User talk:Hesperian

---

Archives: … • 43 • 44 • 45 • 46 • 47 • 48 • 49 • 50 • 51 • 52 • Last archived on 5 February 2017

---

At this stage I am in process of writing a report about discussions in Australia about https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Strategy/Wikimedia_movement/2017 the cycle 2 of the broader wikimedia strategy -

You may well have responded elsewhere - but if you at all interested - not the slightest bother if you are not - please feel free to contact on or off wiki - thanks JarrahTree 06:40, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Article Legitimacy (criminal law) has been requested to be moved to Legitimacy (law) requesting your openion at Talk:Legitimacy_(criminal_law)

Thanks and regards

Mahitgar (talk) 07:41, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Precious

Five years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:57, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for today's Banksia telmatiaea, described: "f ever an article was ready to go to FAC, this is. We have plumbed the depths of obscure sources until convinced we have referenced everything that has ever been written about this plant. We've scaled cyclone fences in search of photographs. We've harassed the world authority on Banksia to verify doubtful photos for us. We've polished and polished and polished." Thanks go to everyone included in the "We"! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:55, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Seven years now! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:02, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Indigenous Australians from Western Australia, which you created, has been nominated for renaming to Category:Indigenous Australian people from Western Australia. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. -- Black Falcon ^(talk) 20:08, 22 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:WAMPs has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 18:23, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

An article that you have been involved in editing—Lily of the valley—has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. mettokki (talk) 03:46, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

happy new year for, 201-, and so on - almost a decade since suggestion lunch feels like JarrahTree 01:19, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

the probable answer but just fyoi anyways

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Meetup/Perth/50 - apologies for late notice - hope you are able to make it or some time!! JarrahTree 04:49, 14 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

G'day. Thanks heaps for the heads-up. I got back from two weeks up north yesterday afternoon, so right now I'm drowning in dirty washing etc, but I would like to get to this if I can. Hesperian 04:58, 14 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is to let you know that I've scheduled Banksia telmatiaea to appear on the main page as today's featured article on 12 August 2018. If you need to make tweaks to the blurb, it is at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/August 12, 2018. Ealdgyth - Talk 14:39, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Lists of Australian animals, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. DexDor ^(talk) 09:52, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

	Austral season's greetings
	Tuck into this! We've made about three of these in the last few days for various festivities. Supermarkets are stuffed with cheap berries. Season's greetings! Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 22:08, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Cas! And you! Hesperian 00:55, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

trust you have had a good christmas- hope to catch up in the new year some time.. JarrahTree 00:13, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers you too! Hesperian 00:55, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You're the guy who wrote Banksia oblongifolia, today's featured article, didn't you? I'd like to say, CONGRATULATIONS! GhotiGhoti (talk) 21:54, 12 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Flora of Australia by taxonomy, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Sietecolores (talk) 10:15, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

me thinks despite your good sense - they are ignoring you - clueless imho - this seems a good excuse - when's a good time for lunch...(limited days available - but maybe an email or phone thing to check)JarrahTree 05:59, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

the elusive hesp - out of the silence - appears! JarrahTree 00:31, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

found another [1] there are still a few out there ! JarrahTree 01:00, 20 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This message was sent to all administrators following a recent motion. Thank you for your attention. For the Arbitration Committee, Cameron11598 03:01, 4 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom would like to apologise and correct our previous mass message in light of the response from the community.

Since November 2018, six administrator accounts have been compromised and temporarily desysopped. In an effort to help improve account security, our intention was to remind administrators of existing policies on account security — that they are required to "have strong passwords and follow appropriate personal security practices." We have updated our procedures to ensure that we enforce these policies more strictly in the future. The policies themselves have not changed. In particular, two-factor authentication remains an optional means of adding extra security to your account. The choice not to enable 2FA will not be considered when deciding to restore sysop privileges to administrator accounts that were compromised.

We are sorry for the wording of our previous message, which did not accurately convey this, and deeply regret the tone in which it was delivered.

For the Arbitration Committee, -Cameron11598 21:03, 4 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yup. Hesperian 01:23, 6 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yesterday I started an article on this alga. I had hoped to add to it but find you have deleted it. I had hoped for advice as two references had been arranged not as I had hoped/expected. Due to computer problems I had to re-enter using a new username. I would be keen to start again and would be grateful for your advice.Gigartina (talk) 12:59, 24 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Gigartina: The article was deleted in 2008 by Hesperian, as a redirect to the genus, there would be no need for permission to start an article on the species. I may be able to help, and without spoiling the surprise I am curious to see what it turns out to be. cygnis insignis 13:13, 24 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Huon tells me I should not have put apostrophes at the name of an author " " - He/she corrected it. But now I cannot find the article he/she corrected!! - I will be grateful for your help.Gigartina (talk) 13:39, 24 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Are you related to the publishing company that shares your name? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 1.126.106.240 (talk) 14:05, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No. Hesperian 23:49, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

couldnt believe more diametrically opposed items - never take user names as having anything to do with reality (as such) JarrahTree 00:11, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, This is a note to ask: would you be interested in submitting any articles for external, academic peer review to improve their accuracy and generate a citable publication?

