User talk:Jusdafax

Archives

Archive 1. Archive 2. Archive 3. Archive 4. Archive 5. Archive 6. Archive 7. Archive 8. Archive 9. Archive 10. Archive 11. Archive 12. Archive 13. Archive 14. Archive 15.

Hello,

In my attempt to add some information to the article "Ijdeebrine", you reverted my changes claiming that my citations weren't valid or not enough. I would just like to say that my changes, those which you reverted, I wasn't done with them and these are very well known facts.

The family that I speak of has many houses across the village considering this a very large family. This family is split after a long process concering ancestry, but the family was reconnected by marriage occuring between 1940 and 1950, that marriage resulting in almost 30-40 new additions to the family by birth and marriage. This family keeps expanding itself across this community making an effort to withstand it.

Please tell me what I should do so that I can add some of the family's contributions and importance in the village.

        -  I noticed that you made a change to an article, Ijdeebrine, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! 

Dominantxx (talk) 23:05, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Your statement that I am "claiming" your sources are inadequate is not correct. I am stating a fact based on established Wikipedia policy. As I said in my edit summary, please read and understand WP:RS (reliable sources) and WP:OR (original research) which details sourcing requirements for Wikipedia. Also important is WP:Citing sources and WP:N (notability), of particular importance in building an encyclopedia based on verifiability, covered under WP:V. Best wishes, Jusdafax (talk) 00:30, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for fixing The Red Room. I didn't notice that the vandalism went back more than one edit! Leschnei (talk) 00:10, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• It happens to me too. Thanks for your note. Cheers! Jusdafax (talk) 00:15, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

!!! I am not a vandal. MOST of what is on the page I have no issue with BUT a government agency CREATED in 1958 did not certify something in 1928!!! (Heath Parasol)

I'D LIKE TO CREDIT AN INNOVATOR... Mr Heath published at least three different versions of his plans in the 1920s, then he later sold kits of one of those plans but to my mind any "flying thing" built to any of those plans is a Heath. Others, notably Mann, credit Heath in the derivative plans they created.

Further NOTHING was certified in the US prior to 1928, only "aircraft" were certified by the CAB 1928-1958 (YOU CAN GOOGLE YOURSELF HERE) and the FAA 1958- (AGAIN GOOGLE "WIKIPEDIA") by legal (FAR 103 -- Guess what! YOU CAN GOOGLE YOU AGAIN!) definition a thing that flies BUT is 254 pounds or less in empty weight is not legally an aircraft.

YOUR ENTRY LISTS THE PARASOL AT 280 pounds with a 105 pound engine, but some INCLUDING MINE were built with 45 pound engines, that brings them under the 254 pound FAR 103 limit. THAT IS ALL THAT I AM TRYING TO SAY. I love the Parasol, I own one, I'd be happy to share and make the entry on the Parasol better -- I AM NOT A VANDAL but the original author has only told part of the story.

Feel free to email me at [email protected]

PS your pages are not easy to navigate — Preceding unsigned comment added by Piper PA25235C (talk • contribs) 21:10, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

How can you delete what I am writing when you don't even know the subject. Why can't I write a biography where you don't know the person. Is there a specific rule? I understand me getting the information on has been a bit messy and probably not the right way but nothing had been published yet and all the information is 100% accurate. Some people need o learn, we don't all do this for a living. please advise. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Floridians (talk • contribs) 04:15, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• First off, please understand I am strictly a volunteer, and have never taken money for my work here, much less doing "this for a living." Nor am I an administrator here. I nominated your published UserPage for deletion because it was being used not for your purposes as a Wikipedia editor, but for promotion. Please note that the administrator who reviewed my nomination agreed, and carried out the deletion. I suggest that you use a Draft page in the future, which clearly distinguishes your material to editors and readers as being an article-in-progress. The learning curve here is a bit steep, but with patience, and study of how other editors write new articles, your sourced content will be accepted. Take your time, and you will understand the various requirements that go with creating content. Best wishes. Jusdafax (talk) 04:55, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Jusdafax. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of User:--MULLIGANACEOUS--, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not a blatant misuse of Wikipedia as a webhost. Thank you. Shirt58 (talk) 08:54, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• This is my personal page, and I am not intending to put anything remotely controversial or unsuitable for this site. Kinda strange that my user page was mistaken as for an actual Wikipedia page. The info posted here comes directly from Candy Crush Saga wiki, which I am an administrator here. Right now, I only occasionally contribute on Wikipedia, mostly correcting vandalism. --MULLIGANACEOUS-- (talk) 02:59, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings to you both. I nominated this User page for speedy deletion because I consider it to be, per under WP:U5 of WP:Speedy, a "Blatant misuse of Wikipedia as a web host" in my view, as the criteria in question describes "Pages in userspace consisting of writings, information, discussions, or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals, where the owner has made few or no edits outside of user pages." The wording on U5 policy is quite direct. Since the User page indeed has very little to do with Wikipedia and describes in substantial detail the user's video gaming activities, complete with tables and including a contact email, it seemed worthy of my nomination. My nomination was declined. Obviously I disagree with that call, and will take the decision under advisement. Best wishes. Jusdafax (talk) 21:58, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

