User talk:Ipankonin

This is a Wikipedia user talk page. This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia. The original talk page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Ipankonin.

Archives

Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3

I just saw this... wow. Superb job, simply excellent. Carl Lindberg (talk) 19:02, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My thoughts exactly. I don't know what I'm most impressed with, the quality of your work or your having the guts to do it :) Fvasconcellos (t·c) 22:21, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! -- I. Pankonin Review me! 22:58, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Been looking through some of the British Royals pages and have to say, Great Job on the coronet images. Very well done! Prsgoddess187 20:42, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hiya Mr Pankonin! I happened to have a wondrance, with which you might be able to help me — its occurs to me that Prince Andrew bears a Royal Ducal coronet, Edward a Son coronet, and William a Wales-son coronet. So what would William's be if he were made a duke in his father's lifetime? Would it become a Royal Ducal? Like for example Prince Albert Victor, Duke of Clarence? Cheers DBD 23:27, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

So you consider that a dukedom would not alter William's coronet? DBD 23:59, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The first image, the one from vector images.com is obviously a derivation of the gov't COA. At some point derivations can become different enough to allow their own copyright. I don't know how that is defined. Quite probably it depends on how good a lawyer you hire. We should avoid redrawing (in vector) close copies of images from VI as there is a possibility that the image has been changed sufficiently to qualify for its own copyright. Which would be a Russian copyright, because VI is, as you know, in Russia. There's another real world factor. It would take a hell of a lot of rubles to hire a decent attorney in the U. S. or U. K. or wherever they would have to sue Wiki. My thought is to quietly move away from using their images. I put this on your talk page, as I don't want educate certain deletionist parties who frequent the graphics lab, please consider deleting it. Sagredo^{⊙☿♀♁♂♃♄} 20:12, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

FYI, your edits to the Fetus article have been reverted. See here. I cannot deal with the reverter, but you are welcome to try.

Also, I have added a comment at the Graphic Lab for you, here. Thanks.Ferrylodge (talk) 18:43, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• ! Chris (クリス • フィッチ) (talk) 08:06, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

lol -- I. Pankonin (t·c) 08:09, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

68.39.174.238 (talk) 17:58, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:ZESA logo.svg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 01:55, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ipankonin, your images are brilliant, and a great addition to articles! Just to let you know that a user (anonymous) claims that the lozenge in the arms of Princess Victoria of the United Kingdom is wrong. I've no knowledge of coats of arms, so I have no idea about it, but the user states:

"On the ascent of her father Edward VII to the throne in 1901 Princess Victoria of Wales became daughter of the Monarch and her title changes to "The Princesss Victoria" and her differencing would have reduced to only three points."

If you could help with this I'd greatly appreciate it :) Thanks, PeterSymonds | talk 20:38, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

...has been nominated for speedy deletion as an orphan! I've taken a wikibreak for Lent, so would you mind helping to sort it out please? Many thanks DBD 00:50, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:Soccer goalkeeper.jpg, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:Soccer goalkeeper.jpg is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Image:Soccer goalkeeper.jpg, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 09:32, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Eh up mate — congrats on your promotion! I was reading my University's page, and noticed the conspicuous absence of the coat of arms. There are several references online here at least if you fancy giving it a go — just if you fancy it! Cheers DBD 01:15, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! Just a quick word of thanks for this template, it is very nice indeed. I ported it over to the Hungarian Wikipedia under the same name. Kind regards, hu:User:Dunee 15:26, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Just thought I'd let you know that there's a discussion about the above at the WikiProject, and I'm inviting all of the members to join in DBD 13:40, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ipankonin,

