User talk:KylieTastic


View this userbox's documentationIt is approximately 7:45 PM where this user lives (Cambridge, UK).Refresh the time

If you have a general question it may be quicker to ask at the Wikipedia:Teahouse or Click this to start a New Question here

AfC Drafts NOTE: To be fair to all submitters I do not review/re-review on request, I just pick new and old submissions at random...

Current Backlog: 994 pending submissions

 


Draft:Gikku Jacob Peter

[edit]

Any suggestions on how to get this page approved?

I have added the links to the news articles, Malayalam film industry page links, and others in the latest submission. It would be good if you could let me know if more reliable resources and references are needed. DhanasreeShylendrakumar (talk) 15:30, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi DhanasreeShylendrakumar, all new articles on Wikipedia have to show the subject is notable (See WP:N) which in most cases requires significant coverage (WP:SIGCOV) in multiple independent (WP:INDY) reliable sources (WP:RS). You currently have 3 sources: the first is good by just 2 sentences; the second is just a basic listing; the third is just a mention. So notability of the subject is not shown yet. The next problem is most of the claims are unsourced and for WP:Biographies of living persons this is a bigger issue. Lastly, it's not written from a WP:Neutral point of view with 'puff' words such as talented, substantial, "diverse and accomplished", vibrant that should not be used unless. Regards KylieTastic (talk) 19:56, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Ruger LC Carbine

[edit]

I need help getting a new article submitted Stormm001 (talk) 17:41, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Ruger LC Carbine Stormm001 (talk) 17:41, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Draft:Ruger LC Carbine Stormm001 (talk) 17:42, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
No you do not nee help getting it submitted, it is not ready. All new articles on Wikipedia have to show the subject is notable (See WP:N) which in most cases requires significant coverage (WP:SIGCOV) in multiple independent (WP:INDY) reliable sources (WP:RS). At the moment you just have the companies own product page, so you have no independent reliable sources to show that the subject is notable. Try googling for reviews etc. KylieTastic (talk) 17:44, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I was wondering if you could take over for me & do proper editing in this article so it can get the proper approval. Only do it if you have the time. If you want decline, that’s ok with me. I’m new to Wikipedia & I’m still learning how to edit Wikipedia articles properly. Stormm001 (talk) 17:46, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Stormm001, sorry I have no time or interest in the subject. There is no rush you can take your time. As a new editor you can ask for general advice from lots of experienced editors at the Wikipedia:Teahouse. Cheers KylieTastic (talk) 17:49, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]