i was just testing the shilmani page. moreover it was initial writing. i want to create a page for Rahat Khan Shalmani who was a prominent figure in our district. can you help me please how to create that — Preceding unsigned comment added by Amirzaman69 (talk • contribs) 20:58, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Hello. I reverted your edit to the Shilmani article that stated "Naek Amal Khan was elected as a member of provincial assembly in 1990 and 1997 from ANP. he was very noble person" which has several problems. Saying someone is "very noble" is a violation of Wikipedia policy per Wikipedia:Neutral point of view. Not including a reference or source to confirm your edit is also a violation of WP:Verifiability and Wikipedia:No original research. To understand the referencing requirements at Wikipedia, I suggest you start at Wikipedia:Reliable sources. A Google search of Rahat Khan Shalmani doesn't give any useable references that I can find in English, but you may find some in other languages. I hope this helps you understand my revert. Best wishes, Jusdafax (talk) 21:27, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Jusdafax. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Wikipedia:Rohan Anil Patole, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: It's not in userspace. Should be in mainspace, I'll move it, then tag it for A7. Sorry to be anal about the criteria. Thank you. GedUK  10:28, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The mainspace article has been speedily deleted by another admin now. Thanks. GedUK  11:03, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• All good, dont recall seeing a case like this before. Thanks for the note. Jusdafax (talk) 13:19, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I am not engaging in sockpuppetry. Mooving Media was shut down by admin because my ID looked corporate. I am just an individual, so i registered under my own name — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nick Cody 66 (talk • contribs) 09:24, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I just read the report and understand my error. Jusdafax (talk) 09:32, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Seems your attack on me for adding factual, balanced, impartial information to the article 'Magnus Walker' has fallen on deaf ears. Too bad. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nick Cody 66 (talk • contribs) 09:35, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'd disagree with your assessment, given the fact that several other editors felt as I did about your edits and reverted them also, and you are now banned from editing the article. I goofed, true. Suggest we call it even and move on. Jusdafax (talk) 10:14, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Jusdafax. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of User:Naomismallsduhh, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Should probably be on a subpage, but it's pretty clearly encylopedic. Thank you. GedUK  13:03, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'd agree about the subpage. It's not a proper User page at all. Jusdafax (talk) 04:37, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Sir/Madame,

I updated the source link in the text/dialogue message. Also i attached hereto. www.cevalogistics.com/about-us/our-history

Would you please have a review?

Thanks Luthyd

P.S. My ID is "Luthyd" — Preceding unsigned comment added by Luthyd (talk • contribs) 09:47, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You are involved in a recently filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case#JzG and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. As threaded discussion is not permitted on most arbitration pages, please ensure that you make all comments in your own section only. Additionally, the guide to arbitration and the Arbitration Committee's procedures may be of use.

Thanks,

• Noted, thanks. I will consider this, and may or may not participate. Jusdafax (talk) 19:30, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The case request "JzG" that you are a party to has been declined by the committee after a absolute majority of arbitrators voted to decline the case request. The case request has been removed from Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case. A permanent link to the declined case can be accessed through this wikilink.

For the Arbitration Committee, Dreamy Jazz ^{talk to me | my contributions} 15:02, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

I had made edits to the Wikipedia page Vic Gilliam regarding the recent death hoax confirmed by Domo (read more here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Domo_(NHK))

So why was my edit reverted, I gave you the link, I hope this can be helpful.

• User blocked. Mr. Gilliam's death is not disputed anywhere I can find. Jusdafax (talk) 04:09, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jusdafax,, I sincerely seek your help regarding this matter. I was trying to prepare a page for this 75+ year old gentleman P V Raghunathan who I feel merits inclusion on the wiki pages. It is not for publicity or for any other commercial reasons. In fact, he does not crave for any limelight. He has recently written his Autobiographical book 'My Many Trysts with God' which has been published by a well-known publisher of Chennai of Tamil Nadu State of India and has garnered excellent reviews on Amazon Indian site as well as global site. It is his maiden published work yet if you see the quality of his work I am sure you will be convinced that it is no less than any autobiography (both in contents as well as expression) written by anyone and published so far.

He is in the process of giving final shape to 2 more projects- one is a book on scientific spiritualism and another is the compilation of his travelogues of the journeys he has undertaken. Both of them are also of excellent quality.

As I am absolutely new to this technology of designing a page on wikipedia, I was making many trials and experiments which forced me view how the page was looking like several times.

I would highly appreciate if you please restore the contents of the page on the namespace of this user. Thanking you, sincerely yours, Abha Mittal — Preceding unsigned comment added by Abhragh2009 (talk • contribs) 02:59, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Sorry, but I'm unable to restore the page. As your topic header notes, I was the editor who nominated the page, but it was actually deleted by an administrator. Your Wikipedia User page is meant to be for your goals as a Wikipedian, not for article drafts. I suggest you review Wikipedia:Drafts, which will give you more information on how to create a proper draft and prepare it for article space. Also worthy of your time are WP:N, WP:V and additional pages like Wikipedia:Citing sources to help you correctly format your draft. Creating a new article on Wikipedia is not easy if you have no previous experience, so you may want to start smaller, with a few edits to articles, to learn the ways of this place. Best wishes! Jusdafax (talk) 04:07, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much Jusdafax for giving me your valuable guidance. I'll seek the help of the administrator in getting the page restored. Sincerely yours, Abhragh2009 (talk) 11:07, 25 June 2020 (UTC)Abha Mittal[reply]

