User talk:JFreeman

This user may have left Wikipedia. JFreeman has not edited Wikipedia since 176 May 2007. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

Archives

May 2006 - November 2006 November 2006 - December 2006 December 2006 - January 2007

I signed up tonight for one reason. I have never tried to delete anything including the Russian article from your site or any one elses. Jenny Wms.

This area is relly not a talk subject, rather an apolgy. I am making an effort to aplogise to all those who posted a warning on the Julian Jr. High Talk Page. On Behalf of the under educated and crude wiki vandalizers at my Jr High, I would like to apologise. Our IP adress has been blocked, and I want it to stay that way. This is an insult to this encyclopedia. Again, I apologise. Thank you.

-Nick B, Student and wiki editor.

--I am your father. 17:35, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Again, thank you so muchTonyCrew 17:43, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you add two more warnings to theis talk page when they hadn't actually vandalised ast all after my warning? I took the liberty of removing one of your warnings as being OTT in the circumstances.Theresa Knott | Taste the Korn 21:35, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

contrary to illustrious the paragraph that was no doubt copied and pasted on how I'm a spammer, I'd like to clarify that i'm not. I'll discuss things in the talks section before writing in articles next time.

regards. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 217.35.77.77 (talk) 16:58, 6 February 2007 (UTC).[reply]

The version I saw was clearly [[1]] when I did my edit. Is it my fault that Wikipedia had a delayed edit (like always?)?

Again, use your brain before accusing someone of vandalism, especially going warning happy.

--131.204.127.101 21:28, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, take a loot at What Vandalism Is Not

And let me know how my actions were vandalism that warranted two warnings.

"If a user treats situations which are not clear vandalism as such, then it is he or she who is actually harming the encyclopedia by alienating or driving away potential editors."

Overzealeous editors like youself are what turn people off. --131.204.127.101 21:14, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This user by the name of Jvandub has been vandalizing the Drew Stanton article. If you have the time could you please keep an eye on it? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by - MrKing84 (talk • contribs) 07:20, 16 February 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Just an FYI, you have warned me twice for editing articles that I've never touched or even read. You need to exercise caution when reporting and/or warning unregistered users by IP address, as I do not have a static IP, nor do the 1500 other individuals with amongst whom this IP address rotates. 12.150.23.178 21:26, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I replied on the user's talk page. --JFreeman ^(talk) 02:56, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

User 206.173.167.194 recently vandalized the chicken (food) article, and viewing his/her talk page, I noticed they had many warnings, the most recent of which was from you. As a relatively new wikipedia editor, I don't know how to block them. If you could look at their recent vandalism, and block them if you see fit (as you said would happen if they continued such behavior), I'd appreciate it.--Grendlefuzz 10:07, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I replied on Grendlefuzz' talk page. --JFreeman ^(talk) 15:41, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

you realise that you can never ban me, ever... it takes me 5 seconds to change my IP address —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 70.49.129.200 (talk) 01:06, 11 March 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Mr Jeni has passed away, whether or not i have an article to go with it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.234.73.190 (talk • contribs) 23:48, 10 March 2007

I replied on the editor's talk page. --JFreeman ^(talk) 06:06, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I understand your concern. Sorry. He is a client of mine and thought i would add it. I will wait until tomorrow when the news breaks. Again, sorry.

The editor was correct; the news broke this morning. I left a response on the editor's talk page and removed the warning I left there yesterday.

