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oops, mea culpa, looks as if it was an IP (89.94.82.139) user. My bad, ignore me :-) Sctechlaw (talk) 02:15, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sctechlaw, Thanks for the thought. Yeah, I wasn't trying to translate anything; I just saw 89's request, and offered to help out. That being said, while I appreciate the effort, Google Translate is pretty well-known in most French speaking countries, and I would imagine that 89 knows how to use it; it's probably not necessary to go through the trouble of pasting the entire translated article on a person's user page ;-). The trouble with Google Translate is simply that it does not get it all right, and sometimes a human speaker of the language is required to interpret it, which is probably why 89 asked instead of simply plugging it in him/herself. Falconus^{p t c} 02:27, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour,

j'ai vu que vous vous étiez proposé pour m'aider à traduire la page anglophone vers la francophone, ce qui est très sympathique de votre part. J'aimerais plus traduire la section « Events » ; pouvez-vous proposer votre traduction française ci-dessous (afin que je la corrige si besoin il y a) s'il vous plaît ?

P.S. : « Conctactez-moi sur mon page de discussion. » est « Contactez-moi sur ma page de discussion. » en français.

Cordialement, et merci de votre aide,
–89.94.82.139 (talk) 20:50, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Salut 89.94.82.139,

Voici mes efforta à traduction pour vous à corriger. (si besoin il y a... bien sur, il y besoin ;-) ).

Tir

Le matin de l'attaque, Syed Rizwan Farook et Tashfeen Malik ont laissé leur fille, vieille de six mois, avec la mère de Farook, en donnant comme raison un rendez-vous chez le médecin. [9][10] Selon certaines sources, Farook, qui était inspecteur de l'action sanitaire chez le San Bernardino County Department of Public Health (le service de la santé publique du compté de San Bernardino), assistait à la célébration des fêtes de fin d'année au Inland Regional Center [11], un établissement sur South Waterman Avenue à but non-lucratif qui sert aux individus avec des handicaps de développement [12][13].[3] Il y avait plus qu'une centaine de personnes qui y assistaient.[14][15] Quelques de ses collègues ont constaté qu Farook était silencieux pendant les premiers moments de l'événement et ont remarqué qu'il était parti de la célébration brusquement, en laissant son manteau, avant la prise d'une photo du groupe.[16][17]. Selon certaines sources, il y avait une dispute avant son départ.[18] Pendant les briefings policiers ultérieurs, on a indiqué que Farook était parti « sous des circonstances dites furieuses ». [19]

À 10 h 59 PST (heure du Pacifique), deux responsables qui portaient des cagoules et du camouflage, ont ouvert le feu sur les participants à la célébration. Des témoins ont indiqué qu'ils ont reconnu Farook comme un des tireurs par son voix et sa charpente.[20]

La réponse policière

À 11h14 PST, les Pompiers de San Bernardino ont déclaré sur Twitter une urgence dans le bloc 1300 du Waterman Avenue, une scène sur laquelle les policiers travaillaient activement.[21][22][23][24] Les routes dans les environs étaient ensuite fermées aux voitures.[25]

Les policiers et les équipes de SWAT encerclaient le bâtiment au même temps que l'évacuation.[26] Les policiers ont fait détoner à distance un objet non identifié à la scène et ont accédé au complexe par bélier.[27][28] Le FBI et le Los Angeles Police Department Counter-Terrorism Unit (département antiterroriste de la gendarmerie de Los Angeles) se sont mobilisés[29]. Les policiers cherchait un SUV noir dans lequel les responsables ont fui de la scène de crime.[27][30][31][32]

Le United States Department of Homeland Security (département de la Sécurité intérieure des États-Unis) a aussi répondu, et ont envoyé un avion de surveillance Pilatus PC-12 aux environs.[33][34]

La fusillade et la mort des responsables

Une fusillade s'est déclaré à environ 15h00 PST sur le East San Bernardino Boulevard, environ 2.7km de la scène au Inland Regional Center. Les policiers ont demandé un BearCat, une véhicule blindé policière, et de l'aide médical d'urgence. Les occupants du SUV, après avoir été poursuites et arrêtés, ont échangé le feu avec les policiers de leur SUV, qui était un Ford Expedition noir, et qui Farook avait loué plusieurs jours avant. [35]

La fusillade a duré moins qu'une minute, et les deux suspects étaient tués.