Hi jusdafax, I got your message; can you please help me in publishing my contribution. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sammylrza (talk • contribs) 06:11, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• To be brief, I can't help because you have used your User page for a draft of an article you wrote about yourself, which is frowned on here per WP:AUTOBIO. It's also an issue per WP:COI. Again, my suggestion is to put the page in Draft space or a Sandbox, and get further advice from someone other than me, probably an administrator. I also suggest you do some editing of different articles, because as of this posting you also appear to be a WP:SPA, here not to build an encyclopedia only to promote yourself. Best wishes, Jusdafax (talk) 12:31, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

How dare you block me! Domo confirmed the death hoax and I provided you with a proper link. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Praisethelord03 (talk • contribs) 06:37, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• User indeffed by an admin. Jusdafax (talk) 22:16, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

How come that you judge polybrominated biphenyls to have a mid importance, while you assign high to kepone (chlordecone)? IMHO PCBs clearly PBBs have a higher importance from an environmental (and public health) perspective. --Leyo 08:53, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Happy to review the importance rating, and in fact I agree. If you'd care to do the honors, that's great, otherwise I'll switch them tomorrow. Cheers! Jusdafax (talk) 08:57, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done On further thought and study, both articles are high importance, so I have upgraded the PBB article to high. PBB's of course are related to PCB's, though not actually the same thing. Kepone is a banned substance as well. If you want to downgrade it, I won't dispute it, but I think it's a good case for high importance. Cheers! Jusdafax (talk) 22:14, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

That's fine, thanks. --Leyo 22:26, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have raised an WP:ANI regarding her edits, here Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#disruptive_editing_from_Single_Purpose_Editor:_Julie_Passas. LibStar (talk) 01:38, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• As I say at ANI, I've filed at AIV, so we can probably close this quickly. Jusdafax (talk) 01:41, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your kind words in support of my appeal, which just closed and was successful. --David Tornheim (talk) 00:38, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• You are welcome. The process took 100 days or so to complete, which I and others felt was excessive, but now that it is over, my cheerful congratulations! Jusdafax (talk) 23:08, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You stated I did not include a citation in my edit, however I not only posted a parenthetical citation but also added the CNN article to the references section. Please give more information regarding what YOU view as a valid citation if an international news source doesn't cut it. It just seems like you're trying to get a school out of acknowledging their racism.65.79.129.245 (talk) 22:25, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Greetings. I revert vandalism on Wikipedia. Please note that you failed to add an edit summary, as the edit screen requested to this edit you made to the infobox. The edit was also malformed, as it did not fit the infobox format. It is indeed true that you added a reference in your previous edit, but that did not show up in the edit you made, again without an edit summary. Since you are a new editor, it's understandable. However, when you accuse me of what you think "seems" to be, you are crossing a line, and creating needless drama. Take your time, learn the formatting rules to edit Wikipedia, and cool the veiled accusations, is my advice. Jusdafax (talk) 22:42, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unless you think that Simon Cooke, olympic sailor also wrote for Your Sinclair magazine, you might be confused. Generally, links to other wikipedia pages don't require citations. I'm not sure what kind of proof you'd expect as a citation, other than links to the actual magazine. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.16.209.4 (talk) 04:30, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Hello. I see the article the Wikipedia link leads to is an article that was deleted, but is under review. I also see you have reverted my edit, but I won't revert further pending the outcome. Best wishes. Jusdafax (talk) 04:38, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• * Thank you. Yeah, there were some recent changes that led to another biography page ended up linked to this one; hopefully this will all get resolved soon so that the link stays correct (or goes away). 24.16.209.4 (talk) 05:03, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I see you nominated for the speedy deletion of my account. Honestly, I don't blame you. I am new to Wikipedia and may not have grasped the essentials of adding and editing articles here. Perhaps, I was hoping you could be of help in giving me some advice... Regards! Persont118 (talk) 06:09, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Hi there. Yes, learning effective editing technique, and understanding the many policies and editor culture here, is the big challenge on this website. I suggest reading Help: Wikipedia: The Missing Manual for starters. As for the User Page that was deleted (not your account, or user identity) it's generally about one's interests and goals on Wikipedia, not a personal biography.

You can start a new User Page with that in mind ; Wikipedia:User pages is a place to start (you will see a reccomendation of "limited" personal details) and WP:Notability, WP:COI and WP:Verifiability are important for editing articles in mainspace. English Wikipedia is a big confusing place that takes study at the start. I learned a lot by looking at the coding in edit screens, and copying coding methods. I hope this helps. Jusdafax (talk) 07:04, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I received your message about you reverting my change in Asta Hampe's page. Your reason for reverting the change is that she is a living person, and in fact, she passed away in 2003. Furthermore, part of the change was merely adding automatic age calculation on the right with the information that is already available in the main article, the change of which I felt should not be reverted. The other change is regarding adding a partner Andy Röper, which is actually directly translated from German Wikipedia article [Hampe] (since she was a German person, often, there are more information about the people in their native language) and because that article did not cite a source there, I presume that particular article might also not be valid.

