User talk:jorgenev

This user may have left Wikipedia. Jorgenev has not edited Wikipedia since December 2011. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

Wikipedia ads	file info – show another – #175

Yo, Jorge, we're nearly an hour away from publication deadline and there's no sign of an Arbitration Report. Are you still planning on writing this? If you can't make it in a given week we can work around that but I really, really need to know in advance (start of the weekend) in future. Cheers, Skomorokh 20:44, 28 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm so sorry! I will next time. jorgenev (t|c|s) 07:30, 30 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Are we okay for this week? Skomorokh 14:32, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Oregon State University residence halls requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for four days or more and it is not presently under discussion at Categories for discussion, or at disambiguation categories.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Philosopher ^{Let us reason together.} 22:46, 29 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your support and comment at my recent successful RFA. Being now the new fellow in the fraternity of administrators, I will do my best to live up to the confidence shown in me by others, will move slowly and carefully when using the mop, will seek input from others before any action of which I might be unsure, and will try not to break anything beyond repair. I do not feel adminship is authority, but is rather a responsibility and trust accompanied by a few extra buttons. Best, Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 17:23, 4 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Try not to edit war with bots next time. It's futile. They're bots. — Jeraphine Gryphon ^(talk) 07:43, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I am glad I am giving you an opportunity for the consumption of popcorn! And, while what you say is somewhat true, it is false when you say the pernicious rigidity of software cannot be overcome. In the situation where SDPatrolBot impedes progress, it only does so for 15-20 seconds, and the upside of that is a valuable opportunity to feed the beast. jorgenev (t|c|s) 08:13, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

(I didn't know you've been doing this before.) That's pretty dumb. TY for the article anyway, looks like a good one. — Jeraphine Gryphon ^(talk) 10:40, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I do not even attempt to try to fathom the working of your mind, but this was blatant trolling. This refers to an earlier occasion, when I gave you a token 24 hour block because you had been persistently edit warring to remove speedy deletion tags from articles you had created yourself. You had done this on a number of articles, over a period of over a month, and had been warned repeatedly. You then proceeded to make unblock requests in which you indicated that you fully intended to do the same again, and described doing so as "just great sport". Three different administrators looked at your unblock requests, and explained to you that what you had been doing was unacceptable. One of them said that, on the basis of what you said in one of your unblock requests, the block length might well be increased. Another one described comments you made relating to the block as a "personal attack". You have now done exactly what you said you would do, which is edit war again to repeatedly remove a speedy deletion tag from an article you created. You did that, following (1) numerous warnings about doing so, (2) a short block, together with what was intended to be a friendly warning that doing so again would be likely to lead to a longer block, (3) the sort of comments from administrators I have just referred to (visible here). Naturally you will have been aware that this was likely to lead to a longer block, as you had been told. I am at a loss as to why you prefer that route to the much simpler and more straightforward one of explaining on the article's talk page why you think the article should not be deleted. Perhaps you enjoy the feeling that you are RIGHT and someone else is WRONG so much that it makes up for the inconvenience of being blocked. Perhps there is some other reason. However, you do not stop there: you add to all that the trolling post to my talk page that I linked to above.

As I have said, the block you underwent the last time was for 24 hours. If this were just a question of removing speedy deletion tags from an article you had created, I might this time block for 3 days or so. However, the combination of your announcement that you intended to do so again, together with other remarks (both on this page and in edit summaries) indicating that you fully intended to be contemptuous both of Wikipedia's procedure and of anyone who attempted to enforce such procedures, and finally your talk page trolling, combine to convince me that such a short block would be insufficient. I have therefore blocked you for two weeks.

I have spent the time and effort in writing the above explanation, rather than just a one sentence block notification, not to inform you (you already know the background) but to clarify the background for any other administrator if you should decide to post an unblock request. However, a word of advice: if you do make an unblock request, I suggest making one that has some chance of success. Similar ones to what you posted last time may well be regarded as time wasting. JamesBWatson (talk) 10:20, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Just so you're aware, there's a discussion about you at Wikipedia_talk:Wikipedia_Signpost#Jorgenev. You're free to reply on this user talk page. --Michaeldsuarez (talk) 14:02, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I do hope you are not gone for good! Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 01:24, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Anita Sarkeesian is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anita Sarkeesian until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. — Bdb484 (talk) 21:10, 14 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article UNI Freethinkers and Inquirers is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/UNI Freethinkers and Inquirers until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 04:52, 17 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

they are rats. thay ar cutie. they are funny they are small .

mbraizer (talk) 20:17, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

they are rats. thay ar cutie. they are funny they are small .

mbraizer (talk) 20:17, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article Birch Hill Cemetery has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet WP:GNG

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Presidentman talk · contribs Random Picture of the Day (Talkback) 19:25, 14 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Birch Hill Cemetery is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Birch Hill Cemetery until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Presidentman talk · contribs Random Picture of the Day (Talkback) 23:20, 17 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Death of Jamison Thrun is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Death of Jamison Thrun until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Presidentman talk · contribs Random Picture of the Day (Talkback) 10:58, 18 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

