User talk:Larrayal

Hello, Larrayal, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Introduction tutorial
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need personal help ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome.  Doug Weller talk 15:05, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not accuse editors of being linked to pro-Taliban groups unless you have credible evidence to back-up your claim. This is a very serious accusation and will likely be interpreted as a personal attack (a very serious violation of policy). To be clear, you're not in any trouble but please be a bit more cautious in the future when making claims about the motives of other editors. Spirit of Eagle (talk) 03:35, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, it was a moment of panic after an already heated situation throughout two days.Larrayal (talk) 03:38, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

		The Original Barnstar
		Out of appreciation for your work on the Animals vital article list. It's genuinely impressive how you added so many in such a short span of time. Keep up the good work my dude!ExcellentWheatFarmer (talk) 21:53, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Cingulata Genera, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Template-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 23:35, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:58, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I have just noticed your edit summary here. You may be interested in this proposal which if successful would reduce the number of dog articles listed. Cavalryman (talk) 16:43, 21 January 2022 (UTC).[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tolypeutinae, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ameghino. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Stegotherium, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Asterostemma.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Stegotherium you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ealdgyth -- Ealdgyth (talk) 22:41, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Stegotherium you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Stegotherium for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ealdgyth -- Ealdgyth (talk) 15:21, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps it's not the best idea to get involved with the David Firth situation? His page's removal is clearly unjust, even according to Wikipedia's policies. Trying to keep it from being added back just makes you look biased. Given your track record, that may be something to keep in mind. Jackstercrack (talk) 03:05, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

For future information, as this is in my talk page and is now a personnal issue, thanks to you : I just notified the author of the deletion on their talk page, to make sure they knew about the tweets, and that they may ensure a protection to avoid too much disruption until things cool down. This is most probably part of a raid caused by the hybris rant of an Internet microcelebrity about the deletion of their bad-referenced Wikipedia page. I didn't participated in this deletion, and I don't want to judge it posteriorly, however the bad referencing argument was indeed justified.

For the track records, I don't know if you're talking about the Taliban issue that was caused by an intense mass fear mongering on actuality article about the presence of Taliban sympathizers on Panjshir-related articles, an incident which happened only once, or if I must take this seriously as a doxxing menace, but I won't be intimidated by that kind of behaviour.

Also, participating in a raid with what most probably is a burner account and trying to intimidate somebody for literally doing something to prevent disruptions seems incredibly more biased than anything else. Now, I'm done with this situation, I don't care enough about this random guy to suffer headaches from any dealing with his stans, so here forward any David Firth stans trying to mess with my talk page will be reported as raiders. Larrayal (talk) 17:37, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Stegotherium you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Stegotherium for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ealdgyth -- Ealdgyth (talk) 15:01, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I hesitated to abandon it myself. Sorry for your time... Larrayal (talk) 17:34, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Dinotoxodon, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Hitro talk 08:30, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Larrayal,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Meatsgains, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I have tagged Rhyphodon for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. You may find our guide for writing quality articles to be extremely informative. Also, you may want to consider working on future articles in draft space first, where they cannot be deleted for lacking content.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Meatsgains}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Meatsgains^(talk) 00:41, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Meatsgains: Hey, please don't, I'm currently translating the article from italian right now, should be finished in a few minutes. Larrayal (talk) 00:45, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

PROD removed. Meatsgains^(talk) 00:49, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Larrayal

Thank you for creating Requisia.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 14:19, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Larrayal

Thank you for creating Eotypotherium.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice work!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 14:20, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Larrayal

Thank you for creating Notonychops.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 14:27, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Larrayal

Thank you for creating Wainka.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 23:17, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Larrayal

Thank you for creating Thadanius.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice work!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 02:57, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Larrayal

Thank you for creating Tartarocyon.

User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

One more reference is needed as every article needed a minimum of 2 references.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 15:38, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Larrayal

Thank you for creating Eosclerocalyptus.