Hey Jusdafax, I think we should take a better look at the changes made to the Plan ADOP article. IP 90.173.2.245 has made 20+ changes, adding lots of information. It's with a learning curve (uncited first, etc), but I think we can assume good faith. After your last revert, the user added some text. Can you think of any reason why this text should be reverted? Cheers, Pyrite Pro (talk) 08:23, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Hello, and thanks for your note. At first glance, what with previous repeated warnings, no edit summaries, and an IP who is a WP:SPA, this looked like an easy call. A further look shows some references were added, so I'll stand down. If you want me to pull my Talk page warning, I will. Jusdafax (talk) 08:31, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Condon Committee, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. There is no evidence that UFOs are taken seriously today. Your edit implied that this may be the case. jps (talk) 19:36, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• 'Do We Believe in U.F.O.s? That’s the Wrong Question' New York Times, July 28, 2020
• ‘Unidentified Aerial Phenomena,’ Better Known as UFOs, Deserve Scientific Investigation' Scientific American, July 27, 2020

Jusdafax (talk) 15:34, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• I see you have not responded to my links, which contradict your assertion in italics. Jusdafax (talk) 22:21, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Richard M. Dolan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard M. Dolan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. jps (talk) 19:40, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello - I saw you made the most recent edits on the perchlorate. I wanted to inform you that the U.S. EPA has recently made a final determination on perchlorate and this information could be added to the section on "Regulation in the US - drinking Water. A link to the notice in the Federal Register is here: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2020/07/21/2020-13462/drinking-water-final-action-on-perchlorate

I would be grateful if you could update the page. As I am a consultant to companies that use and manufacturer perchlorate it would not be appropriate for me do to so.

Thank you in advance - happy to answer any questions. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:204:C500:13A0:5C28:73DF:241F:AE68 (talk) 19:00, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Hello. Actually, I have never edited the perchlorate article. I did add a template to the article Talk page, but that's quite a different matter. A Google search of the term "perchlorate not regulated" leads me to believe the topic is complex and contentious, and at this time I have other priorities on Wikipedia and elsewhere, so I'm going to decline, but thanks for asking. Perhaps one of the other editors on the article can be of assistance. Best wishes, Jusdafax (talk) 00:10, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Awesome

Ten years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 05:38, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Thanks. Quite a decade... Jusdafax (talk) 03:27, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I have added that site (https://hahahafunnyjokes.blogspot.com) in the "Available websites" section... It was surprising for me that you have removed the site just because you don't like it!? WHY? FreeBasic service allowed this site and it should be in the section of the Available website... what's wrong with it? Please add this site again or give me a logical reason. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet.org#Available_websites

Are You There...? Could you please respond on it? I am waiting for your answer.

• I am returning from an extended WikiBreak, and see that my edit reverting you was six months prior to your statements here, and that I am not alone in judging your edit to be spam and reverting it. Since a warning was placed on your Talk page, you seem to have cooled down, and the matter appears to be concluded. Jusdafax (talk) 03:56, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

	The Surreal Barnstar
	thanks for helping me out :) Harry F. Humbert (talk) 14:51, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Thanks, though I can't recall how I was of assistance. Cheers! Jusdafax (talk) 03:30, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, Jusdafax. I'd like to wish you a wonderful First Edit Day on behalf of the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day! Megan☺️ Talk to the monster 07:07, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Thirteen years, eh? Hmmm! Jusdafax (talk) 03:31, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Thanks, I appreciate it. Jusdafax (talk) 03:33, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Jusdafax, I am a casual editor who happened to stumble across your user when investigating possible avenues to report a potential issue. I understand you are not an administrator, but I would appreciate any input on this matter.

I have come across several current (and some reverted) edits by an editor (I found your signature on their talk page) across several articles on Texas municipalities that I believe to be concerning. Edits include stating a city is "known as a redneck enclave" ("redneck" also being present in their other edits), removal of information, swapping out pertinent information with other comments, seemingly a trend to remove references to other municipalities (1, 2, 3, 4), among other changes. I do not believe these edits to be constructive.

I considered reverting many changes, but I am unsure about the actual preferred action to take here (I am not particularly interested in taking a deep dive into Wikipedia policies and processes) and I am not all that interested to be the one to directly tackle this issue. I would appreciate input on this matter (thoughts, comments, issuing a warning, etc.), or if you could please direct this concern to the appropriate request board so that these pages may be restored. Thank you.

SystematicAnarchy (talk) 17:41, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, yes I was concerned about this editor as well some months ago. I see they have been have been blocked earlier today, and if there are further incidents the best thing to do is contact the blocking admin. Cheers, and thanks. Jusdafax (talk) 02:28, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you are interested please discuss at Talk:Battery_electric_vehicle#Merger_proposal Chidgk1 (talk) 06:18, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I did not make any changes to Sarcoidosis.

Cheers, — Preceding unsigned comment added by 182.64.196.47 (talk) 08:03, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Re University of Bradford. You got the wrong geezer.

Sorry for the edit that I did. I just think she is beautiful. 65.128.134.15 (talk) 03:49, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Heard it said numerous times in commentary, and its becoming his moniker in common parlance. Should you all be deciding on Wikipedia edits if you don't actually have a working knowledge of what your editing? Just a thought. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.10.191.51 (talk) 23:25, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Welcome to Wikipedia. If you want to add a nickname of "The Whipping Boy" to a WP:BLP you will have to add a reliable source per WP:RS. Cheers! Jusdafax (talk) 23:35, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

my addition to the article of elizaveta tuktamysheva was immediately taken down by you for not having a source. this would be fair if several pieces of information, including the one DIRECTLY ABOVE IT, also didn't have a source. is this really about the lack of a source or the fact that you think you're special? pick one. good day. Juicygorls (talk) 03:22, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Per your statement, I have removed the dating information as well, and added a citation needed tag re:the schooling sentence. May I suggest that you review WP:BLP and WP:RS to aquaint yourself with the operative Wikipedia sourcing requirements, as well as WP:Five Pillars, in particular the fourth. Jusdafax (talk) 03:53, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

theres literally no way to source a fan nickname but go off i guess Juicygorls (talk) 04:49, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I think I am correct in my recent edit to the Hitman 2007 movie page. The scene in question takes place in Niger, not Nigeria, meaning the demonym is Nigerien. Here is a youtube video of said scene: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OjIh7FHeH8c — Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.52.147.215 (talk) 13:43, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I think I am correct in my recent edit to the Hitman 2007 movie page. The scene in question takes place in Niger, not Nigeria, meaning the demonym is Nigerien. Here is a youtube video of said scene: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OjIh7FHeH8c — Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.52.147.215 (talk) 13:45, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Precious

