User talk:Hurricanehink

Hi, Hurricanehink. I'm just posting to let you know that List of California tornadoes – a list that you have been heavily involved with – has been chosen to appear on the Main Page as Today's featured list for August 12. The TFL blurb can be seen here. If you have any thoughts on the selection, please post them on my talk page or at TFL talk. Regards, Giants2008 (Talk) 21:28, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

When I was editing User:OhHaiMark/1980 Pacific typhoon season, I noticed that when I subsituted the values of the template on the section for Typhoon Dom, it didn't mention the warning center. Normally, it does something like Typhoon (JMA), but it doesn't seem like that's the case. OhHaiMark (talk) 16:56, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Could you rate my current work on this endeavor if you have time? OhHaiMark (talk) 14:53, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 1937 Hong Kong typhoon you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Dora the Axe-plorer -- Dora the Axe-plorer (talk) 00:23, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations, Hurricanehink! The article you nominated, Hurricane Hilary, has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best articles on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.

This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured article. Keep up the great work! Cheers, FrB.TG (talk) via FACBot (talk) 19:50, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Hurricanehink. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Climate of North America, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:06, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Hurricanehink. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Climate of Oceania, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:06, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there Huricanehink (long time, no see!) I am currently working on Draft:List of Illinois tornadoes, and wanted to see if you wanted to help out (since you have experience in "List of ___ tornadoes" articles. It's quite a long list, and any help is greatly appreciated. Thanks! :) Sir MemeGod ._. (talk - contribs - created articles) 05:23, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Hurricanehink. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of Indonesia tornadoes, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:05, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is an alert being sent to all active editors on the WikiProject of Weather and any editor who has recently editors weather-related articles.

Editors on the Commons have received communication from the National Weather Service that the Template:PD-NWS, which is often used to upload weather-related images, is incorrect. There will be a discussion starting on the Commons Copyright Noticeboard within the next few days to determine how to manage this issue. Under the current PD-NWS copyright template, images on any NWS webpage was considered to be in the public domain unless it had a direct copyright symbol and/or copyright watermark.

One National Weather Service office has confirmed this is not the case. For the next few days, it may be best to not upload any image from an NWS webpage that was not made or taken directly by the National Weather Service themselves. Once the Commons determine how to move forward, editors will recent a new alert. The Weather Event Writer (Talk Page) 23:41, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am going to append this additional warning to @WeatherWriter‘s message: the National Weather Service emailed @Rlandmann today and clarified that the upload process does NOT automatically release a photo/video into the public domain. I strongly advise you not to upload anything under a PD-NWS tag unless it is specifically produced by the weather service. West Virginia WXeditor (talk) 04:25, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I know I probably shouldn’t be putting this here. But I don’t have any way of contacting the oversight team; so I’m requesting that you @Hurricanehink either revision delete or ask to suppress a couple versions of the Ghost town talk page. You’ll see which ones I’m referring to; but I don’t want to post which revisions on here publicly. West Virginia WXeditor (talk) 20:14, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I will also further add that the potentially oversightable content had been in place from late February until earlier this evening when I removed it and left the message here. West Virginia WXeditor (talk) 04:43, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Got it. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 20:05, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article 1937 Hong Kong typhoon you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:1937 Hong Kong typhoon for comments about the article, and Talk:1937 Hong Kong typhoon/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Dora the Axe-plorer -- Dora the Axe-plorer (talk) 12:26, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Happy First Edit Day! Hi Hurricanehink! On behalf of the Birthday Committee, I'd like to wish you a very happy anniversary of the day you made your first edit and became a Wikipedian! The Herald (Benison) (talk) 04:57, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

1982 Pacific typhoon season has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 15:33, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 1937 Pacific typhoon season you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of TheNuggeteer -- TheNuggeteer (talk) 01:25, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article 1937 Pacific typhoon season you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:1937 Pacific typhoon season and Talk:1937 Pacific typhoon season/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of TheNuggeteer -- TheNuggeteer (talk) 05:21, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am providing members of the WikiProject of Weather along with users who frequently edit weather-related articles an update to the discussions regarding the PD-NWS image copyright template.

