User talk:Justin Ormont

Thank you, I see you've cleared that out. Cheers Intelligentsium^review 23:47, 6 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Micro-SIM requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Recipe For Hate (talk) 19:51, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thanks for creating the Penn and Teller fool us article. --Rebroad (talk) 21:24, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Justin Ormont. You have new messages at Koman90's talk page.
Message added 05:10, 29 January 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Hi Justin Ormont! I have nominated your article 2011 Israel protests for deleted. Please take a look at this page and feel free to respond. —Ynhockey ^(Talk) 23:46, 3 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox Civil Conflict has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. -- Y not? 01:27, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

2011 United States public employee protests

i think your page is a good idea. i wonder if there might be a different name for it, as it is theoretically covering at least three issues... the budget problems, the legislation, and the protests, but i cant think of a good name so ... anyways. Decora (talk) 14:34, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I agree. I'm not certain what type of name would be better though. I'm generally for naming a page to fit its content, but we could also focus the content to better fit the title too. ~ Justin Ormont (talk) 17:14, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

On the Talk page for the public employee protests, you mentioned that another map showing the states where collective bargaining was already illegal could resolve the whole "third color to the map" issue. I was wondering if you could or wanted to do that, as I don't know how to make and edit maps on WP. MAINEiac4434 (talk) 18:18, 16 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Civil Conflict Infobox style has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward: not at work) - talk 08:17, 18 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This wasn't appropriate. If you want to notify interested parties of a TfD which might interest them then that's fine, but dragging in an unrelated discussion in order to try to bring people onto your side is certainly not. If you think nominating two templates for deletion is a "rampage" then I suggest you try dialling down your sensitivity to other people commenting on your work on here. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward: not at work) - talk 11:50, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• It is merely a notice to their project that their main project template is up for deletion w/ appropriate notice to active members of their project. The inclusion of mine is only as reference for what types of arguments you and others are going to make and possible responses. I'm in no need of assistance. The "rampage" is from your history. ~ Justin Ormont (talk) 12:31, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Why wasn't it? But it's wierd that most of the WP members were notified personally, this hasn't done here before. I have no idea why we even used this template, but haven't read the discussion either, yet. Give my answer soon, when I know what we're dealing here. Btw we have Wikipedia:WikiProject World Rally#Article alerts also. Pelmeen10 (talk) 12:36, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

So far, the Wikipedia:WikiProject World Rally#Article alerts didn't seem to pick up the template for discussion. ~ Justin Ormont (talk) 11:21, 23 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding this: title uses titlestyle while above uses abovestyle. If you want to play about with making the sandbox code be styled exactly like the present deployed code then it shouldn't be too hard, but there's still no actual reason to do so.

Furthemore, cellspacing is not a CSS attribute, so it won't have any effect in the bodystyle parameter. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward: not at work) - talk 09:07, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Justin Ormont. You have new messages at Wikipedia:SVG Help.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Justin Ormont is taking a short wikibreak and will be back on Wikipedia soon.

Need to concentrate on work, projects & research; edits may be sporadic. Watch list & talk page is still being followed.

		The Modest Barnstar
		Thanks for your recent contributions! -129.49.72.78 (talk) 19:00, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Collapsible bulletlist has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) - talk 11:48, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Penn and Teller Fool Us - Ad.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:20, 26 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Blunt Talk, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Starz (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:52, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I am looking for a solution for a template issue. Specifically, I am trying to use the Template:Infobox civil conflict for a civil conflict involving three parties (see Input on proposed infobox on the Talk:Selma to Montgomery marches page. The issue is the width of an infobox to incorporate three parties becomes too large. Is there a way to redesign the infobox to display each party in a horizontal section versus a vertical section (see 1940 Brocklesby mid-air collision as an example)? Or two, disconnect the "Parties to the civil conflict" and/or "Lead figures" section from the infobox with a link in the infobox to the disconnected sections? Not sure where to go on Wikipedia to examine this issue. Thanks. Mitchumch (talk) 07:41, 26 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Machine learning stubs, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:29, 20 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited What Happened to Monday?, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Thriller. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:18, 2 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:57, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Cologne phonetics, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Umlaut. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:31, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Justin. The link you need is Germanic_umlaut#German_orthography. BTW I retranslated the whole text of Cologne phonetics where I thought nobody can understand what was meant. 194.174.73.33 (talk) 14:56, 8 April 2016 (UTC) Marco Pagliero Berlin[reply]

Hello, Justin Ormont. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Justin Ormont. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on FastText requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Theroadislong (talk) 11:22, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating ML.NET, Justin Ormont!

Wikipedia editor Robertgombos just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thanks for the newly created article. Could you create an article about LightGBM as well? I saw there are enough reliable references for it. I hope you will, that's why I kept the red link.

To reply, leave a comment on Robertgombos's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Robertgombos (talk) 03:27, 11 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

	The Writer's Barnstar
	Dear Justin Ormont, thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia, especially your recent creation of bfloat16 floating-point format. Keep up the good work! You are making a difference here! With regards, AnupamTalk 07:36, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Justin Ormont. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:The New Screen Savers - Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:46, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating Learning curve (machine learning).

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Please add context - the intro is inadequate to lead the layman into this subject.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Deb}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Deb (talk) 09:38, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:04, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The article IBM Haifa Research Laboratory has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence this company passes WP:NCOMPANY/GNG. Could redirect to IBM research, through it's dubious this sub-lab is a likely searchable term.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 16:36, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article IBM Haifa Research Laboratory is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IBM Haifa Research Laboratory until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 10:12, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:21, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Smarter Planet is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Smarter Planet until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Historyexpert2 (talk) 02:35, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]