User talk:Lozzaboy

Thank you for your interest in Wikipedia. However, please do not keep making the edit forecasting 50m passengers without sourcing as here. Replacing a sourced figure with an unsourced figure could be construed as vandalism. Please research the situation and find a reliable source for your figure. BlueValour 22:54, 16 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Exuse me madam/sir i am writting to complain about a certian article which keeps getting removed from the o2 dome page i would like to tell you for a fact that the o2 arena is the biggest europe so please stop removing it

many thanks from Mr Hampshire.

Please do not remove valid information from the Manchester article showing evidence that it is viewed internationally as the UK's third city without providing justification. Such edits could be considered vandalism.212.139.246.24 16:22, 19 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Lozzaboy! Thank you for your recent contributions to one of Wikipedia's Greater Manchester-related articles. Given the interest we're assuming you've expressed by your edits, have you considered joining WikiProject Greater Manchester? It's a user-group dedicated to improving the overall quality of all Greater Manchester-related content. There is a discussion page for sharing ideas as well as developing and getting tips on improving articles. The project has in-house specialists to support and facilitate your ideas. If you would like to join, simply add your name to the list of participants. If you have any questions, don't hesitate to ask at the project talk page. We hope to be working with you in the future!

--Jza84 |  Talk  23:40, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm just letting you know that I changed the wording of the article as the source states that the MEN arena is "Europe's largest indoor concert venue". If you change the article to read "one of the largest", please provide a source to back it up. Thanks, Nev1 (talk) 21:07, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I refer you to Wikipedia:Lead#Introductory_text. You are obviously an inexperience editor but attempting to introduce new information into a featured article's lead section with or without correctly cited references is not a good idea. Wikipedia:Citing sources tell you about correct referencing.--J3Mrs (talk) 15:54, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Manchester, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Second City (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:04, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Manchester, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Radicalism (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:39, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I ask you kindly to familiarise yourself with Wikipedia's policies (such as NPOV and Citing Sources correctly) to gain a greater understanding of what edits are constructive. The Manchester page is a featured article (marked by the gold star in top right corner) meaning it is viewed as one of the most comprehensive articles on Wikipedia. As such it is adjudged to not need much editing. Although you may think adding one of Manchester's most important events is a good idea - adding the Peterloo Massacre into the introduction of a FA with no exposition and with an unreferenced source is not welcome. Stevo1000 (talk) 00:20, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Manchester Arena may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• *[[Barbara Streisand]] performed at the venue on July 10 2007 as part of her [[Streisand (concert tour)].

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:03, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Manchester Airport, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Douglas International Airport. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:47, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:55, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Lozzaboy. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]