User talk:Kat

Hi Kat.

Are you the Kat on the members forums at www.keepandbeararms.com?Saltforkgunman 01:35, 13 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm conducting a survey about the Apple II -- any former users are invited to participate. I found you were active on Apple II related articles.

Come to User:Applephreak/survey

Applephreak 19:00, 29 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Are you a member of the Wikiproject Stub Sorting, becauseI'm organizing the participaters list and a name like yours is on it without a link. If you, are please forgive me for my naïvity and correct the name on the list. If not, tell me on my talk page or just delete the name. I will leave it there until then. Thanks and cheers! —¡Randfan! 18:08, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, could you just add your name to the list in the correct place? Thanks again and cheers again! —¡Randfan! 19:28, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

A "{{prod}}" template has been added to the article Fred Samuelson, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Videmus Omnia 14:43, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Fred Samuelson.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 07:11, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• I looked to see whether there were better biographical sources for Fred, or indeed for Rose Anne, that had arisen since. I didn't find any. Uncle G (talk) 10:10, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Charge (group dynamics), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of the page. Pastordavid 20:49, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mosque.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:Mosque (1).jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:Mosque (1).jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 13:34, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rooster.jpg is now available as Commons:File:Rooster (1).jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 13:35, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Mac Gimse, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Routine professor - no more suggested here. No evidence of notability.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Scott Mac (Doc) 14:10, 28 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• I looked for sources for this one, too. Reliable independent biographical information is still thin on the ground. Uncle G (talk) 10:10, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:51, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Do not create articles about living people that are entirely negative in tone and not sourced. Wikipedia has a policy of verifiability and any negative information we use must be reliably sourced, and our articles must be balanced. Negative, unreferenced biographies of living people are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Under section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images in violation of our biographies of living persons policy may be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. WikiWisePowder (talk) 21:40, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Someone pushed the wrong button in Twinkle. See Special:Diff/708483748. Uncle G (talk) 10:10, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Responsibility assumption is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Responsibility assumption (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Natg 19 (talk) 17:38, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Special:Diff/1062334/1019398789

I found your original article buried under 18 years of dren, fixed it up with all of the modern paraphernalia, and pushed it in the original direction. Would that you were still around to see it! Mind you, if you had been still around, the article probably wouldn't have drifted directionlessly for 18 years. Uncle G (talk) 10:10, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi you appear to be the original creator of an article I proposed for deletion, because it's not obvious why this person merits inclusion in an encyclopedia.

A tag has been placed on Craig Blacklock requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 17:10, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]