User talk:Jishiboka1

Please Type Messages here if I have done a mistake or got involved in an edit war, in which I will try my best to resolve the issue. Jishiboka1 (talk) 05:23, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jishiboka1! I noticed your contributions to Talk:Saudi Arabia and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! ◢  Ganbaruby!  (talk) 01:34, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jishiboka1! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Good Faith edits reverted?, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread. See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:03, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that disambiguation pages like Bloodbath (disambiguation) are meant to help readers find a specific existing article quickly and easily. For that reason, they have guidelines that are different from articles. From the Wikipedia:Disambiguation dos and don'ts you should:

• Only list articles that readers might reasonably be looking for
• Use short sentence fragment descriptions, with no punctuation at the end
• Use exactly one navigable link ("blue link") in each entry that mentions the title being disambiguated
• Only add a "red link" if used in existing articles, and include a "blue link" to an appropriate article
• Do not pipe links (unless style requires it) – keep the full title of the article visible
• Do not insert external links or references - Wikipedia is not a business directory

The article Geometry Dash makes no mention of 'Bloodbath', and no other article mentions this level.

Thank you. Leschnei (talk) 23:17, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in the Arab–Israeli conflict. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Johnuniq (talk) 04:25, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps it would be a good idea for you to withdraw your poorly researched proposal at Talk:January_1#Requested_move_22_February_2022. Perhaps you'd be interested in joining WP:DOY. Wikipedia:Read before commenting applies at the most fundamental basis. Toddst1 (talk) 06:36, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind. I've done a non-admin closure of the discussion. Toddst1 (talk) 06:51, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Jishiboka1, welcome to Wikipedia. You recently made this edit and called it a minor spelling change, and this one, which you apparently thought a mere change of "sentence spelling" (?). Both have been reverted, as they very much changed the meaning, not just the spelling. I assume you meant well, and thought those were just spelling matters; but I put it to you that your English may not be strong enough to tell the difference. Please don't attempt further to correct spelling or grammar, unless you're really sure what you're doing. Bishonen | tålk 13:11, 24 February 2022 (UTC).[reply]

Ok, I understand. I apologize, thanks! Jishiboka1 (talk) 04:12, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jishiboka1. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by David Biddulph (talk) 06:57, 4 March 2022 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Hi Jishiboka1! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, How can I start a merge request?, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread. See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:00, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jishiboka1! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Question on citations, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread. See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jishiboka1, please do not initiate formal move requests as a method to generate discussion. If you have a query about the name, please raise it as a regular talkpage post. If you believe an RM is necessary, please provide reasons based on the WP:Article titles policy. Best, CMD (talk) 07:02, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I understand, and I deeply apologize. Thanks for telling me. Jishiboka1 (talk) 07:04, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have a different thought: in general, starting a formal move request is the correct way to generate discussion. However, several of your move proposals are getting SNOW opposition. You should read the Wikipedia Manual of Style and Requested Move guidelines thoroughly, so you have a better sense of which proposals will be supported by other editors. User:力 (powera, π, ν) 19:23, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Sakupen Circles and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 25#Sakupen Circles until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. EDM fan 2 (talk) 04:48, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at World War II. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. 1 Sep 1939 is widely recognized as the start of WW2. Drmies (talk) 04:12, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize, I'm a fan of the Chinese front of WWII, and so I did it without finding multiple credible sources, so I won't edit the article again. Thanks for the information. Jishiboka1 (talk) 04:21, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The page Estonia cannot into Nordic has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done for the following reason:

ungrammatical and incomprehensible redirect, no obvious connection to Countryballs

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Bishonen | tålk 04:47, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again, Jishiboka1 (we spoke in March of this year). I have deleted your redirect Estonia cannot into Nordic, which redirected the phrase "Estonia cannot into Nordic" into Countryballs. The phrase doesn't make any sense and is also ungrammatical. Can you please explain what you meant by it, and what it has to do with Countryballs? Bishonen | tålk 04:49, 7 November 2022 (UTC).[reply]

That is actually 100% genuine countryballs grammar, and a regular countryball phrase. I don't think it needs to be a redirect, but Jishboka1 didn't make it up. CMD (talk) 05:26, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, similar to Poland cannot into Space. But I am sorry this was not today. I will watch my redirect creations now. Jishiboka1 (talk) 05:28, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