<font=3> You're invited to participate in Wikipedia Takes Portland 2012, an annual event which occurs each September in Portland, Oregon as part of Wikipedia Takes America and Wiki Loves Monuments in the United States. Photographing sites in Portland listed on the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) is the main focus of Wikipedia Takes Portland. This year the event will kick off at Saturday, September 22nd at noon at Pioneer Courthouse Square. Currently, there are no formal plans--this is simply an opportunity to meet fellow Wikipedians before trekking around PDX to photograph sites on the Register. Not interested in coming downtown? You can still upload your images as part of the international photo competition. Be sure to RSVP and share the results of your work HERE (number of images uploaded, links to galleries, successes, feedback, etc. Click here for more information about meetups in Portland! --Another Believer (Talk) 15:07, 20 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

<font=3>WIKIPEDIA LOVES LIBRARIES: MULTNOMAH COUNTY EDIT-ATHON! You're invited to participate in Wikipedia Loves Libraries 2012, an edit-athon hosted by Multnomah County Library for the purpose of improving stubs relating to Multnomah County. The event will take place on Saturday, October 27, 2012 from 2:00-4:00pm at the Central Library in downtown Portland. You can view details about this Wiki Loves Libraries event here. Be sure to RSVP and share the results of your work HERE. Click here for more information about meetups in Portland! --Another Believer (Talk) 21:33, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

		Holiday Cheer
		Michael Q. Schmidt my talk page is wishing you Season's Greetings! This message celebrates the holiday season, promotes WikiLove, and hopefully makes your day a little better. Spread the seasonal good cheer by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Share the good feelings.

WIKIPEDIA EDIT-ATHON! You're invited to the upcoming Wikipedia edit-athon, scheduled for Saturday, February 9 from 2–5pm in Old Town. Sponsored by Wiki Strategies and Prichard Communications, the event will begin with an introduction to Wikipedia, followed by an edit-a-thon focused on Portland's food scene, all things that "Keep Portland Weird", and local startup businesses. Details and signup here!

Hope to see you there! --Another Believer _(Talk) 16:52, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Issue 48: March 2013 Previous edition · Next edition

London Transport News March Tube customer satisfaction hits record high as strong reliability performance maintained Crossrail train funding announced February Northern line upgrade one step closer Mayor and TfL unveil plans to double Thames passenger journeys by 2020 New set of Poems on the Tube to celebrate 150th anniversary of the London Underground out now London Overground stations now offer WiFi London Overground concession extended until November 2016 Mark Wallinger unveils largest art commission ever for the Underground's 150th anniversary Below inflation increase to taxi fares London Overground introduces five-car trains to meet increasing demand Victoria line customers have most intensive train service in the country TfL's construction industry review highlights action needed to deliver step-change in road safety Seventy per cent of the Capital's bus stops now fully accessible January TfL scoops two Low Carbon Vehicle Partnership Awards Prince of Wales and Duchess of Cornwall take a ride on the Tube as it celebrates 150 years of serving London and the UK London Underground outlines plan to cut Tube delays even further London Overground tops passenger satisfaction table Londoners encouraged to submit views on proposed changes to Congestion Charging scheme Mayor announces first bus route to be fully served by iconic new bus for London fleet The Royal Mint issues special London Underground coins into circulation to celebrate 150th anniversary of Tube Mayor and TfL continue drive to improve air quality in Putney First phase of Mayor's Clean Air Fund programme has a positive effect London Underground on hunt for musical talent Local bus services affected by closure of Shepherd's Bush Green TfL travel advice to road users following helicopter crash in Vauxhall London's transport network gets ready for cold weather TfL appoints design consultants as major road structure improvement portfolio takes shape New London Overground link carries one million people in one month Transformation of the Tube network continues apace during historic 150th year DLR operating contract extended until September 2014 Passengers to benefit from £45m Upgrade of Vauxhall Tube station Project News Alerts A1 road in London was promoted to Good Article status in December London congestion charge was delisted as a Featured Article in January London Necropolis Company has not been featured in Today's Featured Article Metropolitan Railway was be Today's Featured Article in January Hammersmith & City line has been put up for Peer Review in January and then promoted to Good Article status in February List of bus types used in London was put up for Articles for Deletion in January and closed as keep M11 link road protest was promoted to Good Article status in January St Pancras railway station was put of for Peer Review in February District line was nominated for Good Article status in February Project discussions Within the project, discussions included the Metropolitan Railway being TFA to mark the 150th anniversary of the tube, bus routes in station articles, comparing American pseudo facts with the London Underground, renaming Uxbridge Road station and identifying stations in photographs. Within other related projects, relevant discussions included colours of railway lines, age of metro systems, coordinates in infoboxes, {{S-line}}, watersports in London, aqueducts, lists of bus, distance measurement of British roads, rail usage figures, the West Coast Main Line, identification and rail freight . Requests If you want to post a request for help with an article, finding a photograph or seeking reference material, contact the editor Things to do Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Cleanup : Lists of articles needing cleanup Expand : These top 10 favourite articles to Good Article: J. P. Morgan  · Heathrow Airport  · River Thames