For starters, no "formal" administrative-style rules have occurred. All that means is the template is not formally deprecated and is still in use. However, Rlandmann, an administrator on English Wikipedia, has begun an undertaking of reviewing and assessing all images (~1,400) that use the PD-NWS copyright template.

What we know:

• Following email communications, the National Weather Service of Sioux Falls has removed their disclaimer, which has been used for the PD-NWS template for decades. This means, as far as the National Weather Service is concerned, the following statement is no longer valid: By submitting images, you understand that your image is being released into the public domain. This means that your photo or video may be downloaded, copied, and used by others. Currently, the PD-NWS template links to an archived version of the disclaimer. However, the live version of the disclaimer no longer contains that phrase.
• See this deletion discussion for this point's information. NWS Paducah (1) failed to give attribution to a photographer of a tornado photograph, (2) placed the photo into the public domain without the photographer explicitly giving them permission to do so (i.e. the photo is not actually in the public domain), (3) and told users to acknowledge NWS as the source for information on the webpage. Oh, to note, this photographer is a magistrate (i.e. a judge). So, the idea of automatically trusting images without clear attribution on weather.gov are free-to-use is in question.
• The Wikimedia Commons has a process known as precautionary principle, where if their is significant doubt that an image is free-to-use, it will be deleted. Note, one PD-NWS file has been deleted under the precautionary principle. The closing administrator remarks for the deletion discussion were: "Per the precautionary principle, there is "significant doubt" about the public domain status of this file (4x keep + nominator, 5x delete), so I will delete it."
• Several photographs/images using the PD-NWS are currently mid-deletion discussion, all for various reasonings.
• As of this message, 250 PD-NWS images have been checked out of the ~1,400.
• The photograph of the 1974 Xenia tornado (File:Xenia tornado.jpg) was found to not be in the public domain. It is still free-to-use, but under a CC 2.0 license, which requires attribution. From April 2009 to August 2024, Wikipedia/Wikimedia was incorrectly (and by definition, illegally) using the photograph, as it was marked incorrectly as a public domain photograph.

Solutions:
As stated earlier, there is no "formal" rulings, so no "formal" changes have been made. However, there is a general consensus between editors on things which are safe to do:

• Images made directly by NWS employees can be uploaded and used under the new PD-USGov-NWS-employee template (Usage: {{PD-USGov-NWS-employee}} ). This is what a large number of PD-NWS templated images are being switched to.
• Images from the NOAA Damage Assessment Toolkit (DAT) can be uploaded and used under the PD-DAT template (Usage: {{PD-DAT}} ). A large number of images are also being switched to this template.

For now, you are still welcome to upload images under the PD-NWS template. However, if possible it is recommended using the two templates above. I will send out another update when new information is found or new "rulings" have been made. The Weather Event Writer (Talk Page) 03:28, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I will add that there are a couple other safe templates such as PD-NEXRAD for radar images; and also the generic PD-USGov and PD-USGov-NOAA templates. West Virginia WXeditor (talk) 05:40, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article 1937 Pacific typhoon season you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:1937 Pacific typhoon season for comments about the article, and Talk:1937 Pacific typhoon season/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of TheNuggeteer -- TheNuggeteer (talk) 00:44, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you see an unfamiliar username start commenting on future discussions. I am in the process of changing my username from WestVirginiaWX to Hurricane Clyde. West Virginia WXeditor (talk) 04:27, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I just published the list that I’ve been intermittently working on for the past couple months. I got the list back to 2000; still needs work on tornadoes prior to then and on recent tornadoes that have occurred since I started making the list. 🌀 Hurricane Clyde 🌀 (talk) 22:11, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I hope this message finds you well. I was hoping that you would assist me in the preparation and processing of the FAC nomination. I wanted to nominate this article. I'll be on the lookout for your response Thank you. dxneo (talk) 17:17, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure how, but your template changes on Talk:Hurricane Newton (1986) and Talk:Effects of Hurricane Isaac in Florida have broken the article history templates. Any idea what the issue might be? CMD (talk) 19:06, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Huh. I tried to fix it by changing the date format and it didn't work for me, and look at this oldid, MDY working there fine. Oh well, it's working now, big mystery box. CMD (talk) 03:35, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Hurricanehink. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Climate of South America".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:10, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Hurricanehink. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Climate of Oceania".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:53, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I just want to ask a question, how do you find the warning and info pages for typhoons? (Mostly the JTWC and JMA). Thanks, 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 12:14, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Hurricanehink, I was wondering if you could help us with the discussion on Joseph Barbera talk page. I didn't want to take this issue straight to the administrators' noticeboard. Whatsupkarren (talk) 20:07, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The fourth round of the 2024 WikiCup ended on 29 August. Each of the 8 contestants who advanced to Round 4 scored at least 472 points, and the following contestants scored more than 700 points:

