User talk:Fungus Guy

Archives

Hello. I see that you've blanked the redirect Accipiter hiogaster with the edit summary indicating that the redirect was incorrect. Per WP:BLANK, I've restored the redirect for now. If you believe that the redirect should be deleted, please bring it to WP:RFD. Regards. KJ ^Discuss? 06:50, 28 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

As there is no content for the species A. hiogaster, this is a good move. It was up until recently synonymous with its redirect, so this works until a new species page can be made. Thanks. FUNgus guy (talk) 06:52, 28 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Same for St. Stephen-Milltown. Take it to WP:RFD if you want to delete it, instead of just blanking the page. KJ ^Discuss? 00:17, 20 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited New Maryland-Sunbury, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jack Carr. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 19 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

GREAT work! Thanks so much - Nbpolitico (talk) 19:29, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sunbury (1785-1973 electoral district), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bloc voting. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:06, 18 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

New Brunswick general election, 1982

added a link pointing to George Little

New Brunswick general election, 1987

added a link pointing to George Little

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:13, 25 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Carleton (1834-1974 electoral district), and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.cyclopaedia.de/wiki/Carleton_(1824%E2%80%931974_electoral_district).

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 02:20, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed the tag. The portion of the page that CorenSearchBot has flagged as a direct copy was already on this page, and it appears that Cyclopaedia.de copied it from here. I simply added MLAs from Wiki pages and election results from Elections New Brunswick. FUNgus guy (talk) 02:32, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe it was because I redirected and copied Carleton (1824–1974 electoral district) to this page, as the riding was actually created in 1834? FUNgus guy (talk) 02:37, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Hello, and yes the bot caught an external mirror of the old page, so when you re-created it, it thought it was a violation. Happens all the time, so no worries there. Just one note though, rather than redirect and copy to re-title a page, it is better to just Move it from the "more" dropdown in the upper-right links bar. That way the history of the article isn't split between 2 places, which is important for the CC license we use. I've requested a history merge to fix that, so no worries there either. Thanks for your work, Crow^Caw 00:28, 28 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Fungus Guy! As a Steward I'm involved in the upcoming unification of all accounts organized by the Wikimedia Foundation (see m:Single User Login finalisation announcement). By looking at your account, I realized that you don't have a global account yet. In order to secure your name, I recommend you to create such account on your own by submitting your password on Special:MergeAccount and unifying your local accounts. If you have any problems with doing that or further questions, please don't hesitate to ping me with {{ping|DerHexer}}. Cheers, —DerHexer (Talk) 18:55, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the articles you created on the Aaadonta subspecies! Happy New Year, Invertzoo (talk) 21:11, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Victoria (electoral district), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Victoria City. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Burnaby—New Westminster, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Richmond Centre. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Howdy. Would you please stop restoring former MLAs to the infoboxes of those articles? The MOS on Canadian politics, calls for us to place the elected MLAs into the infoboxes. GoodDay (talk) 00:36, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

They are not MLAs, they are MLA-elects. Once they are sworn in then by all means, update them. FUNgus guy (talk) 00:42, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

That was my argument about a day ago, but I was told that Wikipedia:CANSTYLE#Terms in office says otherwise. You'd run into the same resistance by others, if you made similiar edits on the MLA articles themselves. GoodDay (talk) 00:49, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hmmm, I had the opposite argument regarding federal riding pages. Maybe they have updated the MOS since then. Ok then. FUNgus guy (talk) 00:53, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I won't revert you anymore on those articles, as I happen to personally agree with you. IMHO, the new elected members, don't become MLAs until they're sworn in. GoodDay (talk) 00:59, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Oneida Nation of the Thames page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:32, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I had to undo your article change for the candian thing you edited five minutes ago because there was no source. Please provide one. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jdkonz (talk • contribs) 23:02, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

		The Geography Barnstar
		Thanks so much for working on First nations reserves in Northern Ontario. I have wanted to work on this for some time, but just didn't get around to it. It was high time that these articles were created! Thanks again. -- P 1 9 9  ✉ 12:53, 20 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for cleaning up the infoboxes of so many Ontario articles. Your hard work is appreciated! Magnolia677 (talk) 11:44, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your 'official' changes to the results DO NOT reflect the OFFICIAL results as were printed by multiple media establishments, I was a CANDIDATE in that race in Etobicoke-Center and you are modifying the wikipedia article unjustifiably and LYING about the results. Where is your SOURCE of this information? As a Candidate, I demand to know where your information is coming from that is modifying the election.

I had 240 VOTES. Not 189, for the Freedom Party. Do not modify the results without just cause AND DIRECT PROOF of where those statistics come from. My statistics are from Elections Canada, and as a Candidate who is again running in the 2015 election, I ask that you discontinue your modification of the results.

