Imperial Star Destroyer (if such you be), i was adding not removing content from this website. yrs,86.144.143.146 (talk) 21:18, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I noticed that you have Image:ISD9275860.jpg in your userspace. It is a WP:fair use picture which means it should only be used for that article. Please remove the image from your userspace. If you have any questions contact me at my talk page. Thank You LegoK^ontribsT^alkM 22:08, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Heya, Imperial. I noticed that although you're a very effective vandal fighter (pardon the shameless flattery), you don't appear to leave any warnings on the offending users' talk pages. In order for other users to identify repeat vandals and problem users more easily, you should consider leaving a warning template (a list can be found at WP:TM/UTN) on the user's talk page, usually in a section denoting the current month. User talk:170.252.248.206 is quite a good example of such warnings being issued. Keep up the good work, and hope to see you around more! haz (talk) 21:45, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Seconded. :) Enigma ^message 17:18, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm fairly certain that the IP has been previously vandalizing from a different IP. The history you referenced is incomplete. Doesn't matter, really. Just was pointing that out, because the first edit was to J's page. Enigma ^message 17:17, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well hello there. I'm back again 86.145.151.0 (talk) 18:47, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I must do this for your own good Drogs630 (talk) 18:55, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Alright mate, gave you some time to think about the wrongs that you did, but now I'm back, bigger and better than ever. Notts33 (talk) 19:53, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Adidasnike619 (talk) 16:57, 16 May 2008 (UTC) this is my first talk thingymagigy. so i'd like to make it goood. so i enterd dis.[reply]

its basicly a sketch of caio putting holy water on his head. Featuring: Wicktor Caio(bitch) Marcio(a sssoooddd!!!)

"Dum tee dum tee dum"- sang caio "holy water on my head"-caio said When Caio put holy water on his head he started to dissolve. "IMPOSSIBLE"Screamed Caio in a high pitched voice. And then Wiktor came up and said "Wotteeevaa" "Wotteeevaa" "Wotteeevaa" Then Marcio came up and said "Dont give a damm!" "Dont give a damm!" "Dont give a damm!" Finally Caio dissolved. (cheers in the background:hozar!) The end. By Brendan and Chris.

Lol. Imperial Star Destroyer (talk) 17:24, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I am up kinda late here tonight.

You requested some relevant information, its all there. http://search.japantimes.co.jp/print/fm20080321a1.html

Rock2Wgtn is also chock full of information.

Relevant and up-to-date.

My expectations are with high hopes that all this gets resolved one way or another. As you may know, I have been seeing a lot of things that I view as not so moral on Wiki these past days. I originally was just going to give up my Wiki contributions after seeing them wiped off. Wiki should be about things that are progressed for the reader. I hope you do a tremendous job on what you wish to do here on Wiki.

I want to stay here. I hope you can clear the nonsense that led to me almost leaving for good. Efforts wiped away for no good a reason is practically stressful or bordering on it. Rolling up the towel on Wiki should not be an option for anyone with a mature mind. Editors have no right to claim that they are living in anger or making claims that they are better. I was surprised to read that. Do you agree with what has been going on lately? Do you think this is the way a Wikipedia editor should be handled? Can you see or recognize the on-going problem here? This is about being set as a target from an editor on Wikipedia. In my world it is called juvenile. Abnormally wrong to be associated as an editor on this site.

Alot of faith in you, Imperial Dark Star.

Thank you Electric Japan (talk) 17:51, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, its too bad that a lock can't be put on some text like on some other articles. Once an individual passes on there is only so much you can add to his lifestyle. Anyway, I appreciate your words at this time. I use to be energentically happy to contribute here. I am a writer and find it relaxing to add things that I know about these past years. My hope and expectations are just to remain on here with no issues. There should be no reason for anything like that to happen on this open encylopedia. It was embarrassing to have to bring it up to you and the other fella on Wikipedia. An administrator should watch those two editors with a hawks eye. I would never claim to be an editor doing that kind of irresponsible edits. It only drives people away and give this site a bad image. That is not what Wikipedia wants.