The WikiJournal of Science (www.wikijsci.org) and WikiJournal of Humanities (www.wikijhum.org) aim to couple the rigour of academic peer review with the extreme reach of the encyclopedia. For existing Wikipedia articles, it's a great way to get additional feedback from external experts. Peer-reviewed articles are dual-published both as standard academic PDFs, as well as having changes integrated back into Wikipedia. This improves the scientific accuracy of the encyclopedia, and rewards authors with citable, indexed publications. It also provides much greater reach than is normally achieved through traditional scholarly publishing.

The WP:WikiJournal article nominations page should allow simple submission of existing Wikipedia pages for external review. T.Shafee(Evo&Evo)^talk 03:12, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:04, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Awesome

Ten years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:49, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Has got to a new stage of its progress in this confusing and chaotic world... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Unknown-importance_Australian_biota_articles = 0. Please help by when creating new biota articles for australia, to make sure the unassessed page stays the way it is adequately tagged, or please ask for help in doing so... More on the next stages of the Australian biota project soon... and thank you very much for whatever you have done for the project in any way since 2006 - JarrahTree 05:51, 1 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

David Mabberley (Botanical Revelations,2019, p7) tells a far more likely story:

"The surviving specimen said to be from such 'herborisings' is held in the Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques in Geneva, Switzerland, and represents one of the the two species notable for being the first plants restricted to Australia to be named according to the Linnaean binomial convention in the 'sexual system' of the Swedish doctor and naturalist Carl Linnaeus (1707-78), a classification of plants base on the numbers of sexual parts (stamens and pistils) in the flowers.... They were named and illustrated in the Flora Indica (1768) of Nikolaas Burman (1733-93), a Dutch doctor and botanist, at least one of them coming from surgeon-botanist Christiaan Kleijnhoff (d. 1777), who established the first botanic garden in the tropics, in what is now called Jakarta, Indonesia. It is not known whether they were young plants from Kleijnhoff's garden (though neither is obvious from the names in his 'Descriptio plantarum'). However, if they had been raised from seeds collected on the voyage, this would perhaps help explain the absence of flowers, though Vlamingh was too late for the flowers of both species in any case. Indeed, as they have no flowers, the scraps were at first taken to be from ferns. The first is a wattle, Acacia truncata (Leguminosae), ..... The second, his 'Polypodium spinulosum', of which a specimen survives in Geneva, is a Synaphea (Proteaceae). Although these are technical 'firsts', no-one at the time knew where they had come from, and they therefore had no contemporary effect in revealing the flora of Australia to Europeans".

Thus, Mabberley believes that the specimens were grown in Jakarta from seed collected by Vlamingh and then later, with little idea of provenance, specimens sent to Burman... Thus what continued to exist from Vlamingh's men's herborising on the Swan, has very little to do with the careful pressing of specimens collected on site to be carried on a voyage, but rather more to do with a relatively swift collection of seed. So the statement "it is difficult to credit that far more abundant and showy plants would have been passed over in favour of the unremarkable S. spinulosum", would seem to be not to be the case.

Additionally, APNI gives the Burman reference as: Burman, N.L. (1768), Flora Indica: cui accedit series zoophytorum indicorum, nec non Prodromus Florae Capensis: 233, t. 67, fig. 1 in which Burman describes the type as "ex Java" (from Java).

I think there is a need to rewrite the last two sentences in the second paragraph of this section, to accommodate Mabberley's account, and am hoping you might be of the same view. MargaretRDonald (talk) 01:50, 3 April 2020 (UTC).[reply]

Hi Margaret, thanks for an interesting read. I'm not very active here at the moment. However I'm delighted to know that there are other people in the world who share my obsession with botanical taxonomic history. Mabberley's material is very interesting; please do add it to the article. Hesperian 02:09, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on William Perrin (convict) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Ravenswing 17:38, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Australian $50 note polymer back.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:23, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Mind-boggling that someone would remove pictures of old notes from Australian fifty-dollar note. Clearly encyclopedic, clearly fair-use. Hesperian 02:16, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

you have no idea what current geniuses are up to here... its as crazy as ever JarrahTree 05:05, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Amen to that! Peter coxhead (talk) 11:06, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is to let you know that Banksia sessilis has been scheduled as WP:TFA for 3 August 2020. Please check that the article needs no amendments. If you're interested in editing the main page text, you're welcome to do so at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/August 3, 2020. Thanks! Ealdgyth (talk) 16:01, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Trees of Saint Martin and Saint Barthélemy requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 02:42, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:18, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Yagan for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 02:58, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Lavatera indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:42, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Template ambiguous has been nominated for merging with Template:Template disambiguation. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Gonnym (talk) 09:36, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