FP Andrew Kuess 240 0.51 <<< Real Result of the Election.

3 SOURCES OF PROOF. STOP MODIFYING THE WIKIPEDIA WITH FALSE INFORMATION. http://www.cbc.ca/elections/ontariovotes2014/ridings/view/riding-023 http://365etobicoke.com/2014-provincial-election-results-etobicoke/ http://globalnews.ca/news/1388086/ontario-election-results-2014-get-live-results-on-election-night/

Hi! If you will notice at the bottom of the election template in question, there is a handy-dandy link to Elections Ontario's Official Return from the Records for Etobicoke Centre, which shows the Freedom Party candidate received 189 votes. The media sources quoted above are most likely based on the unofficial election night results. I believe my modifications were justified and truthful, and based on direct proof straight from the horse's mouth. FUNgus guy (talk) 12:49, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Avignon—La Mitis—Matane—Matapédia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jean-François Fortin. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:41, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Mississauga—Brampton South is was a federal electoral district in Ontario, Canada, that has had been represented in the House of Commons of Canada since 2004.
198.96.187.2 (talk) 21:14, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about the [1].198.96.187.2 (talk) 21:21, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Did it.99.233.220.16 (talk) 18:17, 25 September 2015 (UTC)Yet another IP address[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Cypress Hills—Grasslands

added a link pointing to Palliser (electoral district)

Regina—Qu'Appelle

added a link pointing to Palliser (electoral district)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:09, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Avalon (electoral district) may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• **thence easterly approximately 20 km to a point N45(E of [[Baccalieu Island]];
• **thence southerly along Conception Bay to a point approximately 2 km S45(W of the most southwesterly extremity of [[Kelly's Island|Kellys Island]];

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:58, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello FG. What do you think? Now that the Conservative Party has apparently given Jagdish Grewal the heave-ho as their candidate in Mississauga—Malton, should his party allegiance, as shown in the table in that article, be changed from "Conservative" to "Independent" to reflect the way things have unfolded? Or do you think "Conservative" should be kept just because the ballots will still say that? Kelisi (talk) 17:43, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I think it best to leave the election tables as they will appear on the ballots, with a note about what has happened. He is not running as an independent, in fact he's no longer running at all. Same with Victoria's former Liberal candidate Cheryl Thomas. FUNgus guy (talk) 21:23, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Correction: He is, in fact, continuing to run. He plans to continue using the Conservative banner, despite not being endorsed by the party. Still think we should stick to Elections Canada's viewpoint. FUNgus guy (talk) 13:35, 8 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:17, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Parliament of Canada website has corrected the spelling of the party name so it's now Labor-Progressive Party. The article name Labour Progressive Party is therefore incorrect. See this entry for example. Please see new move proposal. (The historical reason for using the spelling 'labor' is, as with the Australian Labor Party which uses the same spelling despite the fact the word labour is spelled with a 'u' in Australia is that dropping the 'u' was seen as a) more modern and progressive and b) a statement against British imperialism. Alexander's Hood (talk) 19:13, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mégantic—Frontenac, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mégantic (electoral district). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is "Fungus Guy". Thank you. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 03:14, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

		The Canada Barnstar of National Merit
		For tireless late-night additions of articles on our nation's new electoral districts! HappyValleyEditor (talk) 05:13, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

+1 for the good work on the electoral district articles, but could you tag the talk pages with {{WikiProject Elections and Referendums}}? Cheers, Number 57 22:59, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like someone already has. Thanks! FUNgus guy (talk) 03:37, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Blackfin cisco, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Extant. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:15, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. I'm not sure why Pinawa, Manitoba was moved to Pinawa. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 23:05, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unless there are other Pinawas, I see no need to disambiguate. FUNgus guy (talk) 23:51, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Because few readers or editors know where the hamlet of "Pinawa" (pop. 1,444) is unless "Manitoba" is attached to its name, this move seems contrary to WP:CRITERIA. This isn't Manhattan. Would you be willing to change this edit back? Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 00:23, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I see you've done this to King-Lebel as well. Oh my. Magnolia677 (talk) 00:26, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps I see your point, is Pinawa a hamlet or a punk-rock band? But there are many unique place names that are not disambiguated by their province; Manitouwadge (pop. 2k) and Shebandowan (unincorporated community), for example. WP:MOSCAN#Places says that less-than-city settlements don't have to disambiguate if their name is completely unique. FUNgus guy (talk) 07:00, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

