User talk:Jaspergeli

This user talk page might be watched by friendly talk page stalkers, which means that someone other than me might reply to your query. Their input is welcome and their help with messages that I cannot reply to quickly is appreciated.

Jasper's Talk
Hi!
Born	Marikina
Nationality	Filipino

Archives

Archive 1

Hello, I'm Widr. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Southern platyfish because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Widr (talk) 08:58, 17 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jaspergeli! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! ChamithN (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the Teahouse This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 18:02, 17 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:White Moor Goldfish.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 15:05, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, its Jaspergeli I just want to suggest that delete or remove that file that I upload, I'm sorry. Jaspergeli (talk) 17:44, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not move a page to a title that is harder to follow, or move it unilaterally against naming conventions or consensus, as you did to Platy. This includes making page moves while a discussion remains under way. We have some guidelines to help with deciding what title is best for a subject. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the test Wikipedia. Thank you. --Animalparty! (talk) 22:16, 1 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on List of koi varieties requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://homepage.ntlworld.com/a.antonio/antoniokoi_007.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Compassionate727 (talk) 17:25, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of List of koi varieties, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://bestkoidirect.com/index/index.php/koi-varieties/koi-identification.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 12:13, 14 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, List of koi varieties. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Koi#Varieties. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Koi#Varieties – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Bazj (talk) 12:21, 14 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your addition to List of koi varieties has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Continually reposting copyrighted content can and will lead to a block. This is your last warning. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 08:27, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I've reverted your move of List of goldfish varieties to "Goldfish (jaspergeli)". That article was a list of varieties of goldfish, not the main article on goldfish. From your comment "I named this Goldfish (jaspergeli) because there are current goldfish article, the original Goldfish article. I made this article because I just want to make my own and correct some mistakes especially in goldfish varieties," I gather you want to work on this further before publishing it (that comment does not belong on a published page). I've created a sandbox/subpage in your user space at User:Jaspergeli/Goldfish preserving your contribution. Feel free to work on it there, or to contribute further to the list of goldfish varieties. Note that detailed general information about goldfish is not needed in the variety list; that information belongs in the general goldfish article, and please leave out unencyclopedic comments about your editing intentions in published articles. Thank you for your interest in contributing to Wikipedia. Plantdrew (talk) 02:31, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Wild boar a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Wild pig. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 03:55, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Zebu, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 23:26, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Eurasian aurochs. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Aurochs. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Aurochs. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Robert McClenon (talk) 09:00, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have a question: how to suggest to make an article named "Eurasian aurochs" or, can you it make for me? Just kidding. Jaspergeli (talk) 16:30, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Breed. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 12:58, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Breed. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 12:58, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I'm not sure what it is you are trying to achieve here, but please be much more careful in what you do. I've just reverted your mass-deletion of the categories from Aurochs. Why did you think that was a good idea? Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 13:49, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating Sand rat, Jaspergeli!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thanks for creating this. I WP:INLINECITED the references. Until this was done, any further edits would have been unclear as to where the information was from and people are often put off editing an article for that reason. It could also have never reached Good or Featured Article status.

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Boleyn (talk) 13:07, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I've undone that cut-and-paste move from Psammomys, Boleyn. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 13:25, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Boleyn (talk) 14:46, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but it's not just a simple cut-and-paste move. I think it's better. "Psammomys" are actually a sand rat genus. It would be a great idea if we replace "Psammomys" with "Sand rat". Jaspergeli (talk) 16:27, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Psammomys a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. I see you've already had a message about this. If you don't know how to do something, please ask! Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 13:22, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Well sorry, because the genus "Psammomys" is a genus of sand rats and it's featured in some articles, so I managed to cut-and-paste to "Sand rat" and make the "Psammomys" redirect to that page. Why do you think it's not better? Regards, Jaspergeli. Jaspergeli (talk) 16:17, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Because we don't use cut-and-paste to move articles – please read what I wrote above, and follow the blue links. If you think a page should be moved, you can start a discussion on the talk-page – please see the next section. I think – I hope! – we use scientific names for genera. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 06:47, 12 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't move stuff without discussion unless you quite sure that you are right to do so. I've reverted your move of Przewalski's gerbil since the title you chose appears to be hardly ever used. If you want to propose a page move, please add

{{subst:Requested move|NewName |reason= Why}} 

to the foot of the article talk-page (making the necessary changes, obviously). I've undone your mistaken edits at Talk:Mongolian gerbil, as those won't achieve anything. I see that you were invited to the Teahouse a whle ago. I encourage you to go there to ask questions about how to edit here. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 14:02, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry Justlettersandnumbers, because I'm checking most sources and most sources said that all the species in the genus Meriones are called "jirds". It's officially called "Mongolian jird", but since the term "gerbil" is far more popular, it gained another name, "Mongolian gerbil". The same as one page that you've just changed. Thanks anyway for always reminding me. I'm so worried and nervous because you always notify me. Haha. I'll hope that you'll give me some of your editing skills! Jaspergeli (talk) 16:17, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Jaspergeli,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Domesticated guineafowl for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. Take a look at our suggestions for essential content in short articles to learn what should be included.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Stephreef (talk) 04:37, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Jaspergeli,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Domesticated turkey for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. Take a look at our suggestions for essential content in short articles to learn what should be included.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Stephreef (talk) 04:38, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

For example, why did you add "red junglefowl" as a separate entry from "chicken"? In fact, right *above* chicken.

And, if you could go back and group con-generics of the snakes you added, as per the entries for things like yellow-crested and citron-crested cockatoos, or the Argentine and Cranwell's horned frogs, it would be appreciated. The list is already super-long, grouping congenerics helps keep it from being ridiculously long. Tamtrible (talk) 19:14, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Jaspergeli. The removal of sourced content on wikipedia is unconstructive, such as your multiple edits to Archaeopteryx. If you have any issue with the content of a page, bring it up on the Help:Talk page before making changes to sourced article content. Also avoid breaking the syntax of references or templates, please preview your contributions before submitting. IJReid ^{{{T - C - D - R}}} 14:22, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Other spurious edits:

• Archaeopteryx
• Archaeopteryx
• Pachycephalosaurus
• Avialae
• Coelophysis
• Sharovipteryx
• Euhelopus
• Anhanguera

How come you include others than Archaeopteryx? I should've not editted Archaeopteryx to not let you include others. And why only this time I received this message when the time I'm editting others. I only received this when I just editted Archaeopteryx.

The other edits all follow your trend of removing content which has sources. You removed the content and the source from Pachycephalosaurus, and you removed content from taxon boxes that is sourced in the main article on the other articles I mentioned. I only gave you this message now because until your edit of Archaeopteryx I was not aware of the changes you made before that. IJReid ^{{{T - C - D - R}}} 23:05, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jaspergeli. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Jaspergeli. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Domesticated turkey, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not a test page, but a redirect made in good faith. WP:RFD if you want it deleted. Thank you. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 15:33, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

So do you mean that all redirects can't be deleted? Jaspergeli (talk) 15:36, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Redirects can be deleted. But what made you think that that one should be? Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 23:09, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, thanks, I understand. Jaspergeli (talk) 04:05, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jaspergeli. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:18, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Mix voice, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Celestina007 (talk) 14:22, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:44, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jaspergeli. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Mix voice".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 16:08, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]