Eight years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:36, 10 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Thank you Gerda. It goes by quick! Jusdafax (talk) 09:13, 10 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I am Yinglong999, the creator of 2021 World Wushu Championships. I support your stance that both navboxes ('World Championships in 2021' and 'World Wushu Championships') should be kept, and it seems that user:91.124.116.230 is acting quite disruptive right now, deleting what you wrote on his talk page and calling it ″nonsense.″ I will be adding the World Wushu Championships navbox back as it is helpful and all other WWC articles have it. Yinglong999 (talk) 17:33, 10 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Hello. My edits have been called much worse than that over the years. I've reverted the article back to my previous revert, and placed a second warning for unexplained content deletion on the IP editor's Talk page. Cheers! Jusdafax (talk) 21:34, 10 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

earning that "Counter-Vandalism Unit" badge my dear jonas.

good man.

it's like "SVU" but for wikipedia. it's cute and charming! 142.179.232.172 (talk) 02:02, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

!!! I am not a vandal. MOST of what is on the page I have no issue with BUT a government agency CREATED in 1958 did not certify something in 1928!!! (Heath Parasol)

I'D LIKE TO CREDIT AN INNOVATOR... Mr Heath published at least three different versions of his plans in the 1920s, then he later sold kits of one of those plans but to my mind any "flying thing" built to any of those plans is a Heath. Others, notably Mann, credit Heath in the derivative plans they created.

Further NOTHING was certified in the US prior to 1928, only "aircraft" were certified by the CAB 1928-1958 (YOU CAN GOOGLE YOURSELF HERE) and the FAA 1958- (AGAIN GOOGLE "WIKIPEDIA") by legal (FAR 103 -- Guess what! YOU CAN GOOGLE YOU AGAIN!) definition a thing that flies BUT is 254 pounds or less in empty weight is not legally an aircraft.

YOUR ENTRY LISTS THE PARASOL AT 280 pounds with a 105 pound engine, but some INCLUDING MINE were built with 45 pound engines, that brings them under the 254 pound FAR 103 limit. THAT IS ALL THAT I AM TRYING TO SAY. I love the Parasol, I own one, I'd be happy to share and make the entry on the Parasol better -- I AM NOT A VANDAL but the original author has only told part of the story.

Feel free to email me at [email protected]

PS your pages are not easy to navigate — Preceding unsigned comment added by Piper PA25235C (talk • contribs) 21:10, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Hello Piper PA25235C. I have moved your comment down to the bottom and given it a topic header.

I have not termed you a vandal in my templated message on your Talk page, I do however note that your information, which I have reverted, is unsourced. If you could please add a citation, it will help your assertions, which are in my view likely.

Wikipedia can indeed be confusing for new editors. We run on verifiability as a core concept, per WP:V, and sourcing reqirements per WP:RS. Please read these links carefully, and understand their importance.

Again, I personally don't doubt you, but these policies I mention require sources for big additions to the encyclopedia. If you dont know how to cite material, look at how other material in the article has been sourced, on the edit screen. I hope this helps, and best wishes to you. Jusdafax (talk) 04:21, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Marky Cielo committed Suicide by hanging in there house in Antipolo City because of his Gay Manager wanted to spread their Sex Video in The Public threatening him . His mother Mildred avoid the Police Autopsy and Forensic investigation . On the Funeral his body wearing a Turtle Neck Shirt to hide the scars on his neck . His Family hide the truth about his Death . After his burial Marky Cielo Tomb Park became a Tourist Attraction in Barangay Sinto Bauko Mountain Province between Cadaweng Compound and MIA"S Muffins Houzz Cafe and Restaurant . Mormons 1111 (talk) 10:04, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Greetings. Please read and understand the Wikipedia verifiability policy at WP:V and the sourcing requirements at WP:RS. The short version is this: information, especially controversial material, must be sourced. I am reverting the article again, please do not restore your edit until you can source it, thanks. Jusdafax (talk) 10:20, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

My name is Robb Cooper and I am the personal manager for the duo known as Lime. I edited the content and explained why.

Two impostors named Joy Dorris and Robert Hubertz have been performing illegally as Lime. They've never sung a notebon any Lime song and we've already begun legal action.

That said, please feel free to contact me at 760-464-0500 or 800-617-8161 or [email protected] and ill be happy to put you in contact with the record company, producer and our attorney.

These two imposter seriously diminish the authentication that Wikipedia thrives on.

