User talk:Ladybirdintheuk

This user may have left Wikipedia. Ladybirdintheuk has not edited Wikipedia for a considerable amount of time. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

Madame LadybirdintheUK, when you put forth to delete my article, I had only put it on here just a day before.

Please note: I'm on holiday for a week. Please leave a message after the bleep, and I'll get back to you!

_{The preceeding comment was left by Cpofserozza at 17:56, 27 September 2006.}

Thanks for uploading Image:BBBand.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:09, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs John-Paul Clarkin Bruton Arthur Highway Wincanton ITV London Operation Condor (Afghanistan) Alexander Cameron Sim John-Paul Wilkins Addicting Games Victor Bergman John-Paul Langbroek Net primary productivity Milborne Port Detrended price oscillator Cycloid gear Templecombe Van Mieu Diproton Kevin Ingram

Cleanup Lincoln, Lincolnshire Parenting Purchasing power parity Merge Renate Blauel List of Ferrari Enzo owners Sixth form college Add Sources Albert Sabin Free Boolean algebra Uxbridge Wikify Marilyn Mitzel Governmental accounting Omar al-Mucktar Expand List of Little Penguin colonies British Afro-Caribbean community Court

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 22:35, 27 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, It appears that nobody has yet welcomed you, so ...

Welcome!

Hello, Ladybirdintheuk, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  Brian 16:02, 4 July 2006 (UTC)btball~~[reply]

You could have just taged the page as db-repost ... but now an admin/sysop has concluded that it was rewritten sufficiently so that it needs to go through the PROD / AfD process again. I've started it by tagging the page as PROD and I'll watch the page. If anyone takes the PROD notice off in the next four days then I'll just take it to AfD. I added comments to the talk page of the article explaining why I think it should be delete (non-notable company, blatant advertising). Thanks for catching this! Let me know if there's anything I can do to help, you can ask me a question anytime by adding a comment to my talk page. Brian 16:02, 4 July 2006 (UTC)btball[reply]

Welcome, Ladybirdintheuk, to the Wikipedia Birthday Commitee!!! You have met all of the membership requirements. Any concerns should be directed to Steveo2. (Between June 14 and September 10, 2006, speak to Mr. Turcotte instead.) See the Birthday Committee Project Page to see our userbox, and the Birthday Message Templates. Go to the bulletin board to see any new announcements concerning the committee. Remember, Be Bold!

Thanks for joining! If you have any questions, feel free to ask me. Mr. Turcotte^talk 19:56, 4 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I just looked at the Birthday Committee Bulletin and realized that we have a new member. Welcome to the Birthday Committee! I know that you'll enjoy you're time here, as I have since I joined over a month ago. Again, welcome, and thanks for joining! Thistheman 21:05, 5 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I wasn't sure if it was an outright copyright vio or if it just merited a check, so I played it safe (while I've been a member for a while, I've only started editing articles recently). Thanks for setting things straight! --Hobbularmodule 21:29, 5 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the wonderful Birthday wishes and cookie!  :) Darthgriz98 21:45, 5 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks heaps for the birthday wishes, much appreciated! Normy132 23:05, 31 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the birthday cookie! —Goh wz 15:54, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, uh thanks and all, but mine is on the eleventh. Not the tenth. Notice the birthday countdown on the top of my page. But I'll keep this for tomorrow anyway. Thanks again. - Bagel7 14:16, 10 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your birthday wishes [to me] on my talk page. :D I appreciate it!--ViolinGirl^♪ 00:31, 13 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ditto! Thank you for the well wishes (has it really been a year?), I've had a very happy edit day indeed. :) All the best -- Banes 14:19, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the birthday wishes (Hmm, I'm also surprised another year finished so soon). BTW may be you can direct all birthday greeting thank-yous to one place like User talk:Jenmoa. -- Paddu 20:41, 27 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ladybirdintheuk...a couple of quick comments on the merge nomination. When using the {{mergeto}} and {{mergefrom}} templates, please include a link to the talk page of the article that you're nominating to merge...the wiki format for the template is {{mergefrom|nominated_article|Talk:nominated_article}}. Also, once you've nominated an article to be merged into another article, please build a case for the proposed merge on the talk page of the nominated article (you can still add your thoughts to the Old Medley's talk page here. Hope this helps! AreJay 13:16, 25 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

