User talk:Johannes Maximilian

Archives (index)

2018: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2019: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2020: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2021: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2022: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2023: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2024: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by ClueBot III when more than 3 sections are present.

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Johannes Maximilian,

I have a question to my article I'm writing. I don't think it is in the state to be resubmitted due to still having not enough articles instead of video footage.

But this is my current problem at the moment; as the very first subjects in the article are difficult to find (enough) viable evidence in either text or official images such as websites.

For example the hair dye brand "Palty" has many websites to gyaru related subject it created over the years that can be found through wayback machine but due to the lack of saved images or corrupted images one of the websites that would be the best for citation can not be used due to inaccessible or corrupt images.

I'd like to ask for aid. Maybe could you look if the article has currently enough new citations or which subject in the article should be expanded in citations. Just something to tell me where I need to improve before resubmiting the article. I don't want aid in help for writing or adding citations to the article; just where it could be improved. ...If that is allowed.

Thank you. 80.57.242.245 (talk) 00:11, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Johannes,

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marcus_Baur explicitly references the SAP Sailing Analytics. Meanwhile, the article draft I wrote has been deleted. I failed to make a backup copy. Chances are, SAP will publish the project as open source under an Apache 2.0 license anytime soon. I still haven't understood why we couldn't agree on steps that would have allowed Wikipedia to talk about the project.

-- Axel Axeluhl (talk) 00:06, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Axel! Now, keeping things simple; Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, i.e., a collective body of work that contains what is believed to be established knowledge. As such a work, Wikipedia recounts, re-narrates, and summarises the contents of sources suitable to establish knowledge – reliable, secondary sources intellectually independent of the subject – if these sources sufficiently discuss the subject. A lack of sources fulfilling these criteria is indicative of a lack of notability. The mere existence of a subject does not suffice for Wikipedia. I can recall that the sources your draft cited were, unfortunately, mediocre at best if not close to being uncitable. None of the sources seemed to discuss the subject at all, and the footnotes were rather decorative tha supporting. If you seek to further improve upon your draft, I suggest you try WP:REFUNDING it. Best regards, --Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 08:27, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Johannes,

Thank you for taking the time to review this article.

As you can see the draft has been rejected for different reasons, and these have been addressed. In this case could you help the contributors to get it right by saying what would constitute reliable sources? The article already includes material from:

• academic institutions: Glasgow, Cranfield, Wageningen, Journal of Rural Co-operation
• government bodies: H&I Development Board, Scottish Enterprise
• respected media: BBC, West Highland Free Press, Co-operative News

It would be very helpful to be able to further improve this draft.TobyJ (talk) 17:26, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

January 2025 Backlog Drive | New pages patrol
On 1 January 2025, a one-month backlog drive for new pages patrol will begin in hopes of addressing the growing backlog. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled. Each article review will earn 1 point, while each redirect review will earn 0.2 points. Streak awards will be given out based on consistently hitting point thresholds for each week of the drive. Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:53, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

		The Articles for Creation Barnstar 2024 Top Editor
		In 2024 you were one of the top AfC editors, thank you! --Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 13:34, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]