User talk:Jdlambert

Jd, there actually is a list of the Harry Potter books further down on the page. I've undone your edit. FeralDruid 22:52, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, FeralDruid, don't know how I missed that. JD Lambert 01:43, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, since you made some good edits to Coca Cola, would you care to join Wikiproject soft drinks? Telcourbanio Care for a talk? 15:10, 22 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Telcourbanio! Thanks for the invitation, but I'll decline. I'm not particularly interested in soft drinks, I mostly just read a lot and tweak when I see things that I can improve a little. JD Lambert 15:23, 22 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Jdlambert. I changed your edit to Creek people and removed the citations from the Sequoyah Research Center, which looked a lot like original research. You may be on to something, but Wikipedia is not the place to hold its debut. On the other hand, the documents you cite may not be the best available sources for the origin of the name "Muscogee." Other documents exist that would give other derivations. If there is a consensus of experts, that is what we should cite.

All the same mvto for your efforts. Your point about Coweta and Cusseta is (I think) a good addition. -- Rob C (Alarob) 19:51, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Rob, thanks for the corrections/improvements, and for teaching me my first Muskogee word -- mvto! I didn't realize that original research in Wikipedia was inappropriate, but now I know better. I am glad you left at least one occurance of the reference, though... it seems to me that linking to original source material is a very valuable part of Wiki. BTW, my wife and children have some Creek ancestors. I'm stuck with plain old Europeans. JD Lambert 21:20, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with you about original sources, especially when it comes to history topics. Your link to those documents showed me some sources I'd never seen before, and I appreciate that.

If you'd like to learn all the Maskoke I know (and then some!), here is a great website: Creek Language Archive. (One of my ambitions is to go to Oklahoma to study the language. As it is, I'm in Alabama surrounded by Muskogee place names, but no one speaks the language.) -- Rob C (Alarob) 22:40, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It hasn't been locked for seven months, but since May 20. I very much hope you leave it locked, and in fact the other titles involved in the dispute need to be locked too to force all the editors to the table. It's because they have simply carried on editing the other titles (but we have stayed away from them so as not to edit war) that they feel fine about turning down mediation. SlimVirgin ^(talk) 02:32, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not an admin, so I can't unlock it. However, I think the chance of mediation helping is near zero, I think that keeping it locked will not convince others to agree to mediation, and I think that unlocking could allow us to make progress if people will hash out proposed changes on the talk page before making any changes. If unlocking doesn't work, it's easy enough to lock it again. JD Lambert 15:50, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Jdlambert, I'll respond to you here, since you addressed your response on the article page to me. I agree with SlimVirgin above – the only reason the others are refusing to compromise or to agree to mediation is because other related pages are open, we are not editing them to avoid edit warring, and therefore the other pages have become POV forks. Unlocking this page would be exactly the wrong move – it would remove any pressure on that group to mediate or negotiate, and only result in the resumption of the edit warring that caused the original protection. As an admin, I never unprotect an article that I protect due to edit warring, unless I have personally verified that there are improved chances for meaningful negotiations and collaboration. I don't see any such changes in this case – the fact that one side absolutely refuses mediation speaks volumes. Crum375 16:49, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What SQL procedural extension does MySQL have? "MySQL" as the name is suspicious.--Chealer 03:17, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've looked, but never found one. Everything I've seen just refers to it as SQL. If you find somewhere that MySQL AB refers to it by name, please add it and its citation. JD Lambert 15:52, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I guess it could be called "SQL" because it's part of SQL now. Do you have any evidence that MySQL has a [non-standard] SQL procedural extension?