		The Working Woman's Barnstar
		For your tireless efforts on the wikification drive and not yet being scared away! Here's hope to getting caught up. --Brad101 10:02, 26 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This subject is covered (in slightly more detail) as part of the "reuse" page. I believe it should be merged into this article to save duplicating our efforts, and a redirect added here. -Ladybirdintheuk 13:43, 25 July 2006 (UTC)

I think im inclined to agree with you on this one ----Alex 13:30, 27 July 2006 (UTC) Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Waste_exchange"[reply]

You've placed a proposed-deletion tag on this page. It isn't obvious whether you're testing {{prod}} or want the page deleted. If you want to delete it, could you please tag it with {{db-user}} to request its speedy deletion as an unwanted user subpage? --ais523 12:04, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

Hi, By the way there is a boilerplate for wiki project pages - I don't know if it's any use but It might be good for sourcing some ideas! Template:WikiProject.

I'll take a look at your sub page in a few minutes :D --Errant Tmorton166^(Talk)(Review me) 13:58, 1 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Cool - I'd already made a start before I saw your comment, but I will look if there are any other sections we should add in. As I mentioned, feel free to change anything that looks wrong - it's only a first draft, and needs attention! -Ladybirdintheuk 14:31, 1 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, forgive me if I have misunderstood, I am relatively new to Wikipedia and I only contribute occasionally. But one of the articles that I posted is concerns "Arvède Barine". That is her psyudonym, so I had to correct what you changed it to during the Wikification process, hopefully making it perfectly clear. Just wanted to let you know. Also, other changes were made by other editors, some are clear to me, some are not, because they reinserted text that I could not verify, and so decided to remove. Obviously, I'm still new to Wiki protocol.Bob em 14:24, 1 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the birthday wishes! DoubleBlue (Talk) 20:40, 3 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I noticed you wanted to start a wikiproject on wikification, and I'd like to help. I have experience with wikiprojects before, I can help find members and do some template design where needed. I'm a member of the WP:BDC just like you, I made the purple headers :) Please contact me on my talk page if I can be of any assistance. --Draicone ^(talk) 21:55, 4 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I may be able to create a small banner for people to use on their userpages emphasising the importance of the backlog, the basic goals of the project and how to join, as this would really boost member numbers if it were used a lot. --Draicone ^(talk) 20:50, 5 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

		Thanks for all the wonderful banners
		To the people who have wished me a happy birthday: I appreciate the show of appreciation for me and I hope I can pass it on to others--Chili14 21:56, 4 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You prodded the article Lewis Kaplan as a copyvio. I wanted to let you know that I have removed the copyvio material, although the article is now a stub. Could you please take a look at the article and make any other changes that seem appropriate? Thanks. TruthbringerToronto (Talk | contribs) 08:54, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the birthday wishes! I had a great day, made all the better by your kind message! EVOCATIVEINTRIGUE TALKTOME | EMAILME 16:12, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You recently removed the importance tag from Musical Monkey. The article, however, fails to assert the importance of the album; it only states that it is the fourth album by Guttermouth. Please either restore the tag, or improve the article so that it is clear why this particular album is notable. Thanks! --M@rēino 21:37, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Understood. This is currently under discussion here, and I encourage you to comment, especially since we seem to disagree. --M@rēino 19:12, 12 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well it seems that WikiProject Wikify is getting off to a good start as a wikipriject. I have been looking at the discussion on the main category page and I wonder if there is an issue there that could be addressed. Do we need a section that says basically what wikification is for, what articles can be wikified and what other processes may be more relevant (or something of that ilk) for people just searching for the wikify tag. Alot of aritcles seem to be tagged to be wikified wrongly.