Just to let you know that the Featured Picture Image:Waterloo Campaign map-alt3.svg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on June 15, 2008. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2008-06-15. howcheng {chat} 22:45, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I tried a couple of ways to fix the bug where ribbons with devices start a new line. As I stated on that talk page, it can be fixed by adding display:inline-block; to the outer two divs in each subtemplate, but this won't be well supported until FF3 and IE8 are out. (Actually these two divs could be pulled into the main template since they aren't specific to the number of devices on a ribbon.) – flamurai (t) 21:30, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AH, I just noticed you are inactive. – flamurai (t) 21:33, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Introducing WikiProject United States Government... [edit]
	Hello Ipankonin, Are you interested in Politics, Law or the United States? Do you enjoy expanding, creating or maintaining articles relating to those subjects? Or do you enjoy the small stuff? Or maybe you like learning about the United States Congress or the Commander in Chief. Well, wait no longer, because we have a project for you! WikiProject United States Government is where all the cool Wikipedians who watch C-SPAN hang out! Join the project today and help us get it off the ground and flying. Thanks in advance, « Diligent Terrier Bot (talk) 21:23, 3 August 2008 (UTC) [reply] This message has been delivered by Diligent Terrier Bot on behalf of WikiProject United States Government. You have received it because you are a member of a related WikiProject or you have said you are interested in your userspace. Message written by Leonard^Bloom and Diligent Terrier.	Help us get the project off the ground and flying.

I know you're inactive, but I thought I'd still better post on your user page that I've removed Image:Adolphus Duke of Cambridge Arms.svg from Prince Adolphus, Duke of Cambridge and Template:Teck-Cambridge Family; see the relevant talk pages for why. Opera hat (talk) 10:55, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hiya. For several months now, the article naming for 18th Century British royals has been ever-which-where — all over the shop. In an attempt to solve this, I have prepared a page for discussion: here. Please, please, please come and discuss, even contribute to the Poll. Cheers! DBD 15:37, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I believe there is an error with the Armorial of the Earl of Warwick - the "Kingmaker".

The first Grand Quarter, quarters 2 and 3 are depicted as Warwick, but should be Clare. The fourth Grand Quarter, quarters 1 and 4 are depicted as Clare, but should be Warwick.

The Arms of Clare "Or three chevronelles Gules" can be referenced in Burke's General Armory, page 198. The ancient Arms of Warwick "Chequy or and azure, a chevron ermine" are in A Familiar Introduction to Heraldry (Barrington, 1848) page 160. The Arms of Neville detailing the Grand Quarters is in the first reference on page 727. There are many other references - I will get them for you if you wish.

S. Denison Genealogist —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.184.136.184 (talk) 21:18, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:CaseLogo.svg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:22, 10 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I see that you are inactive but did want to mention something relative to the excellent template you made. I just added some text to the talk page for the template -- specifically, that apparently the Navy and Marine Corps do things differently from how the Army and Air Force do them for multiple awards. I will try to get some better documentation and then figure out some way to change the script. The good news is I think that oak leaves all work one way and award stars the other... DukeEGR93 21:41, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

They look so good - any chance I could get hold of the texture for military ribbons? I'm trying to update the military ribbons for countries in the game Erepublik :) Jan Baykara (talk) 16:20, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Is there any chance you might do a set of aribic numerals for the U.S. Air Medal. There is a general officer article with awards but he has 23 Air Medals and no way to display it. Let me echo all the others and say your work is magnificent. Meyerj (talk) 00:05, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hullo there. I have opened a new discussion about the styling of HRH The Earl of Wessex's children: here because their articles are currently in violation of the NPOV policy. Do please drop by and have your say (and feel free to pass on the word to other concerned parties!) DBD 21:58, 3 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Ipankonin, I'd like to make a request but I wanted to see if you were checking your talk page or if you were still absent. Please let me know. Evan.oltmanns (talk) 23:44, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

An image created by you has been promoted to featured picture status Your image, File:England Expects Signal.svg, was nominated on Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution! Makeemlighter (talk) 00:11, 31 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Is there any chance that numerals and the Navy "E" devices can be added to the "type" parameter? Just curious, — - dain- talk    20:27, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ipankonin,