Here's a few... Do, Handler, Load Data Infile, Kill, Reset, Flush. All these are listed in MySQL AB's documentation under "13. SQL Statement Syntax" and I don't believe they're ANSI standard. As with other RDBMS vendors, they don't normally distinguish in their documentation as to which of their commands are standard and which are extensions. JD Lambert^(T|C) 18:56, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding this revision, yes: I only noticed the red highlighted text, I'm afraid, where he inserted his signature. I missed his addition of the link all-together. Thanks for the help. – ClockworkSoul 22:12, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A request for mediation has been filed with the Mediation Committee that lists you as a party. The Mediation Committee requires that all parties listed in a mediation must be notified of the mediation. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Requests_for_mediation/factory_farming, and indicate whether you agree or refuse to mediate. If you are unfamiliar with mediation, please refer to Wikipedia:Mediation. There are only seven days for everyone to agree, so please check as soon as possible. Jav43 17:30, 8 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, well, BCST2001 has already disagreed. I signed as agreeing anyway, just to indicate my willingness for future reference, however dim the prospects. JD Lambert^(T|C) 00:57, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I noticed your involvement on U.S. South-related articles, categories and WikiProjects, and I wanted to let you know about a bid we're formulating to get next year's Wikimania held in Atlanta! If you would like to help, be sure to sign your name to the "In Atlanta" section of the Southeast team portion of the bid if you're in town, or to the "Outside Atlanta" section if you still want to help but don't live in the city or the suburbs. If you would like to contribute more, please write on my talk page, the talk page of the bid, or join us at the #wikimania-atlanta IRC chat on freenode.org. Have a great day!

P.S. While this is a template for maximum efficiency, I would appreciate a note on my talk page so I know you got the message, and what you think. This is time-sensitive, so your urgent cooperation is appreciated. :) Mike H. I did "That's hot" first! 07:23, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is rather time-sensitive, I would appreciate a response tomorrow if at all possible. Mike H. I did "That's hot" first! 08:32, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Mike, I won't be able to travel to Atlanta, and have very little spare time right now. Or rather, I have health problems that limit what I can do with my spare time. JD Lambert^(T|C) 18:29, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry to hear that. I hope things get better for you! Mike H. I did "That's hot" first! 03:19, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A {{prod}} template has been added to the article Data Domain (corporation), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{db-author}}. Fabrictramp 23:28, 25 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Done.JD Lambert^(T|C) 22:06, 29 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Floyd Medical Center, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.floyd.org/about/index.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot 16:48, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

G11 is blatantly promotional materal, but the final version was not. I must have been looking at the original, which was. "Stub" means that the article is short, not that it doesn't have to comply with policies like WP:N. Feel free to recreate the article in a non-promotional manner with appropriate citations to reliable sources showing notability. -- But|seriously|folks  16:49, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'd like to invite you to join the new task forces proposed in the Georgia WikiProject. We are currently looking for new members to join our proposed task forces and work groups. With your help we can make it one of the best WikiProjects. Remember cooperative works can do amazing things. Regards Absolon S. Kent (talk) 20:33, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry, but at 777K bytes, Public access stations (United States) was about 20 times bigger than a decent Wikipedia article ought to be. It is not the length of the visible article that is the problem but the massive use of HTML markup. This also suggests the article is a copyvio. I have movd it to User:Jdlambert/sandbox. If it is not a copyvio, please convert it to wiki markup - you will find the size comes crashing down! -- RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 20:04, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It's not a copyright violation, but I agree it's too large. I ran out of time to work on it today, but I'll fix in my sandbox. I'll try to break it into smaller chunks as well as converting the markup and other improvements. JD Lambert^(T|C) 02:32, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It may not be a copyvio, but you do need to declare its source. I have found it in two places on the web, both equally massive files due to ridiculous HTML - but different HTML from yours! It will probably be OK as one article once you convert it entirely to wiki markup. -- RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 06:33, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I was pleasantly surprised to see the turn of events at Fairfax Public Access, and your eventual tagging it for deletion when you determined that it did not meet notability guidelines. It's not often that you see that amount of reason in people who have created pages that are nominated as not notable enough! It was very pleasant to see. -- Natalya 13:54, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fine - since you're implying that you've read the book, I'll be interested to see how you develop the material and use it in the topic. Tedickey (talk) 12:23, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello JD, A week and a half ago, you reversed a link deletion on the Nathan Bedford Forrest article with the comment "Hi, Donald. I'm not sure why you think the animated history links are spam, but I restored the one on General Forrest after checking the link. I think it's an excellent link for anyone interested in Forrest's military history. JD Lambert(T|C) 23:46, 4 September 2008 (UTC)"

Donald also deleted a number of other links to battle animations and then reported me as a spammer. I tried to reverse the links, but a spammer-policeman (kind of - they do good work) named Merc then reversed those.

