User talk:Hablabar

Welcome!

Hello, Hablabar, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Alfietucker (talk) 10:31, 5 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I very much liked the story related by Lucy Ishkanian which you added to this page - only Wikipedia's policy is to provide a citation for any unfamiliar or potentially contentious material added to an article. Have you a published source you could cite to confirm the story? If you are not sure how to add a citation, do please add an answer to this message (type it below - I will know when you respond) and I will try to help. Best wishes, Alfietucker (talk) 10:37, 5 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help find a resolution. The discussion is about the topic Azerbaijanis in Armenia. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! — TransporterMan (TALK) 14:11, 16 October 2013 (UTC) (DRN volunteer)[reply]

Hi there. I'm here to nudge you along to respond to the DRN filing. A dispute cannot be resolved without editors participating in the process. Failure to respond could lead to a summary consensus against your viewpoint Hasteur (talk) 12:51, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Shusha may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• and Russia, 1626-1796: A Documentary Record. Costa Mesa, CA: Mazda Publishers, 2001, page 133, (Kekhva Chelebi’s Report to the Collegium of [Russian] Foreign Affairs (17 December 1725)</ref><ref
• Karabakh and Shusha in the 18th century, the Russian diplomat and historian S. M. Bronevskiy (Russian: С. М. Броневский (1763—1830) implied in his ''Historical Notes'' that Shusha was a

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 01:37, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help find a resolution. The discussion is about the topic Talk:Shusha. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! — TransporterMan (TALK) 16:07, 22 November 2013 (UTC) (DRN volunteer)[reply]

Hello Hablabar. You've been involved the dispute at Shusha. You may be aware that Shusha is a contested article and it falls in the domain of Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Armenia-Azerbaijan 2. It looks like the WP:DRN discussion is about to close due to non-participation by those involved, including you. If you pass up the option for dispute resolution but you continue to revert the article in the future this may not count in your favor. WP:ARBAA2 provides for discretionary sanctions in contested areas. Please consider participating in the DRN. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 16:13, 28 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tigranakert of Artsakh, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kingdom of Armenia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help find a resolution. The thread is "Azerbaijan". Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! — Keithbob • Talk • 18:43, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: The case is open if you'd like to participate.-- — Keithbob • Talk • 18:45, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Azerbaijan may have broken the syntax by modifying 4 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• Atlas''. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2001: map 19 (Orontid Armenia, p. 33), map 20 (Empire of [[Tigranes the Great]], p. 34, map 21 (Artaxiad Armenia, p. 35), map 27 (Arsakid Armenia, p. 45</ref> More specifically, these lands made up Armenia's provinces of [[

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:22, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help find a resolution. The thread is "Khojaly Massacre". Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you. --Guy Macon (talk) 21:30, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Mediation Committee has received a request for formal mediation of the dispute relating to "Azerbaijan". As an editor concerned in this dispute, you are invited to participate in the mediation. Mediation is a voluntary process which resolves a dispute over article content by facilitation, consensus-building, and compromise among the involved editors. After reviewing the request page, the formal mediation policy, and the guide to formal mediation, please indicate in the "party agreement" section whether you agree to participate. Because requests must be responded to by the Mediation Committee within seven days, please respond to the request by 11 March 2014. 

Would you be able to signify here whether, or not, you agree to participate in this mediation? Sunray (talk) 17:39, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Hablabar. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Azerbaijan.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

The request for formal mediation concerning Azerbaijan, to which you were listed as a party, has been declined. To read an explanation by the Mediation Committee for the rejection of this request, see the mediation request page, which will be deleted by an administrator after a reasonable time. Please direct questions relating to this request to the Chairman of the Committee, or to the mailing list. For more information on forms of dispute resolution, other than formal mediation, that are available, see Wikipedia:Dispute resolution. 

Hi, Hablabar. In the article Azerbaijan Democratic Republic you are adding the image about events of 1920 to the section about establishment of republic. In this section we don't have a description of the events of 1920 and this image doesn't have anything about establishment. It could give readers wrong interpretation. I've described the reason of my removing of this image on the talk page. But you without consensus and participating on the talk return your variant. This your action goes against WP:CONSENSUS and seems like starting edit war. Please don't return disputed image and go to the talk page. If you continue non consensus edits I will fill a request on you. --Interfase (talk) 08:27, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. --Interfase (talk) 17:33, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mesrop Mashtots, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page State. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 3 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:52, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Hablabar. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Hablabar. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Hablabar. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]