User talk:Ferengi

I know we have our differences over this article, but I think we can agree that this Bob Swagger guy is violating the nuetral point of view policy. I hope you're willing to help me out with this. DurinsBane87 20:01, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for the late reply, but I was busy offline these days. I agree with you, I'll check it out and see what I can do. Ferengi 15:50, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Don't worry, he got blocked. Thanks though! DurinsBane87 16:04, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Damn, I go chop up weeds with a sword and hang out, I come back, and you did all that? good job! DurinsBane87 18:50, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks :) When I have more time I'll try to incorporate some more trivia. Ferengi 08:52, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes is is supported by a reference: the 2001 census. There won't be another census until 2011, so you'll just have to wait if you want something more up to date I'm afraid :) --NetProfit 23:07, 18 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There is an older discussion on this issue on the talkpage, Talk:Greeks#Fake population figures. There may be older ones as well, I haven't checked.--NetProfit 23:21, 18 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think this is how it works. Here it says that 93% of the total population of Greece are Greeks according to the 2001 census (this is because there are also foreigners in Greece, Albanians, Ukrainians and the like). In the 2001 census, the total population of Greece was 10,964,020, therefore 10,964,020 x 93% = 10,196,539. Obviously the Factbook has been updated since the discussion on the talkpage; then it must have said that 98% of Greece's population were Greeks. You're right, the article does need updating.--NetProfit 23:29, 18 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, you`re right it was poor sourcing on my part, however Muslim population of Balkans has been expelled or killed during the balkan wars, i wasnt refering to mutual atrocities of the Greco Turkish war..I can provide you more sources on the issue using non-pro turkish documents..

For instance: `The process that begun with mutual `ethnic cleansing` in the Balkans and progressed, with World War I, to the expulsion and massacre of christians in Anatolia, entered a new period following the Ottoman defeat...`

Taner Akcam, A Shameful Act, Armenian Genocide and the question of Turkish responsibility, p. 322--laertes d 07:44, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Loveamongtheruinscc.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

• That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
• That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 02:53, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Ferengi, I have granted rollback rights to your account; the reason for this is that after a review of some of your contributions, I believe I can trust you to use rollback correctly by using it for its intended usage of reverting vandalism, and that you will not abuse it by reverting good-faith edits or to revert-war. For information on rollback, see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback and Wikipedia:Rollback feature. If you do not want rollback, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Good luck and thanks. Acalamari 23:48, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. :) Good luck and take care. Acalamari 15:10, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Crap, thanks - I thought I'd removed that particular bit of vandalism, but my computer is slow. Looks like it came back through when I refreshed. --User:AlbertHerring ^{Io son l'orecchio e tu la bocca: parla!} 17:44, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I don't agree with your additions regarding the news reports on the bodies, please see the two comments that I've added at the end of the Preliminary Report section of the AF 447 Discussion page.--Gautier lebon (talk) 08:24, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I understand your rationale behind the revert of my copy edit:

"Most of the passengers onboard Yemenia Flight 749, operated using an Airbus A330-200, originated from Paris with a stopover at Marseille Provence Airport in Marseille, h France, where some of the passengers and crew boarded. After arriving at Sana'a International Airport in Sana'a, Yemen, passengers transferred to an Airbus A310 for Flight 626, which was due to arrive at Prince Said Ibrahim International Airport in Moroni, Comoros, at 2:30 a.m. local time on 30 June.

However, the phrase:

"Most of the passengers originated from Paris onboard Yemenia Flight 749, operated using an Airbus A330-200, with an interval at Marseille Provence Airport in Marseille, France"

bothers me in terms of English for two reasons:

• The grammar "originated from Paris onboard" is clumsy IMHO. How about "originated from Paris, who boarded"
• The word "interval" does not seem appropriate IMHO (see ^[1] for the definitions of this word). I still believe the official term in avionics is "stopover".

I like the change from "some of the" to "some more".

Let me know what you think as I do not want to get into an edit war. Regards AlexandrDmitri (talk) 05:47, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your mesage on my talk page. I've made the minor adjustments discussed. AlexandrDmitri (talk) 10:23, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You are right, Kirk's 48 hours are up. Tony the Marine (talk) 20:52, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thats a brilliant addition to this tiny article i created. i had never heard of opponent theory. i wonder if anyone at Sharp was familiar with this. i will occasionally look for sources directly attaching the two.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 04:18, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm interested in whether this product is really different. I hope you can add more references, esp. reviews (i suppose you might add yours if you do one). i plan on viewing this product asap. I also hope that sharp can release more technical info (they may not as they may want to protect proprietary tech). Im not sure why this fascinates me, but i was also excited about Foveon, the new digital camera technology that uses 3 color pixel layers, and doesnt have to interpolate as much. Mercurywoodrose (talk) 04:14, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm afraid I've deleted that image under CSD F7. It's not the best-known of the criteria, but images from news sources (such as BBC News) cannot be used unless the image itself is the subject of commentary in the article, this is because we are effectively competing with such organisations (even though we're a charity) and so use of the images does not respect the Beeb's commercial value of the image, a requirement of WP:NFCC#2. Sorry about that, HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 08:43, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you can find the image from the Russian government, it would at least survive for a week. I can't guarantee it won;t be tagged for deletion under one of the other points of CSD F7, but it wouldn't be eligible for instant deletion. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 08:52, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have decided to put on a mini-contest within the November 2013 monthly disambiguation contest, on Saturday, November 23 (UTC). I will personally give a $20 Amazon.com gift card to the disambiguator who fixes the most links on that server-day (see the project page for details on scoring points). Since we are not geared up to do an automated count for that day, at 00:00, 23 November 2013 (UTC) (which is 7:00 PM on November 22, EST), I'll take a screenshot of the project page leaderboard. I will presume that anyone who is not already listed on the leaderboard has precisely nine edits. At 01:00, 24 November 2013 (UTC) (8:00 PM on November 23, EST), I'll take a screenshot of the leaderboard at that time (the extra hour is to give the board time to update), and I will determine from that who our winner is. I will credit links fixed by turning a WP:DABCONCEPT page into an article, but you'll have to let me know me that you did so. Here's to a fun contest. Note that according to the Daily Disambig, we currently have under 256,000 disambiguation links to be fixed. If everyone in the disambiguation link fixers category were to fix 500 links, we would have them all done - so aim high! Cheers! bd2412 T 02:23, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:35, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ferengi. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ferengi. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ferengi. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]