--JFreeman ^(talk) 19:05, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've been blocking a lot of vandals you reported today, and I've noticed that you often give multiple final warnings within minutes of each other. Is there a particular reason you do this? I know it's not wrong or anything, but it seems like a less ideal use of your time. Natalie 17:32, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I replied on Natalie's talk page. --JFreeman ^(talk) 17:48, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No, it doesn't seem like a bad thing at all - just unusual. For school vandals, also, I suppose there is a chance that the user has changed within those few minutes. But mostly, I was just curious about your logic. Thanks for indulging me! Natalie 17:49, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I just wanted to say thank you for the great information you gave on how to stop vandals. I've encountered a few annoying ones in the past few weeks, and being able to easily find the links to report serious & repeated vandalism as well as templates for warning messages has been useful. I appreciate it! Keep up the good work with helping new wikipedians! --Grendlefuzz 22:53, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm wondering why a link to a popular discussion board (PlanoOnline.com) for Plano, Texas residents would be banned, but a link to a popular Frisco, Texas discussion board (Frisco-Online.com) is allowed? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 76.184.219.229 (talk) 14:45, 22 March 2007 (UTC).[reply]

I replied on the editor's talk page. --JFreeman ^(talk) 16:53, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry it has been a while. i accidently edited a page of yours and i overreacted at your response. My first question is "That warning that i recieved was that just a normal thing that occurs with edits to your pages?". second "How do you add photos to a wiki entry?" later you can help me with learning how to make my user page and teach me wikiett if you want.

Sorry i just tried to carry out a test. I didn't mean to.

At 01:18, 7 April 2007 (UTC), you warned 66.32.146.127 and reverted the edit for adding incorrect information. However, 66.32.146.127 was actually reverting 72.129.108.101's vandalism (changing the date of Nevada's separation from Utah from 1861 to 2007). I edited Nevada to correct that date. ⇒Bayerischermann ^- 20:55, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You've reverted a bunch of edits by Judeeclare, and I don't argue that they were worth reverting. Judeeclare made a bunch of edits today, all (of those that I looked closely at) related to inserting links to/information from a particular external site. Do you know (or speculate) what the story is with that user? -Ipoellet 23:06, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I replied on the editor's talk page. --JFreeman ^(talk) 03:27, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

As you know, the user 222.152.194.25 has continued to vandalize aafter multiple warnings. I am a new user, so I was just wondering how to request a ban or block or something. Thanks. Yaksar 23:29, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I was unaware that my links were considered spam.

I don't own these pages and I thought they would be considered good content for your site.

I have read your warnings and will not post on this site anymore until I learn the correct way to go about doing so.

This is in reference to this post you wrote to me.

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:72.135.214.91&redirect=no

Christina —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 72.135.214.91 (talk) 00:45, 12 April 2007 (UTC).[reply]

From a student @ KCTC PUBLIC SCHOOL

This ISP is part of a network with over 300 users and I would recommend that you make it unable to edit posts, due to the inability to determine the exact identity of the poster due to the number of possible users.

I was very distressed to see that you had removed Procyon Lotor's historical discussion of recent civil rights litigation in Williamson County and I want to see that material restored immediately. You say it was removed because it was "opinion" or viewpoint, when the truth is that EVERY fact asserted in that article on civil rights litigation was (a) a matter of public record and (b) links were expressly stated to the public records described. Your removal of this material was irresponsible. Not all truthful history is comforting or flattering, and the subject matter of Civil Rights Litigation in Williamson County may well NOT be comfortable to some people, but it is ALL true and ALL verifiable and Procyon Lotor provided ALL links sufficient to confirm ALL the facts which were stated. Your removal of this historical information about ongoing litigation seems to express YOUR viewpoint and opinion of what the truth may be. What Procyon Lotor provided was verifiable true history which was calculated to avoid problems such as this one. Local history needs to be told just as accurately and carefully as National history. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Procyon Lotor Linnaeus (talk • contribs) 07:26, 23 April 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Although the tone of Procyon Lotor's addition on Litigation in Williamson County, Texas, was not neutral, I suggest that that he submit a revised section that sticks to verifiable facts and provides cites that allow the reader to verify those facts, with no editorial commentary expressing a point of view on them. It is certainly appropriate to include material on a political jurisdiction that there is litigation there that may be of interest to readers. 207.11.113.30 15:17, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