Thanks! Electric Japan (talk) 18:05, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, you've been here long enough to know that additions, especially to biographical articles, must be backed up by a reliable source. Also, this statement, "In the spring of 2008, Alice returned to the Pacific region after years of anticipation from fans. Alice Cooper, flew from Melbourne, Australia, where he performed two successful concerts before continuing on to a huge rock Festival in Wellington" is riddled with peacock terms. --NeilN ^{talk ♦ contribs} 18:16, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:PEACOCK. Things like "after years of anticipation" and "successful concerts" need to be sourced from neutral third party sources. --NeilN ^{talk ♦ contribs} 18:27, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The source does not mention anything about his upcoming concert schedule nor does it use the terms I described above. I noticed you undid my edit - are you going to improve the addition? --NeilN ^{talk ♦ contribs} 18:33, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

How about this: "In the spring of 2008, Cooper returned to the Pacific region. The Japan Times asked him on this latest theatrical tour, "Alice what took you so long to return?" Alice replied back, "Hauling the gallows around is pretty expensive." It took twenty some odd years for the singer to return to the country. Full interview located here.[[1]]" --NeilN ^{talk ♦ contribs} 18:37, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I made the edit (similar to what I proposed). Hopefully it's a good compromise. --NeilN ^{talk ♦ contribs} 18:44, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

		Wikipedia Motivation Award
		Hello! Thanks for the help in the Alice issue. I know you understand. I think you may of even increased your knowledge on the singer himself. And this is why Wikipedia is important. To open wide more informative articles on individuals and historic events in the world you and I live on. Educating people with up-to-date useful articles. I apppreciate your quick help.Electric Japan (talk) 05:55, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm looking into the problem accounts, I see some have targeted you. Thought you'd like to know it's getting attention. FT2 ^{(Talk | email)} 04:22, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello beasty.remember me? adidasnike619.Well im not him really i'm Fitzpatrick brendan (talk) 16:55, 24 May 2008 (UTC).I created another account so i could still talk to you over the half term period. Its gets kind o" depressindgwaiting to be unblocked so i created my second account.Im obviously still blocked as adidasnike619.So what. Remember this' Jeffs scared'?[reply]

Willy on Wheels was probably the most notable chronic page-move vandal. He was fond of appending "on wheels" (and various other things) to the titles dozens of articles at a time. Initially it seems to have been a single person operating many accounts, but sooner or later other folks began to take up the same tactic and it became less obvious who the 'real' Willy was. We tried to ban him for a while but this turned out not to make much sense: obviously any account that began moving pages in the Willy style would be blocked at once anyway, and we would have no way to detect, nor indeed any objection to, Willy's creating a regular account to use for non-vandalous edits. Eventually, like most vandals, he got bored and went away. (Or perhaps he began making legitimate edits -- heck, he might be an administrator now.) — Dan | talk 19:00, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

In re Willy - he actually left Wikipedia after it saved him from failing a university course. IINM, he left a note on the mailing list asking forgiveness; I believe it was linked to in AN/I or its bigger brother AN sometime within this past month. (Apologies for the necromancy) -Jéské ^{(v^_^v E pluribus unum)} 16:47, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Surprisingly, User:Willy on Wheels is not the 'original'. It seems that particular account was never actually used for vandalism, though many accounts with similar names were. The page User:Willy on Wheels, which at first had no corresponding user, was used to keep track of blocked accounts used for Willy-style vandalism until it was deleted in the VFD you have no doubt found; I guess the username was not created until the VFD itself. I came across the account a month or so later and blocked it for good measure. — Dan | talk 06:28, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

im unblocked so i can delete fitzpatrick brendan. although this is fitzpatricks brendan"s last message.farewelll.... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fitzpatrick brendan (talk • contribs) 12:15, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It's obvious, I can't win here with the regulars. I will continue monitoring Wikipedia. I put in a big effort here, a lot of my time as well. They do love yanking chains here. I am eager to avoid any involvement with the young ones. I just see things on here being thwarted by a few music fans. I try to keep away from unusual situations involving young people in deeply to that genre of music.

