User talk:Jonesrmj

The

Adventure

Hi Jonesrmj!! You're invited: learn how to edit Wikipedia in under an hour. I hope to see you there! Ocaasi Play The Wikipedia Adventure This message was delivered by HostBot (talk) 17:32, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jonesrmj! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

• The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
• The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
• The Teahouse new editor help space
• Wikipedia Help pages

-- 14:31, Saturday, August 15, 2015 (UTC)

Hello, Jonesrmj, I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether McConnell Johnson Innovation Center should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/McConnell Johnson Innovation Center . If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top. Thanks, 🍺 Antiqueight ^chat 04:49, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have replied over at my page. BTW - to sign your name on a conversation you need to add four tildas (~) which will link back to your own talk page. 🍺 Antiqueight ^chat 18:42, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I think you are signing your name the hard way- not sure. Easy way is using four tildes (~~~~)). That's all you have to type. 🍺 Antiqueight ^chat 22:44, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm using the [[]] method, I don't really see the difference but I guess its another way to keep in mind - Jonesrmj (talk) 20:06, 1 February 2016 (UTC)jonesrmj[reply]

I reverted this edit at List of tallest buildings by U.S. state on the following grounds:

1. Insulting edit summary (which as a general rule is sufficient cause for reverting). I didn't "fix" it, I fixed it and after considerable research.
2. Probably wrong on the merits, although it's a complicated question.
3. There is an extensive thread on the talk page, Talk:List of tallest buildings by U.S. state#Huh... so what is the tallest building in Wyoming? discussing the matter. Make your case there and provide some proof of your assertion.
4. And there's a note in the article directing editors to that thread specifically if wishing to change it to White Hall.

I do understand that White Hall being the tallest building in Wyoming is something that "everybody knows" and is probably passed down from class to class of undergraduates. So? We don't base our articles on urban legends (high plains legends I guess in the case of Wyoming) but on sources. It could be that White Hall is the tallest building in Wyoming. I doubt it, but maybe. What we need is preponderance of good sources showing this. Provide those on the talk page and Bob's your uncle. Herostratus (talk) 04:52, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Re: White Hall - Hi, thanks for your comment and reasoning. I will admit, you probably know more about Wyoming than I do, and I wasn't trying to be mean, so I apologies if I sounded mean. I myself did some research too, and have found that every other source I've seen has stated that White Hall is the tallest. I just thought that maybe you made a mistake, but like I said, I don't know much about Wyoming. Thanks for the feedback! :) Jonesrmj (talk) 18:02, 28 October 2017 (UTC)jonesrmj[reply]

OK! Herostratus (talk) 04:37, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jonesrmj. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jonesrmj. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jonesrmj. You have new messages at Camerafiend's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:19, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No Comments. -> If you want to comment, comment here with your name signed.

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 1001–1011 Jefferson Street is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1001–1011 Jefferson Street until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Boleyn (talk) 20:48, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]