Selon le chef de police de San Berardino, les policiers ont tiré 380 balles et les suspects 76 pendant la fusillade.[35] Des témoins ont dit que les suspects portaient de l'armure du même style que les police, et jetaient les objets par fenêtre.[38][39]

Les policiers ont quadrillé les rues dans les environs, et ont demandé aux résidents à rester à l'intérieur.[38] Un chef de police a confirmé que les deux responsables était tués.[5] Le tireur et la tireuse portaient « la tenue tactique », armés avec des pistolets ainsi que des fusils de .223 calibres.

Greetings Recent Changes Patrollers!

This is a one-time-only message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:

1. Adjust number of entries and days at Last unpatrolled
2. Editor-focused central editing dashboard
3. "Hide trusted users" checkbox option on watchlists and related/recent changes (RC) pages
4. Real-Time Recent Changes App for Android
5. Shortcut for patrollers to last changes list

Further, there are more than 20 proposals related to Watchlists in general that you may be interested in reviewing. (and over 260 proposals in all, across many aspects of wikis)

Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.

Note: You received this message because you have transcluded {{User wikipedia/RC Patrol}} (user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings.

Best regards, Stevietheman — Delivered: 01:09, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The WikiEagle

The WikiProject Aviation Newsletter

Volume I — Issue 1
Aviation Project • Project discussion • Members • Assessment • Outreach • The WikiEagle
Announcements After over a decade of silence, the WikiProject Aviation newsletter is making a comeback under the name The WikiEagle. This first issue was sent to all active members of the project and its sub-projects. If you wish to continue receiving The WikiEagle, you can add your username to the mailing list. For now the newsletter only covers general project news and is run by only one editor. If you wish to help or to become a columnist, please let us know. If you have an idea which you believe would improve the newsletter, please share it; suggestions are welcome and encouraged. On 16 December, an RfC was closed which determined theaerodrome.com to be an unreliable source. The website, which is cited over 1,500 articles, mainly on WWI aviation, as of the publishing of this issue. Luft46.com has been added to the list of problematic sources after this discussion. The Jim Lovell article was promoted to Featured Article status on 26 December after being nominated by Hawkeye7. The Raymond Hesselyn article was promoted to Good Article status on 4 December after being nominated by Zawed. The Supermarine Sea King article was promoted to Good Article status on 22 December after being nominated by Amitchell125. The William Hodgson (RAF officer) article was promoted to Good Article status on 26 December after being nominated by Zawed.
Members New Members KingAviationKid (Joined on 17 December) PatrickChiao (Joined on 22 December) Wp9097 (Joined on 16 December) Number of active members: 386. Total number of members: 921. Closed Discussions Featured Article assessment Jim Lovell (discussion) – Closed as promoted on 26 December 2021 Good Article assessment HAL Tejas (discussion) – Closed as not promoted on 30 December 2021 William Hodgson (RAF officer) (discussion) – Closed as promoted on 26 December 2021 Supermarine Sea King (discussion) – Closed as promoted on 22 December 2021 Raymond Hesselyn (discussion) – Closed as promoted on 4 December 2021 Deletion Timeline of Berlin Brandenburg Airport's construction (discussion) – Closed as delete and redirect on 30 December 2021 Evergreen International Airlines Flight 17 (discussion) – Closed as keep on 25 December 2021 Requested moves Akbarpur (Ambedkar Nagar) Airstrip → Akbarpur Airstrip (discussion) – Closed as moved on 30 December 2021 1983 Avensa Douglas DC-9 crash → Avensa Flight 007 (discussion) – Closed as moved on 30 December 2021 Garuda Indonesia Flight 035 → Garuda Indonesian Airways Flight 035 (discussion) – Withdrawn on 28 December 2021	Article Statistics This data reflects values from DMY. Aviation pages by quality Quality Total FA 142 FL 15 A 56 GA 505 B 4,573 C 11,878 Start 15,082 Stub 18,754 List 2,539 Category 11,638 Disambig 653 File 2,713 Portal 629 Project 89 Redirect 1,518 Template 2,489 NA 66 Assessed 73,339 Unassessed 1 Total 73,340 WikiWork factors (?) ω = 251,916 Ω = 4.91