I did find it hysterical. We'll talk later,okay. Thanks for the messages.

Your friend, Electric Japan (talk) 15:28, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well I am sorry if I offended you!! But please, don't call me Ziggy - I am not the same of Zippycup, despite what all of you think. You guys are way off!! You've labelled a bunch of sockpuppets as his which aren't. Personally, I find it hilarious that you are so inept at doing any of your admin and blocking correctly. Enjoy the rest of your holidays!! And have a barnstar why don't you? 86.135.198.100 (talk) 10:00, 28 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well obviously I'm a vandal (although I'm on a vandal's vacation at the moment). My point is that you lot completely screw up all of your sockpuppet pages - me and Zippycup are different people. You all talk about Checkuser like its unquestionable and almighty, but clearly its broken or doesn't work very effectively. Personally, I actually find it quite amusing that you all talk with such confidence and are so wrong. Toodles 86.135.198.100 (talk) 13:55, 28 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

For funsies. But also to make a valid point 86.135.198.100 (talk) 17:09, 28 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Chris i have a ???. Wot is your username on wookeepedia???please tell me. by the way i created my own account on it.i still av the same username on it.see ya .p.s hope your aving a good time!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Adidasnike619 (talk • contribs) 18:01, 28 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. He deleted last section in my talk page - "eurovision map". So I did not control and wrote. US - Jimmy Slade (talk) 22:20, 28 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Imperial Star Destroyer. Please see my talk page for a response to your comment. - tholly ^--Turnip-- 10:04, 29 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. It is another late night here. My wife saw what you wrote. Nice work. I am too busy in Japan to pick up the language like you. How long did it take you to pick that up. I am not a Japanaholic. I just got here in a series of events. I have traveled around the globe a few times and thought Japan was the best suited for me. It ain't easy here by a long shot.

Anyway, I have another issue with this character User:Indopug. it has potential to get worse. What is up with this guy?

Who is this? Now he's tinkering with the Cheap Trick page. I am baffled at his obsessions. I broke out laughing when he gave his reason for fiddling with it.

I'm telling you this is just cracking me up. He has no idea how significant this concert was for the band. Thirty years! It was an anniversary concert. The fact is that if it wern't for Japan there would be no Cheap Trick now. I've seen this band countless times and have spoken to them about the importance of the Budokan and Japan to the group.

What am I doing in a place like this?

Electric Japan (talk) 17:42, 7 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks again for the message, you had me fooled. The language is very complex and not useful to me. All I need to know is how to converse with the people. And that is something more all together.

Thanks, Electric Japan (talk) 05:43, 9 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that on 18:32, 8 June 2008, I momentarily blocked this user: It was a mistake on my part; the mistake was recorded in the block log and I am recording it here as well. I was in the process of blocking a user that had vandalized this user's page when I made the error. I apologize for any inconvenience. Toddst1 (talk) 18:36, 8 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Imperial Star Destroyer, I had a look through some of your recent reverts of vandalism, and they looked quite good. Would you like me to grant your account rollback rights to make vandal-fighting easier for you? Just remember that rollback, if granted, should only be used to revert vandalism, and should not be used to revert good-faith, and certainly should not be used to revert-war either: misuse or abuse can lead to the tool being taken away. Tell me what you think: it'll help you revert vandalism much more easily. Thanks. Acalamari 01:59, 9 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Rollback granted. :) For practice, you may wish to see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback. Good luck. Acalamari 15:28, 9 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to User talk:Rsazevedo, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Rsazevedo ^msg 16:17, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No worries. The user who put those tags has been kind of a nuisance in several articles. Someone should keep an eye on him. All the best, Rsazevedo ^msg 16:22, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Darthipedia, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. andy (talk) 22:25, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have semi'd your talk page in order to stem the flow of harassment from those IPs. Both are blocked at present. -Jéské ^{(v^_^v E pluribus unum)} 17:54, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

How did you become an administrator please tell me its not fair!!!!!Adidasnike619 (talk) 15:43, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Out of curiosity, have you ever revealed your RL identity on Wikipedia? (I'm not suggesting you do if you haven't, I'm merely asking as it may have a bearing on what's been going on.) -Jéské ^{(v^_^v E pluribus unum)} 17:26, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Chris sorry i slapped u The reason i did it for: because i felt like it.Anyway moving on i have a present for you.