Just to let you know that the Featured Picture File:England Expects Signal.svg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on October 21, 2013. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2013-10-21. Thank you for all of your contributions! — Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:01, 7 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, i would like to have your opinion about a discussion which i started here, thank.Kingroyos (talk) 23:14, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A proposal to de-authorize a group of idle interwiki bots on the English Wikipedia is currently in process. A bot account of yours has been included in the list. If you are no longer using this bot, no action is neccessary by you. Should you wish to revive your bot in the near future, please remove your bot from the list here: en:Wikipedia:Bot_owners'_noticeboard#Bot_that_are_inactive_for_the_last_2-4_years_and_may_lose_bot_flag. Thank you for your contributions. For the en: Bot Approvals Group, Magioladitis (talk) 05:53, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Al qaeda in iraq. Since you had some involvement with the Al qaeda in iraq redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. ~Technophant (talk) 05:31, 15 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:41, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:46, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ipankonin, I'd like to invite you to an upcoming edit-a-thon:

ART+FEMINISM EDIT-A-THON

• Saturday, March 5th, 9:30 a.m. – noon
• Madison Public Library (Madison, Wisconsin)
• Bring a laptop! There will be snacks and daycare

RSVP on the event page if you plan to attend or have any suggestions. czar 00:53, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You received this message because you are a member of Category:Wikipedians in Wisconsin. To opt-in to future Madison event messages, add yourself to the mailing list.

Thanks for uploading File:Twin Rivers logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:30, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Ongoing conflict. Since you had some involvement with the Ongoing conflict redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 20:09, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Liberation of Iraq. Since you had some involvement with the Liberation of Iraq redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Tataral (talk) 06:23, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bots Newsletter, April 2017

Greetings! The BAG Newsletter is now the Bots Newsletter, per discussion. As such, we've subscribed all bot operators to the newsletter. You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future newsletters by adding/removing your name from this list. Highlights for this newsletter include: Arbcom Magioladitis ARBCOM case has closed. The remedies of the case include: Community encouraged to review common fixes Community encouraged to review policy on cosmetic edits Developers encouraged to improve AWB interface Bot approvals group encouraged to carefully review BRFA scope Reminders/Restrictions specific to Magioladitis BRFAs We currently have 27 open bot requests at Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval, and could use your help processing! Discussions There are multiple ongoing discussions surrounding bot-related matters. In particular: RFC on COSMETICBOT Efforts at WP:CHECKWIKI to identify cosmetic fixes Requested move for the Bot Owners' Noticeboard A phabricator ticket T162685 has been made to have a "bots" tag, so issues related to bot frameworks can be tracked New things Several new things are around: A BAG Guide has been created (WP:BAGG, discussion). Users now have the option to hide AWB from their watchlists via a script (WP:HIDEAWB, discussion) The guidance on how to deal with bot issues has been overhauled (WP:BOTISSUE, discussion) The bot policy has been updated to clarify that bot operators are required to register accounts. (WP:BOTACCOUNT, discussion) Wikimania Wikimania 2017 is happening in Montreal, during 9–13 August. If you plan to attend, or give a talk, let us know! Thank you! edited by:Headbomb 11:35, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply] (You can unsubscribe from future newsletters by removing your name from this list.)

Since you've been inactive for a while, I've removed you from the subscription list. Feel free to re-add yourself to the newsletter if you become active again though. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 23:47, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:USCG decorations has been nominated for merging with Template:US interservice decorations. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. PPEMES (talk) 17:02, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:US Navy Department decorations has been nominated for merging with Template:US interservice decorations. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. PPEMES (talk) 17:03, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:USAF decorations has been nominated for merging with Template:US interservice decorations. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. PPEMES (talk) 17:03, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:USArmy decorations has been nominated for merging with Template:US interservice decorations. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. PPEMES (talk) 17:03, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:US interservice decorations has been nominated for merging with Template:USArmy decorations. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. PPEMES (talk) 17:04, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:US interservice decorations has been nominated for merging with Template:USAF decorations. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. PPEMES (talk) 17:04, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:US interservice decorations has been nominated for merging with Template:US Navy Department decorations. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. PPEMES (talk) 17:04, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:US interservice decorations has been nominated for merging with Template:USCG decorations. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. PPEMES (talk) 17:04, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]