User talk:FumblingTowardsEcstasy

An article that you have been involved in editing, S.O.S. (Let the Music Play), has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/S.O.S. (Let the Music Play). Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Aspects (talk) 19:06, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

As for the Aria chart on Anastacia discography, the real problem is the fundamental rule that a column represents one chart. It wouldn't make sense for it to be physical chart for one song, download for the next, composite for the third, dance club play for another. However, if the only chart an artist usually charted on was a component chart, there wouldn't be a big problem with using that component chart for the entire column.—Kww(talk) 02:34, 19 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Component charts refer to charts that are added together to form a main chart for example the Billboard Hot 100 is a cumulation of Hot 100 Airplay, Hot 100 Downloads and Hot 100 Sales therefore if you include the Billboard Hot 100 chart you could not include either of its component charts.

In the UK and Australia the urban/r&B charts do not get added to the pop or airplay charts to form the main singles charts because airplay doesnt count toward chart positions. this is why these positions are acceptable but some are not. Just because they are based on the sales does not make them a component only R&B songs can chart on R&B charts and therefore this calculates the chart position for the R&B genre, it is distinctly different from a component chart for the above reason. (Lil-unique1 (talk) 14:59, 2 August 2009 (UTC))[reply]

the point is the song is a R&B song. and just as a matter of interest a seriously experienced editor (User:Aspects) has been editing the article recently (see article's history) and he/she found no errors in the chart section. He/she normally identifies if there are such issues and removes them ASAP. The poiint i was making was that i have been editing for longer than yourself and on more contentious/controversial articles such as Doll Domination and I Am... Sasha Fierce where such charts have been allowed and experienced users/administrators have also been active editors and not found issues with such charts. (Lil-unique1 (talk) 15:28, 2 August 2009 (UTC))[reply]

apologies i didnt mean to sound rude that was not my intentions. i understand completely what your are saying but guidelines have to bet taken in context, i've noticed from your talk page that you have had issues with charts on Anastacia's page. this situation is different because the song did chart on main charts and we have added genre based charts not component charts. however if you insist removing them we shall ask wikipedia administrators to clarify if the rule about component charts applies to genre charts. I will post the question on the single's talk page and requestion admin intervention. until then we shall leave them in. agreed (Lil-unique1 (talk) 15:42, 2 August 2009 (UTC))[reply]

Hello, I need your help/memory please. Over a year ago (on 19 September 2009), you edited Jenny Morris, and according to article history, you changed her birth information from 1956 to 26 September 1956 and gave precise location as Tokoroa in New Zealand. Do you remember where you found this information? The article has since been edited considerably and now has 29 September but the Tokoroa remains. A reliable source for the Tokoroa has been requested.shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 12:03, 18 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I am a Wikipedian, who is studying the phenomenon on Wikipedia. I need your help to conduct my research on about understanding "Motivation of Wikipedia contributors." I would like to invite you to Main Study. Please give me your valuable time, which estimates about 20 minutes. I chose you as a English Wikipedia user who made edits recently through the RecentChange page. Refer to the first page in the online survey form for more information on the study and me.cooldenny (talk) 03:44, 24 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Coin-Laundry.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 12:05, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

	Perth Meetup v t e Next: 2 November 2024 (watch) Last: 6 October 2024
See also: Australian events listed at Wikimedia.org.au (or on Facebook)

There is a meetup happening this weekend in Perth, if you're interested. (You're in Category:Wikipedians in Perth.) — Sam Wilson ( Talk • Contribs ) … 07:53, 17 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:01, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, FumblingTowardsEcstasy. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

As an Australian Wikipedian, your opinion is sought on a proposal to advocate for the introduction of Fair Use into Australian copyright law. The discussion is taking place at the Australian Wikipedians' notice board, please read the proposal and comment there. MediaWiki message delivery MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:07, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This message has been automatically sent to all users in Category:Australian Wikipedians. If you do not wish to receive further messages like this, please either remove your user page from this category, or add yourself to Category:Opted-out of message delivery