• Generalissima (submissions) with 1,150 points, mostly from 3 featured articles, 2 featured lists, 7 good articles, and 13 did you know nominations;
• Arconning (submissions) with 791 points, mostly from 2 featured lists, 8 good articles, 4 did you know nominations, and plenty of reviews;
• AirshipJungleman29 (submissions) with 718 points, mostly from a high-multiplier featured article on Genghis Khan and 2 good articles; and
• BennyOnTheLoose (submissions) with 714 points, mostly from 1 featured article on Susanna Hoffs, 2 featured lists, and 3 good articles.

Congratulations to our eight finalists and all who participated. Contestants put in extraordinary amounts of effort during this round, and their scores can be seen here. So far this year, competitors have gotten 36 featured articles, 55 featured lists, 15 good articles, 93 in the news credits, and at least 333 did you know credits. They have conducted 357 featured content reviews, as well as 553 good article reviews and peer reviews, and have added 30 articles to featured topics and good topics.

Any content promoted after 29 August but before the start of Round 5 can be claimed during Round 5, which starts on 1 September at 00:00 (UTC). Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. If two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether for a good article, featured content, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. Remember to claim your points within 14 days of earning them, and importantly, before the deadline on 31 October.

If you would like to learn more about rules and scoring for the 2024 WikiCup, please see this page. Further questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges (Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs), Epicgenius (talk · contribs), and Frostly (talk · contribs)) are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:12, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am providing members of the WikiProject of Weather along with users who frequently edit weather-related articles an new update (2nd update) to the discussions regarding the PD-NWS image copyright template.

On the Commons, an RFC discussion is taking place to figure out how to manage the template. No "formal" administrative-style rules have occurred, so nothing has changed. That is not a surprise as the RFC is still ongoing.

What is new?

• The entire Template:PD-NWS has been placed inside a "License Review" template, which is viewable via the link aforementioned.
• Most of the photographs which were uploaded to the Commons originally under the PD-NWS template (approximately 1,500) have been reviewed. Out of those ~1,500 images, only about 150 are requiring additional looks. Most images have been verified as free-to-use and switched to a respective, valid template.
• As of this moment, approximately 50 photos have been nominated for deletion (results pending).
• A handful of images have been deleted (either confirmed copyrighted or under the Commons precautionary principle.
• One image has been kept following a deletion request under the PD-NWS template.

How to deal with new photos?

Given all of this, you might be wondering how the heck you use weather photos while creating articles? Well, here is what you can do!

• If the photo was made by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (excluding NWS), You can upload it under the PD-NOAA template via {{PD-NOAA}}.
• If the photo was made by the National Weather Service (NOT Third Party), you can upload it using the new PD-NWS-employee template via {{PD-USGov-NWS-employee}}.
  • If the photo originates on the Damage Assessment Toolkit, you can upload it using the PD-DAT template via {{PD-DAT}}.
• If the photo is from a U.S. NEXRAD radar, you can upload it using the PD-NEXRAD template via via {{PD-NEXRAD}}.

What about third-party photos?

In the case of third-party photos...i.e. ones not taken by the National Weather Service themselves...there is an option which was discussed and confirmed to be valid from an English Wikipedia Administrator.