We actually have a genuine article on the topic! Nordic identity in Estonia CMD (talk) 05:29, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A redirect would only make sense if the phrase, or any reference to it, appeared in the Countryballs article. Bishonen | tålk 09:17, 8 November 2022 (UTC).[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:51, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

GLORY TO PALESTINE AND PALESTINIAN FREEDOM FIGHTERS. Jishiboka1 (talk) 23:15, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your edit warring at Two Knights Defense. Several editors have reverted your low quality changes to the article. If you persist I will ask an admin to impose sanctions pursuant to WP:3RR. Quale (talk) 02:47, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Glory to Hamas and Palestinian Freedom Fighters, the PLA, and free Palestine, and establish Palestinian rule over Israel for once and all! Jishiboka1 (talk) 01:00, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm PopoDameron. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, ChatGPT, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. – Popo Dameron talk 20:15, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Peng Dehuai, the hero and great general of great nation of the People's Republic of China, was a great man who dreamed for a prosperous, rich, militarily powerful China. Unlike Chairman Mao, he set realistic goals and rose his voices for the people of the nation. He was born in poverty, eventually had to abandon education due to food shortages of the 1907 famine and poverty of his family, and he had to beg for food and had to work for food until 1910. He eventually wanted to train in an academy, rising up the ranks, becoming a soldier of the Jiangxi Soviet. He executed 2 bandit leaders, though 1 of them killed themselves. He became a senior leader of the Jiangxi Soviet, eventually joining with Mao Zedong, who would later become his arch-rival. He led a massive campaign against the evil nation of the Empire of Japan, and worked hard during both WW2 and the Civil War. He did lead the Chinese forces in the Korean war against my country (I am South Korean), but he was a realistic leader who vowed for his soldiers, unlike most other leaders. He was at the frontline all the time, constantly risking his life but wanted to be a model. He knew better than anyone else the struggles, victories, defeats, and suffering of the soldiers of the People's Liberation Army, and he signed the ceasefire agreement which ended the war. Then, he began rooting for a prosperous China. He began becoming critical of Mao's regime and policies, and in 1958 he began critizing Mao's policies and regime, at a time when very few were daring to do so. At the Lushan Conference of 1959, he outright criticized Mao, which Mao saw as an attack on his power and regime, as well as on his personality. Thus, Peng was removed as Minister of National Defense and replaced by Lin Biao, who would never be the same as Peng. Peng lived in obscurity, having done 2 tours in which he saw the conditions even worse than in 1959, and still hated Mao, but it would've been highly dangerous if he'd outspoken so highly like in 1959. He had a brief, limited return to power in 1965, but when the Cultural Revolution (a big mistake) began, he was purged and tortured, and suffered for years of torture. He died in 1974, and unfortunately did not outlive Mao and didn't see his dreams of a prosperous, rich, and militarily powerful China come true, but 49 years later, he will forever be remembered as a great marshal and a great leader of the great nation of the People's Republic of China. Jishiboka1 (talk) 02:22, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The last five posts you've made to your user talk page (from "Yoon Suck-Fever" to the above) are inappropriate use of the talk page. Your talk page is meant to discuss you and your involvement with Wikipedia. This sort of soap boxing is not appropriate at all, most especially the calls for violence. Since I'm hesitant to curate another editor's talk page, I leave that for you to do. Please delete those messages. Thanks. _signed, Willondon (talk) 02:02, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please also avoid leaving invective commentary in edit summaries, such as here. CMD (talk) 02:06, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted, I apologize. Jishiboka1 (talk) 02:49, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making abusive or otherwise inappropriate edit summaries, as you did to Yoon Suk-yeol. Your edit summary may have been removed. Please communicate with civility and refrain from making personal attacks. Thank you. — AP 499D25 (talk) 07:53, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have recently edited a page related to Liancourt Rocks, a topic designated as contentious. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially-designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

-- Shadow of the Starlit Sock 11:41, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Offline sources must be cited with full details, so that they can be verified.

The fourth source does not support anything in the draft.

If this is all that can be said about the subject summarising reliable published sources, it isn't obvious that this requires a standalone article rather than developing further the relevant section in the Sicilian Defence article.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sicilian Defence, Sveshnikov Variation and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:52, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jishiboka1! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:52, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Wither skeleton has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 September 22 § Wither skeleton until a consensus is reached. QuicoleJR (talk) 15:29, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jishiboka1. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Sicilian Defence, Sveshnikov Variation, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:06, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:56, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jishiboka1. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Sicilian Defence".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:43, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]