Along that line of thought is there a reference anywhere of exactly what cleanup processes are around, how to tag them abd how to choose the relevant ones? If not perhaps we could work on creating one! --Errant Tmorton166^(Talk)(Review me) 11:14, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm yeah its not a great resource is it? But yes I think it needs more prominence and perhaps a sentence or 2. I will think about that maybe. As to telling people on talk pages - yes it wont have a great affect but I have noticed some people who go around adding no end of wikify tags - alot of them wrongly so I posted on their talk pages a few times... Nevertheless I think I might make a template anyway for that purpose - we may as well try and notify some people! --Errant Tmorton166^(Talk)(Review me) 11:43, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah it does seem to be alot of RC patrollers who arte doing that. I think mostly because it is something alot of new wikipedians do to get involved (per suggestions or frm the project page) without reading up on what to tag and where! I know I was like that.. --Errant Tmorton166^(Talk)(Review me) 11:58, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've noticed a couple articles where you put the wikify tag back on. Just wondering what you thought was wrong there. Thanks. --Brad101 10:34, 17 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I was just wondering. Some of the articles seem to be maxed out as far as wikify goes. I'm still wading through what is left of April but it's dragging on and on as I keep finding the tough ones. Oh, you seem to have upset The Royal Family! How Dare You! :) --Brad101 10:52, 17 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks very much for my birthday greeting, I am glad there are Wikipedians around who find time to be kind like that. —Vanderdecken∴ ∫ξφ 11:06, 20 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Add me to the "thank-you" list. --Joe Sewell 12:53, 22 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yep me again Im afraid :P, I was wondering how you work out the numbers for the wikify progress graph. DO you manually count up the last page in each sub-category to get the total or is there an easier tool? I know User:Dragons flight has a total pages to be wikified but is there anywhere else that lists the individual date categories? If you do count them all - kudos to you :D --Errant Tmorton166^(Talk)(Review me) 11:27, 20 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

God you must be mad :) well I dont have an easy way. I was asking just in case you new of one as I am going to join in the taks of updating the progress and didnt want ot pratt around counting if theres an easier way! Guess that makes me mad too then... --Errant Tmorton166^(Talk)(Review me) 19:22, 20 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

...for the kind birthday greeting. It was really nice of you. My day went great. Thanks again. See you around. Orane (talk • cont.) 17:10, 23 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ladybird

I thought that was an extraordinarily long article, and now I know why... Thanks for the revert. How do you find out that something is just copied from another website? Is it just the manual search on Google, or is there a tool somewhere?

Thanks Blowski 10:22, 24 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ladybird

Thanks for taking that off (and the "bold" bit). I looked first thing and thought it was a bit odd but didn't get back to it (& as I'd edited I thought it might be me). Needs some work but a list is a list! See you around - regards --Nigel ^(Talk) 09:36, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

I've noticed that Pearle hasn't done the daily change of "wikify" to "wikify-date" for a few days. Just thought I'd let you know, in case there's a problem! -Ladybirdintheuk 12:57, 31 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Probably just because my laptop hasn't been home enough at the right time of day. Thanks for noticing, though! -- Beland 04:59, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

As a trusted member of the Wikification project and the only other person to way in on my feelings about the template updates...would you mind stopping by User talk:Rmky87 to discuss the template updates? The user is updating the template just because s/he likes to see numbers go down and finds it depressing when s/he has to update it with large amounts of additions. Would you mind adding your thoughts to this user? It's clearly not helping our project by having him/her update as soon as one article changes, it makes it impossible to easily see our progress. Metros232 20:50, 1 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The article on the Vicariate Apostolic of Natal that you so hastily deleted (in a matter of a efw hours; the unknown time zone difference -as there are wikipedian son all continents- alone requires at least 24 hours so the editor might have a change to read it, and DON'T assume everyone goes online every day either) and clearly without doing your homework, clearly linked to a website which contains over 12,000 pages from the Catholic Encyclopaedia NONE of which is under copyright (contrary to fewer articles on the same website from later date, clearly not marked as CE), as they are all way over 70 years (in this case, since 1911), therefore there exists a long-standing project (see Wikipedia:Catholic Encyclopedia topics) to integrate and wikify them all; none of my hundreds of contributions from CE has every been succesfully challenged as copyrighted, nor any of the numerous other linking ones I know about.