• KEY: Third party images of tornadoes & weather-related content can potentially be uploaded via Wikipedia's Non-Free Content Guidelines!
• Experiments/testing has been done already! In fact, I bet you couldn't tell the difference, but the tornado photograph used at the top of the 2011 Joplin tornado was already switched to a Non-Free File (NFF)! Check it out: File:Photograph of the 2011 Joplin tornado.jpeg! That photo's description can also be used as a template for future third-party tornado photographs uploaded to Wikipedia...with their respective information replaced.
• NFFs can be uploaded to multiple articles as well!
• The absolute key aspect of NFFs is that they relate to the article and are not decoration. For example with the Joplin tornado, the photograph: (1) shows the size of the tornado, (2) shows the "wall of darkness", which was described by witnesses, (3) shows a historic, non-repeatable event of the deadliest tornado in modern U.S. history. The exact reasoning does not have to be extremely specific as Wikipedia's NFF guidelines "is one of the most generous in the world" (words of Rlandmann (not pinged), the administrator reviewing all the PD-NWS template images).
• Tornado photographs will almost certainly qualify under the NFF guidelines, especially for tornadoes with standalone articles or standalone sections.
• NFFs cannot be used when a free-photograph is available, no matter the quality, unless the section is about that specific photograph. For example, the photograph used at the top of the 2013 Moore tornado article is confirmed to be free-to-use, therefore, no NFFs of that tornado can be uploaded on Wikipedia. However, the "Dead Man Walking" photograph could almost certainly be uploaded as an NFF to the 1997 Jarrell tornado article as that photograph is the topic of a section in the article.
• NFFs currently on Wikipedia can and should be placed in this category: Category:Non-free pictures of tornadoes.

Update Closing

Hopefully all of that information kept you informed on the Commons copyright discussion process and how you can still create the best articles possible! If you have a question about something mentioned above, reply back and I will do my best to answer it! Also, ping me in the process to ensure I see it! Have a good day! The Weather Event Writer (Talk Page) 00:59, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Hurricanehink. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "List of South Atlantic tropical and subtropical cyclones".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:28, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Hurricane Dennis you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of JCMLuis -- JCMLuis (talk) 22:03, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I saw that you weren't active on Wikipedia since 2 September, so I decided to complete most of the tasks in the nomination since I did not want it to fail due to inactivity. You're welcome! _ZZ^Z'S 00:04, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Hurricane Dennis you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Hurricane Dennis and Talk:Hurricane Dennis/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of JCMLuis -- JCMLuis (talk) 14:24, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Hurricane Dennis you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Hurricane Dennis for comments about the article, and Talk:Hurricane Dennis/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of JCMLuis -- JCMLuis (talk) 22:44, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

1943 Mazatlán hurricane has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. OhHaiMark (talk) 21:58, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Since we are proposing a lot of mergers, here are a few others that might be worth considering

• Effects of Hurricane Ivan in Alabama
• Effects of Hurricane Ivan in Florida (note that those two can probably also be combined for a larger subarctle for the Southeast, similar to Katrina)
• Effects of Hurricane Georges in Florida
• Effects of Hurricane Georges in Louisiana
• Effects of Hurricane Jeanne in Puerto Rico

12.74.53.67 (talk) 21:09, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I want to add onto this comment. For Hurricane Georges, we can either merge Puerto Rico, the Dominican Republic, Haiti, and Cuba into a new article called the Greater Antilles or all except Cuba back into the main article. _ZZ^Z'S 23:02, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm currently working on a draft for the 1936 North Indian Ocean cyclone season. How does it look? OhHaiMark (talk) 19:27, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Now I've made a draft for Typhoon Ruth (1991). How is it? Tavantius (talk) 04:04, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I want to be able to improve articles and get them to GA/FA class without relying on others to do it for me. Now that you're not very active in getting the 2005 Atlantic hurricane season to FT status, are you at least able to mentor me in getting Earth science-related articles to GA and/or FA status. If you're not able to, at least you responded. Thank you in advance. _ZZ^Z'S 02:50, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Hurricanehink. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Congratulations, Hurricanehink! The article you nominated, Hurricane Cindy (2005), has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best articles on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.

