User talk:JohnCWiesenthal

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to IntelliStar, but we cannot accept original research. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, and ideas—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Please stop adding the Products section to the article. If you continue to do so, I will report you for edit-warring. Thank you. --ZLMedia 20:36, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to IntelliStar. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. --ZLMedia 00:40, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:JohnCWiesenthal reported by User:ZLMedia (Result: ). Thank you. --ZLMedia 00:45, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges, as you did at IntelliStar. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Spike Wilbury (talk) 16:29, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have made your block indefinite only because you have thus far not shown any understanding that Wikipedia is a collaborative workspace where you must explain and discuss your edits when engaged by other editors. Continuing to add material to IntelliStar, without any sign that you understand why it's problematic or that other editors object, is an example of disruptive editing. Any admin may unblock you once you show some willingness to explain and discuss your edits. --Spike Wilbury (talk) 16:32, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

JohnCWiesenthal (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I understand the reason for my block. I'll admit that I did not have the amount of competence needed to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia and resorted to edit warring instead of talking with others. I promise that I will not repeat this behavior again, and I will discuss with other users instead of engaging in constant reversions. JohnCWiesenthal (talk) 15:02, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Accept reason:

After eight years, I will give you another chance. 331dot (talk) 21:08, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Village pump (policy) § Spongebob Squarepants is now freely licensed!. This is a terrible idea. — Alexis Jazz (talk or ping me) 09:10, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your opinion on this issue is requested

You have been tagged to this conversation because you may have previously participated in similar discussions and there has been a notable development. Please consider sharing your views. 𝓣𝓱𝓮 𝓔𝓭𝓾𝓬𝓪𝓽𝓲𝓸𝓷 𝓐𝓾𝓭𝓲𝓽𝓸𝓻 23:14, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I added a comment to that files for discussion that I believe is important to consider, please ping me with your response. Kung Fu Man (talk) 15:23, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:29, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]