User talk:Kridha
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:44, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 3
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Hindu texts, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Tantric and Jayadev.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
[edit]The Special Barnstar | ||
For your efforts towards creating Ashtasakhi and Krishnaism-related content. Chronikhiles (talk) 07:46, 8 July 2023 (UTC) |
- @Chronikhiles Thank you so much. Really appreciate your gesture. I will cherish this for long time. Kridha (talk) 08:15, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:58, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
A barnstar for you !
[edit]The Original Barnstar | ||
The article Radha is beautifully written✨. You also deserve this for the other Krishnaism articles! Seyamar(245CMR)💬📜 15:59, 21 August 2024 (UTC) |
- Thank you so much. It's been a while seeing your edits and then today, I realized that your username is changed. Anyways, it's great to have you back here on this platform. Regards. Kridha (talk) 20:53, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
Radha page
[edit]Hi @Kridha I saw you changed back the lead section changes that I had removed. I just want to explain here that the reason why I had removed was that such details in lead are not detailed in the body of the page - maybe I have overlooked. It would be great if are able to add details in the body first with WP:RS, and then maybe if important to include, we can add it in the Lead. Also, you don't have to include citations in the lead. See WP:LEAD for more details. Asteramellus (talk) 22:08, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Hello, @User:Asteramellus. Firstly, I would like to apologise for replying so late, I was not on the Wikipedia from last few days. Secondly, regarding the changes and WP:Lead, I am aware of that guideline but I personally prefer to back the statement with a WP:RS. So that, it cannot be unnecessarily removed citing the lack of reliable references. Many editors don't even bother to check the remaining section and quickly revert the lead, citing the same reason. Now, regarding the traditions which are mentioned briefly in the Introduction and not in the body is because of this section's similarity with the "Traditions" section of the page Radha Krishna. If I add the traditions in detail here, it would look more or less like the information provided on Radha Krishna's page. So, I haven't added it till now. But, it can be added later with the modification if required. Other than this, if you have any specific query or suggestion regarding the page Radha, please do let me know. I would love to discuss it. Regards, Kridha (talk) 09:13, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- @Kridha sorry, I missed replying earlier. Thanks for the clarifications. I see your point that adding details to support what is in the lead will be pretty much repeating information which is there on Radha Krishna. And that's why I think adding such detail in the lead (without support in the body) on this Radha page is not justified. Some of those details makes sense when we talk about Radha along with Krishna, and as you have mentioned, Radha Krishna page is for that. You can also give some thought to this, but I definitely see your point. Asteramellus (talk) 14:02, 11 October 2024 (UTC)