Thank you. LIME MANAGER (talk) 21:01, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Hello. This may well be true, but you need a reliable source per WP:RS as a citation (WP:CITE) in the article to confirm that. I suggest you find an article in the media regarding the changes you wish to make that supports your contentions. Please remember that you must use a reliable source per WP:RS. Wikipedia is built on the concept of verifiability per WP:V. Since you are a new editor, it's clear you don't yet understand how the encyclopedia works. I am an unpaid volunteer, and don't call people on the phone to verify information or changes to articles. New editors are often puzzled when they start editing here, because there is a lot to learn about the way this place works. Take your time. Also please be aware of the three revert rule per WP:3RR. Best wishes. Jusdafax (talk) 21:19, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the barnstar. I appreciate it as an incentive to continue editing -- and to try to be a better wikipedian. Smallchief (talk) 20:51, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Thanks for the thanks. I've been an admirer of your Wiki-skills for a decade or so, and salute you with good humor. Cheers! Jusdafax (talk) 23:10, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, that was just a test from now on I will use my sandbox. Vampiredragon999 (talk) 02:07, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jusdafax, Arent you a bit too fast to stick a tag for Speedydeletion in my userspace? I havent even hardly started writing the article. I do think I know a little the rules of Wikipedia, see my contributions especially at the Dutch Wikipedia. Thanks in advance for removing the tag? --Chescargot (talk) 18:29, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Allow me to suggest that you copy the article and create a draft article per WP:Drafts. While it is true that WP:User pages allows article drafts in subpages, these subpages are often abused for promotional purposes at odds with the purpose of Wikipedia, which brings us to this situation. I see you have contested my nomination, which is your right, of course. An admin will be the judge of this. Pending that decision, I again suggest the course suggested in my first sentence. Thanks. Jusdafax (talk) 18:45, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the clarification. In line with your advice I created a draft article to copy the text there, but then the text was already removed, regardless my contest (which I thought would buy me some time)... --Chescargot (talk) 18:58, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I did too. My apologies. Jusdafax (talk) 19:23, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I believe that you are in breach of Wikipedia's BLP guidelines. Please immediately restore the page as I wrote it and make no further changes until we have referred these matters to Wikipedia administrators.

Lisa Gorton's secondary schooling is not on topic, and private information.

It is also incomplete information: Lisa attended Preshil for longer than she attended St Catherine's. Your Wikipedia version relies on an interview with St Catherine's school which is littered with inaccuracies.

Lisa did not study poetry under Chris Wallace-Crabbe; or, only with him among many other professors of literature at the University: she did not complete a creative writing degree.

You have also incorrectly named Lisa's undergraduate degree, which is a BA (Hons). The 'Hons' is a year-long addition to the Arts degree.

You have also incorrectly named Lisa's graduate degree. Lisa did not complete a Master of Arts at Oxford. That is a different kind of degree. She completed an MPhil in Renaissance Literature.

Lisa did not win the John Donne Society Award for Distinguished Publication in Donne Studies for her doctorate. She received it for an essay.

Lisa did not work for Scaffidi Hugh-Jones. She was an independent, freelance communication consultant. However, the information is private, and not on topic; and, if career information is to be included, your version is skewed and unrepresentative. Lisa has undertaken many other jobs at various times.

Lisa has never been a full-time writer.

The rest of your article is a stub, and, as such, misrepresents Lisa's writing life. It does not include anthologies that she has edited and been published in; it does not include public events in which she has participated; it does not include all her publications.

Lisa's grandparents are not on-topic.

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Jusdafax&action=edit&section=new

Livingpersonedits (talk) 01:13, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Editor blocked by an admin for edit warring. Jusdafax (talk) 02:12, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

how were they not constructive. All factually correct and supported by citations many of which I included years ago. This seems like a bot like reversal.

• Greetings, IP. Please remember to sign your Talk page posts and to place them at the bottom, at least on my Talk page. it appears I made a mistake in this revert, and I will restore your edits. My apologies, and best wishes. Jusdafax (talk) 23:30, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. It’s heartening to see humility and good faith in action. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.60.170.151 (talk) 17:10, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Do not undo someone's edit without discussing it first. You asked me to cite a plot element from the story Aladdin itself? How about you read the story that is the subject of the article (and the SOURCE of my information) before showing your ignorance and demanding a source. DO NOT undo MY edit without discussing it with me first. Or you would be guilty of an edit war. See how that works?

• It appears you have either learned from others regarding your editing and discussion tone, or have lost interest in collaboratively building an encyclopedia. Good fortunes to you. Jusdafax (talk) 22:02, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey thanks for setting up the Pentagon UAP report article, I've expanded it following most of your content into Background, Report (and maybe in the future "Reactions") sections, let me know what you think of it in the Talk page or here and further help would be much appreciated! --Loganmac (talk) 07:50, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your note, that article stub was my last editing before a multi-week Wikibreak. At first glance your work appears correct and proper. I'll go back and take a longer look soon. Thanks again! Jusdafax (talk) 21:50, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like there is consensus, or very close to it, for renaming Pentagon UFO Report. You recognized that possibility when you created the article. Your input would be appreciated for doing the rename if you have experience in that process. Thanks. 5Q5|^✉ 11:55, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jusdafax, I moved the content to "Accidents and Incidents" section.

It was formerly under "History" which shouldn't. It was not deleted.