May songs

Precious

Nine years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:48, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you today for Banksia integrifolia, introduced (in 2006) as a "comprehensive and well-written article on an important Australian tree"! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:16, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

today performances in Ukraine - for Ukraine - for peace, at the bottom an imaginary set of eight DYK - and more May pics--Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:17, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

today more pics, and should this woman have an article? - or only her sons? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:32, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I like my talk today (actually mostly from 29 May - I took the title pic), enjoy the music, two related videos worth watching! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:44, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A recently closed Request for Comment (RFC) reached consensus to remove Autopatrolled from the administrator user group. You may, similarly as with Edit Filter Manager, choose to self-assign this permission to yourself. This will be implemented the week of December 13th, but if you wish to self-assign you may do so now. To find out when the change has gone live or if you have any questions please visit the Administrator's Noticeboard. 20:06, 7 December 2021 (UTC)

Hi!

You get this message because you are an admin on a Wikimedia wiki.

When someone edits a Wikimedia wiki without being logged in today, we show their IP address. As you may already know, we will not be able to do this in the future. This is a decision by the Wikimedia Foundation Legal department, because norms and regulations for privacy online have changed.

Instead of the IP we will show a masked identity. You as an admin will still be able to access the IP. There will also be a new user right for those who need to see the full IPs of unregistered users to fight vandalism, harassment and spam without being admins. Patrollers will also see part of the IP even without this user right. We are also working on better tools to help.

If you have not seen it before, you can read more on Meta. If you want to make sure you don’t miss technical changes on the Wikimedia wikis, you can subscribe to the weekly technical newsletter.

We have two suggested ways this identity could work. We would appreciate your feedback on which way you think would work best for you and your wiki, now and in the future. You can let us know on the talk page. You can write in your language. The suggestions were posted in October and we will decide after 17 January.

Thank you. /Johan (WMF)

18:13, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

Template:Taxobox/sandbox/species has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 10:10, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Yagan of the Bibbulmun cover.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Hog Farm _Talk 00:34, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Botanical collectors active in Australia has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rathfelder (talk) 14:52, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is to let you know that the above article has been scheduled as today's featured article for 6 May 2022. Please check that the article needs no amendments. Feel free to amend the draft blurb, which can be found at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/May 6, 2022, or to make more comments on other matters concerning the scheduling of this article at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/May 2022. I suggest that you watchlist Wikipedia:Main Page/Errors from the day before this appears on Main Page. Thanks and congratulations on your work. Gog the Mild (talk) 17:04, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

22:52, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Flora of New South Wales and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 September 2#Flora of New South Wales until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 08:01, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ten years ago, you were found precious. That's what you are, always. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:33, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is a reminder that established policy provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period. You are receiving this annual reminder since you have averaged less than 50 edits per year over the last 5 years.

Inactive administrators are encouraged to reengage with the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for reengaging with the project are available at Wikipedia:WikiProject Editor Retention/administrators. If you do not intend to be engaged with the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at the bureaucrats' noticeboard.

Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — JJMC89 bot 00:24, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Abishe (talk) 02:41, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

— Moops ^⋠T⋡ 02:50, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Banksia brownii to be today's featured article for an unspecified date. You are invited to join the discussion by clicking here. Z1720 (talk) 14:13, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nice. Hesperian 23:42, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is to let you know that the Banksia brownii article has been scheduled as today's featured article for April 12, 2023. Please check the article needs no amendments. If you're interested in editing the main page blurb, you're welcome to do so at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/April 12, 2023, but note that a coordinator will trim the lead to around 1000 characters anyway, so you aren't obliged to do so. If you wish to make comments on other matters concerning the scheduling of this article, you can do so at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/April 2023.

