User talk:MRSC

Archives

Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3 Archive 4 Archive 5 Archive 6 Archive 7 Archive 8 Archive 9 Archive 10 Archive 11 Archive 12 Archive 13 Archive 14 Archive 15 Archive 16 Archive 17 Archive 18 Archive 19

Hallo, Thanks for adding the infobox to Beryl (company), but you added an ambiguous link to Bath. Here's my boiler-plate message ...

There is an easy way to avoid linking to disambiguation pages: if you go to "Preferences", "Gadgets", and look under "Appearance" you'll see "Display links to disambiguation pages in orange" towards the bottom of the section. Select that tickbox, and whenever you Preview a page you'll be able to see whether you've accidentally linked to a disambiguation page. Thanks, and Happy Editing. PamD 12:38, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Cheshire and Warrington Local Enterprise Partnership indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:50, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello MRSC!

• The New Pages Patrol is currently struggling to keep up with the influx of new articles needing review. We could use a few extra hands to help.
• We think that someone with your activity and experience is very likely to meet the guidelines for granting.
• Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time, but it requires a strong understanding of Wikipedia’s CSD policy and notability guidelines.
• Kindly read the tutorial before making your decision, and feel free to post on the project talk page with questions.
• If patrolling new pages is something you'd be willing to help out with, please consider applying here.

Thank you for your consideration. We hope to see you around!

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:21, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Combined authorities indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:12, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

So I noticed you made the GeoJSON page for Airfield ward. My question is how did you get the data for the 1978 boundaries? TheHaloVeteran2 (talk) 12:09, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Some of them have been published by the ONS / UK Data service [1] but watch out for older ones marked "synthetically generated" as they are far too imprecise. There are maps of the 1965 boundaries here. [2] MRSC (talk) 14:55, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Mayor and cabinet executives has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 07:03, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Blackheath (Lewisham ward), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Juliet Campbell.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:57, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Coat of arms of Brighton and Hove City Council.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:28, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:06, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Are you aware of the almost-blanking of the template you originally created and filled many years ago?

See... EDIT:974255512.

Was there any discussion before this was done? I am not aware of any.

This template was very useful as it originally listed every UK prefix, by type, in a very compact format, with links out for specific types and examples.

-- 92.18.74.255 (talk) 20:51, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Thurrock Council coat of arms.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:47, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:People from South Lakeland District indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:11, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have started a move discussion about moving the name to Victoria Park, Finchley, and I am notifying you as I see that you did the reverese move back in 2010. Dudley Miles (talk) 10:50, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Milton (Southend-on-Sea ward), to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Milton (Southend-on-Sea ward) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Westborough (ward), to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Westborough (ward) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Romford has been listed for good article reassessment. The discussion is located at Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Romford/1. Hog Farm _Talk 03:42, 24 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article New Town (Colchester ward), to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/New Town (Colchester ward) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Craven District has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Northernhenge (talk) 12:32, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

In what possible way does it not exist? Danners430 (talk) 14:06, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It does not exist yet. It has not yet been constituted. The legislation creating it has not been introduced to parliament. MRSC (talk) 14:51, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Devons Road DLR station is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Devons Road DLR station until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

JMWt (talk) 09:36, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. Thanks for the changes you are currently making to this article. I am sure it will be much improved when you have finished. At present, you have made 42 amendments in about 16 hours. This means a huge list of changes in the page's history, and a lot of work for others who are watching the page. Could you possibly consider drafting up all your planned changes using your sandbox, and then doing a single update? Thanks. Masato.harada (talk) 11:42, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No. MRSC (talk) 11:43, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) This is a genuine problem - making lots of small edits in a short space of time causes problems with watchlists and makes it difficult to read histories. Please consider either making one large edit or using your sandbox. Danners430 (talk) 11:45, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No. MRSC (talk) 11:45, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Are you going to contribute contructively to a genuine concern that an editor has raised or are you going to just be dismissive and rude? Danners430 (talk) 11:46, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

		The Good Article Rescue Barnstar
		This is presented to you by the GAR process in recognition of your sterling work in helping Romford retain its Good Article status. Please feel free to display the GA icon on your userpage. Keep up the good work! ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 13:30, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Elm Park tube station you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Icepinner -- Icepinner (talk) 02:43, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The article Elm Park tube station you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Elm Park tube station for comments about the article, and Talk:Elm Park tube station/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Icepinner -- Icepinner (talk) 13:42, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, MRSC. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Coat of arms of Greater London, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:06, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Crossrail 2 navbox has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. 10mmsocket (talk) 07:14, 6 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2025 July 24 § People by region subcategories on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Kaffet i halsen (talk) 07:14, 30 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. I noticed we both have some GANs that have sat there for a while and that we both seem to intend on having lots more GANs. Would you like to return a favour and we can review each others. We could do one-for-one or just keep reviewing each others' nominations as and when we can; whatever works for you. Don't worry at all if you don't want to. Thanks, JacobTheRox^{(talk | contributions)} 20:46, 30 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article Upney tube station is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Buttons to Push Buttons -- Buttons to Push Buttons (talk) 16:05, 31 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article Upney tube station has been placed on hold, as the article needs some changes. See the review page for more information. If these are addressed within 7 days, the nomination will pass; otherwise, it may fail. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Buttons to Push Buttons -- Buttons to Push Buttons (talk) 18:05, 31 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article Upney tube station has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Buttons to Push Buttons -- Buttons to Push Buttons (talk) 16:41, 1 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - I see you have been working on a number of LT&SR stations recently. I am currently working on Benfleet and then working towards Shoeburyness mostly to expand the history sections and add operations (Goods/Signals/Timetables and Industrial sidings). I know you have changed a few thing so I will try and pick them up when I rework any articles but if you do see something I have deleted please let me know. Thanks also for the improved nationalisation text - I did have the (original) text on Fenchurch Street but its been deleted so be careful. Best. Davidvaughanwells (talk) 18:37, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Thanks for the message. I'm planning on working mostly on the stations in Greater London, including the ones that are now District line and London Overground stations. So we should have them all covered between us. No doubt there will still be some crossover. MRSC (talk) 19:39, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Great - I'll continue east and then see if I can add anything to the ones you're doing. My main source is the Peter Kay set on the LT&SR with some Middleton Press as well. Thanks Davidvaughanwells (talk) 14:56, 4 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]