But thanks for the heads up. Militaryafrica (talk) 01:35, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Copy that. Cheers! Jusdafax (talk) 00:56, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jusdafax, I've noticed that you have been tagging some user subpages marked with {{User sandbox}} for deletion using {{db-afc}}. Please note that WP:G13 only applies to userspace if it is tagged with {{AFC submission}} or contains article wizard placeholder text only, and not to user sandboxes without the AFC template. Thank you. ✗plicit 00:51, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Good to know, thanks. I've been looking into sandboxes over 6 months old which appear to be abandonded, or are just vandalism. What should I tag them with, using Huggle? Jusdafax (talk) 00:55, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• If the sandboxes don't meet any of the speedy deletion criteria, they can simply be left untouched. There is WP:MFD, but consensus there historically opposes deletion of harmless sandboxes just sitting around. ✗plicit 01:08, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Seeing some interesting info at Wikipedia:WikiProject Abandoned Drafts and still digging. Jusdafax (talk) 01:19, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on User:SAIEWsaiew requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here.

Really guy? Barely on Wikipedia for 24 hours and you request my user page be deleted? Come on guy! SAIEWsaiew (talk) 02:51, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Really. I nominated your page and it was deleted by an administrator. Please review WP:UserPage to understand Wikipedia's policies, which your User Page did not conform to. "Wikipedia is not a blog, webspace provider, or social networking site." Jusdafax (talk) 03:01, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Jusdafax, this is User:PopeClementXV. I have reverted my edit back on Pope Francis. The removal was intentional, as I have created the new page Pope Francis bibliography, where all the content can be found. Thank you for the heads up though, I forgot to include a removal reason initially, which I have now done. PopeClementXV(talk) 16:51, 31 October 2021 (PST)

• Fair enough, thanks. Jusdafax (talk) 03:39, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Saw that you commented on my page that has since been deleted Grace Elizabeth Wilkinson (talk) 06:27, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An IP continues to vandalize Maccabean Revolt, despite your revert and mine :( 185.13.106.222 (talk) 03:39, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• The IP has been blocked by an admin, thanks! Jusdafax (talk) 05:51, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Precious

Nine years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:08, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you kindly! Nine years sure goes by fast... cheers! Jusdafax (talk) 07:51, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Acronyms should be publicly listed on the Internet. The obfuscation of verbal technology (acronyms) is one of the events that helped collapsed the Roman empire. If you let people like LLVM and CVS declare "an acronym is no longer an acronym, because it suits us, and helps you forget we have a past," then infirmity is afoot!

Change the site to list the original meaning and words behind LLVM! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.11.187.188 (talk) 02:50, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jusdafax, I saw that you were interested in biographies of political figures on WikiProject Biography. Would you have any interest in the requests I made of the Stephanie Cutter article? Though not an elected official, she's been in politics for a long time. In my requests I've done my best to use only top-tier sources and make requests within the rules of Wikipedia, so hopefully these requests are easy! I am trying to follow the conflict of interest process so I'm not making any of these edits myself. Please let me know if you're interested! PrecisionChristian (talk) 17:24, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Greetings. The entry you noticed was one I made back in 2016, and I'm currently staying out of politicians' articles except to revert vandalism or in some cases, unsourced material. I have now adjusted my entry accordingly. Thanks for thinking of me, however! Best wishes, Jusdafax (talk) 15:59, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You're very welcome! Thank you for letting me know! PrecisionChristian (talk) 13:53, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Werewolves of London, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page David Lindley.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I knew it! 32.140.13.82 (talk) 07:21, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:List of best-selling music artists on a "Media, the arts, and architecture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 03:30, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Happy First Edit Day! Hi Jusdafax! On behalf of the Birthday Committee, I'd like to wish you a very happy anniversary of the day you made your first edit and became a Wikipedian! 15th Chris Troutman (talk) 12:15, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Thank you, and also for the invite below... woo hoo! Jusdafax (talk) 03:17, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Jusdafax,

I'd like to extend a cordial invitation to you to join the Fifteen Year Society, an informal group for editors who've been participating in the Wikipedia project for fifteen years or more. ​

Best regards, Chris Troutman (talk) 12:15, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Hey thanks Chris! I will be honored to join you and the group, even though it makes me feel incredibly ancient. I never dreamed in 2007 I'd be here now. Cheers to you and the rest of the Society, and thanks again for the kindly invitation, which I truly appreciate! Jusdafax (talk) 03:15, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Thank you kindly, it's certainly been a day for reflection about Wikipedia and my years of involvement here. I'm much obliged to you and the Birthday Committee! Jusdafax (talk) 05:28, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Happy First Edit Day! Hi Jusdafax! On behalf of the Birthday Committee, I'd like to wish you a very happy anniversary of the day you made your first edit and became a Wikipedian! CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 20:44, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Thanks Captain, and it's been an interesting experience to date, to say the least. I'm not sure I have another 15 years left in me, but the spirit is willing, despite some discouraging factors, and there are encouraging developments as well... and the Wiki-Love messages are encouraging, I must admit. It's nice to be acknowledged! Jusdafax (talk) 05:55, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I removed two double links and fixed a redirect. Hope you understand. 70.54.150.70 (talk) 22:26, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• First off, you are editing without using edit summaries, as the edit screen clearly requests where it says "Briefly describe your changes." Doing so is important because it helps vandal patrollers like myself to understand your intent. Secondly, seeing that your second edit to the article left the sentence you edited incomplete, I found good reason to revert your edits. I hope you will learn from this experience, since you started editing Wikipedia less than a week ago, and use edit summaries from now on, as well as make an effort to edit the encyclopedia competently by reviewing your edits before publishing them, as well as afterwards. Thank you. Jusdafax (talk) 22:55, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  So are you going to honor my edit and revert your revert of my edit? 70.54.150.70 (talk) 03:34, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  I have now fixed the entry for March as noted in my edit summary, and, since I see in your edit history that you have yet to do so, again remind you that making edit summaries saves your fellow editors time and effort. Jusdafax (talk) 03:58, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Whatever you celebrate at this time of year, whether it's Christmas or some other festival, I hope you and those close to you have a happy, restful time! Have fun, Donner60 (talk) 00:16, 23 December 2022 (UTC)}} [reply]