User:DIVINE, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good job.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|DIVINE}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

DIVINE 📪 03:32, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, please do not dump raw machine translations on Wikipedia as this is against site policy per WP:MACHINETRANSLATION. You must manually clean up the translation to make sure it makes grammatical sense in English. Hemiauchenia (talk) 03:13, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I usually spend time cleaning up those translations, but if you notice any errors, notify me - english is not my first language, and while I can read italian, dutch is a language I'm not very familiar with. Larrayal (talk) 03:17, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Hemiauchenia : If that can reassure you, I'll probably stop uploading translations as long as the heatwave is not gone - extreme temperatures are visibly limiting my abilities to correct anything efficiently. I'll probably start a correction tour when the temperatures will be a little milder. The header you corrected, for instance, was entirely made by hand...

Larrayal (talk) 04:00, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No hard feelings, sorry if I came across as harsh, I wasn't aware of the context. Make sure to take care of yourself. Kind regards. Hemiauchenia (talk) 04:24, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Nimravidae has been nominated for merging with Template:Feliformia. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Magnatyrannus (talk | contribs) 17:58, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Larrayal. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Dinotoxodon, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:01, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Larrayal. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Dinotoxodon".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:47, 16 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Copepteryx, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Titan.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Larrayal, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the autopatrolled user right to your account. This means that pages you create will automatically be marked as 'reviewed', and no longer appear in the new pages feed. Autopatrolled is assigned to prolific creators of articles, where those articles do not require further review, and may have been requested on your behalf by someone else. It doesn't affect how you edit; it is used only to manage the workload of new page patrollers.

Since the articles you create will no longer be systematically reviewed by other editors, it is important that you maintain the high standard you have achieved so far in all your future creations. Please also try to remember to add relevant WikiProject templates, stub tags, categories, and incoming links to them, if you aren't already in the habit; user scripts such as Rater and StubSorter can help with this. As you have already shown that you have a strong grasp of Wikipedia's core content policies, you might also consider volunteering to become a new page patroller yourself, helping to uphold the project's standards and encourage other good faith article writers.

Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! – Joe (talk) 10:54, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

On 30 June 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Klallamornis, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the flightless suliforme Klallamornis likely went extinct when the volcanic islands it used for shelter along the coast of the Pacific Northwest eroded away into the Pacific Ocean? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Klallamornis. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Klallamornis), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

—Kusma (talk) 00:03, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Klallamornis you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of SilverTiger12 -- SilverTiger12 (talk) 17:40, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Charles Anderson (mineralogist)

added a link pointing to Australian

Karel Absolon

added a link pointing to Czech

Sava Athanasiu

added a link pointing to Romanian

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An article that you have been involved in editing—Plage aux Ptérosaures—has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. Deor (talk) 18:18, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article Klallamornis you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Klallamornis for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of SilverTiger12 -- SilverTiger12 (talk) 14:23, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Saint-Chinian Formation, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Soluta.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:58, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your edits to Template:Passeroidea, however several of the links went to disambiguation pages. I have fixed some of these but it would be great if, with future edits, you could ensure that they are linking to the intended articles. A trick to help with this is to go to your "Preferences" - accessible from the drop down menu top right, then the gadgets tab & scroll down to "appearance" and put a tick next to "Display links to disambiguation pages in orange". This should help you spot when you are linking to a dab page.— Rod ^talk 18:12, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, thanks, didn't know you could do that ! And thank you also for your help in correcting the last one. Larrayal (talk) 18:32, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like there are/were two such genera. Cynchramus Boie, 1826 is listed in Passeres per IRMNG, while Cynchramus Bonaparte, 1828 is lised by the same in Meleagridae. CoL shows several taxa that are probably connected to Boie as synonyms for Emberiza taxa. [GBIF] says they are both doubtful. All that to say... you were correct to remove it, but also that it's the Boie taxon that is associated with Emberiza, not the Bonaparte one. - UtherSRG (talk) 13:19, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Theridomorpha has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 09:00, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! UtherSRG (talk) 13:33, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The maintenance pages listed Template:Perissodactyla Genera as needing a fix to a link to a disambiguation page. Unfortunately, I have no clue where Armania should link to. Can you fix that issue? The Banner talk 10:10, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's been corrected. Good call, thanks ! Larrayal (talk) 11:16, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. The Banner talk 11:27, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]