User talk:Havradim

Hi Havradim! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Jtmorgan (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:03, 13 July 2016 (UTC)

Sadqa Hussein, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

MatthewVanitas (talk) 16:24, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I came across your new article for Sadqa Hussein when you added it to Sanhedria Cemetery, which is on my watchlist. I took the time to add some reliable sources and removed the PRIMARY tag. However, I didn't check the other sources you used. I just wanted to say that you are using very flowery language on both these articles, in violation of WP:PEACOCK and WP:NOTESSAY. Please try to maintain an impartial, encyclopedic tone in your future article writing. Thank you for your contributions. Yoninah (talk) 23:35, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the good edit and tips, I learned some things that I did not know from your sources. I have seen some of your extensive work in WP. I rolled back the name of the shul to Shemesh Sedaqah (it's visible 3x on the building in the photograph) and the name of the sefer (in Tidhar's book it's a typo; see here [1]). Also, you may want to check out my shul article here Draft:Shemesh_Sedaqah_Synagogue Havradim (talk) 03:57, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I included a source for the incident with the young Ovadia Yosef. Did you not trust it? It doesn't contradict the story with Attiya, which was in reference to keeping Yosef in the yeshiva, rather than sending him there in the 1st place. Havradim (talk) 04:05, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CatcherStorm was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Shemesh Sedaqah Synagogue and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CatcherStorm ^talk 19:02, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Havradim. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Shemesh Sedaqah Synagogue".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. TheSandDoctor (talk) 17:35, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Havradim. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Havradim. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Havradim! You created a thread called Flickr Commons licensing at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread. Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

On 6 July 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Aziz Abu Sarah, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Aziz Abu Sarah, a peace activist from East Jerusalem and promoter of Arab–Israeli peace projects, neither understood Hebrew nor knew any Israeli Jews until after leaving high school? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Aziz Abu Sarah. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Aziz Abu Sarah), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 00:02, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I wanted to address you about your in the 1948 article naming discussion. You voted agaisnt "1948 Arab-Iseaeli War" because there was no Israel during the civil war phase. I'd like to point out that World War I, as well as World War II were not always "world wars", but still the invasion of Poland as well as the battle of Tannenberg are part of these world wars. The Indo-Pakistani war of 1947-1948 began with the Pakistani invasion of Kashmir, although India didn't participate in the war yet. We try to reach a consensus here. I respect your opinion and if you still oppose this option after my explanation so be it. Still I think it makes a lot sense and it is one of the most common titles for the whole war and in my opinion the most recognizable and neutral.--Bolter21 (talk to me) 16:21, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

And please ping me if you respond.--Bolter21 (talk to me) 16:44, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Bolter21: Your point is well taken, but there are still problems with it. The name in this iteration for the second part of the war is overblown and repetitive. Leaving sources on the side for the moment, I have trouble figuring out just how to define the combatants. Arabs or Palestinians? Israelis or Jews? There were other players to the conflict as well such as Arabist British interests (Glubb Pasha et al.) so for accuracy maybe we should say British and Arab-Israeli War, as in French and Indian War. But combatants are not really necessary, we use American Civil War, not Union-Confederate War. 1948 War may sound bland, but it does appear in Hebrew: מלחמת תש״ח as an alternate name for the war. Arab-Israeli is usually found in regards to The Conflict, using the definite article Hebrew: הסכסוך הערבי-ישראלי, not the war. Havradim (talk) 22:14, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Well, the Palestinians are Arabs, and the Israelis are Jews. Can we really call the conflict between the Jews and Arabs a full-scale "war"? Most of the battles during that time were against the Arab Liberation Army, which was led by a Syrian and most of its men were not Palestinians. There was the Najjdah and Jihad al-Mukkadas, but that's it pretty much. The "war", as in, an army (or a militia) against an army began in 15 May 1948. The "War" clearly, officially, begins in 30 December 1947, and end with the armistices. The casualties are counted that way, the framework of the Nakba is exactly that, and hisotrians, and more importnant (to me), less academic sources, such as lectures for the simple people or school books just go with the simple option of calling the entire period of conflict a signle war. And what would be a better name than Arab-Israeli war? It was an Arab-Israeli war. Sure there was no Israel before 14 May, but it was proto-Israel. And sure it was in Palestine but also fought in Lebanon and Sinai, and the Palestinians didn't matter to any one here. The Arab nations cared about themselves, and the Jews cared about themselves. Essentially I am not trying to find an ideal name, I am trying to find a name that will divert readers where they need and help them understand. The current names do a terrible job. "Palestine War" will annoy pro-Israeli readers, who don't even know such name exists. Israeli War of Independence will annoy pro-Palestinians. 1948 War was deemed too general and the other options were confusing. It feels like if we only had one article it would be much simpler.--Bolter21 (talk to me) 10:59, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Bolter21: I agree with you that the entire event should be viewed as one war, as in your World Wars example. But I don't agree with your aim of trying to stretch the word 'Israeli' over the whole thing. Your enthusiasm to label it Arab-Israeli seems even stronger than your desire to call it a war, which you have stated only begins after 30 December or 15 May. Aside from Israeli not really being accurate, it will also irk Arab and Palestinian readers without achieving any real benefit. I am in agreement with you that using Palestine will only serve to alienate and confuse Jewish readers, who won't find the overview article or the civil war article easily. Using 1948 war will avoid most or all of these problems. I don't think the 3 articles will be merging into one any time soon. Havradim (talk) 21:36, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I reallly like the "Arab-Israeli" option from innocent reasons. There is a good ring to it and it is used by historians to refer to the entire war. I also really like the "First Arab-Israeli War" as it feels like how it would be named by a future historian when the conflict will end (with peace or total annihilation). I also like the "Palestine" option because it makes a lot of sense, but when speaking with fellow Israelis about it they were instantly raged.--Bolter21 (talk to me) 09:43, 18 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Bolter21: Adding 'First', 'Second' etc. is another reason not to like the Arab-Israeli War option since it takes all the character out of these unique historical events. Having 1948 War, Suez Crisis, Six-Day War and Yom Kippur War makes each one more identifiable at a glance instead of a confusing sequential number count. I understand why you think Palestine might make sense, but the whole point of this is to achieve consensus, which will be difficult with any politically charged term, as you have already seen with your friends. Now, will the people over at the main discussion going to see any of this back-and-forth? The naming question seems to remain unresolved at this point. Havradim (talk) 14:00, 18 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'd like to know on what source (or refs) your claim about the Rabbi's parents origin is based on. At least, as far as I know (from 'Arrutz 7' channel & more), his mother, Tova, immigrated from Aleppo (in today's Syria), and met her husband-to-be, Ben-TZion, in Israel. Thank you, בנצי (talk) 10:43, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