I suggest that you watchlist Wikipedia:Main Page/Errors from the day before this appears on Main Page. Thanks Jimfbleak - talk to me? 13:44, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Coilostylis indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:27, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Finally online, this - with the original names Solander coined but were never published for Banks and Solanders 1770 haul of plants. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 20:57, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Cas! Good to hear from you. Oh, that's lovely. It's a pity they couldn't do colour photos though. Hesperian 23:48, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

True. I've returned to dungeon-mastering in DnD after many years, so free (and wikipedia) time chewed up by (fantasy) world-building Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 02:01, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 October 1 § Category:WikiProject X members on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Qwerfjkltalk 09:31, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Vegetation of Australia has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 15:59, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Vegetation of New Zealand has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 16:00, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Abishe (talk) 14:33, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Established policy provides for the removal of the administrative permissions of users who have made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period. Your administrative permissions will be removed if you do not return to the required activity level before the beginning of May 2024.

Inactive administrators are encouraged to engage with the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for re-engaging with the project are available at Wikipedia:WikiProject Editor Retention/administrators. If you do not intend to re-engage with the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at the bureaucrats' noticeboard.

Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — JJMC89 bot 00:27, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This bot is broken. At the time this message was posted, I'd made 114 edits in the past 60 months. A little over-eager to strip people of their admin rights, eh? Hesperian 10:47, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Hesperian,

I hope this message finds you well. I've noticed that your Talk page has grown quite extensive, which is a testament to your active engagement on Wikipedia. However, I'd like to suggest considering archiving some of the older discussions.

Archiving can lead to several benefits, including:

• Better Organization: It makes it easier for you and others to navigate through current discussions without scrolling through a long history of past conversations.
• More Conducive Conversations: With a cleaner Talk page, it becomes simpler for other editors to engage in ongoing discussions and for you to manage responses.
• Improved User Experience: For users on older computers or slower networks, a shorter page can significantly enhance loading times and overall accessibility.

If you're unsure about how to archive your Talk page, you can find detailed instructions here. I'm also happy to assist if you need any help.

Thank you for considering this suggestion. Your contributions to Wikipedia are greatly valued, and I believe that archiving could make your Talk page even more effective as a tool for collaboration.

Best regards, skarz (talk) 17:01, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Established policy provides for the removal of the administrative permissions of users who have made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period. Your administrative permissions will be removed if you do not return to the required activity level before the beginning of September 2024.

Inactive administrators are encouraged to engage with the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for re-engaging with the project are available at Wikipedia:WikiProject Editor Retention/administrators. If you do not intend to re-engage with the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at the bureaucrats' noticeboard.

Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — JJMC89 bot 00:29, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, thanks for creating this. Can you please add your sources? Thanks, Boleyn (talk) 17:20, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Trove referred to, contact sometime JarrahTree 11:13, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Established policy provides for the removal of the administrative permissions of users who have made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period. Your administrative permissions will be removed if you do not return to the required activity level before the beginning of September 2024.

Inactive administrators are encouraged to engage with the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for re-engaging with the project are available at Wikipedia:WikiProject Editor Retention/administrators. If you do not intend to re-engage with the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at the bureaucrats' noticeboard.

Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — JJMC89 bot 00:26, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sad. Hesperian 03:06, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I hope you're doing well. I hate this new feature for what it represents at times like this. Guettarda (talk) 21:36, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's not a problem. Thanks Guettarda, nice to hear from you. I hope you're going well too. Hesperian 23:37, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Established policy provides for the removal of the administrative permissions of users who have made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period. Your administrative permissions have been removed.

Subject to certain time limits and other restrictions, your administrative permissions may be returned upon request at WP:BN.

Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — xaosflux ^Talk 00:11, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I recall positive encounters with you in the past when we were both much more active on Wikipedia. I wish you well in whatever you are doing now. Scott Davis ^Talk 23:43, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oh hi Scott! A blast from the past. Someone who was around when I first joined -- OMG -- nearly twenty years ago. Yeah, I'm going really well, thanks. Way too busy for Wikipedia at the moment, but I still love the place and will be back one day. And you? Hesperian 00:39, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Very positive memories as well - back one day - hopefully not too long, sorely missed... JarrahTree 09:51, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Only somethingteen years until retirement :-) Hesperian 23:38, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Weren't you this younger guy? (At least relative to Casliber or me). How did 20 years pass? I'm at WikiConference North America right now, seeing people in person for the first time in five years. And I'm baffled by all the grey hair that has appeared from nowhere. Guettarda (talk) 20:14, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm keeping busy doing similar kinds of things - WikiTree is getting more of my time at present. I spent a lot of effort on places in South Australia in Wikipedia. Wikitree and gradually increasing interest in a few organisations that focus more on the colonial people who lived there. --Scott Davis ^Talk 14:49, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah...good ol' real life. I returned to dungeonmastering in Dungeons and Dragons a few years ago, which really chews up my desktop hours :) But I try to keep my toe in Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 19:17, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.

You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:27, 23 October 2024 (UTC) [reply]