JFreeman, I think that with 72.134.55.98 you bit the newcomer. It was his first edit ever, he added things testing formatting. (diff) I know that wasn't the right place for him to test, but giving a message like that (level 3 test) suggests that he's been doing it repeatedly and on purpose to be a vandal, instead of just being new and not knowing better. --Mini-Geek ^(talk) 00:47, 5 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

(responding to the message you left on my talk page)
I think that instead of that, it would be good if, on your first post, it gives a message saying something to the effect of "If you want to test to try out formatting on your first post, please use the sandbox." And yeah, we all make mistakes. --Mini-Geek ^(talk) 15:16, 5 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I Can't Edit why? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 64.49.112.26 (talk) 16:48, 9 May 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Take a look at your talk page. It seems you've been blocked for vandalism. --JFreeman ^(talk) 17:01, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I wonder if you would mind taking a look at this article there is a rather contentious dispute "raging" there and a neutral observer might help. Thanks. RalphLender^talk 17:48, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wow! Thanks for watching over that article :-) -SpuriousQ (talk) 18:17, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have semi protected Google search for 1 week to deal with the IP hopping link spammer. After 1 week if they return, please report to WP:RFPP. —dgies^t_c 18:17, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks - I'm making so many people happy today... :) Kuru ^talk 23:31, 12 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I would suggest you block this IP if you have the power. Here is another vandalism by him [2]___J.delanoy 16:16, 22 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Before I do it, I'm wondering if this site would now fit in the Collin County, Texas area? The site is collincountystation. com and has a good deal of information on it. Please look at the site before you say no. :) F. Vest 11:42, 15 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The IP address 128.61.112.250 is a dynamically-assigned, shared address for Georgia Tech's wireless network users. You attempted to send the following message to this address, but it will likely not be received by its intended recipient. Please refrain from sending messages by IP address to any users in the 128.61.x.x subnet for this reason.

Please do not add unhelpful and unconstructive information to Wikipedia, as you did to Atlanta, Georgia. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.

As a current or past contributor to a related article, I thought I'd let you know about WikiProject University of Florida, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of University of Florida. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks and related articles. Thanks!

Um I do not know if that was being sent towards me but well I got yelled at for doing something to Issac Newton and I actually did nothing to it at all I am sorry if this is annoying but well I really did nothing to it —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.177.13.1 (talk) 20:31, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Nv. I saw your name at Image:JPF-TX-Georgetown-BlueHole.jpg. How to Eat Fried Worms was filmed in and around Austin, Texas. This article gives a very good description on the exact location where the film was shot. If you have the time, would you please take photos of the filming locations and post them in the How to Eat Fried Worms (film) article. Thanks. Bebestbe (talk) 23:34, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi JFreeman. You contributed to this page which has been nominated for deletion. I hope you will help keep this from happening. The article needs improvement and strengthening, not deletion. Regards, Hmose (talk) 13:25, 8 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, JFreeman! WikiProject United States, an outreach effort supporting development of United States related articles in Wikipedia, has recently been restarted after a long period of inactivity. As a user who has shown an interest in United States related topics we wanted to invite you to join us in developing content relating to the United States. If you are interested please add your Username and area of interest to the members page here. Thank you!!!

--Kumioko (talk) 18:15, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate your dedication to this site and keeping it moderated but I have never altered any sites and have never heard of a tv show called two-a-days to even alter it. Thanks though. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.57.248.33 (talk) 23:10, 26 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox spring has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Magioladitis (talk) 21:35, 13 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hey J Freedman, I am not sure where you got the idea that I "vandalized" a page on wikipedia. I have never even visited the Plano, Texas page, which you claimed I vandalized. Please calm down, and keep insane accusations at bay. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.104.20.25 (talk) 05:15, 17 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:54, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You are invited to participate in the 50,000 Challenge, aiming for 50,000 article improvements and creations for articles relating to the United States. This effort began on November 1, 2016 and to reach our goal, we will need editors like you to participate, expand, and create. See more here!

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:40, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Image TXMap-doton-Bastrop.PNG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]