I took the time work with the Civil War Community and, based on the advice of the two project managers, I asked for an opinion on Civil War Talk which you can view here: [1] The opinion given is by Hal Jespersen who is the guiding/driving force for the entire project as he has created all of the maps for civil war on Wiki. (His website is: [2]). Hal states: "I think your animations are well done and don't object to judicious inclusion as External links. My concept of judicious would be to select only the most important or relevant places to link. For instance, Gettysburg has dozens of articles about the campaign and battle and literally hundreds of articles about men, women, and units who fought there. I'd recommend linking only from Battle of Gettysburg and Gettysburg Campaign (assuming you also animate the campaign as a whole). ....... Hal Jespersen (talk) 15:05, 10 September 2008 (UTC)"

The only other warning I ever had about spamming is on my own Talk page and the author of the article itself replied to the warning thanking me for adding the link to the article.

I made my case to Merc the person who redeleted my links quoting all the above on his Talk page. His response is: "I wouldn't recommend reinserting the links yourself because you may find yourself being reverted again by someone else citing our conflict of interest guideline. If Hal (or some third party) feels the links are worthwhile then by all means he should add them himself. Our spam archives are full of examples of people spamming their own sites for money and/or ego, so we need to be wary of people adding links to their own sites in a systematic manner. MER-C 09:29, 13 September 2008 (UTC)" See his talk page [3]

Donald Ashbury, who originally deleted the links, has quit Wiki according to his home page and won't be back. He deleted your comment.

Based on Merc's suggestion, I was wondering if you would do me a great favor and reverse Merc's links (he said it is OK but recommends that I personally do not do it).

The links to reverse would be: Battle of Gettysburg / Overland Campaign / Battle of Perryville / Battle of Stones River / Battle of Chancellorsville / Third Battle of Chattanooga / Battle of Leyte Gulf / Battle of Iwo Jima.

And if you were very nicely inclined, put a link in or copy the link for The Battle of Gettysburg and add it to The Gettysburg Campaign article Gettysburg Campaign under external links (as Hal Jespersen has suggested)? The link should NOT be the first one and would be "* Animated History of The Gettysburg Campaign" (you can see the actual http by editing this page).

I would be very grateful if you could help with this. If I can perform any service for you in return in the future you need only ask.

James Cagney Jcagney (talk) 15:04, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, James. I'm willing to consider each one, but my health limits my time. If you would, please post here each proposed link with each article. I'll check out each pair and either add the links to the articles or explain my objections. JD Lambert^(T|C) 02:15, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I found some other people to help with this. Again, JD, thank you for your original comment on the Nathan Bedford Forrest article when it was deleted. I am a huge Forrest fan and ultimately hope to do an animation dedicated to just his raids. He was highly, highly underated and underused during the war.

Hi. I have submitted a review of Rome, Georgia on the article's talk page. Please let me know if you have any questions. Best, epicAdam^(talk) 18:55, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Jdlambert:

I noticed the photo you posted entitled "Sherman and His Officers."

General Sherman does not appear in that photo, as can be seen in the linked version below. http://www.generalsandbrevets.com/ngv/vandever.htm

The seated figure with the hat in hand probably is not a general at all (given his uniform) and this appears to be the staff of General William Vandeveer, who was posted to Rome in May 1864.

It would be nice if you could correct the title of the image you have posted, which I don't know how to do.

Anyway, I have done what I can to correct things on the JPG page and the Rome, Georgia page.

Thanks for your consideration,

Hartfelt (talk) 14:35, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jdlambert! WikiProject United States, an outreach effort supporting development of United States related articles in Wikipedia, has recently been restarted after a long period of inactivity. As a user who has shown an interest in United States related topics we wanted to invite you to join us in developing content relating to the United States. If you are interested please add your Username and area of interest to the members page here. Thank you!!!