This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured article. Keep up the great work! Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) via FACBot (talk) 00:05, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hurricane Isaias tornado outbreak closed with a consensus to merge. 74.101.118.218 (talk) 21:20, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And so did Effects of Hurricane Isabel in New Jersey, Effects of Hurricane Isabel in Pennsylvania and Effects of Hurricane Isabel in New York and New England.74.101.118.218 (talk) 21:32, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I just want to ask; can I continue the newsletter? The newsletter seems like a good idea, and I don't want to let it go to waste. 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 02:12, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I know that you believe that Kirk is not noteworthy, but I've been working on the draft and slowly improving it. I would really appreciate if you (or any other more experienced editors) didn't redirect it.

Thanks, 96.236.149.251 (talk) 00:10, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Also, by the way, this is the other account of Shmego talking. Am I allowed to have two accounts if I make it known that they are the same person? I know you have a mobile account so I just want to check. Shmego2 (talk) 00:14, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm currently seeking to try to rewrite the 1967 Pacific typhoon season, spin off all needed articles, and hopefully promote it to FA-status. However, there's one odd problem...The JMA did not include any intensity estimates in their BT, choosing to use pressure instead, and it seems like the JMA intensity are just original research. How should I rewrite this? Tavantius (talk) 20:02, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've done the met history of three of the storms, which you can see here, and spun off an article on Typhoon Sally. How are they? Tavantius (talk) 19:33, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Hurricanehink! I have to admit I don't know exactly what I'm doing as I have only started adding to wikipedia. I have a weird love for sharpies and noticed that the page didn't talk about specific colors or where they come from (certain colors are discontinued or only come in certain packs). I don't want to be a bother but I added a bunch to this page and it was reverted by another user. At first glance they hadn't said anything, just simply reverted my input. I had to ask them why and they gave me attitude and really no explanation for the revert. So I added my information again....to have the same user revert my stuff again. I don't understand because I sourced my work. Once looking at this user's talk page I realized he does this to many people, on many different subjects. He thinks he's wikipedia king, the end all be all if you will. Many people on the page are asking for the information I provided, I truly don't get if this is my fault or the user who feels they would like to revert anything added by another person. I don't know if I should open a dispute resolution or ask for a protection for my items, as stated previously I don't completely understand how all of this works. Thank you in advance for all that you do. Thegoldengen (talk) 04:24, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure if you noticed, but JayTee32 recently boldly merged Hurricane Beatriz. I just wanted to ask whether this was fair or if there should have been a merge discussion for this, because prior to the merge I believed that there was enough information on Beatriz for it to stay as an article.

Thanks, Shmego2 (talk) 00:21, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Shmego2 If you disagree with my actions then you can discuss them on my talk page or we can move it to a community discussion on the 2023 Pacific hurricane season talk page. I don't see why you went to an uninvolved administrator without discussing my own edits with me first. JayTee⛈️ 14:22, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Shmego Tagging your main acct as well. JayTee⛈️ 14:23, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

JayTee32 (talk · contribs) I saw nothing wrong with your edits. I let Shmego2 know about the bold, revert, discuss cycle. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 19:50, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@JayTee32 I apologize. I haven't really seen a merge like that and I was unaware of this policy. I only asked Hurricanehink because he is an experienced editor who I know. Once again, I apologize for the inconvenience.

Shmego2 (talk) 22:07, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Just address me directly next time you wish to talk about my edits, I'm always open to discussion. JayTee⛈️ 16:30, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.

You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:22, 23 October 2024 (UTC) [reply]

While searching through the history of the 1967 Pacific typhoon season to improve my draft on it, I found revision 29387684, an edit of yours which stated where Clara originated from. If you remember, could you tell me where that came from? Tavantius (talk) 19:37, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Tavantius (talk · contribs) - almost all of my edits from that article came from the JTWC annual report for 1967 - link here. If you look on page V-31 (just click on Clara in the Table of Contents), you can see where they describe the origins of the storm. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 19:47, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the info! Tavantius (talk) 20:19, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The 2024 WikiCup has come to an end, with the final round being a very tight race. Our new champion is AirshipJungleman29 (submissions), who scored 2,283 points mainly through 3 high-multiplier FAs and 3 GAs on military history topics. By a 1% margin, Airship beat out last year's champion, BeanieFan11 (submissions), who scored second with 2,264 points, mainly from an impressive 58 GAs about athletes. In third place, Generalissima (submissions) scored 1,528 points, primarily from two FAs on U.S. Librarians of Congress and 20 GAs about various historical topics. Our other finalists are: Sammi Brie (submissions) with 879 points, Hey man im josh (submissions) with 533 points, BennyOnTheLoose (submissions) with 432 points, Arconning (submissions) with 244 points, and AryKun (submissions) with 15 points. Congratulations to our finalists and all who participated!