• Nor do I appreciate your baseless assumption (or gross sarcasm) that I would be a novice at Wikipedia - my watchlist is already over 9500 articles long (including my many redirects) on a wide range of subjects. If such hasty 'work' is what you call 'wikification', then don't do it at all; if, as I can only hope, this is an accidental error like we all make from time to time, then know that nothing makes me more venimous then needless data loss, but that is nothing personal, all the more as I don't recall ever having heard of you before (as very few user names suggest a female, I probably would have noticed at least that, especially as I appreciate the real insectivorous insect in the garden and have a soft spot for the British). Fastifex 12:44, 13 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have reverted you at Vicariate Apostolic of Natal. Wikipedia has thousands of articles taken from public domain sources, such as the Catholic Encyclopedia, the Jewish Encyclopedia and the EB1911. These are very often dated and biased, but perfectly legal to use. Please don't mark them as copyvios. up+land 18:24, 13 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

As a newcomer here at Wikipedia, I just got involved with the Wikification drive and have been doing my best to get things done. I wanted to thank you for your fantastic work! Sincerely, Emmegan 23:13, 19 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed the proposed deletion template from this article on two grounds:

1. WP:SCHOOLS is a proposed guideline and its notability standards do not have consensus.
2. Even so, Coral Way appears to be rather notable on account of its role in establishing bilingual education programs in the United States. --Dystopos 20:14, 26 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! You still have "E" from the July backlog marked as in progress. Could you update the status if you have finished? -- Whpq 20:25, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Looking forward to your 2000th!

Thanks for your contributions! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Ojis (talk • contribs) 19:59, 9 January 2007 (UTC).[reply]

	HAPPY FIRST EDIT DAY!	from the BIRTHDAYCOMMITTEE
	Wishing Ladybirdintheuk a very Happy First Edit Day! Have a fantastic day! From the Wikipedia Birthday Committee

Politics rule 12:36, 23 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

	HAPPY FIRST EDIT DAY!	from the BIRTHDAYCOMMITTEE
	Wishing Ladybirdintheuk a very Happy First Edit Day! Have a fantastic day! From the Wikipedia Birthday Committee

Destructo^{Talk to me} 22:44, 23 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

	HAPPY FIRST EDIT DAY!	from the BIRTHDAYCOMMITTEE
	Wishing Ladybirdintheuk a very Happy First Edit Day! Have a fantastic day! From the Wikipedia Birthday Committee

Arnon Chaffin ^{Got a message?} 12:45, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:BBBand.jpg. You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talkpage. Thank you. Longhair\^talk 10:00, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia:Birthday Committee is proud to wish you a very happy birthday. May all your wishes come true! Thank you for all of your contributions to this wonderful encyclopedia. Yours truly, Eddie 00:17, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Just a happy Birthday message to you, Ladybirdintheuk, from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day!

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:BBBand.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MER-C 07:56, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Happy First Edit Day, Ladybirdintheuk, from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day! User:Idontknow610 (talk) 05:46, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Idontknow610^TM 01:08, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Happy First Edit Day, Ladybirdintheuk, from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day!

Best wishes from Canada!  ;-) --RobNS 04:21, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

	Happy Birthday	from the Birthday Committee
	Wishing Ladybirdintheuk a very happy birthday on behalf of the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Don't forget to save us all a piece of cake!

Idontknow610^TM 19:20, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ladybirdintheuk! An article you have been involved with has been tagged by its parent project as being in need of a little attention or further development. If you can help with these minor issues please see talk:Fladbury--Kudpung (talk) 08:58, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, Ladybirdintheuk. Just stopping by to wish you a Happy Birthday from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day!-- Vatsan34 (talk) 05:55, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is an important message from WikiProject Wikify. You are currently listed as a member of WikiProject Wikify. As agreed upon by the project, all members will be required to confirm their membership by February 1, 2010. If you are still interested in assisting with the project, please add yourself to the list at this page—this will renew your membership of WikiProject Wikify. Thank you for your support, WikiProject Wikify

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Wikify at 19:57, 22 December 2010 (UTC).[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Brian Bedford Band is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Brian Bedford Band until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. RJFJR (talk) 17:40, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Macula (archaeology) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Macula (archaeology) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Trovatore (talk) 01:14, 30 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, Ladybirdintheuk. Just stopping by to wish you a Happy Birthday from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day! Vatsan34 (talk) 16:29, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Wikipediholism test. Thanks. — {{U|Technical 13}} (e • t • c) 06:35, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Birthday, Ladybirdintheuk, from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a nice day!

Hello Ladybirdinthuk, regarding payana[1], Cheers, Tortillovsky (talk) 17:35, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:56, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]