User talk:KristofferAG
Welcome!
Hello, KristofferAG, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}}
before the question. Again, welcome! --Darwinek (talk) 22:47, 26 December 2009 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:08, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]Hello, KristofferAG. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, KristofferAG. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, KristofferAG. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
NFL
[edit]Hey, really not sure, tbh. I always went with the P2P but that does not mean it is correct... Maybe ask for other comments at the NFL project page? Kante4 (talk) 21:58, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
- No problem. Going with the consensus and i get your point about the time, just never thought of it. Kante4 (talk) 22:26, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
- Yup, saw it and after thinking it makes sense, so i was wrong. Kante4 (talk) 21:49, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit]Disambiguation link notification for December 7
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2019 Indianapolis Colts season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jonathan Williams (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:44, 7 December 2019 (UTC)
Template bolding
[edit]Go to 1936 Boston Redskins season or any other season and look at the navboxes: the 1936 season is in bold, but it is not a championship season. This is a problem across all such templates and such bolding needs to be removed per MOS:BOLD. DrKay (talk) 14:08, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
- @DrKay: Ah, I see! I thought you meant the links themselves turned bold after the article had been visited. I understand the issue then. Given that league titles are displayed in a separate group I suppose the bolding is completely unnecessary anyway. Thanks for clearing it up! KristofferAG (talk) 14:21, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 26
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2020 Dallas Cowboys season, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Greg Zuerlein and Antonio Gibson.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:33, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for November 16
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2020 Houston Texans season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Randall Cobb.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:12, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit]2021 Miami Dolphins season
[edit]Bibfortuna69 has once again undid the review edit for 2021 Miami Dolphins season. Could you please assist? Neovu79 (talk) 14:20, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
- @Neovu79: I see you've already reported the user on WP:ANEW and left a(nother) warning message on their talk page, and there's also a comment from another user on their talk page about the page in question, so I'm not sure if there's much else to do but wait for a reply from an admin at this point. KristofferAG (talk) 15:40, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
2021 Philadelphia Eagles season
[edit]Hi. I just wanna ask you, is there some sort of way to stop that anonymous user (they're currently blocked, but that expires tomorrow) from making false edits to the 2021 Philadelphia Eagles season article? I'm asking because when that guy edits, they are just saying stuff that are not true. Examples of this are:
- taking out the week 18 game vs Cowboys saying that there are 17 weeks even though it is now officially 18 weeks
- saying that players will return to the Eagles even though they are not
- saying that Jason Peters got an 11-year deal but that is clearly impossible
Hopefully this message is helpful! DENBRO1995 (talk) 18:47, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
- @DENBRO1995: I know who you're referring to, and they were handed a 48 hour ban just yesterday, and that's still in effect. I'm only an admin on the Norwegian Wikipedia, so I can't do much here. If he does come back and continues being disruptive, you can report him at WP:AIV. Given the amount of previous warnings and that you've already addressed the 17/18 week thing on their talk page, I reckon if they continue being disruptive after their bans admins would incline to agree that it goes as obvious vandalism. KristofferAG (talk) 19:18, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
Ok. How many warnings does a user have to have in order for them to get reported? DENBRO1995 (talk) 20:39, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
- @DENBRO1995: As far as I know there's no set amount needed. WP:GAIV says "What constitutes "enough" is left to your best judgment." If you take a quick look at WP:WARNVAND, you'll se some samples of warning templates that can be used as well. Either way, given that they've already received a ban I would report them given any further disruption after the ban period is over. KristofferAG (talk) 07:10, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
Ok, I’ll do that if they make further disruptive edits on the article, or any other article. Thanks! DENBRO1995 (talk) 08:40, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
Your edit on Dan Marino was reverted
[edit] Hello, I'm Formal Dude. Your recent edit to the page Dan Marino appears to have removed accurate encyclopedic information, so it has been reverted for now. The source used in articles, pro-football-reference.com, shows that Dan Marino was an AP selected second-team All Pro player in both 1988 and 1983. If I've made a mistake please let me know. Thanks! —FORMALDUDE (talk) 03:57, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit]NFL 1982 season - No division champions
[edit]Howdy. You may want to check over all the NFL Division articles. I can't remember if I made the same mistake on them or not, concerning the NFL not recognising Division champions in 1982. GoodDay (talk) 16:58, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
- @GoodDay: It's a pretty easy mistake to make, you're not the first to do it. Looks like the rest of the articles are fine! KristofferAG (talk) 17:15, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
- Ok, the CFL I know quite well. The NFL, not so much :) GoodDay (talk) 17:17, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Los Angeles Rams staff
[edit]Hello Kristoffer, I only added 2024 in order to conform with the previous Los Angeles Rams season pages, which all have the year in front of "Los Angeles Rams staff." Please reconsider the reversion. AUColonist (talk) 16:24, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
- I understand the edit, and while I don't think it's a problematic change, we've never included the current year in the main staff templates for the teams. On the season pages a separate template is used which specifies the year. Maybe a discussion for WP:NFL. KristofferAG (talk) 17:13, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
Official sacks
[edit]Hi KristofferAG. I agree with you regarding the Alzado page (official since 1982). Myself and another editor thought about a vote etc. Another editor even stopped putting the unofficial (PFR) numbers. Just wanted to say that I ran across yet another editor who amended sacks for dozens of players prior to 1982. The cat was out of the bag at that point. Could be an uphill battle with those, being that our discussion never really took off months ago. Nice meeting you. Bringingthewood (talk) 23:33, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
- Hi, I've noted some editors changing the infobox statistics to the unofficial sack counter a few times over the years, so it's good to know you're also keeping an eye on it. I assume most of these editors get the statistics from PFR, so I understand not everyone will know it's an unofficial counter. It might be worth opening a new discussion on WP:NFL, but I honestly think it wouldn't change much, as I doubt the editors making these changes would be paying attention to the discussions. We'll just have to keep our eyes peeled! Good to meet you as well. KristofferAG (talk) 08:14, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
- I agree with everything you said and the editor that did the most of them doesn't seem like a big discussion guy. Three of us tried to come up with presenting it and it died on the vine. I would say to someone, not an official stat and only official stats go in the infobox. They respond with, who said official only in the infobox, and PFR got as close as possible with 1960. I didn't have much of a comeback with no 'official' consensus. Well, we'll see, maybe this year. Thanks for the reply and at least WE agree, lol. Regards, Bringingthewood (talk) 00:25, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
NFL
[edit]NFL season doesn't begin, until September. GoodDay (talk) 19:06, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
- Games don't begin till September. The 2024 League Year began on March 13. See here and here, among other places, for confirmation on this. KristofferAG (talk) 19:18, 25 June 2024 (UTC)