For no other reason than clarity to readers and editors, the province or state should be attached. There really is no advantage to removing the province or state from places no one has ever hear of. If you saw "Hookers Hot Springs", you'd have no idea it was a ghost town unless the state was attached (Hookers Hot Springs, Arizona). If you would consider reverting these back it would be a big improvement. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 16:16, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Magnolia677: I disagree with you, but have re-opened the move discussion to others at WP:RM#C. FUNgus guy (talk) 05:19, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Fungus Guy, I see from my watchlist that you are proposing a lot of merges. I haven't had a chance to look at all to discern exactly what you are proposing. Of the few I have reviewed, there appears to be a lack of information associated with the proposed merge templates. To make sure it is clear what you are proposing, please start a discussion on the Manitoba WikiProject so that we can engage the community and share our thoughts in one central location. Cheers, Hwy43 (talk) 03:13, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Darn work and life getting in the way. I will get back to you at the Manitoba WikiProject ASAP once life settles down. Thanks for being patient. Hwy43 (talk) 09:31, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No worries. I am in no hurry whatsoever. FUNgus guy (talk) 21:36, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

		The Special Barnstar
		For your patience and open-mindedness with respect to the discussion on the potential merger of articles affected by Manitoba's 2015 municipal amalgamations! Hwy43 (talk) 07:03, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

I just wanted to let you know I have processed the page move you requested.

Thanks! -- Dane ^talk 04:44, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Greens had no seats in 2008 (see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canadian_federal_election,_2008), yet they're still shown. SD won 3 seats before the election, but lost all its seats in the 2015 election; like the Greens in 2008. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.71.236.71 (talk) 18:25, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Any party that had a seat before the election, won a seat, or garnered >5% of the popular vote gets to be in the infobox. Greens won 6.8% of the popular vote in 2008, making it more than a "fringe" party. Strength in Democracy was created after the election, so no-one sat in the House of Commons as an SiD member. They only won 0.05% of the popular vote, so definitely on the fringes. FUNgus guy (talk) 05:21, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I am seeking independent and neutral viewpoints on the article ThoughtAudio, which is being considered for deletion. If you have a few minutes to review it, I would appreciate your opinion on the decision as to whether this article merits the decision to retain and improve, or to delete it. I fear that ThoughtAudio may have been targeted by the same editor that made a failed attempt to delete the wikiquote article Michael Scott Gallegos on the grounds "Not sufficiently notable." The majority of my work has been as the wikiquote editor ELApro. I have also been a long time editor for Wikipedia, but have not created many articles here. I would much appreciate your advice and/or contributions with regard to this decision. ELApro (talk) 18:55, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Shingwauk logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:20, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Would you have a moment to comment at Talk:Ancaster, Hamilton, Ontario#Ancaster, Ontario moved to Ancaster, Hamilton, Ontario. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 16:51, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Langford-Juan de Fuca

added a link pointing to John Horgan

Saanich North and the Islands

added a link pointing to Gary Holman

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:54, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. What I had removed there was a bunch of wiki markup which hadn't been used. If you look at every other year from 1999, the number of total valid votes etc. isn't mentioned/included. Regards,   Aloha27  talk  12:15, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Charlesbourg (provincial electoral district) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to François Blais

Richmond (Quebec provincial electoral district) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to André Bachand

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:24, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Matthew hk. I noticed that you recently removed content from Wikipedia:Requested moves/Technical requests without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Matthew hk (talk) 05:26, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The 10,000 Challenge of WikiProject Canada is approaching its third-anniversary. Please consider submitting any Canada-related articles you have created or improved since November 2016. Please try to ensure that all entries are sourced with formatted citations and have no unsourced claims.

You may use the above button to submit entries, or bookmark this link for convenience. For more information, please see WP:CAN10K. Thank-you, and please spread the word to those you know who might be interested in joining this effort to improve the quality of Canada-related articles. – Reidgreg (talk) 13:09, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, can you help complete the expenditures section of 2019 results? Thanks! Eric0892 (talk) 00:01, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:03, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	Thanks for your work Eric0892 (talk) 01:10, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Essex West (electoral district), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Essex North. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:14, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Fungus Guy! Thank you for making election result tables for BC ridings. It seems that previous election result tables are made in a separate template (e.g. Template:British Columbia provincial election, 2020/Richmond North Centre). Could you please help me separate tables into it's own templates? Thanks. - Eric0892 (talk) 19:22, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:17, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article Free Party Canada has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG and WP:ORG. Not all political parties get an article just because they have a leader or a candidate.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Walter Görlitz (talk) 17:17, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ivanvector's squirrel (^trees/_nuts) 16:38, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:力百 (alt of power~enwiki, π, ν) 20:08, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:04, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:CA religion has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:41, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Fungus Guy, I hope you're doing well. I was going through the list of active members of Wikiproject Somaliland, and wanted to check if you still considered yourself to be an active member of the project, which only means you are still interested in Somaliland and its related articles. If not, that's perfectly fine, I'm just seeking confirmation. Thanks! Johnson524 (Talk!) 16:58, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Is this an accepted species? Notable? FloridaArmy (talk) 14:31, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]