Donner60 (talk) 04:41, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

— Moops ^⋠T⋡ 04:59, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

.. for having the courage to speak up at ANI. And I agree with what you said about comments at ITN/C. – Sca (talk) 00:20, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

And thanks again today. -- Sca (talk) 15:20, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

...you are welcome. I just took a look, and I see it's turned into a pile-on. My advice now is to drop the appeal and work elsewhere on the 'pedia. Give it a longer time like six months or a year. Work on articles and subjects that interest you, get some good article creation/expansion work done, or perhaps tackle the humble but highly needful field of vandal patrolling, where help is always needed. Keep it low stress, make the Wiki better, and you will get the block lifted down the road. Here's to a happier 2023... Best Wishes! Jusdafax (talk) 04:45, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You're not email-able here. Happy editing! Atsme 💬 📧 13:40, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Atsme! I assure you my listed email works, because I get a steady supply of WP-bot notifications there. Are you sending to [email protected] ? Jusdafax (talk) 14:03, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

???? - sent to the addy you gave. I think you have to activate it in your preferences, maybe? Atsme 💬 📧 16:01, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Right. Try it now. Jusdafax (talk) 16:56, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Englewood, KS is a ghost town. The population used to be in the hundreds and is now less than 100. The source was already provided in the article. I would ask that you please re-instate the edit I made. 69.14.225.92 (talk) 23:36, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• According to the U.S. Census in the second sentence of the article, the population is 58, which is indeed under 100. The Wikipedia article Ghost town is inconclusive on a definition. I'm declining your request both as a courtesy to the remaining residents and more importantly a matter of my deferring to the online Encyclopedia Britiannica definition: "a town that no longer has any people living in it : an abandoned town." You are free, of course, to contest my reasoning on the article Talk page and see if you can get a consenus. Jusdafax (talk) 00:00, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ten years ago, you were found precious. That's what you are, always. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:56, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks again. I appreciate it, if after a delay since your post. Jusdafax (talk) 10:46, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You recently offered a statement in a request for arbitration. The Arbitration Committee has accepted that request for arbitration and an arbitration case has been opened at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/SmallCat dispute. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/SmallCat dispute/Evidence. Please add your evidence by August 4, 2023, which is when the evidence phase closes. You can also contribute to the case workshop subpage, Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/SmallCat dispute/Workshop. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. For the Arbitration Committee, Dreamy Jazz ^{talk to me | my contributions} 13:04, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The proposed decision in the SmallCat dispute has been posted. You are invited to review this decision and draw the arbitrators' attention to any relevant material or statements. Comments may be brought to the attention of the committee on the proposed decision talk page. For the Arbitration Committee, Dreamy Jazz ^{talk to me | my contributions} 10:53, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't read your edit carefully at User talk:Deadshot78 and assumed it was for Chandrayaan-3 – thanks for reverting my error. Celjski Grad (talk) 17:21, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• All good. Deadshot78 appears to be a problem editor, and a record of their doings will help keep track of their questionable edits. Thanks for your note, and best wishes! Jusdafax (talk) 17:26, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Thank you, I appreciate thinking back to those innocent days. Cheers! Jusdafax (talk) 06:04, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm a new user and I wanted to post 2 very recent articles to David Grusch talk page to be discussed, but it was semi-protected. I was wondering if you can post it there instead:

1. https://www.nytimes.com/2024/01/12/us/politics/ufos-aliens-classified-briefing.html https://archive.is/CTvNC

2. https://www.theguardian.com/science/2024/jan/14/what-happens-if-we-have-been-visited-by-aliens-lied-to-ufos-uaps-grusch-congress John-w-Buchanan (talk) 22:48, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• I have restored your post here, which I was startled to see was deleted without my knowledge. Now it appears you have been blocked for socking, a serious offense on Wikipedia. However, I appreciate the heads up on the NYT article, which I have not read. I’ll try to take a look at it. This topic, UFO’s/UAP’s, is quite contentious both on Wikipedia and worldwide, and in my view dubious tactics are in play by various parties. I strongly suggest you refrain from further sockpuppet activity. If you establish a record of good contributions on other WikiMedia projects, you may be able to succeed in appealing your block down the road. Best wishes, Jusdafax (talk) 23:33, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jusdafax

You may have noticed that you have not received any messages from the Wikipedia:Feedback request service for over a month. Yapperbot appears to have stopped delivering messages. Until that can be resolved, please watch pages that interest you, such as Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Wikipedia policies and guidelines.

This notification has been sent to you as you are subscribed to the Feedback Request Service. - MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:11, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia talk:Help Project on a "Wikipedia policies and guidelines" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 07:51, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia:Village pump (policy) on a "Wikipedia policies and guidelines" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 05:30, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

7&6=thirteen (☎) has given you a Dobos torte to enjoy! Seven layers of fun because you deserve it. To give a Dobos torte and spread the WikiLove, just place {{subst:Dobos Torte}} on someone else's talkpage, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.

7&6=thirteen (☎) 11:37, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia talk:Criteria for speedy deletion on a "Wikipedia policies and guidelines" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 19:30, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]