User talk:JucheCapitalist

Hello, I'm Dirkbb. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Politics of North Korea seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Dirkbb (talk) 14:04, 24 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi JucheCapitalist! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Abelmoschus Esculentus (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:04, 24 August 2018 (UTC)

You are trying to change the consensus version of the Juche article. It's your duty to convince others on the talk page of that article rather engage in a back and forth edit war. In addition, it has been explained to you many times that all content needs to follow our rules on reliable sources and neutral point of view. Please familiarize yourself with those rules. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 23:50, 25 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Seconded - we cannot declare NASA photography of North Korea a "100% fake propaganda picture" without some kind of factual basis. GAB^gab 20:48, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Once again. For everything you add, you need to be able to cite a reliable source. This is not a reliable source for anything and does not support any of your additions. Also, don't remove content others have added that is referenced to reliable sources. If you think there is an error in such sources, please point it out on the talk page of the article in question. But don't bother saying everything that reliable sources say is just part of a conspiracy; if you honestly think so, Wikipedia is not a place for you. So far every single one of your edits to articles has been reverted. Now it would be a perfect time to take a break from editing and read our core content policies. If you continue adding unreferenced content and promoting fringe theories, you might get blocked from editing. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 01:02, 29 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

are you kidding me? It is so obvious that I do not need to provide sources. If you think its an actual photo from space then I have nothing to say to you. you put an animation or painting on wikipedia and claim to be a photo from space. You need to provide sources obviously. Not even NASA would admit its a photo from space. You are living in another dimension of reality, it seems. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JucheCapitalist (talk • contribs)

The article Juche-Capitalism has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

An entirely WP:OR idea that no reliable source has ever mentioned. A WP:BATTLEGROUNDish WP:POVFORK following multiple reverts at the article Juche.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 01:31, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Don't create articles like that when after the conversations you've had on the talk pages at Talk:Juche and elsewhere it should be clear to you that this is inadmissible material. You need to follow the core content policies. If you won't and continue with tendentious editing like that, that behavioral issue will be settled at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 01:36, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, and by the way, is User:KimYaJong another account you are using? I'm asking because they have echoed your points on the talk page at Talk:Juche and created the similar now-deleted article de:Juche-Kapitalismus. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 01:53, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Juche-Capitalism is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Juche-Capitalism until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 14:40, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with this edit to Juche-Capitalism. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Shellwood (talk) 15:19, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of KimYaJong (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · logs · block log · arb · rfc · lta · SPI · cuwiki) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. GABgab 23:16, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nobody reads your COMMIE policy and millions of rules. I dont have the time to. I will not participate any longer on this COMMIE website nor will I use it to find information. Wikipedia is done for me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JucheCapitalist (talk • contribs)