--Kumioko (talk) 18:12, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article Data domain has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No clear claim on notability. No references in more than a year.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stuartyeates (talk) 07:53, 19 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Smallpox, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pox (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

In this case I meant to link to the disambiguation page because it has a short definition of the word pox with links to the various kinds of pox. JD Lambert^(T|C) 01:52, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Thanks for the barnstar, I hope you are OK that I have edited your sandbox? My editing speed nowadays is VERY slow, but I will try to help. --Stefan ^talk 01:44, 1 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I am very grateful for your help! JD Lambert^(T|C) 16:43, 1 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I saw that you were in a dispute with User:Colin about whether the "ketogenic diet" that you're personally on should be the one that's at the title "Ketogenic diet" on Wikipedia. I think you're wasting your time there, but I wanted to say something else. You said that you "have done far more edits on Wikipedia than" Colin. The number of edits isn't necessarily a good measure of value, but your assertion appears to be wrong. As of today, Colin's made 12,609 edits, and your account shows exactly 836 non-deleted edits to your account. If your other edits are in a different account, then you can use {{User alternative account}} or similar templates to link them together. It's optional, but for most purposes, it's considered helpful. WhatamIdoing (talk) 06:48, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You are correct that I was incorrect about me having more edits than Colin. I suspect I looked at the wrong thing when getting numbers to compare. I agree that the number of edits is not necessarily a good measure of total value, but a significant number of edits can indicate a novice editor vs. an experienced editor. I agree I wasted my time trying to change Colin's mind. I intend to finish an initial article on ketogenic diets in general, make it live, and then make an appeal to a wider Wiki audience regarding the names of the articles. Unfortunately my efforts are limited by the effects of Mild Cognitive Impairment and the remnants of damage from encephalitis, but I intend to continue as long as I am able to make progress. JD Lambert^(T|C) 15:07, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have a version of the article available? I might be interested in working on it. TobyK (talk) 17:14, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I am very tired. It is 5:50AM. I am here on Wikipedia telling you that they deleted the article without consensus using the same tired logic. I added the Michael J. Fox bit with links to both their website and Anavex's. The last one with a delete vote didn't even seem to read the article. Very exhausting work for no gain. --Agamemnus (talk) 09:53, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have commented on the deleter's talk page, following yours. If they cannot improve their argument or do not restore the article, I plan to appeal. JD Lambert^(T|C) 23:32, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:38, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! As an FYI Islamic Saudi Academy closed because it was replaced by King Abdullah Academy near Herndon. WhisperToMe (talk) 18:24, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You are invited to participate in the 50,000 Challenge, aiming for 50,000 article improvements and creations for articles relating to the United States. This effort began on November 1, 2016 and to reach our goal, we will need editors like you to participate, expand, and create. See more here!

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:41, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The article Data domain (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unnecessary disambiguation page per WP:TWODABS. A hatnote is sufficient for those looking for the minor topic.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Tavix ^(talk) 03:22, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jdlambert. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article Fairfax Public Access has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rusf10 (talk) 01:39, 19 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Commonwealth Games of Virginia requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://vas.clearagility.com/about-us/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. S Philbrick(Talk) 22:57, 20 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jdlambert. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

--S Philbrick(Talk) 17:57, 21 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Got it, thanks!! JD Lambert^(T|C) 18:13, 21 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jdlambert. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The article Fairfax Public Access has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable community cable channel; fails WP:GNG and WP:BCAST.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Raymie (t • c) 03:48, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello JD, I am not sure if or when you will get this but I left a comment on talk:Rome, Georgia and since you are or were from there I thought it would be great to give you the chance to discuss it with me. Nothing amazingly difficult but I would value your input. --Tsistunagiska (talk) 17:49, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:21, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article SQL PL is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SQL PL until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Boleyn (talk) 12:05, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:2023 Rolls Royce Specte Coupe.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:01, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]