Adidasnike619 (talk) has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Cheers, and happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

hope you like mate!!Adidasnike619 (talk) 16:45, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've reverted your page move of the above article, as he's widely known as Nani, not by his birth name. If you disagree, please discuss it on the talk page. Cheers, Darkson (BOOM! An interception!) 21:40, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Two reasons: 1)It's malformed. 2)You don't have even 500 edits. Someone with less than 500 edits will have no chance of passing an RfA in today's RfA climate. If you have any questions, I'll be glad to answer them. Please hold off on pursuing another RfA until you have more experience. Also, stolen from Dlohcierekim, see this edit and read it. Enigma ^message 06:36, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

		The Original Barnstar
		Keep up the good work Weevilcatcher (talk) 08:46, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about the vandalism - I've seen the error of my ways Weevilcatcher (talk) 18:30, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

How did you get that Motivation and Barnstar award???Please tell me.adidasnike619 15:16, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

Hello. I saw your message. What does that mean? Did someone say something about me?

Electric Japan (talk) 01:12, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What are you talking about?

I have no idea? I am just not into the erasing anymore. I am not into the switcheroo's on Wikipedia anymore. I wrote with passion in mind, but not to have it erased. I can't understand this concept. I know publishers have done a few edits but on here it is too much. I type pretty fast and ...well that is another story all together.

Are you trying to encourage me back? Electric Japan (talk) 08:59, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OK But it was sent to my Talk Page for some reason. Hey, I did not quit. I just took a break from the cold hearted nonsense.

Thanks, Electric Japan (talk) 15:17, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

As a regularly contributing UK Wikipedian, we were wondering if you wanted to contribute to the Oxford bid to host the 2010 Wikimania conference. Please see here for details of how to get involved, we need all the help we can get if we are to put in a compelling bid.

We are also in the process of forming a new UK Wikimedia chapter to replace the soon to be folded old one. If you are interested in helping shape our plans, showing your support or becoming a future member or board member, please head over to the Wikimedia UK v2.0 page and let us know. We plan on holding an election in the next month to find the initial board, who will oversee the process of founding the company and accepting membership applications. They will then call an AGM to formally elect a new board who after obtaining charitable status will start the fund raising, promotion and active support for the UK Wikimedian community for which the chapter is being founded.

You may also wish to attend the next London meet-up at which both of these issues will be discussed. If you can't attend this meetup, you may want to watch Wikipedia:Meetup, for updates on future meets.

We look forward to hearing from you soon, and we send our apologies for this automated intrusion onto your talk page!

Addbot (talk) 23:36, 30 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

hiya im sorry i just cant find the time to come on here anymore so i am deleting my account. Cheers for all the help. See ya!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Adidasnike619 (talk • contribs) 16:11, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:49, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings Recent Changes Patrollers!

This is a one-time-only message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:

1. Adjust number of entries and days at Last unpatrolled
2. Editor-focused central editing dashboard
3. "Hide trusted users" checkbox option on watchlists and related/recent changes (RC) pages
4. Real-Time Recent Changes App for Android
5. Shortcut for patrollers to last changes list

Further, there are more than 20 proposals related to Watchlists in general that you may be interested in reviewing. (and over 260 proposals in all, across many aspects of wikis)

Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.

Note: You received this message because you have transcluded {{User wikipedia/RC Patrol}} (user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings.

Best regards, Stevietheman — Delivered: 01:11, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]