New/Ongoing Discussions Featured Article review D. B. Cooper (discussion) – Since 14 December 2021 A-class Article assessment Granville Gee Bee Model A (discussion) – Since 21 April 2020 List of aviation shootdowns and accidents during the Iraq War (discussion) – Since 22 February 2010 Good Article assessment Romanian Air Corps (discussion) – Since 25 December 2021 Jean Batten (discussion) – Since 2 October 2021 Merger proposals List of astronauts by name → List of astronauts by year of selection (discussion) – Since 10 August 2021 List of cosmonauts → List of space travelers by nationality (discussion) – Since 10 August 2021 List of space travelers by name → List of space travelers by nationality (discussion) – Since 10 August 2021 Holidays Czech Airlines → Czech Airlines (discussion) – Since 23 June 2021 Bendix Aviation → Bendix Corporation (discussion) – Since 30 May 2021 Airport Movement Area Safety System → Airport Surface Surveillance Capability (discussion) – Since 29 May 2021 ASDE-X → Airport Surface Surveillance Capability (discussion) – Since 28 May 2021 Splitting proposals Family Airlines (discussion) – Since 23 November 2021 2021 Kabul airport attack (discussion) – Since 24 September 2021 List of military aircraft of the United States (discussion) – Since 16 August 2021 Braniff International Airways (discussion) – Since 8 September 2019 Deletion List of maiden voyages (discussion) – Since 29 December 2021 Requested moves Hot-air balloon → Hot air balloon (discussion) – Since 30 December 2021 Aeropostal Alas de Venezuela Flight 108 → Aeropostal Alas de Venezuela Flight 109 (discussion) – Since 28 December 2021 Garuda Indonesia Flight 150 → Garuda Indonesian Airways Flight 150 (discussion) – Since 28 December 2021 Garuda Indonesia Flight 206 → Garuda Indonesian Airways Flight 206 (discussion) – Since 28 December 2021 Garuda Indonesia Flight 708 → Garuda Indonesian Airways Flight 708 (discussion) – Since 28 December 2021 Garuda Indonesia Flight 892 → Garuda Indonesian Airways Flight 892 (discussion) – Since 28 December 2021 TWA Flight 800 → TWA Flight 800 (1996) (discussion) – Since 27 December 2021 Dynamic Airways Flight 405 → Dynamic International Airways Flight 405 (discussion) – Since 26 December 2021 CommutAir Flight 4281 → CommutAir Flight 4821 (discussion) – Since 25 December 2021 Thai Airways → Thai Airways International (discussion) – Since 13 December 2021 Thai Airways fleet → Thai Airways International fleet (discussion) – Since 13 December 2021 List of Thai Airways destinations → List of Thai Airways International destinations (discussion) – Since 13 December 2021 Did you know Ravish Malhotra (discussion) – Since 30 December 2021 Alexander Tahy (discussion) – Since 26 December 2021 Veronica Volkersz (discussion) – Since 6 December 2021 Rudolf Szepessy-Sokoll (discussion) – Since 3 December 2021 On The Main Page Did you know... ... that the aerobatic demonstration aircraft used by SoloTürk is also used in military operations of the Turkish Air Force? (24 December)
Discuss & propose changes to The WikiEagle at The WikiEagle talk page. To opt in/out of receiving this news letter, add or remove your username from the mailing list. Newsletter contributor: ZLEA

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:35, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]