The final round was very productive, and contestants had 7 FAs, 9 FLs, 94 GAs, 73 FAC reviews, and 79 GAN reviews and peer reviews. Altogether, Wikipedia has benefited greatly from the activities of WikiCup competitors all through the contest. Well done everyone!

All those who reached the final will receive awards and the following special awards will be made, based on high performance in particular areas of content creation. So that the finalists do not have an undue advantage, these prizes are awarded to the competitor who scored the highest in any particular field in a single round, or in the event of a tie, to the overall leader in this field.

• Generalissima (submissions) wins the featured article prize for 3 FAs in round 4, and 7 FAs overall.
• Hey man im josh (submissions) wins the featured list prize for 23 FLs overall.
• MaranoFan (submissions) wins the featured topic prize for 9 articles in featured topics in round 1.
• Hey man im josh (submissions) wins the featured content reviewer prize for 110 FA/FL reviews overall.
• BeanieFan11 (submissions) wins the good article prize for 58 GAs in round 5, and 70 GAs overall.
• Fritzmann (submissions) wins the good topic prize for 6 articles in good topics in round 2.
• Sammi Brie (submissions) wins the good article reviewer prize for 45 GA reviews in round 2, and 78 GA reviews overall.
• BeanieFan11 (submissions) wins the DYK prize, for 131 Did you know articles overall.
• Muboshgu (submissions) wins the ITN prize, for 15 In the news articles in round 1, and 36 overall.

Next year's competition will begin on 1 January. You are invited to sign up to participate; the WikiCup is open to all Wikipedians, both novices and experienced editors, and we hope to see you all in the 2025 competition. Until then, it only remains to once again congratulate our worthy winners, and thank all participants for their involvement!

If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs), Epicgenius (talk · contribs), and Frostly (talk · contribs). MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:48, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Hurricanehink. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of Texas hurricanes, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:07, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Hink,

I wanted to ask for some help verifying a death estimate for a EPac storm. I was doing some research on 1988's Hurricane Kristy, a storm which appears to have caused significant deadly flooding and was building a draft article in my sandbox. In 2014, @Cyclonebiskit made an edit claiming 21 direct deaths had been due to the hurricane (which was the primary reason I decided to look into making an article for it), but the source he provided had no direct link, and I can't find the article he referenced anywhere online or in newspaper archives.

The reason I'm coming to you is because Cyclonebiskit appears to have gone inactive for almost a year now, so I can't ask him to provide the source for me, and I wanted a more experienced editor to look for the source for a quick couple minutes in case I missed something. If you can find it anywhere, let me know. If not I plan to remove the source and delete the draft, as I feel uneasy about the potentially inaccurate death toll having gone unnoticed for over 10 years now. Here's a courtesy link to Kristy's section, the source is FN59. JayTee⛈️ 06:54, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

		The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
		For doing as much as you could to help a user who wasn't of the best state; for being considerate, helpful and generous with your time for them, even though things didn't work out in the end. BarntToust 14:22, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

well, I don't know why this didn't add in a new section. darn. Separated into its own section now BarntToust 14:23, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Hurricanehink. You have new messages at Zzzs's talk page.
Message added 03:39, 6 November 2024 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

_ZZ^Z'S 03:39, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Wikipedia. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement.

Take the survey here.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 00:18, 13 November 2024 (UTC) [reply]

A tag has been placed on Talk:Hurricane Rafael (2024)/GA1 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Tavantius (talk) 20:44, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:05, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What do you think of the old article 1902 Pacific typhoon season, which I've improved recently. I expanded the lead, fixed the references, and added some pictures. The article looks sharper. 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 (My "blotter") 04:38, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]