בנצי it wasn't my claim, that (erroneous, as it turns out) information was there before I started editing. Good catch though, and I just added the source from the hewiki article. Havradim (talk) 08:43, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I see. since, obviously, I scanned the hewiki article 1st for origin, I turned to the enwiki one only afterwards, following a comment by the user who was the 1st to claim Iranian origin. Erroneously, as you say, he says there that he established his claim on enwiki. I seems I've to renew my detective work - kind of an open loop. בנצי (talk) 15:09, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Chaim Malinowitz at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 12:01, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

On 1 January 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Chaim Malinowitz, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Rabbi Chaim Malinowitz approved every line and footnote of the English translation of the Talmud in the 73-volume Schottenstein Edition of the Babylonian Talmud? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Chaim Malinowitz. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Chaim Malinowitz), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 12:01, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

In cases where there's no damage to the wiki, {{uw-agf-sock}} can be more productive than filing an SPI case. IMHO. Cabayi (talk) 09:02, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Cabayi Thank you for the link. Is there any reason why this template is not listed under Wikipedia:Template messages/User talk namespace or in Category:Sockpuppet templates? Havradim (talk) 05:49, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Template messages/User talk namespace#Single-level templates, under "New user is likely to be using multiple accounts". As for the category, no idea. I'm not going to steal your credit if you want to fix it. Cabayi (talk) 17:17, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you look at my history, I was going through many pages of Palestinian villages and expanding the articles with information that you will find here https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Dura_al-Qar%27

This Huldra person didn’t like these mass changes, and it was decided I should try an “RFC”. Unfortunately, I’ve read the article for how to make an RFC numerous times and still can’t figure it out...can you put the information in the Wikipedia link above into an RFC form for me? And if so, send me a link to the RFC...any help you can help offer is much appreciated, thank you very much Zarcademan123456 (talk) 03:39, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This action can now be found here. Havradim (talk) 16:24, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:50, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

... for what you said for Yoninah! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:18, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:45, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

On 16 January 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Stay of exit, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the stay of exit has trapped possibly hundreds of British people? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Stay of exit. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Stay of exit), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 12:02, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Passover!

Hello Havradim, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this passover. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a happy passover or easter, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy editing, 𝕸𝖗 𝕽𝖊𝖆𝖉𝖎𝖓𝖌 𝕿𝖚𝖗𝖙𝖑𝖊 🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦 (talk) 17:56, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply] Spread the love by adding {{subst:Happy Passover}} to other user talk pages.

𝕸𝖗 𝕽𝖊𝖆𝖉𝖎𝖓𝖌 𝕿𝖚𝖗𝖙𝖑𝖊 🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦 (talk) 17:56, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Moadim LeSimha, and kudos for this. Havradim leaf a message 00:09, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in the Balkans or Eastern Europe. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. If you have questions, please contact me.

Jahaza (talk) 04:46, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

...you maliciously attacked and falsely accused another editor of being anti-Semitic... [2] I want to let you know that such horrendous false representation of what you actually said is unacceptable. You didn’t say what they claim you did. - GizzyCatBella🍁 15:13, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Now who's misrepresenting whom here? GizzyCat just gave you an outdated edit. This is the revised edit [3].
Things To Notice, 1) the revise edit was made 2 min after the original edit and 2) the revised edit was posted at least 1 hour prior to GizzyCat intentionally posting the outdated edit to misrepresent what I said. hmmm....
Heck, since you keep follow me on wiki and you sit on my Talk page, the least you can do is not misrepresent what I write on it. Lol! BetsyRMadison (talk) 16:24, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

See my response here. Havradim leaf a message 20:01, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Yosef Shenberger at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 15:40, 9 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The content I added on David Elazar is not a problem. You removing it is a problem because I added facts. Thank you and have a wonderful day! Sauce5544 (talk) 16:26, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The context in regards to this (sadly) subsequently blocked user. Havradim leaf a message 08:55, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

On 21 July 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Yosef Shenberger, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Yosef Shenberger was inspired to add stained glass and other decorative elements to his synagogues through his study of ancient ruins? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Yosef Shenberger. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Yosef Shenberger), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 12:02, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:32, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

...for fixing my inexplicable error. Not sure how I got the two intifadas mixed up there... Iskandar323 (talk) 09:52, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Until I read the Main Page, I had not known that the latest flareup was a direct result of Khader Adnan's death. Havradim leaf a message 10:20, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

On 30 June 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Hamad City, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Hamad City in Gaza was largely destroyed within minutes? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Hamad City. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Hamad City), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Z1720 (talk) 00:03, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]